Navitoclax plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis: Preliminary safety and efficacy in a multicenter, open-label phase 2 study

7015

Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX), a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is the current standard of care for patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF) that improves splenomegaly and disease symptoms with limited impact on disease biology. Many pts lose response over time, highlighting an unmet need for novel therapies. Navitoclax (NAV) is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of BCL-XL and BCL-2 that has a synergistic effect when used in combination with JAK inhibitors to enhance apoptosis. This ongoing, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT03222609) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of NAV with/without RUX in pts with MF. Here, we report results from JAK inhibitor-naïve pts treated with NAV+RUX. Methods: Enrolled pts had primary or secondary MF with splenomegaly (DIPSS ≥INT-1) and did not receive prior JAK-2 therapy or bromodomain and extraterminal motif (BET) inhibitors. Pts initiated NAV at 100 mg QD or 200 mg QD if baseline (BL) platelet count was ≤150 × 109/L or >150 × 109/L, respectively. RUX was given BID with starting dose based on BL platelet count per local label. The primary endpoint was spleen volume reduction of ≥35% (SVR35) from BL at wk 24. Key secondary endpoints were ≥50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50), bone marrow (BM) fibrosis reduction, and anemia response. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Results: As of Oct 04, 2021, 32 pts received NAV+RUX. Median duration of f/u was 6.1 (range, 1.9 ─ 18.6) mos. 28 (88%) pts received NAV 200 mg and 4 (13%) received 100 mg OD. Median age was 69 (44 ─ 83) yrs, and median spleen volume was 1889.08 cm3 (645.6 ─ 7339.6). Median NAV and RUX exposures were 24.1 (5.1 ─ 80.9) and 20.1 (0.1 ─ 80.1) wks, respectively. 31 (97%) pts reported ≥1 AE (Grade ≥3 AEs, 25 [78%]; serious AEs, 6 [19%]). Most common Grade ≥3 AEs were anemia (34%), thrombocytopenia (31%), and neutropenia (19%). 3 (9%) and 2 (6%) pts reported an AE leading to NAV and RUX discontinuation, respectively, and 2 (6%; 1 PD, 1 cardiac disorder unrelated to NAV) AEs led to death ≤30 days after last NAV dose. SVR35 was achieved by 52% of evaluable pts at wk 24 (SVR35 in INT-2, 50%; HR, 33%) and by 76% at any time on treatment (Table). Median time to first SVR35 was 12.1 (11 ─ 47) wks. Conclusions: The combination of NAV+RUX was well tolerated and demonstrated early and robust reductions in spleen volume, anemia, and BM fibrosis in pts without prior JAK-2 inhibitor exposure. SVR35, TSS50, and BM fibrosis improved over time. Clinical trial information: NCT03222609. [Table: see text]

Methotrexate-Induced Subacute Neurotoxicity Surrounding an Ommaya Reservoir in a Patient with Lymphoma

BACKGROUND Intraventricular administration of methotrexate (MTX) using an Ommaya reservoir is a useful therapeutic maneuver for malignant CNS involvement in patients with hematological malignancies. MTX-induced subacute neurotoxicity is a rare complication that typically progresses with involvement of the basal ganglia. Local toxicity due to misplaced catheters has been described, although the impact of normally positioned catheters on toxicity is not clear. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 21-year-old man diagnosed with stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who experienced a central nervous system relapse. While receiving intraventricular MTX using an Ommaya reservoir and systemic MTX, he experienced sudden left-side hemiparesis. All diagnostic tests were negative except for altered MRI findings with FLAIR hyperintensity in the basal ganglia and restricted diffusion in the same location that followed the track of the Ommaya catheter. The syndrome resolved after administration of high-dose steroids, and the patient received subsequent MTX courses without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS MTX-induced neurotoxicity is a rare adverse event related to systemic and intrathecal administration of the drug. Many cases of Ommaya-related CNS symptoms have been described, although most were related to misplaced or malfunctioning catheters. Here we present a case of subacute MTX toxicity affecting the area around a correctly positioned catheter, suggesting that the catheter track could be more susceptible to MTX-induced toxicity.

Graft-versus-tumor effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in HIV-positive patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a well-established therapeutic option for hematological malignancies. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has enabled the treatment of medical conditions in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the same way as in the general population. Moreover, improvements in supportive care have allowed HIV-infected patients with life-threatening hematological disorders to be treated with Allo-HSCT. We report on four HIV-infected patients with hematological malignancies receiving an Allo-HSCT in our institution, and on the use of donor lymphocyte infusions to successfully treat post-Allo-HSCT relapse. Of note, one of them is the first HIV(+) patient to receive a "dual transplant" (unrelated umbilical cord blood stem cells combined with mobilized T cell-depleted CD34(+) stem cells from a mismatched third party donor). cART drugs interactions were satisfactorily managed. This approach provided long-term control of the hematological disease. Nevertheless, despite adequate immune reconstitution, infections were the main cause of morbidity and mortality after Allo-HSCT.