1
|
Kresse SH, Brandt-Winge S, Pharo H, Flatin BTB, Jeanmougin M, Vedeld HM, Lind GE. Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood. Clin Epigenetics 2023; 15:151. [PMID: 37710283 PMCID: PMC10503171 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-023-01563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DNA methylation biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have great clinical potential for cancer management. Most methods for DNA methylation analysis require bisulfite conversion, causing DNA degradation and loss. This is particularly challenging for cfDNA, which is naturally fragmented and normally present in low amounts. The aim of the present study was to identify an optimal combination of cfDNA isolation and bisulfite conversion kits for downstream analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma. RESULTS Of the five tested bisulfite conversion kits (EpiJET Bisulfite Conversion Kit, EpiTect Plus DNA Bisulfite Kit (EpiTect), EZ DNA Methylation-Direct Kit, Imprint DNA Modification Kit (Imprint) and Premium Bisulfite Kit), the highest and lowest DNA yield and recovery were achieved using the EpiTect kit and the Imprint kit, respectively, with more than double the amount of DNA for the EpiTect kit. Of the three tested cfDNA isolation kits (Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit, QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (CNA) and QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Mini Kit), the CNA kit yielded around twice as much cfDNA compared to the two others kits, although with more high molecular weight DNA present. When comparing various combinations of cfDNA isolation kits and bisulfite conversion kits, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing combination, resulting in the highest yield of bisulfite converted cfDNA from normal plasma, as measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). As a proof of principle, this kit combination was used to process plasma samples from 13 colorectal cancer patients for subsequent ddPCR methylation analysis of BCAT1 and IKZF1. Methylation of BCAT1 and/or IKZF1 was identified in 6/10 (60%) stage IV patients and 1/3 (33%) stage III patients. CONCLUSIONS Based on a thorough evaluation of five bisulfite conversion kits and three cfDNA isolation kits, both individually and in combination, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing kit combination, with highest DNA yield and recovery across a range of DNA input amounts. The combination was successfully used for detection of clinically relevant DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma from cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine H Kresse
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sara Brandt-Winge
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Pharo
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørnar T B Flatin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pinto R, Hauge T, Jeanmougin M, Pharo HD, Kresse SH, Honne H, Winge SB, Five MB, Kumar T, Mala T, Hauge T, Johnson E, Lind GE. Targeted genetic and epigenetic profiling of esophageal adenocarcinomas and non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Clin Epigenetics 2022; 14:77. [PMID: 35701814 PMCID: PMC9195284 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01287-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the efforts to describe the molecular landscape of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and its precursor lesion Barrett’s esophagus (BE), discrepant findings are reported. Here, we investigated the prevalence of selected genetic (TP53 mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) status) and epigenetic (DNA promoter hypermethylation of APC, CDKN2A, MGMT, TIMP3 and MLH1) modifications in a series of 19 non-dysplastic BE and 145 EAC samples. Additional biopsies from adjacent normal tissue were also evaluated. State-of-the-art methodologies and well-defined scoring criteria were applied in all molecular analyses. Results Overall, we confirmed frequent TP53 mutations among EAC (28%) in contrast to BE, which harbored no mutations. We demonstrated that MSI and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation are rare events, both in EAC and in BE. Our findings further support that APC, CDKN2A, MGMT and TIMP3 promoter hypermethylation is frequently seen in both lesions (21–89%), as well as in a subset of adjacent normal samples (up to 12%). Conclusions Our study further enlightens the molecular background of BE and EAC. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies addressing a targeted analysis of genetic and epigenetic modifications simultaneously across a combined series of non-dysplastic BE and EAC samples. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-022-01287-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Pinto
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tobias Hauge
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi D Pharo
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine H Kresse
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sara B Winge
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - May-Britt Five
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Theresa Kumar
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom Mala
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Truls Hauge
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Egil Johnson
- Department of Pediatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0379, Oslo, Norway. .,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Namløs HM, Skårn M, Ahmed D, Grad I, Andresen K, Kresse SH, Munthe E, Serra M, Scotlandi K, Llombart-Bosch A, Myklebost O, Lind GE, Meza-Zepeda LA. miR-486-5p expression is regulated by DNA methylation in osteosarcoma. BMC Genomics 2022; 23:142. [PMID: 35172717 PMCID: PMC8851731 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08346-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour of bone occurring in children and young adolescents and is characterised by complex genetic and epigenetic changes. The miRNA miR-486-5p has been shown to be downregulated in osteosarcoma and in cancer in general. Results To investigate if the mir-486 locus is epigenetically regulated, we integrated DNA methylation and miR-486-5p expression data using cohorts of osteosarcoma cell lines and patient samples. A CpG island in the promoter of the ANK1 host gene of mir-486 was shown to be highly methylated in osteosarcoma cell lines as determined by methylation-specific PCR and direct bisulfite sequencing. High methylation levels were seen for osteosarcoma patient samples, xenografts and cell lines based on quantitative methylation-specific PCR. 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine treatment of osteosarcoma cell lines caused induction of miR-486-5p and ANK1, indicating common epigenetic regulation in osteosarcoma cell lines. When overexpressed, miR-486-5p affected cell morphology. Conclusions miR-486-5p represents a highly cancer relevant, epigenetically regulated miRNA in osteosarcoma, and this knowledge contributes to the understanding of osteosarcoma biology. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08346-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi M Namløs
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magne Skårn
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Deeqa Ahmed
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Iwona Grad
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kim Andresen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine H Kresse
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Else Munthe
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Massimo Serra
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Katia Scotlandi
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Ola Myklebost
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department for Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Genomics Core Facility, Department of Core Facilities, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vedeld HM, Grimsrud MM, Andresen K, Pharo HD, von Seth E, Karlsen TH, Honne H, Paulsen V, Färkkilä MA, Bergquist A, Jeanmougin M, Aabakken L, Boberg KM, Folseraas T, Lind GE. Early and accurate detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis by methylation markers in bile. Hepatology 2022; 75:59-73. [PMID: 34435693 PMCID: PMC9300181 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Early and accurate CCA detection represents an unmet clinical need as the majority of patients with PSC are diagnosed at an advanced stage of malignancy. In the present study, we aimed at establishing robust DNA methylation biomarkers in bile for early and accurate diagnosis of CCA in PSC. APPROACH AND RESULTS Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to analyze 344 bile samples from 273 patients with sporadic and PSC-associated CCA, PSC, and other nonmalignant liver diseases for promoter methylation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1, cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1, septin 9, and vimentin. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed high AUCs for all four markers (0.77-0.87) for CCA detection among patients with PSC. Including only samples from patients with PSC diagnosed with CCA ≤ 12 months following bile collection increased the accuracy for cancer detection, with a combined sensitivity of 100% (28/28) and a specificity of 90% (20/203). The specificity increased to 93% when only including patients with PSC with longtime follow-up (> 36 months) as controls, and remained high (83%) when only including patients with PSC and dysplasia as controls (n = 23). Importantly, the bile samples from the CCA-PSC ≤ 12 patients, all positive for the biomarkers, included both early-stage and late-stage CCA, different tumor growth patterns, anatomical locations, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. CONCLUSIONS Using highly sensitive ddPCR to analyze robust epigenetic biomarkers, CCA in PSC was accurately detected in bile, irrespective of clinical and molecular features, up to 12 months before CCA diagnosis. The findings suggest a potential for these biomarkers to complement current detection and screening methods for CCA in patients with PSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research CentreOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Marit M. Grimsrud
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Kim Andresen
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research CentreOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Heidi D. Pharo
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research CentreOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Erik von Seth
- Department of Medicine HuddingeUnit of Gastroenterology and RheumatologyKarolinska InstitutetKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Tom H. Karlsen
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway,Section of GastroenterologyDepartment of Transplantation MedicineDivision of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and TransplantationOslo University Hospital–RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research CentreOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Vemund Paulsen
- Section of GastroenterologyDepartment of Transplantation MedicineDivision of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and TransplantationOslo University Hospital–RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Martti A. Färkkilä
- Department of MedicineDivision of GastroenterologyHelsinki University Hospital and Helsinki UniversityHelsinkiFinland
| | - Annika Bergquist
- Department of Medicine HuddingeUnit of Gastroenterology and RheumatologyKarolinska InstitutetKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research CentreOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Lars Aabakken
- Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway,Section of GastroenterologyDepartment of Transplantation MedicineDivision of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and TransplantationOslo University Hospital–RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Kirsten M. Boberg
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway,Section of GastroenterologyDepartment of Transplantation MedicineDivision of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and TransplantationOslo University Hospital–RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Trine Folseraas
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Section of GastroenterologyDepartment of Transplantation MedicineDivision of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and TransplantationOslo University Hospital–RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research CentreOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flatin BTB, Vedeld HM, Pinto R, Langerud J, Lind GE, Lothe RA, Sveen A, Jeanmougin M. Multiregional assessment of CIMP in primary colorectal cancers: Phenotype concordance but marker variability. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:1652-1657. [PMID: 33284993 PMCID: PMC7898891 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Intratumor heterogeneity of colorectal cancers (CRCs) is manifested both at the genomic and epigenomic levels. Early genetic aberrations in carcinogenesis are clonal and present throughout the tumors, but less is known about the heterogeneity of the epigenetic CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). CIMP characterizes a subgroup of CRCs thought to originate from specific precursor lesions, and it is defined by widespread DNA methylation within promoter regions. In this work, we investigated CIMP in two to four multiregional samples from 30 primary tumors (n = 86 samples) using the consensus Weisenberger gene panel (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1). Twenty‐nine of 30 tumors (97%) showed concordant CIMP status in all samples, and percent methylated reference (PMR) values of all five markers had higher intertumor than intratumor variation (P value = 1.5e−09). However, a third of the CIMP+ tumors exhibited discrepancies in methylation status in at least one of the five gene markers. To conclude, CIMP status was consistent within primary CRCs, and it is likely a clonal phenotype. However, spatial discordances of the individual genes suggest that large‐scale analysis of multiregional samples could be of interest for identifying CIMP markers that are robust to intratumor heterogeneity. What's new? Colorectal cancers (CRCs) exhibit significant intratumoral genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity. A subgroup of CRCs is characterized in particular by the epigenetic CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), though the extent to which CIMP contributes to intratumoral heterogeneity in these tumors is unknown. Here, investigation of CIMP in multiregional samples from primary CRCs shows that CIMP status is highly homogenous within tumors. In one‐third of CIMP‐positive primary CRCs, methylation status differed in at least one of five gene markers investigated. The findings suggest that inclusion of multiregional CRC samples could aid the development of more robust marker panels for CIMP assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjørnar T B Flatin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rita Pinto
