Acute mitral isthmus block during catheter ablation with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion: Angiographic considerations

BACKGROUND

Achieving bidirectional mitral isthmus block is still challenging. Conventional ablation methods involve radiofrequency applications on the endocardial aspect of the lateral mitral isthmus, and often epicardial applications inside the coronary sinus.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of the systematic use of ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall on the achievement of acute mitral isthmus block of additional epicardial component lesion.

METHODS

We evaluated patients referred to two centres for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation or recurrent peri-mitral flutter. All patients had pulmonary vein isolation and mitral isthmus line using ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall for the first procedure and additional radiofrequency ablation lesion if necessary. For redo procedures, additional ablations (atrial lines and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablations, if needed) were also performed.

RESULTS

We included 149 patients, and ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall was not performed in 27 patients (18%). Among 122 patients, 115 had long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (94.2%) and seven had peri-mitral flutter (5.8%). The mean duration of continuous atrial fibrillation was 53 months before ablation. Acute bidirectional mitral isthmus block was obtained in 115 (94.2%) of the 122 patients who received ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (77% when considering the total population). The mean radiofrequency delivery time to obtain mitral isthmus block was 2.6minutes for the endocardial mitral isthmus radiofrequency ablation and 2.6minutes for the epicardial mitral isthmus radiofrequency ablation. Failure to obtain mitral isthmus block was associated with increased mitral isthmus length and left atrial dilation. No major complications related to ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall were observed.

CONCLUSION

Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall, when feasible (82%), was a safe approach to obtaining a high success rate (94%) of acute bidirectional endocardial and epicardial mitral isthmus block.

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Very few data have been published on the use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes associated with S-ICDs in patients with CHD.

METHODS

This nationwide French cohort including all patients with an S-ICD was initiated in 2020 by the French Institute of Health and Medical Research. Characteristics at implantation and outcomes were analyzed in patients with CHD.

RESULTS

From October 12, 2012, to December 31, 2019, among 4,924 patients receiving an S-ICD implant in 150 centers, 101 (2.1%) had CHD. Tetralogy of Fallot, univentricular heart, and dextro-transposition of the great arteries represented almost one-half of the population. Patients with CHD were significantly younger (age 37.1 ± 15.4 years vs 50.1 ± 14.9 years; P < 0.001), more frequently female (37.6% vs 23.0%; P < 0.001), more likely to receive an S-ICD for secondary prevention (72.3% vs 35.9%; P < 0.001), and less likely to have severe systolic dysfunction of the systemic ventricle (28.1% vs 53.1%; P < 0.001). Over a mean follow-up period of 1.9 years, 16 (15.8%) patients with CHD received at least 1 appropriate shock, with all shocks successfully terminating the ventricular arrhythmia. The crude risk of appropriate S-ICD shock was twice as high in patients with CHD compared with non-CHD patients (annual incidences of 9.0% vs 4.4%; HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3-3.4); however, this association was no longer significant after propensity matching (especially considering S-ICD indication, P = 0.12). The burden of all complications (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-2.1; P = 0.4) and inappropriate shocks (HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.4-2.0; P = 0.9) was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study, patients with CHD represented 2% of all S-ICD implantations. Our findings emphasize the effectiveness and safety of S-ICD in this particularly high-risk population. (S-ICD French Cohort Study [HONEST]; NCT05302115).

Rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with tetralogy of Fallot and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Insights from the DAI-T4F nationwide registry

BACKGROUND

In repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), little is known about characteristics of patients with rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT). Also, whether patients with a first episode of nonrapid VT may subsequently develop rapid VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) has not been addressed.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to compare patients with rapid VT/VF with those with nonrapid VT and to assess the evolution of VT cycle lengths (VTCLs) overtime.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from a nationwide registry including all patients with TOF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) since 2000. Patients with ≥1 VT episode with VTCL ≤250 ms (240 beats/min) formed the rapid VT/VF group.

RESULTS

Of 144 patients (mean age 42.0 ± 12.7 years; 104 [72%] men), 61 (42%) had at least 1 VT/VF episode, including 28 patients with rapid VT/VF (46%), during a median follow-up of 6.3 years (interquartile range 2.2-10.3 years). Compared with patients in the nonrapid VT group, those in the rapid VT/VF group were significantly younger at ICD implantation (35.2 ± 12.6 years vs 41.5 ± 11.2 years; P = .04), had more frequently a history of cardiac arrest (8 [29%] vs 2 [6%]; P = .02), less frequently a history of atrial arrhythmia (11 [42%] vs 22 [69%]; P = .004), and higher right ventricular ejection fraction (43.3% ± 10.3% vs 36.6% ± 11.2%; P = .04). The median VTCL of VT/VF episodes was 325 ms (interquartile range 235-429 ms). None of the patients with a first documented nonrapid VT episode had rapid VT/VF during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients with TOF and rapid VT/VF had distinct clinical characteristics. The relatively low variation of VTCL over time suggests a room for catheter ablation without a backup ICD in selected patients with well-tolerated VT.

Insights from atrial surface activation throughout atrial tachycardia cycle length: A new mapping tool

BACKGROUND

A novel "LUMIPOINT" software in the Rhythmia system (Boston Scientific) displays a histogram of activated area over the entire atrial tachycardia (AT) cycle length (CL) with a normalized score.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine whether the pattern of this global activation histogram (GAH) identified reentrant vs focal AT and whether a decrease in atrial activation area, shown as valleys in the GAH, identifies isthmuses.

METHODS

One hundred eight activation maps of ATs (17 focal, 57 macroreentrant, 21 localized, 13 multiple loop) in 67 patients were reviewed retrospectively with the LUMIPOINT software. The ACTIVATION SEARCH feature highlighted the activated area in a given time period irrespective of the activation map. A 30-ms unit time interval was set, and the GAH patterns and electrophysiological properties of highlighted areas were examined.

RESULTS

Focal ATs systematically displayed a plateau with GAH-Score <0.1 for at least 30% of the CL. Most reentrant ATs (90/91 [98.9%]) lacked this plateau and displayed activity covering the entire CL, with 2 [1-2] GAH-Valleys per tachycardia. Each GAH-Valley highlighted 1 [1-2] areas in the map. Among 264 highlighted areas, 198 (75.0%) represented slow conduction, 19 (7.2%) lines of block, 27 (10.2%) wavefront collision, 3 (1.1%) unknown, and 17 (6.4%) absence of activation in focal ATs. Practical ablation sites all matched one of the highlighted areas based on GAH-Valleys, and they corresponded better with areas highlighted by GAH-Score ≤0.2 (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

GAH shows focal vs reentrant mechanisms at first glance. Decrease in activated areas (displayed by GAH-Valleys) is mostly due to slow conduction and highlights areas of special interest, with 100% sensitivity for isthmus identification.