Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in obstetric brachial plexus injury: our experience with shoulder motion analysis

BACKGROUND

Obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) is a weakening or paralysis of the upper arm caused by brachial plexus injury followed by a muscle paralysis with severe repercussions on the movement of the shoulder joint following a progressive glenohumeral joint deformity. This case series analyzes the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in OBPI patients with a follow-up of 2 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OBPI patients with secondary end-stage glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in the study and they were treated with RSA. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes [Range of Motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)] were evaluated. A novel Shoulder motion analysis was carried out to investigate specific movement patterns of scapulothoracic movements in these patients. This study is a prospective cohort study.

RESULTS

Four Patients (M: F = 1:3) were enrolled in the study, the mean age was 49.3 years (+ 2.75), the mean OSS (Oxford Shoulder Score) decreased from 48.8 (± 2.5) preoperatively to 18.30 (± 2.78), the mean VAS (Visual Analog Scale) decreased from 7.25 (± 0.5) to 1.7 (± 0.3) in the follow up (∆% relative pain reduction:- 76.5%), Shoulder ROM obtained an improvement (p < 0.05) except for abduction and external rotation. The average follow-up time was 26.3 months (+- 4.5). Shoulder motion analysis showed a complete loss of the scapular tilting above 90 degrees of flexion compared to the typical one of standard RSA with a pattern shifted towards scapular retraction (engaging trapezius and rhomboid muscles) to compensate the loss of the posterior tilting.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA in OBPI patients demonstrated a significant improvement of pain symptoms and a moderate improvement in daily activities, anyway with a more appreciable quality of life over time even if the marked hypotrophy especially of the posterior shoulder muscles showed some limits in maintaining suspension of the upper limb and a minor external rotation, with an internal rotation attitude during the movements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series.

Scapulohumeral rhythm in shoulders with reverse shoulder arthroplasty measured with a new portable three-dimensional scapular kinematics assessment system

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a valid and increasingly popular treatment option in eccentric arthrosis and cuff arthropathy. We know that the deltoid is the motor of RSA. However, the role of scapular motion has been poorly documented in the literature. The aim of our study is to analyze and quantify the role of the scapular contribution in the functional outcome of patients undergoing RSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients who underwent primary RSA were included in the study. In all cases, a reverse prosthesis with lateralizing stem was implanted. All patients underwent clinical examination, video recording, and motion analysis. X-ray and postoperative CT examinations were collected to evaluate positioning and any loosening. ShowMotion (NCS Lab srl, Modena, Italy) 3D kinematic tracking system was used to evaluate and measure the scapular motion in 3 planes.

RESULTS

All patients show substantial amount of posterior tilting and lateral rotation starting at 30° in forward elevation. A further difference is the anticipation of the retraction during the range of motion in the RSA side. The contribution of scapular motion in the RSA shoulder was greater than in the healthy shoulder. In patients with bilateral RSA, the contribution of scapular motion was higher in tilting and lateral rotation in the worse shoulder side in terms of range of motion. This means that to compensate for the loss of glenohumeral motion in RSA, more scapula-thoracic motion is needed to obtain the same thoraco-humeral elevation angle.

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of what has been measured, the post-RSA scapular kinematics has typical characteristics that must be achieved in order to obtain a good functional outcome. We can conclude that on the RSA side, the patients anticipate upward rotation both in flexion and abduction. The contribution of the upward rotation to elevation in the RSA group is therefore more significant. In addition to this, to facilitate elevation movements, there is an anticipation of the scapular retraction and a more prominent tilt resulting in different scapular kinematics. The analysis of scapular motion could be useful in the postoperative follow-up of patients undergoing RSA surgery and improve adaptative physiotherapy protocols. It potentially can even be included in future arthroplasty planning systems.

Ambulatory measurement of the scapulohumeral rhythm: intra- and inter-operator agreement of a protocol based on inertial and magnetic sensors

To measure the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) in outpatient settings, the motion analysis protocol named ISEO (INAIL Shoulder and Elbow Outpatient protocol) was developed, based on inertial and magnetic sensors. To complete the sensor-to-segment calibration, ISEO requires the involvement of an operator for sensor placement and for positioning the patient's arm in a predefined posture. Since this can affect the measure, this study aimed at quantifying ISEO intra- and inter-operator agreement. Forty subjects were considered, together with two operators, A and B. Three measurement sessions were completed for each subject: two by A and one by B. In each session, the humerus and scapula rotations were measured during sagittal and scapular plane elevation movements. ISEO intra- and inter-operator agreement were assessed by computing, between sessions, the: (1) similarity of the scapulohumeral patterns through the Coefficient of Multiple Correlation (CMC(2)), both considering and excluding the difference of the initial value of the scapula rotations between two sessions (inter-session offset); (2) 95% Smallest Detectable Difference (SDD(95)) in scapula range of motion. Results for CMC(2) showed that the intra- and inter-operator agreement is acceptable (median≥0.85, lower-whisker ≥ 0.75) for most of the scapula rotations, independently from the movement and the inter-session offset. The only exception is the agreement for scapula protraction-retraction and for scapula medio-lateral rotation during abduction (inter-operator), which is acceptable only if the inter-session offset is removed. SDD(95) values ranged from 4.4° to 8.6° for the inter-operator and between 4.9° and 8.5° for the intra-operator agreement. In conclusion, ISEO presents a high intra- and inter-operator agreement, particularly with the scapula inter-session offset removed.