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Langerud
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Cancer Medicine, K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jeanmougin M, Håvik AB, Cekaite L, Brandal P, Sveen A, Meling TR, Ågesen TH, Scheie D, Heim S, Lothe RA, Lind GE. Improved prognostication of glioblastoma beyond molecular subtyping by transcriptional profiling of the tumor microenvironment. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:1016-1027. [PMID: 32171051 PMCID: PMC7191188 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, is characterized by a high level of molecular heterogeneity, and infiltration by various immune and stromal cell populations. Important advances have been made in deciphering the microenvironment of GBMs, but its association with existing molecular subtypes and its potential prognostic role remain elusive. We have investigated the abundance of infiltrating immune and stromal cells in silico, from gene expression profiles. Two cohorts, including in‐house normal brain and glioma samples (n = 70) and a large sample set from TCGA (n = 393), were combined into a single exploratory dataset. A third independent cohort (n = 124) was used for validation. Tumors were clustered based on their microenvironment infiltration profiles, and associations with known GBM molecular subtypes and patient outcome were tested a posteriori in a multivariable setting. We identified a subset of GBM samples with significantly higher abundances of most immune and stromal cell populations. This subset showed increased expression of both immune suppressor and immune effector genes compared to other GBMs and was enriched for the mesenchymal molecular subtype. Survival analyses suggested that tumor microenvironment infiltration pattern was an independent prognostic factor for GBM patients. Among all, patients with the mesenchymal subtype with low immune and stromal infiltration had the poorest survival. By combining molecular subtyping with gene expression measures of tumor infiltration, the present work contributes with improving prognostic models in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annette B Håvik
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lina Cekaite
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petter Brandal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torstein R Meling
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trude H Ågesen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - David Scheie
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sverre Heim
- Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vedeld HM, Goel A, Lind GE. Epigenetic biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancers: The current state and clinical perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol 2018; 51:36-49. [PMID: 29253542 PMCID: PMC7286571 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Each year, almost 4.1 million people are diagnosed with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Due to late detection of this disease, the mortality is high, causing approximately 3 million cancer-related deaths annually, worldwide. Although the incidence and survival differs according to organ site, earlier detection and improved prognostication have the potential to reduce overall mortality burden from these cancers. Epigenetic changes, including aberrant promoter DNA methylation, are common events in both cancer initiation and progression. Furthermore, such changes may be identified non-invasively with the use of PCR based methods, in bodily fluids of cancer patients. These features make aberrant DNA methylation a promising substrate for the development of disease biomarkers for early detection, prognosis and for predicting response to therapy. In this article, we will provide an update and current clinical perspectives for DNA methylation alterations in patients with colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, liver and esophageal cancers, and discuss their potential role as cancer biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ajay Goel
- Center for Gastrointestinal Research, and Center for Translational Genomics and Oncology, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute and Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vedeld HM, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA, Lind GE. Re-assessing ZNF331 as a DNA methylation biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Epigenetics 2018; 10:70. [PMID: 29854011 PMCID: PMC5975481 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-018-0503-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
We have previously shown that aberrant promoter methylation of ZNF331 is a potential biomarker for colorectal cancer detection with high sensitivity (71%) and specificity (98%). This finding was recently confirmed by others, and it was additionally suggested that promoter methylation of ZNF331 was an independent prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (n = 146). In the current study, our initial colorectal cancer sample series was extended to include a total of 423 cancer tissue samples. Aberrant promoter methylation was found in 71% of the samples, thus repeatedly suggesting the biomarker potential of ZNF331 for detection of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, multivariate Cox’s analysis indicated a trend towards inferior overall survival for colorectal cancer patients with aberrant methylation of ZNF331.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Marie Vedeld
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,2K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- 2K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,4Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Aker, Oslo, Norway.,5Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,2K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,5Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,2K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pharo HD, Andresen K, Berg KCG, Lothe RA, Jeanmougin M, Lind GE. A robust internal control for high-precision DNA methylation analyses by droplet digital PCR. Clin Epigenetics 2018; 10:24. [PMID: 29484034 PMCID: PMC5822558 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-018-0456-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) allows absolute quantification of nucleic acids and has potential for improved non-invasive detection of DNA methylation. For increased precision of the methylation analysis, we aimed to develop a robust internal control for use in methylation-specific ddPCR. Methods Two control design approaches were tested: (a) targeting a genomic region shared across members of a gene family and (b) combining multiple assays targeting different pericentromeric loci on different chromosomes. Through analyses of 34 colorectal cancer cell lines, the performance of the control assay candidates was optimized and evaluated, both individually and in various combinations, using the QX200™ droplet digital PCR platform (Bio-Rad). The best-performing control was tested in combination with assays targeting methylated CDO1, SEPT9, and VIM. Results A 4Plex panel consisting of EPHA3, KBTBD4, PLEKHF1, and SYT10 was identified as the best-performing control. The use of the 4Plex for normalization reduced the variability in methylation values, corrected for differences in template amount, and diminished the effect of chromosomal aberrations. Positive Droplet Calling (PoDCall), an R-based algorithm for standardized threshold determination, was developed, ensuring consistency of the ddPCR results. Conclusion Implementation of a robust internal control, i.e., the 4Plex, and an algorithm for automated threshold determination, PoDCall, in methylation-specific ddPCR increase the precision of DNA methylation analysis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0456-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Pharo
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.,2KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,4Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kim Andresen
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.,2KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kaja C G Berg
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.,2KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.,2KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,4Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.,2KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- 1Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.,2KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,3Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,4Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berg KCG, Eide PW, Eilertsen IA, Johannessen B, Bruun J, Danielsen SA, Bjørnslett M, Meza-Zepeda LA, Eknæs M, Lind GE, Myklebost O, Skotheim RI, Sveen A, Lothe RA. Multi-omics of 34 colorectal cancer cell lines - a resource for biomedical studies. Mol Cancer 2017; 16:116. [PMID: 28683746 PMCID: PMC5498998 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-017-0691-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines are widely used pre-clinical model systems. Comprehensive insights into their molecular characteristics may improve model selection for biomedical studies. Methods We have performed DNA, RNA and protein profiling of 34 cell lines, including (i) targeted deep sequencing (n = 612 genes) to detect single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions; (ii) high resolution DNA copy number profiling; (iii) gene expression profiling at exon resolution; (iv) small RNA expression profiling by deep sequencing; and (v) protein expression analysis (n = 297 proteins) by reverse phase protein microarrays. Results The cell lines were stratified according to the key molecular subtypes of CRC and data were integrated at two or more levels by computational analyses. We confirm that the frequencies and patterns of DNA aberrations are associated with genomic instability phenotypes and that the cell lines recapitulate the genomic profiles of primary carcinomas. Intrinsic expression subgroups are distinct from genomic subtypes, but consistent at the gene-, microRNA- and protein-level and dominated by two distinct clusters; colon-like cell lines characterized by expression of gastro-intestinal differentiation markers and undifferentiated cell lines showing upregulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and TGFβ signatures. This sample split was concordant with the gene expression-based consensus molecular subtypes of primary tumors. Approximately ¼ of the genes had consistent regulation at the DNA copy number and gene expression level, while expression of gene-protein pairs in general was strongly correlated. Consistent high-level DNA copy number amplification and outlier gene- and protein- expression was found for several oncogenes in individual cell lines, including MYC and ERBB2. Conclusions This study expands the view of CRC cell lines as accurate molecular models of primary carcinomas, and we present integrated multi-level molecular data of 34 widely used cell lines in easily accessible formats, providing a resource for preclinical studies in CRC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0691-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja C G Berg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter W Eide
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ina A Eilertsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjarne Johannessen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jarle Bruun
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine A Danielsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Merete Bjørnslett
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda
- Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Core Facilities and Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Eknæs
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ola Myklebost
- Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Core Facilities and Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rolf I Skotheim
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O.Box 4953 Nydalen, -0424, Oslo, NO, Norway. .,Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. .,Norwegian Cancer Genomic Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pharo HD, Andresen K, Jeanmougin M, Lind GE. Abstract 5387: Droplet digital PCR for sensitive quantification of DNA methylation in non-invasive material: Development of a robust control. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-5387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive method for quantification of nucleic acids, with great potential for detection of biomarkers present in low quantities. As for DNA methylation analyses using ddPCR, there is no consensus on whether or not a control should be included. The aim of the present study was to; 1) demonstrate that use of a control is essential in such analyses, and 2) develop a robust control with better performance than the existing alternatives.
