Prevalence of pathogens in honey bee colonies and association with clinical signs in southwestern Quebec, Canada

Honey bees can be affected by a variety of pathogens, which impacts their vital role as pollinators in agriculture. A cross-sectional study was conducted in southwestern Quebec to: i) estimate the prevalence of 11 bee pathogens; ii) assess the agreement between beekeeper suspicion of a disease and laboratory detection of the causative pathogen; and iii) explore the association between observed clinical signs and pathogen detection in a colony. A total of 242 colonies in 31 apiaries owned by 15 beekeepers was sampled in August 2017. The prevalence of Varroa destructor detection was estimated as 48% for colonies and 93% for apiaries. The apparent prevalence of colonies infected by Nosema spp. and Melissococcus plutonius was estimated as 40% and 21%, respectively. At least 180 colonies were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for deformed wing virus (DWV), acute-Kashmir-Israeli complex (AKI complex), and black queen cell virus (BQCV), which were detected in 33%, 9%, and 95% of colonies, respectively. Acarapis woodi, Paenibacillus larvae, and Aethina tumida were not detected. Varroasis was suspected by beekeepers in 14 of the 15 beekeeping operations in which the mite was detected. However, no correlation was found between suspected European foulbrood and detection of M. plutonius or between suspected nosemosis and detection of Nosema spp. Colony weakness was associated with Nosema spore counts of at least 0.5 × 106 per bee. Melissococcus plutonius was more frequently detected in colonies showing scattered brood.

Beekeeping management practices in southwestern Quebec

The growing number of honey bee colonies and beekeepers in Canada has led to a great diversity of beekeeping practices. All beekeeping operations, however, need to implement consistent management measures for the control of diseases. The objective of this study was to document the actual disease management practices of beekeeping productions in southwestern Quebec, Canada. A survey was conducted to describe management practices used by 15 beekeepers who own 1824 colonies in that area. Data were obtained by telephone interviews. When infectious diseases were suspected, beekeepers generally avoided using potentially toxic acaricides and chemical treatments associated with antimicrobial resistance and instead used preventive, physical or management methods, although laboratory diagnosis was rarely used. This study highlights the wide variety of operation sizes, activities, and disease management strategies among beekeepers in southwestern Quebec. It identifies the need to encourage the use of services available to them and to propose a standardized preventive medical approach for field veterinarians to avoid the spread of infectious diseases.