Using groundwater monitoring wells for rapid application of soil gas radon deficit technique to evaluate residual LNAPL

The application of the 222Radon (Rn) deficit technique using subsurface soil gas probes for the identification and quantification of light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) has provided positive outcomes in recent years. This study presents an alternative method for applying this technique in the headspace of groundwater monitoring wells. The developed protocol, designed for groundwater monitoring wells with a portion of their screen in the vadose zone, is based on the use of portable equipment that allows rapid measurement of the Rn soil gas activity in the vadose zone close to the water table (i.e., smear zone) where LNAPL is typically expected. The paper first describes the step-by-step procedure to be followed for the application of this method. Then, a preliminary assessment of the potential of the method was carried out at two Italian sites characterized by accidental gasoline and diesel spills into the subsurface from underground storage tanks. Although the number of tests conducted does not allow for definitive conclusions, the results obtained suggest that, from a qualitative point of view, Rn monitoring in the headspace of monitoring wells is a promising, fast, and minimally invasive screening method that could also potentially reduce the costs associated with field data acquisition. This method proves to be suitable for detecting the presence of LNAPL in both the mobile and residual phases with results consistent with the other lines of evidence available at the sites, such as groundwater and soil gas monitoring. Future efforts should be directed toward evaluating the accuracy of this method for a quantitative assessment of residual LNAPL saturations.

Ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites in Italy: Guidelines and path forward

Ecological risk assessment (ERA) is defined as an iterative process that evaluates the likelihood of adverse ecological effects resulting from exposure to one or more stressors. Although ERA is recognized as a valuable procedure to better address efforts and strategies for site remediation, in Europe a common framework for the implementation of ERA in the management of contaminated sites is lacking. In Italy, there are no legally binding provisions regulating the direct assessment of potential likelihood of ecological risks. In this context, the main objective of this article was to develop a guideline to facilitate ERA application in support of an effective and sustainable management of contaminated sites in Italy and to facilitate a multistakeholder dialogue. The work was based on a critical review of existing ERA guidelines in the international context, as well as other regulatory documents and technical approaches dealing with the evaluation of ecological effects of chemical contaminants in different environmental compartments. Approaches and tools available in these documents were then used to prepare a proposed guideline for the Italian context; the proposed ERA guideline is meant to represent a flexible but robust approach that can be useful in evaluating existing data (e.g., from past investigations) as well as in the planning of site-specific investigations. To facilitate the direct application of the ERA procedure, the guideline was prepared including several templates of summary tables, checklists, and examples. The proposed ERA guideline could facilitate the decision-making process for contaminated sites with ecological values, although its application would necessarily require, at least in the initial phase, testing of its suitability to the Italian context and setting-up of a close dialogue and collaboration with local authorities and other stakeholders. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;00:1-7. © 2022 SETAC.