Results and methods: A 4-gene control panel was developed in our lab, and its performance compared to the existing alternatives ACTB and C-LESS-C1. This was done through analyzing the methylation level of four target genes in DNA from 34 colon cancer cell lines. All ddPCRs were performed using the QX200™ PCR platform (BioRad). Details will be presented.
Conclusions: In summary, use of a control is essential for robust and consistent ddPCR based DNA methylation, and can prevent erroneous interpretation of technical artifacts.
Citation Format: Heidi D. Pharo, Kim Andresen, Marine Jeanmougin, Guro E. Lind. Droplet digital PCR for sensitive quantification of DNA methylation in non-invasive material: Development of a robust control [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5387. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5387
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research & Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vedeld HM, Merok M, Jeanmougin M, Danielsen SA, Honne H, Presthus GK, Svindland A, Sjo OH, Hektoen M, Eknaes M, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA, Lind GE. CpG island methylator phenotype identifies high risk patients among microsatellite stable BRAF mutated colorectal cancers. Int J Cancer 2017; 141:967-976. [PMID: 28542846 PMCID: PMC5518206 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer remains unsettled. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of this phenotype analyzing a total of 1126 tumor samples obtained from two Norwegian consecutive colorectal cancer series. CIMP status was determined by analyzing the 5‐markers CAGNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1 by quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP). The effect of CIMP on time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were determined by uni‐ and multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to MSI and BRAF mutation status, disease stage, and also age at time of diagnosis (<60, 60‐74, ≥75 years). Patients with CIMP positive tumors demonstrated significantly shorter TTR and worse OS compared to those with CIMP negative tumors (multivariate hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.86 [1.31‐2.63] and 1.89 [1.34‐2.65], respectively). In stratified analyses, CIMP tumors showed significantly worse outcome among patients with microsatellite stable (MSS, P < 0.001), and MSS BRAF mutated tumors (P < 0.001), a finding that persisted in patients with stage II, III or IV disease, and that remained significant in multivariate analysis (P < 0.01). Consistent results were found for all three age groups. To conclude, CIMP is significantly associated with inferior outcome for colorectal cancer patients, and can stratify the poor prognostic patients with MSS BRAF mutated tumors. What's new? As many as one‐fifth of colorectal cancers have a CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) involving widespread promoter DNA methylation. CIMP is associated with key factors related to disease outcome, including microsatellite instability and BRAF mutations. In this study, CIMP was found to be significantly associated with worse prognosis in colorectal cancer patients, particularly those with microsatellite stable (MSS) BRAF‐mutated tumors. In stratified analyses, trends toward worse survival were identified for CIMP‐positive stage III and stage IV patients in the MSS BRAF‐mutated group. The findings suggest that CIMP status should be included in prognostic analyses at time of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Merok
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Aker, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine A Danielsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gro Kummeneje Presthus
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aud Svindland
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole H Sjo
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Aker, Oslo, Norway
| | - Merete Hektoen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Eknaes
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Aker, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sveen A, Johannessen B, Tengs T, Danielsen SA, Eilertsen IA, Lind GE, Berg KCG, Leithe E, Meza-Zepeda LA, Domingo E, Myklebost O, Kerr D, Tomlinson I, Nesbakken A, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA. Multilevel genomics of colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability-clinical impact of JAK1 mutations and consensus molecular subtype 1. Genome Med 2017; 9:46. [PMID: 28539123 PMCID: PMC5442873 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-017-0434-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 15% of primary colorectal cancers have DNA mismatch repair deficiency, causing a complex genome with thousands of small mutations-the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype. We investigated molecular heterogeneity and tumor immunogenicity in relation to clinical endpoints within this distinct subtype of colorectal cancers. METHODS A total of 333 primary MSI+ colorectal tumors from multiple cohorts were analyzed by multilevel genomics and computational modeling-including mutation profiling, clonality modeling, and neoantigen prediction in a subset of the tumors, as well as gene expression profiling for consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and immune cell infiltration. RESULTS Novel, frequent frameshift mutations in four cancer-critical genes were identified by deep exome sequencing, including in CRTC1, BCL9, JAK1, and PTCH1. JAK1 loss-of-function mutations were validated with an overall frequency of 20% in Norwegian and British patients, and mutated tumors had up-regulation of transcriptional signatures associated with resistance to anti-PD-1 treatment. Clonality analyses revealed a high level of intra-tumor heterogeneity; however, this was not associated with disease progression. Among the MSI+ tumors, the total mutation load correlated with the number of predicted neoantigens (P = 4 × 10-5), but not with immune cell infiltration-this was dependent on the CMS class; MSI+ tumors in CMS1 were highly immunogenic compared to MSI+ tumors in CMS2-4. Both JAK1 mutations and CMS1 were favorable prognostic factors (hazard ratios 0.2 [0.05-0.9] and 0.4 [0.2-0.9], respectively, P = 0.03 and 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Multilevel genomic analyses of MSI+ colorectal cancer revealed molecular heterogeneity with clinical relevance, including tumor immunogenicity and a favorable patient outcome associated with JAK1 mutations and the transcriptomic subgroup CMS1, emphasizing the potential for prognostic stratification of this clinically important subtype. See related research highlight by Samstein and Chan 10.1186/s13073-017-0438-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Bjarne Johannessen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Torstein Tengs
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Stine A. Danielsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Ina A. Eilertsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Kaja C. G. Berg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Edward Leithe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Leonardo A. Meza-Zepeda
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Genomics Core Facility, Department of Core Facilities, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Enric Domingo
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN UK
| | - Ola Myklebost
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - David Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN UK
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Rolf I. Skotheim
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pharo HD, Honne H, Vedeld HM, Dahl C, Andresen K, Liestøl K, Jeanmougin M, Guldberg P, Lind GE. Experimental factors affecting the robustness of DNA methylation analysis. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33936. [PMID: 27671843 PMCID: PMC5037394 DOI: 10.1038/srep33936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Diverging methylation frequencies are often reported for the same locus in the same disease, underscoring the need for limiting technical variability in DNA methylation analyses. We have investigated seven likely sources of variability at different steps of bisulfite PCR-based DNA methylation analyses using a fully automated quantitative methylation-specific PCR setup of six gene promoters across 20 colon cancer cell lines. Based on >15,000 individual PCRs, all tested parameters affected the normalized percent of methylated reference (PMR) differences, with a fourfold varying magnitude. Additionally, large variations were observed across the six genes analyzed. The highest variation was seen using single-copy genes as reference for normalization, followed by different amounts of template in the PCR, different amounts of DNA in the bisulfite reaction, and storage of bisulfite converted samples. Finally, when a highly standardized pipeline was repeated, the difference in PMR value for the same assay in the same cell line was on average limited to five (on a 0–100 scale). In conclusion, a standardized pipeline is essential for consistent methylation results, where parameters are kept constant for all samples. Nevertheless, a certain level of variation in methylation values must be expected, underscoring the need for careful interpretation of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Pharo
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege M Vedeld
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christina Dahl
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kim Andresen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marine Jeanmougin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per Guldberg
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biosciences, The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, Marzioni M, Andersen JB, Invernizzi P, Lind GE, Folseraas T, Forbes SJ, Fouassier L, Geier A, Calvisi DF, Mertens JC, Trauner M, Benedetti A, Maroni L, Vaquero J, Macias RIR, Raggi C, Perugorria MJ, Gaudio E, Boberg KM, Marin JJG, Alvaro D. Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13:261-80. [PMID: 27095655 DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 829] [Impact Index Per Article: 103.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies with features of biliary tract differentiation. CCA is the second most common primary liver tumour and the incidence is increasing worldwide. CCA has high mortality owing to its aggressiveness, late diagnosis and refractory nature. In May 2015, the "European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma" (ENS-CCA: www.enscca.org or www.cholangiocarcinoma.eu) was created to promote and boost international research collaboration on the study of CCA at basic, translational and clinical level. In this Consensus Statement, we aim to provide valuable information on classifications, pathological features, risk factors, cells of origin, genetic and epigenetic modifications and current therapies available for this cancer. Moreover, future directions on basic and clinical investigations and plans for the ENS-CCA are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus M Banales
- Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute - Donostia University Hospital, Ikerbasque, CIBERehd, Paseo del Dr. Begiristain s/n, E-20014, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Vincenzo Cardinale
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 37, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Carpino
