The utility of pathologic evaluation of adult hernia specimens.
Am J Surg 2015;
209:783-6; discussion 786. [PMID:
25725504 DOI:
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.019]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Revised: 12/21/2014] [Accepted: 12/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Pathological examination of hernia sac specimens adds additional steps and cost to a surgical procedure but has no proven benefit. Although well studied in pediatrics, there are limited data in the adult literature pertaining to this practice.
METHODS
This is a retrospective analysis from a single institution referral center over a 4-year period (2007 to 2011). All inguinal, incisional, ventral, and umbilical hernia repairs greater than 18 years of age were included.
RESULTS
A total of 1,216 inguinal (55.4%), incisional (11.4%), umbilical (21.5%), or ventral hernia (11.7%) repairs were included. In 246 cases (20.2%), hernia sac specimens were sent to pathology (open 96.7%; laparoscopic 3.3%). There were no cases in which management of the patient changed because of the final results.
CONCLUSION
The rarity of changes in diagnosis and treatment from routine pathologic examination of a hernia sac does not justify this practice and indicates that it may be omitted except in unique circumstances.
Collapse