1
|
Khadhouri S, Gallagher KM, MacKenzie KR, Shah TT, Gao C, Moore S, Zimmermann EF, Edison E, Jefferies M, Nambiar A, Anbarasan T, Mannas MP, Lee T, Marra G, Gómez Rivas J, Marcq G, Assmus MA, Uçar T, Claps F, Boltri M, La Montagna G, Burnhope T, Nkwam N, Austin T, Boxall NE, Downey AP, Sukhu TA, Antón-Juanilla M, Rai S, Chin YF, Moore M, Drake T, Green JSA, Goulao B, MacLennan G, Nielsen M, McGrath JS, Kasivisvanathan V. Developing a Diagnostic Multivariable Prediction Model for Urinary Tract Cancer in Patients Referred with Haematuria: Results from the IDENTIFY Collaborative Study. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1673-1682. [PMID: 35760722 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient factors associated with urinary tract cancer can be used to risk stratify patients referred with haematuria, prioritising those with a higher risk of cancer for prompt investigation. OBJECTIVE To develop a prediction model for urinary tract cancer in patients referred with haematuria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective observational study was conducted in 10 282 patients from 110 hospitals across 26 countries, aged ≥16 yr and referred to secondary care with haematuria. Patients with a known or previous urological malignancy were excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcomes were the presence or absence of urinary tract cancer (bladder cancer, upper tract urothelial cancer [UTUC], and renal cancer). Mixed-effect multivariable logistic regression was performed with site and country as random effects and clinically important patient-level candidate predictors, chosen a priori, as fixed effects. Predictors were selected primarily using clinical reasoning, in addition to backward stepwise selection. Calibration and discrimination were calculated, and bootstrap validation was performed to calculate optimism. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The unadjusted prevalence was 17.2% (n = 1763) for bladder cancer, 1.20% (n = 123) for UTUC, and 1.00% (n = 103) for renal cancer. The final model included predictors of increased risk (visible haematuria, age, smoking history, male sex, and family history) and reduced risk (previous haematuria investigations, urinary tract infection, dysuria/suprapubic pain, anticoagulation, catheter use, and previous pelvic radiotherapy). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the final model was 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.85-0.87). The model is limited to patients without previous urological malignancy. CONCLUSIONS This cancer prediction model is the first to consider established and novel urinary tract cancer diagnostic markers. It can be used in secondary care for risk stratifying patients and aid the clinician's decision-making process in prioritising patients for investigation. PATIENT SUMMARY We have developed a tool that uses a person's characteristics to determine the risk of cancer if that person develops blood in the urine (haematuria). This can be used to help prioritise patients for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinan Khadhouri
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK; British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK.
| | - Kevin M Gallagher
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kenneth R MacKenzie
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Chuanyu Gao
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sacha Moore
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
| | - Eleanor F Zimmermann
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torbay, UK
| | - Eric Edison
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Department of Urology, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Jefferies
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK; Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Arjun Nambiar
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Thineskrishna Anbarasan
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Miles P Mannas
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Taeweon Lee
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy; University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France; CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University Lille, Lille, France
| | - Mark A Assmus
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Taha Uçar
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Matteo Boltri
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giuseppe La Montagna
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Tara Burnhope
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Nkwam Nkwam
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Tomas Austin
- Department of Urology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | | | - Troy A Sukhu
- University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Sonpreet Rai
- St James University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Madeline Moore
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | | | - James S A Green
- Department of Urology, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Healthcare and Population Research, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Beatriz Goulao
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Matthew Nielsen
- University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John S McGrath
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK; Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Collaborative, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khadhouri S, Gallagher K, MacKenzie K, Shah T, Gao C, Moore S, Zimmermann E, Edison E, Jefferies M, Nambiar A, Mannas M, Lee T, Marra G, Rivaz JG, Marcq G, Assmuss M, Ucar T, Claps F, Boltri M, Montagna GL, Burnhope T, Nkwam N, Austin T, Boxall N, Downey A, Sukhu T, Anton0Juanilla M, Rai S, Chin Y, Moore M, Drake T, Green J, Nielsen M, Takwoingi Y, McGrath J, Kasivisvanathan V. O6 Reshaping the diagnostic pathways for investigation of haematuria during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Diagnostic accuracy of strategies for the detection of bladder cancer from the IDENTIFY cohort study. BJS Open 2021. [PMCID: PMC8083464 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab033.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Haematuria often requires investigation with an imaging test and flexible cystoscopy to rule out urinary tract cancers. With a reduction in diagnostic services due to the COVID-19 pandemic there is a risk of compromise in the care of patients referred with haematuria. We aimed to provide a pragmatic strategy that optimises the use of scarce resources by reducing patient visits to hospital and allocating the appropriate diagnostic tests according to risk of bladder cancer. Methods The IDENTIFY study was an international, prospective, multicentre cohort study of over 11,000 patients referred to secondary care for investigation of newly suspected urinary tract cancer. Patients underwent cystoscopy, imaging tests, urine cytology and transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), where indicated. We developed strategies using combinations of imaging and cytology as triage tests to flexible cystoscopy. These strategies aimed to maximise cancer detection within a pragmatic pathway in a resource-limited environment. Findings 8112 patients (74·4%) received an ultrasound or a CT urogram, with or without cytology. 5737 (70·7%) patients had visible haematuria (VH) and 2375 (29·3%) had non-visible haematuria (NVH). Amongst all patients, 1474 (18·2%) had bladder cancer; 1333 (23·2%) in VH group and 141 (5·94%) in NVH group. Diagnostic test performance was used to determine optimal age cut-offs for each proposed strategy. We recommended proceeding directly to TURBT for patients of any age with positive triage tests for cancer. Patients with negative triage tests under 35-years-old with VH, or under 50-years-old with NVH can safely be discharged without undergoing flexible cystoscopy. The remaining patients may undergo flexible cystoscopy, with a greater priority for older patients (threshold of 60-years-old with VH, or 70-years-old with NVH) to capture high risk bladder cancer. Interpretation We suggest diagnostic strategies in patients with haematuria, which focus on detection of bladder cancer, whilst reducing the burden to healthcare services in a resource-limited setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinan Khadhouri
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST),Corresponding Author: Mr. Sinan Khadhouri ()
| | | | | | - Taimur Shah
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Chuanyu Gao
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Sacha Moore
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | - Eric Edison
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | - Arjun Nambiar
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Miles Mannas
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Taeweon Lee
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | | | - Gautier Marcq
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Mark Assmuss
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Taha Ucar
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | - Mattes Boltri
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | - Tara Burnhope
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Nkwam Nkwam
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Tomas Austin
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | - Alison Downey
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Troy Sukhu
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | - Sonpreet Rai
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Yew0Fung Chin
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Madeline Moore
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - Tamsin Drake
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | - James Green
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | | | | - John McGrath
- British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST)
| | | |
Collapse
|