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Marzioni
- Department of Clinic and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Tronto 10, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jesper B Andersen
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Pietro Invernizzi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
- Program for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, International Center for Digestive Health, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trine Folseraas
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stuart J Forbes
- MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, EH16 4SB, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Fouassier
- INSERM UMR S938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75571, Paris cedex 12, Fondation ARC, 9 rue Guy Môquet 94803 Villejuif, France
| | - Andreas Geier
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstrasse 6, D-97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Diego F Calvisi
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Friedrich-Löffler-Strasse 23e, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Joachim C Mertens
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio Benedetti
- Department of Clinic and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Tronto 10, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Maroni
- Department of Clinic and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Tronto 10, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| | - Javier Vaquero
- INSERM UMR S938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75571, Paris cedex 12, Fondation ARC, 9 rue Guy Môquet 94803 Villejuif, France
| | - Rocio I R Macias
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Experimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, E.I.D. S-09, University of Salamanca, IBSAL, CIBERehd, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Chiara Raggi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria J Perugorria
- Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute - Donostia University Hospital, Ikerbasque, CIBERehd, Paseo del Dr. Begiristain s/n, E-20014, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Eugenio Gaudio
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Alfonso Borelli 50, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Kirsten M Boberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jose J G Marin
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Experimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, E.I.D. S-09, University of Salamanca, IBSAL, CIBERehd, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Domenico Alvaro
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 37, 00185, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cekaite L, Eide PW, Lind GE, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA. MicroRNAs as growth regulators, their function and biomarker status in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7:6476-505. [PMID: 26623728 PMCID: PMC4872728 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gene expression is in part regulated by microRNAs (miRNAs). This review summarizes the current knowledge of miRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC); their role as growth regulators, the mechanisms that regulate the miRNAs themselves and the potential of miRNAs as biomarkers. Although thousands of tissue samples and bodily fluids from CRC patients have been investigated for biomarker potential of miRNAs (>160 papers presented in a comprehensive tables), none single miRNA nor miRNA expression signatures are in clinical use for this disease. More than 500 miRNA-target pairs have been identified in CRC and we discuss how these regulatory nodes interconnect and affect signaling pathways in CRC progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Cekaite
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter W. Eide
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf I. Skotheim
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Andresen K, Boberg KM, Vedeld HM, Honne H, Jebsen P, Hektoen M, Wadsworth CA, Clausen OP, Lundin KE, Paulsen V, Foss A, Mathisen Ø, Aabakken L, Schrumpf E, Lothe RA, Lind GE. Four DNA methylation biomarkers in biliary brush samples accurately identify the presence of cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2015; 61:1651-9. [PMID: 25644509 PMCID: PMC4832263 DOI: 10.1002/hep.27707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Early detection of the highly aggressive malignancy cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains a challenge but has the potential to render the tumor curable by surgical removal. This study evaluates a biomarker panel for the diagnosis of CCA by DNA methylation analyses of biliary brush samples. The methylation status of 13 candidate genes (CDO1, CNRIP1, DCLK1, FBN1, INA, MAL, SEPT9, SFRP1, SNCA, SPG20, TMEFF2, VIM, and ZSCAN18) was investigated in 93 tissue samples (39 CCAs and 54 nonmalignant controls) using quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The 13 genes were further analyzed in a test series of biliary brush samples (15 CCAs and 20 nonmalignant primary sclerosing cholangitis controls), and the methylation status of the four best performing markers was validated (34 CCAs and 34 primary sclerosing cholangitis controls). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to evaluate the performance of individual biomarkers and the combination of biomarkers. The 13 candidate genes displayed a methylation frequency of 26%-82% in tissue samples. The four best-performing genes (CDO1, CNRIP1, SEPT9, and VIM) displayed individual methylation frequencies of 45%-77% in biliary brushes from CCA patients. Across the test and validation biliary brush series, this four-gene biomarker panel achieved a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 98%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.944. CONCLUSION We report a straightforward biomarker assay with high sensitivity and specificity for CCA, outperforming standard brush cytology, and suggest that the biomarker panel, potentially in combination with cytological evaluation, may improve CCA detection, particularly among primary sclerosing cholangitis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Andresen
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–The Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway,Norwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Cancer, Surgery and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Kirsten Muri Boberg
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Cancer, Surgery and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–The Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–The Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Peter Jebsen
- Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and InterventionOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Merete Hektoen
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–The Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Christopher A. Wadsworth
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Section, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ole Petter Clausen
- Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and InterventionOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Knut E.A. Lundin
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer, Surgery, and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Vemund Paulsen
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer, Surgery, and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Aksel Foss
- Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery, and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Øystein Mathisen
- Section for Hepatopancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Division of Cancer, Surgery, and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Lars Aabakken
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer, Surgery, and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Erik Schrumpf
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Cancer, Surgery and TransplantationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway,Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–The Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Department of Molecular OncologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital–The Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway,Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bruun J, Kolberg M, Ahlquist TC, Røyrvik EC, Nome T, Leithe E, Lind GE, Merok MA, Rognum TO, Bjørkøy G, Johansen T, Lindblom A, Sun XF, Svindland A, Liestøl K, Nesbakken A, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA. Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 2 Identifies High-Risk Patients within Both Major Phenotypes of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:3759-70. [PMID: 25910952 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer has high incidence and mortality worldwide. Patients with microsatellite instable (MSI) tumors have significantly better prognosis than patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Considerable variation in disease outcome remains a challenge within each subgroup, and our purpose was to identify biomarkers that improve prediction of colorectal cancer prognosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Mutation analyses of 42 MSI target genes were performed in two independent MSI tumor series (n = 209). Markers that were significantly associated with prognosis in the test series were assessed in the validation series, followed by functional and genetic explorations. The clinical potential was further investigated by immunohistochemistry in a population-based colorectal cancer series (n = 903). RESULTS We identified the cell-cycle gene regulator of chromosome condensation 2 (RCC2) as a cancer biomarker. We found a mutation in the 5' UTR region of RCC2 that in univariate and multivariate analyses was significantly associated with improved outcome in the MSI group. This mutation caused reduction of protein expression in dual luciferase gene reporter assays. siRNA knockdown in MSI colon cancer cells (HCT15) caused reduced cell proliferation, cell-cycle arrest, and increased apoptosis. Massive parallel sequencing revealed few RCC2 mutations in MSS tumors. However, weak RCC2 protein expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis, independent of clinical high-risk parameters, and stratifies clinically important patient subgroups with MSS tumors, including elderly patients (>75 years), stage II patients, and those with rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Impaired RCC2 affects functional and clinical endpoints of colorectal cancer. High-risk patients with either MSI or MSS tumors can be identified with cost-effective routine RCC2 assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarle Bruun
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Matthias Kolberg
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Terje C Ahlquist
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen C Røyrvik
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, ORCRB, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Torfinn Nome
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Edward Leithe
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne A Merok
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aker Hospital-Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torleiv O Rognum
