Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Swallowing is a complex function that can be disrupted after stroke. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation therapy that recently has been tested to treat stroke-related dysphagia.

METHODS

The authors performed a search in the literature to review the described evidence of the use of tDCS in dysphagia after stroke. Three electronic databases were searched. The risk of bias evaluation was carried out through the RoB-2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was also implemented.

RESULTS

Of 265 articles, only nine studies were included in this review. The most common location of the tDCS stimulation was the unaffected hemisphere (44%). Regarding the outcome measure, the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) was the most commonly used (55%). However, due to the high heterogeneity of the protocols, and considering the differences between the types of stroke, the authors opted not to perform a metanalysis. Instead, a systematic review with a thorough analysis of each individual study and the impact of the differences to the outcomes was preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

The final considerations are that even though the majority of studies described benefits from tDCS in post-stroke dysphagia, as they present too many methodological differences, it is not possible to compare them. In addition, many articles included patients with less than 6 months after stroke, which is an important bias as the swallowing function can be recovered spontaneously within this period, turning the certainty of the evidence really low.

Prophylactic antiseizure drugs for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is concern that recommendations on prophylactic antiseizure drugs (PASDs) for patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) are biased by studies using older drugs and no electrographic monitoring.

AIMS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether PASDs in patients with sICH reduced seizure occurrence and improved functional outcomes. We included analyses of newer trials, newer antiseizure drugs, and effectiveness in patients with consistent electrographic monitoring.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception until 12 August 2022, to identify studies with patients with sICH treated with PASDs, regardless of study design. The studied outcomes were functional status and occurrence of seizures.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, including 6742 patients. Risk of bias was low overall. There was no effect of PASD on seizure occurrence overall (odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.15), but they were associated with reduced occurrence in studies with electrographic monitoring (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.70). There was no effect of PASDs on functional outcomes (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.91-1.47) or mortality (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.11).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic antiseizure medications after sICH reduce seizures in studies with electroencephalogram monitoring in high-risk patients. However, this benefit did not reflect in the improvement of functional outcomes, even in studies with newer, less toxic, antiseizure drugs.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown that dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are effective in the treatment of chronic insomnia. However, the superiority of one particular DORA over the others remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

 To perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different DORAs in patients with chronic insomnia.

METHODS

 The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for RCTs that compared DORA with placebo in patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder. We pooled outcomes for wake time after sleep onset (WASO), latency to persistent sleep (LPS), total sleep time (TST), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

 We included 10 RCTs with 7,806 patients, 4,849 of whom received DORAs as the intervention. Overall, we found that DORAs were associated with the improvement of all analyzed efficacy outcomes. Concerning TST, an apparent dose-dependent pattern was noticed, with higher doses relating to a longer TST. Lemborexant 10mg provided the largest reduction in WASO (at month 1) in minutes (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -25.40; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = -40.02--10.78), followed by suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = -25.29; 95%CI = -36.42--14.15), which also appeared to provide the largest decrease in long-term WASO (SMD = -23.70; 95%CI = -35.89--11.51). The most frequent AEs were somnolence, nasopharyngitis, and headache, with rates of up to 14.8%.

CONCLUSION

 Our results suggest that DORAs are associated with greater efficacy when compared with placebo in the treatment of insomnia, a complex 24-hour sleep disorder. Additionally, dosing might play an important role in the management of chronic insomnia.