Intrathecal Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics and Glymphatic Enhancement in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disease, characterized by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow disturbance. Today, the only available treatment is CSF diversion surgery (shunt surgery). While traditional imaging biomarkers typically assess CSF space anatomy, recently introduced imaging biomarkers of CSF dynamics and glymphatic enhancement, provide imaging of CSF dynamics and thereby more specifically reveal elements of the underlying pathophysiology. The biomarkers address CSF ventricular reflux grade as well as glymphatic enhancement and derive from intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI. However, the contrast agent serving as CSF tracer is administered off-label. In medicine, the introduction of new diagnostic or therapeutic methods must consider the balance between risk and benefit. To this end, we performed a prospective observational study of 95 patients with iNPH, comparing different intrathecal doses of the MRI contrast agent gadobutrol (0.10, 0.25, and 0.50 mmol, respectively), aiming at the lowest reasonable dose needed to retrieve diagnostic information about the novel MRI biomarkers. The present observations disclosed a dose-dependent enrichment of subarachnoid CSF spaces (cisterna magna, vertex, and velum interpositum) with dose-dependent ventricular reflux of tracer in iNPH, as well as dose-dependent glymphatic tracer enrichment. The association between tracer enrichment in CSF and parenchymal compartments were as well dose-related. Intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol, but not 0.10 mmol, was at 1.5T MRI considered sufficient for imaging altered CSF dynamics and glymphatic enhancement in iNPH, even though 3T MRI provided better sensitivity. Tracer enrichment in CSF at the vertex and within the cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter was deemed too low for maintaining diagnostic information from a dose of 0.10 mmol. We conclude that reducing the intrathecal dose of gadobutrol from 0.50 to 0.25 mmol gadobutrol improves the safety margin while maintaining the necessary diagnostic information about disturbed CSF homeostasis and glymphatic failure in iNPH.

Noise dependency in vascular parameters from combined gradient-echo and spin-echo DSC MRI

Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) imaging is a widely used technique for assessment of cerebral blood volume (CBV). With combined gradient-echo and spin-echo DSC techniques, measures of the underlying vessel size and vessel architecture can be obtained from the vessel size index (VSI) and vortex area, respectively. However, how noise, and specifically the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), affect the estimations of these parameters has largely been overlooked. In order to address this issue, we have performed simulations to generate DSC signals with varying levels of CNR, defined by the peak of relaxation rate curve divided by the standard deviation of the baseline. Moreover, DSC data from 59 brain cancer patients were acquired at two different 3 T-scanners (N = 29 and N = 30, respectively), where CNR and relative parameter maps were obtained. Our simulations showed that the measured parameters were affected by CNR in different ways, where low CNR led to overestimations of CBV and underestimations of VSI and vortex area. In addition, a higher noise-sensitivity was found in vortex area than in CBV and VSI. Results from clinical data were consistent with simulations, and indicated that CNR < 4 gives highly unreliable measurements. Moreover, we have shown that the distribution of values in the tumour regions could change considerably when voxels with CNR below a given cut off are excluded when generating the relative parameter maps. The widespread use of CBV and attractive potential of VSI and vortex area, makes the noise-sensitivity of these parameters found in our study relevant for further use and development of the DSC imaging technique. Our results suggest that the CNR has considerable impact on the measured parameters, with the potential to affect the clinical interpretation of DSC-MRI, and should therefore be taken into account in the clinical decision-making process.

Off-label intrathecal use of gadobutrol: safety study and comparison of administration protocols

Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents have been used off-label for diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and lately also for assessment of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatic drainage. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the short- and long-term safety profile of intrathecal MRI contrast agents.

Methods

In this prospective study, we compared the safety profile of different administration protocols of intrathecal gadobutrol (Gadovist^TM; 1.0 mmol/ml). Gadobutrol was administered intrathecal in a dose of 0.5 mmol, with or without iodixanol (Visipaque^TM 270 mg I/ml; 3 ml). In addition, a subgroup was given intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol. Adverse events were assessed at 1 to 3 days, 4 weeks, and after 12 months.

Results

Among the 149 patients, no serious adverse events were seen in patients without history of prior adverse events. The combination of gadobutrol with iodixanol did not increase the occurrence of non-serious adverse events after days 1–3. Intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol caused less severity of nausea, as compared with the dose of 0.5 mmol. The clinical diagnosis was the major determinant for occurrence of non-serious adverse events after intrathecal gadobutrol.

Conclusion

This prospective study showed that intrathecal administration of gadobutrol in a dose of 0.5 mmol is safe. Non-serious adverse events were to a lesser degree affected by the administration protocols, though preliminary data are given that side effects of intrathecal gadobutrol are dose-dependent.

Intrathecal Use of Gadobutrol for Glymphatic MR Imaging: Prospective Safety Study of 100 Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intrathecal contrast-enhanced glymphatic MR imaging has shown promise in assessing glymphatic function in patients with dementia. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety profile and feasibility of this new MR imaging technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective safety and feasibility study was performed in 100 consecutive patients (58 women and 42 men, 51 ± 19 years of age) undergoing glymphatic MR imaging from September 2015 to August 2018. Short- and long-term serious and nonserious adverse events were registered clinically and by interview after intrathecal administration of 0.5 mL of gadobutrol (1.0 mmol/mL) along with 3 mL of iodixanol (270 mg I/mL). Adverse events are presented as numbers and percentages.

RESULTS

One serious adverse event (anaphylaxis) occurred in a patient with known allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents (1%). The main nonserious adverse events during the first 1-3 days after contrast injection included severe headache (28%) and severe nausea (34%), though the frequency depended heavily on the diagnosis. After 4 weeks, adverse events had resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal administration of gadobutrol in conjunction with iodixanol for glymphatic MR imaging is safe and feasible. We cannot conclude whether short-duration symptoms such as headache and nausea were caused by gadobutrol, iodixanol, the lumbar puncture, or the diagnosis. The safety profile closely resembles that of iodixanol alone.