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway. Division of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Pathology and Clinical Forensic Medicine, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Bjørkøy
- University College of Sør-Trøndelag, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Terje Johansen
- Molecular Cancer Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xiao-Feng Sun
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, County Council of Östergötland, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Aud Svindland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway. Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aker Hospital-Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf I Skotheim
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department for Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kolberg M, Høland M, Lind GE, Ågesen TH, Skotheim RI, Hall KS, Mandahl N, Smeland S, Mertens F, Davidson B, Lothe RA. Protein expression of BIRC5, TK1, and TOP2A in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours--A prognostic test after surgical resection. Mol Oncol 2015; 9:1129-39. [PMID: 25769404 PMCID: PMC5528761 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 01/22/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
No consensus treatment regime exists beyond surgery for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST), and the purpose of the present study was to find new approaches to stratify patients with good and poor prognosis and to better guide therapeutic intervention for this aggressive soft tissue cancer. From a total of 67 MPNSTs from Scandinavian patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1, 30 MPNSTs were investigated by genome‐wide RNA expression profiling and 63 MPNSTs by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, and selected genes were submitted to analyses of disease‐specific survival. The potential drug target genes survivin (BIRC5), thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), and topoisomerase 2‐alpha (TOP2A), all encoded on chromosome arm 17q, were up‐regulated in MPNST as compared to benign neurofibromas. Each of them was found to be independent prognostic markers on the gene expression level, as well as on the protein level. A prognostic profile was identified by combining the nuclear expression scores of the three proteins. For patients with completely resected tumours only 15% in the high risk group were alive after two years, as compared to 78% in the low risk group. In conclusion, we found a novel protein expression profile which identifies MPNST patients with inferior prognosis even after assumed curative surgery. The tested proteins are drug targets; therefore the expression profile may provide predictive information guiding the design of future clinical trials. Importantly, as the effect is seen on the protein level using IHC, the biomarker panel can be readily implemented in routine clinical testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Kolberg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maren Høland
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trude H Ågesen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf I Skotheim
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kirsten Sundby Hall
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nils Mandahl
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sigbjørn Smeland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fredrik Mertens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ben Davidson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kristensen AT, Solbakken A, Larsen SG, Giercksky KE, Hovig E, Lothe R, Lind GE, Guren MG, Flatmark K. Abstract 2850: Biomarkers for detection of exfoliated tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity in rectal cancer. Cancer Res 2014. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-2850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
During tumor growth, and possibly by manipulation during surgery, cells from rectal tumors may be shed into the peritoneal cavity. Such cells may contribute to development of metastatic disease, in the form of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Detection of cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity at the time of primary surgery might therefore be of value for prediction of disease recurrence with subsequent prognostic implications.
We previously investigated the incidence of exfoliated cancer cells in peritoneal lavage fluid after resection of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). DNA from cells obtained by peritoneal lavage was analyzed with respect to mutations in hotspots of the K-RAS gene. K-RAS mutations were present in 30% of the primary tumors, and were detected in 8% of the lavage fluids examined. The presence of cells with K-RAS mutations in lavage fluid was associated with poor survival, suggesting that a molecular approach for detection of exfoliated tumor cells may be feasible, but K-RAS, although highly specific for detection of tumor cells, is insufficient as the only biomarker. Furthermore, since lavage fluid was collected only at the end of the surgical procedure, the relevance of spontaneous versus iatrogenic tumor cell exfoliation could not be determined.
Based on these encouraging results, a prospective study was initiated, in which lavage is performed before and after surgical removal of the primary tumor to provide data regarding the cause of tumor cell exfoliation and their respective contributions to patient outcome. To increase detection sensitivity, a set of highly specific DNA methylation-based biomarkers is explored. In a pilot experiment, a panel of 12 biomarkers has been evaluated in primary tumors from 17 LARC patients using quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction. Methylation of six genes, CNRIP1, MAL, SPG20, FBN1, SNCA and CDO1 was present at high frequencies in this cohort (in 55-88 % of the samples analyzed), and this biomarker panel has been selected for further comparative analysis in lavage samples. The presence of K-RAS, B-RAF and PIK3CA mutations is analyzed using denaturant capillary electrophoresis of PCR-amplified genes. Results from these genetic analyses of the primary tumors and lavage samples of 50 LARC patients will be presented.
Citation Format: Annette T. Kristensen, Arne Solbakken, Stein G. Larsen, Karl-Erik Giercksky, Eivind Hovig, Ragnhild Lothe, Guro E. Lind, Marianne G. Guren, Kjersti Flatmark. Biomarkers for detection of exfoliated tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity in rectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2850. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2850
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette T. Kristensen
- 1Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Tumorbiology, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arne Solbakken
- 2Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein G. Larsen
- 2Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karl-Erik Giercksky
- 2Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- 1Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Tumorbiology, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Lothe
- 3Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Cancer Prevention, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- 3Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Cancer Prevention, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne G. Guren
- 4Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Department of Oncology, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- 1Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Tumorbiology, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bethge N, Honne H, Andresen K, Hilden V, Trøen G, Liestøl K, Holte H, Delabie J, Lind GE, Smeland EB. A gene panel, including LRP12, is frequently hypermethylated in major types of B-cell lymphoma. PLoS One 2014; 9:e104249. [PMID: 25226156 PMCID: PMC4165585 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications and DNA methylation in particular, have been recognized as important mechanisms to alter gene expression in malignant cells. Here, we identified candidate genes which were upregulated after an epigenetic treatment of B-cell lymphoma cell lines (Burkitt's lymphoma, BL; Follicular lymphoma, FL; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL activated B-cell like, ABC; and germinal center like, GCB) and simultaneously expressed at low levels in samples from lymphoma patients. Qualitative methylation analysis of 24 candidate genes in cell lines revealed five methylated genes (BMP7, BMPER, CDH1, DUSP4 and LRP12), which were further subjected to quantitative methylation analysis in clinical samples from 59 lymphoma patients (BL, FL, DLBCL ABC and GCB; and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, PMBL). The genes LRP12 and CDH1 showed the highest methylation frequencies (94% and 92%, respectively). BMPER (58%), DUSP4 (32%) and BMP7 (22%), were also frequently methylated in patient samples. Importantly, all gene promoters were unmethylated in various control samples (CD19+ peripheral blood B cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tonsils) as well as in follicular hyperplasia samples, underscoring a high specificity. The combination of LRP12 and CDH1 methylation could successfully discriminate between the vast majority of the lymphoma and control samples, emphasized by receiver operating characteristic analysis with a c-statistic of 0.999. These two genes represent promising epigenetic markers which may be suitable for monitoring of B-cell lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Bethge
- Department of Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kim Andresen
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vera Hilden
- Department of Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild Trøen
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Holte
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Delabie
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erlend B. Smeland
- Department of Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Almeida M, Costa VL, Costa NR, Ramalho-Carvalho J, Baptista T, Ribeiro FR, Paulo P, Teixeira MR, Oliveira J, Lothe RA, Lind GE, Henrique R, Jerónimo C. Epigenetic regulation of EFEMP1 in prostate cancer: biological relevance and clinical potential. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18:2287-97. [PMID: 25211630 PMCID: PMC4224561 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic alterations are common in prostate cancer (PCa) and seem to contribute decisively to its initiation and progression. Moreover, aberrant promoter methylation is a promising biomarker for non-invasive screening. Herein, we sought to characterize EFEMP1 as biomarker for PCa, unveiling its biological relevance in prostate carcinogenesis. Microarray analyses of treated PCa cell lines and primary tissues enabled the selection of differentially methylated genes, among which EFEMP1 was further validated by MSP and bisulfite sequencing. Assessment of biomarker performance was accomplished by qMSP. Expression analysis of EFEMP1 and characterization of histone marks were performed in tissue samples and cancer cell lines to determine the impact of epigenetic mechanisms on EFEMP1 transcriptional regulation. Phenotypic assays, using transfected cell lines, permitted the evaluation of EFEMP1’s role in PCa development. EFEMP1 methylation assay discriminated PCa from normal prostate tissue (NPT; P < 0.001, Kruskall–Wallis test) and renal and bladder cancers (96% sensitivity and 98% specificity). EFEMP1 transcription levels inversely correlated with promoter methylation and histone deacetylation, suggesting that both epigenetic mechanisms are involved in gene regulation. Phenotypic assays showed that EFEMP1 de novo expression reduces malignant phenotype of PCa cells. EFEMP1 promoter methylation is prevalent in PCa and accurately discriminates PCa from non-cancerous prostate tissues and other urological neoplasms. This epigenetic alteration occurs early in prostate carcinogenesis and, in association with histone deacetylation, progressively leads to gene down-regulation, fostering cell proliferation, invasion and evasion of apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mafalda Almeida
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of the Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Danielsen SA, Lind GE, Kolberg M, Høland M, Bjerkehagen B, Sundby Hall K, van den Berg E, Mertens F, Smeland S, Picci P, Lothe RA. Methylated RASSF1A in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors identifies neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with inferior prognosis. Neuro Oncol 2014; 17:63-9. [PMID: 25038505 PMCID: PMC4416132 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare and highly aggressive disease with no evidence of effect from adjuvant therapy. It is further associated with the hereditary syndrome neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Silencing of the tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A through DNA promoter hypermethylation is known to be involved in cancer development, but its impact in MPNSTs remains unsettled. Methods The RASSF1A promoter was analyzed by methylation-specific PCR in 113 specimens, including 44 NF1-associated MPNSTs, 47 sporadic MPNSTs, 21 benign neurofibromas, and 1 nonneoplastic nerve sheath control. Results RASSF1A methylation was found only in the malignant samples (60%) and identified a subgroup among patients with NF1-associated MPNST with a poor prognosis. These patients had a mean 5-year disease-specific survival of 27.3 months (95% CI: 17.2–37.4) versus 47.4 months (95% CI: 37.5–57.2) for NF1 patients with unmethylated promoters, P = 0.014. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, methylated RASSF1A remained an adverse prognostic factor independent of clinical risk factors, P = .013 (hazard ratio: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.4–19.4). Conclusion A considerable number of MPNST samples display hypermethylation of the RASSF1A gene promoter, and for these tumors, this is the first molecular marker that if validated can characterize a subgroup of patients with inferior prognosis, restricted to individuals with NF1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine A Danielsen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Matthias Kolberg
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Maren Høland
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Bodil Bjerkehagen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Kirsten Sundby Hall
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Eva van den Berg
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Fredrik Mertens
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Sigbjørn Smeland
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Piero Picci
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., M.K., M.H., R.A.L.); Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.H., S.S.); Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (S.A.D., G.E.L., R.A.L.); Department of Pathology (B.B), Division of Diagnostics and Intervention and Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (K.S.H., S.S.); Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands (E.v.d.B.); Department of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (F.M.); Laboratory of Oncologic Research of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (P.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vedeld HM, Andresen K, Eilertsen IA, Nesbakken A, Seruca R, Gladhaug IP, Thiis-Evensen E, Rognum TO, Boberg KM, Lind GE. The novel colorectal cancer biomarkers CDO1, ZSCAN18 and ZNF331 are frequently methylated across gastrointestinal cancers. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:844-53. [PMID: 24948044 PMCID: PMC4277335 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
We have previously shown that gastrointestinal cancers display similar epigenetic aberrations. In a recent study, we identified frequently methylated genes for cholangiocarcinoma (CDO1, DCLK1, SFRP1 and ZSCAN18), where one of these genes, DCLK1, was also confirmed to be highly methylated in colorectal cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine whether these four genes, in addition to one gene found to be methylated in colon cancer cell lines (ZNF331), are commonly methylated across gastrointestinal malignancies, as well as explore their role as potential biomarkers. Quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) of colorectal cancer (n = 164) and normal colorectal mucosa (n = 106) samples showed that all genes were frequently methylated in colorectal cancer (71–92%) with little or no methylation in normal mucosa (0–3%). Methylation of minimum two of these five genes identified 95% of the tumors with a specificity of 98%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.98. For gastric (n = 25) and pancreatic (n = 20) cancer, the same panel detected 92% and 90% of the tumors, respectively. Seventy-four cancer cell lines were further analyzed by qMSP and real time RT-PCR. In addition to the previously reported DCLK1, a high negative correlation between promoter DNA methylation and gene expression was observed for CDO1, ZNF331 and ZSCAN18. In conclusion, the high methylation frequency of these genes in colorectal- as well as in gastric-, pancreatic- and bile duct cancer confirmed an epigenetic similarity between gastrointestinal cancer types, and simultaneously demonstrated their potential as biomarkers, particularly for colorectal cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital- Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sirnes S, Lind GE, Bruun J, Fykerud TA, Mesnil M, Lothe RA, Rivedal E, Kolberg M, Leithe E. Connexins in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Int J Cancer 2014; 137:1-11. [PMID: 24752574 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The connexins constitute a family of integral membrane proteins that form channels between adjacent cells. These channels are assembled in plasma membrane domains known as gap junctions and enable cells to directly exchange ions and small molecules. Intercellular communication via gap junctions plays important roles in regulating cell growth and differentiation and in maintaining tissue homeostasis. This type of cell communication is often impaired during cancer development, and several members of the connexin protein family have been shown to act as tumor suppressors. Emerging evidence suggests that the connexin protein family has important roles in colorectal cancer development. In the normal colonic epithelial tissue, three connexin isoforms, connexin 26 (Cx26), Cx32 and Cx43, have been shown to be expressed at the protein level. Colorectal cancer development is associated with loss of connexin expression or relocalization of connexins from the plasma membrane to intracellular compartments. Downregulation of connexins in colorectal carcinomas at the transcriptional level involves cancer-specific promoter hypermethylation. Recent studies suggest that Cx43 may constrain growth of colon cancer cells by interfering with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. There is also increasing evidence that the connexins may have potential as prognostic markers in colorectal cancer. This review discusses the role of connexins in colorectal cancer pathogenesis, as well as their potential as prognostic markers and targets in the prevention and treatment of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig Sirnes
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vedeld HM, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA, Lind GE. The recently suggested intestinal cancer stem cell marker DCLK1 is an epigenetic biomarker for colorectal cancer. Epigenetics 2014; 9:346-50. [PMID: 24384857 PMCID: PMC4053453 DOI: 10.4161/epi.27582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, Dclk1 expression was identified to be an intestinal cancer stem cell specific biomarker in mouse models, implicating a potential role for targeting the DCLK1-postive cancer cells as a treatment for colorectal cancer. Using quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) we here demonstrated that the DCLK1 promoter is hypermethylated in the vast majority of colorectal cancers (134/164; 82%), with no methylation in the normal mucosa samples (0/106). We further showed by Affymetrix exon arrays that DCLK1 is significantly downregulated in human colorectal cancer (n = 125) compared with normal colonic mucosa (n = 15), which was further confirmed by real-time RT-PCR of a subgroup of the samples. Additionally, a significant negative correlation was observed between methylation and DCLK1 expression in 74 cancer cell lines derived from 15 different tissues, and gene expression increased significantly after epigenetic drug treatment of initially methylated cancer cell lines. These findings underscore the potential of DCLK1 as a colorectal cancer biomarker for early detection, but may also have clinical implications regarding the previously proposed therapy toward DCLK1-positive cancer cells. This therapy would at best affect the cancer stem cell population, but will, based on the present results, not be efficient to treat the bulk of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Marie Vedeld
- Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf I Skotheim
- Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital-Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bethge N, Lothe RA, Honne H, Andresen K, Trøen G, Eknæs M, Liestøl K, Holte H, Delabie J, Smeland EB, Lind GE. Colorectal cancer DNA methylation marker panel validated with high performance in Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Epigenetics 2013; 9:428-36. [PMID: 24362313 PMCID: PMC4053461 DOI: 10.4161/epi.27554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Genes with altered DNA methylation can be used as biomarkers for cancer detection and assessment of prognosis. Here we analyzed the methylation status of a colorectal cancer biomarker panel (CNRIP1, FBN1, INA, MAL, SNCA, and SPG20) in 97 cancer cell lines, derived from 17 different cancer types. Interestingly, the genes were frequently methylated also in hematological cancer types and were therefore subjected to analyses in primary tumor samples from the major types of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and in healthy controls. In total, the genes CNRIP1, FBN1, INA, MAL, SNCA, and SPG20 were methylated in 53%, 23%, 52%, 69%, 97%, and 92% of the tumor samples, respectively, and were unmethylated in all healthy controls. With the exception of a single tumor sample, a correct prediction of lymphoma or normal sample was made in a blinded analysis of the validation series using a combination of SNCA and SPG20. The combined ROC-curve analysis of these genes resulted in an area under the curve of 0.999 (P = 4.2 × 10−18), and a sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 100%, respectively, across the test and validation series. Interestingly, the promoter methylation of CNRIP1 was associated with decreased overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (P = 0.03).
In conclusion, our results demonstrate that SNCA and SPG20 methylation might be suitable for early detection and monitoring of NHL. Furthermore, CNRIP1 could potentially be used as a prognostic factor in DLBCL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Bethge
- Department of Immunology; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Kim Andresen
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild Trøen
- Department of Pathology; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Eknæs
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Holte
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology; The Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Delabie
- Department of Pathology; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| | - Erlend B Smeland
- Department of Immunology; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine; University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Håvik AB, Lind GE, Honne H, Meling TR, Scheie D, Hall KS, van den Berg E, Mertens F, Picci P, Lothe RA, Heim S, Brandal P. Sequencing IDH1/2 glioma mutation hotspots in gliomas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neuro Oncol 2013; 16:320-2. [PMID: 24311631 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Annette B Håvik
- Corresponding author: Petter Brandal, MD, PhD, Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Medical Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bethge N, Honne H, Hilden V, Trøen G, Eknæs M, Liestøl K, Holte H, Delabie J, Smeland EB, Lind GE. Identification of highly methylated genes across various types of B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma. PLoS One 2013; 8:e79602. [PMID: 24260260 PMCID: PMC3834187 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 09/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic alterations of gene expression are important in the development of cancer. In this study, we identified genes which are epigenetically altered in major lymphoma types. We used DNA microarray technology to assess changes in gene expression after treatment of 11 lymphoma cell lines with epigenetic drugs. We identified 233 genes with upregulated expression in treated cell lines and with downregulated expression in B-cell lymphoma patient samples (n = 480) when compared to normal B cells (n = 5). The top 30 genes were further analyzed by methylation specific PCR (MSP) in 18 lymphoma cell lines. Seven of the genes were methylated in more than 70% of the cell lines and were further subjected to quantitative MSP in 37 B-cell lymphoma patient samples (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (activated B-cell like and germinal center B-cell like subtypes), follicular lymphoma and Burkitt`s lymphoma) and normal B lymphocytes from 10 healthy donors. The promoters of DSP, FZD8, KCNH2, and PPP1R14A were methylated in 28%, 67%, 22%, and 78% of the 36 tumor samples, respectively, but not in control samples. Validation using a second series of healthy donor controls (n = 42; normal B cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, bone marrow, tonsils and follicular hyperplasia) and fresh-frozen lymphoma biopsies (n = 25), confirmed the results. The DNA methylation biomarker panel consisting of DSP, FZD8, KCNH2, and PPP1R14A was positive in 89% (54/61) of all lymphomas. Receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine the discriminative power between lymphoma and healthy control samples showed a c-statistic of 0.96, indicating a possible role for the biomarker panel in monitoring of lymphoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Bethge
- Department of Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Honne
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vera Hilden
- Department of Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild Trøen
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Eknæs
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Holte
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Delabie
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erlend B. Smeland
- Department of Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brackmann S, Pretorius M, Klepp P, Clausen OPF, Andersen SN, Vatn MH, Lothe R, Lind GE, Danielsen HE. The distribution of chromosomal and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers related to inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.3607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3607 Background: Surveillance for colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has so far not been effective. Mucosal or fecal biomarkers may be useful in the selection of high risk patients. The yield may depend on the underlying carcinogenic pathway. In IBD associated CRC (IBD-CRC) the distribution of chromosomal instability (CIN) and microsatellite instability (MSI) is not well documented. Our objective was to determine the distribution of CIN and MSI and the association to clinico-histological factors in a cohort of patients with IBD-CRC. Methods: Ploidy was measured by high-resolution image cytometry and MSI by using two markers (BAT 25 and BAT26) in 62 patients with 72 CRC-IBD selected by matching the Norwegian Cancer Registry with IBD cohorts of three university hospitals in Oslo. The association between ploidy/MSI status and clinicohistological factors were analyzed by non-parametric tests. Results: Ploidy status was analyzed in 67 (93%), microsatellite stability in 68 (94%) tumors. Fourty-nine (73.1%) were non-diploid (43 aneuploid, 1 polyploid, 5 tetraploid), 13 (19.4 %) diploid, five (7.5%) indeterminate. Forty-three (63.2%) were microsatellite stable (MSS), four (5.8%) microsatellite instable (MSI). One tumor was MSI in BAT25 but MSS in BAT26. Twenty (29.5%) tumors showed no PCR-product in at least one of the markers. In 46 tumors, both ploidy and MSI status were available. All non-diploid tumours (36, 78.3%) were MSS and all MSI tumors (4, 8.7%) were diploid. Six (13%) tumors were diploid and MSS. Four patients were treated with 5-ASA prior to diagnosis of CRC. Three developed diploid, one aneuploid cancers. Of the untreated patients, 31 developed aneuploid, 7 diploid cancers (p=0.036). We did not find an association between age, gender, type of IBD, duration of IBD, localisation of CRC,TNM-stage and CIN or MSI. Conclusions: The majority of CRC-IBD in our cohort seem to present CIN and only a minority MSI. Some CRC-IBD patients present neither CIN nor MSI. Future studies should determine whether these display the CpG island methylator phenotype. Biomarkers for CRC-IBD should be derived from all three pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Pretorius
- Institute for Medical Informatics, The Norwegian Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ole Petter Fraas Clausen
- Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Morten H Vatn
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Ahus Campus, Nordbyhagen, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Lothe
- Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radiumhospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention; Institute for Cancer Research; Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radiumhospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Haavard E Danielsen
- Institute for Medical Informatics,The Norwegian Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mesquita B, Lopes P, Rodrigues A, Pereira D, Afonso M, Leal C, Henrique R, Lind GE, Jerónimo C, Lothe RA, Teixeira MR. Frequent copy number gains at 1q21 and 1q32 are associated with overexpression of the ETS transcription factors ETV3 and ELF3 in breast cancer irrespective of molecular subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138:37-45. [PMID: 23329352 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2408-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2012] [Accepted: 01/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Several ETS transcription factors are involved in the pathogenesis of human cancers by different mechanisms. As gene copy number gain/amplification is an alternative mechanism of oncogenic activation and 1q gain is the most common copy number change in breast carcinoma, we investigated how that genomic change impacts in the expression of the three 1q ETS family members ETV3, ELK4, and ELF3. We have first evaluated 141 breast carcinomas for genome-wide copy number changes by chromosomal CGH and showed that 1q21 and 1q32 were the two chromosome bands with most frequent genomic copy number gains. Second, we confirmed by FISH with locus-specific BAC clones that cases showing 1q gain/amplification by CGH showed copy number increase of the ETS genes ETV3 (located in 1q21~23), ELF3, and ELK4 (both in 1q32). Third, gene expression levels of the three 1q ETS genes, as well as their potential targets MYC and CRISP3, were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR. We here show for the first time that the most common genomic copy number gains in breast cancer, 1q21 and 1q32, are associated with overexpression of the ETS transcription factors ETV3 and ELF3 (but not ELK4) at these loci irrespective of molecular subtypes. Among the three 1q ETS genes, ELF3 has a relevant role in breast carcinogenesis and is also the most likely target of the 1q copy number increase. The basal-like molecular subtype presented the worst prognosis regarding disease-specific survival, but no additional prognostic value was found for 1q copy number status or ELF3 expression. In addition, we show that there is a correlation between the expression of the oncogene MYC, irrespectively of copy number gain at its loci in 8q24, and the expression of both the transcriptional repressor ETV3 and the androgen respondent ELK4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Mesquita
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ahmed D, Danielsen SA, Aagesen TH, Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G, Rognum TO, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA, Lind GE. A tissue-based comparative effectiveness analysis of biomarkers for early detection of colorectal tumors. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2012; 3:e27. [PMID: 23324654 PMCID: PMC3535074 DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2012.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We recently identified a six-gene methylation-based biomarker panel suitable for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we compared the performance of this novel epi-panel with that of previously identified DNA methylation markers in the same clinical tissue sample sets. METHODS: Quantitative methylation-specific PCR was used to analyze the promoter region of SEPT9 and VIM in a total of 485 tissue samples, divided into test and validation sets. ITGA4, NTRK2, OSMR, and TUBG2 were also included in the analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the performances of the individual biomarkers with that of the novel epi-panel. RESULTS: SEPT9 and VIM were methylated in 82 and 67% of CRCs (n=169) and in 88 and 54% of the adenomas (n=104). Only 3% of the normal mucosa samples (n=107) were methylated for these genes, confirming that the methylation was highly cancer-specific. Areas under the ROC curve (AUC), distinguishing CRCs from normal mucosa, were 0.94 for SEPT9 and 0.81 for VIM. AUC values for separating adenomas from normal mucosa samples were 0.96 and 0.81 for the same genes. In comparison, the novel epi-panel achieved an AUC of 0.98 (CRC) and 0.97 (adenomas). ITGA4, OSMR, NTRK2, and TUBG2 were methylated in 90, 78, 7, and 1% of the CRCs, and in 76, 77, 3, and 0% of the adenomas. Between 0 and 2% of the normal mucosa samples were methylated for the same genes. ITGA4 and OSMR achieved an AUC of 0.96 and 0.92 (CRC vs. normal mucosa), and 0.93 and 0.92 (adenomas vs. normal mucosa). CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed the high performance of some of the previously identified DNA methylation markers. Furthermore, we showed that a recently reported epi-panel performed better than the individual DNA methylation biomarkers when analyzed in the same tissue samples. This observation was also true for VIM and SEPT9, which are included in commercially available noninvasive tests for CRC. These results further underscore the value of combining a manageable number of individual markers into a panel, which in addition to having a higher sensitivity and specificity might provide a more profound robustness to a noninvasive test compared with single markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeqa Ahmed
- 1] Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway [2] Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Several clinical factors have an impact on prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), but as yet they are inadequate for risk assessment. The present study aimed to develop a gene expression classifier for improved risk stratification of patients with stage II CRC. METHODS 315 CRC samples were included in the study. Gene expression measurements from 207 CRC samples (stage I-IV) from two independent Norwegian clinical series were obtained using Affymetrix exon-level microarrays. Differentially expressed genes between stage I and stage IV samples from the test series were identified and used as input for L1 (lasso) penalised Cox proportional hazards analyses of patients with stage II CRC from the same series. A second validation was performed in 108 stage II CRC samples from other populations (USA and Australia). RESULTS An optimal 13-gene expression classifier (PIGR, CXCL13, MMP3, TUBA1B, SESN1, AZGP1, KLK6, EPHA7, SEMA3A, DSC3, CXCL10, ENPP3, BNIP3) for prediction of relapse among patients with stage II CRC was developed using a consecutive Norwegian test series from patients treated according to current standard protocols (n=44, p<0.001, HR=18.2), and its predictive value was successfully validated for patients with stage II CRC in a second Norwegian CRC series collected two decades previously (n=52, p=0.02, HR=3.6). Further validation of the classifier was obtained in a recent external dataset of patients with stage II CRC from other populations (n=108, p=0.001, HR=6.5). Multivariate Cox regression analyses, including all three sample series and various clinicopathological variables, confirmed the independent prognostic value of the classifier (p≤0.004). The classifier was shown to be specific to stage II CRC and does not provide prognostic stratification of patients with stage III CRC. CONCLUSION This study presents the development and validation of a 13-gene expression classifier, ColoGuideEx, for prognosis prediction specific to patients with stage II CRC. The robustness was shown across patient series, populations and different microarray versions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trude H Agesen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Andresen K, Boberg KM, Vedeld HM, Honne H, Hektoen M, Wadsworth CA, Clausen OP, Karlsen TH, Foss A, Mathisen O, Schrumpf E, Lothe RA, Lind GE. Novel target genes and a valid biomarker panel identified for cholangiocarcinoma. Epigenetics 2012; 7:1249-57. [PMID: 22983262 PMCID: PMC3499326 DOI: 10.4161/epi.22191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is notoriously difficult to diagnose, and the mortality rate is high due to late clinical presentation. CpG island promoter methylation is frequently seen in cancer development. In the present study, we aimed at identifying novel epigenetic biomarkers with the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of cholangiocarcinoma. Microarray data analyses of cholangiocarcinoma cell lines treated with epigenetic drugs and their untreated counterparts were compared with previously published gene expression profiles of primary tumors and with non-malignant controls. Genes responding to the epigenetic treatment that were simultaneously downregulated in primary cholangiocarcinoma compared with controls (n = 43) were investigated for their promoter methylation status in cancer cell lines from the gastrointestinal tract. Genes commonly methylated in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines were subjected to quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in a total of 93 clinical samples (cholangiocarcinomas and non-malignant controls). CDO1, DCLK1, SFRP1 and ZSCAN18, displayed high methylation frequencies in primary tumors and were unmethylated in controls. At least one of these four biomarkers was positive in 87% of the tumor samples, with a specificity of 100%. In conclusion, the novel methylation-based biomarker panel showed high sensitivity and specificity for cholangiocarcinoma. The potential of these markers in early diagnosis of this cancer type should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Andresen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radiumhospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Abstract
Abstract
Epigenetic and genetic alterations of microRNAs (miRNAs) are frequently seen in cancer, and are responsible for the deregulation of differentiation and proliferation programs. The levels of transcription of miRNAs have been directly linked to epigenetic silencing, i.e. hypermethylation of CpG islands in tumors. Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor and shows complex genomic aberrations. Using Illumina's Infinium technology we have profiled global promoter methylation of the EuroBoNeT osteosarcoma cell line panel (eurobonet.eu), in addition to a small panel of normal samples (osteoblast primary cultures and normal bone). A list of miRNAs that could be associated to a promoter CpG island was generated by identifying miRNAs that are encoded within transcripts of protein-coding host genes, or within 10 kb from a CpG island. Using an integrative approach, we have analyzed miRNA expression patterns together with DNA methylation data. Interestingly, hypermethylation of the upstream promoter seems to strongly suppress miRNA expression, and a high inverse correlation was observed between the degree of DNA methylation and expression of 17 miRNAs. The identified miRNAs were associated with hypermethylation in a high proportion of the osteosarcoma cell lines and hypomethylation in normal samples, suggesting that their transcription is regulated by promoter methylation, and that their silencing may play a role in osteosarcoma biology. To study this further, a subset of the cell lines was treated with a DNA demethylation agent. The relative expression levels of 8 miRNAs were found to increase upon treatment, as determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Thus, the transcription of these miRNAs seems to be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. The methylation status of CpG islands associated with the most interesting miRNAs was then analyzed in more detail using methylation-specific PCR and direct bisulphite sequencing. We are currently expanding these investigations to a large tumor set where we will use quantitative methylation-specific PCR as a tool to determine the methylation status. Based on our findings, methylation of CpG islands seems to play a crucial role in controlling miRNA expression in osteosarcomas. This reveals new possibilities for activation of tumor-suppressing miRNAs by epigenetic treatment of osteosarcomas.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 197. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-197
Collapse
|
38
|
Sveen A, Bakken AC, Ågesen TH, Lind GE, Nesbakken A, Nordgård O, Brackmann S, Rognum TO, Lothe RA, Skotheim RI. The exon-level biomarker SLC39A14 has organ-confined cancer-specificity in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2012; 131:1479-85. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2011] [Accepted: 11/25/2011] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
39
|
Boberg KM, Lind GE. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and malignancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 25:753-64. [PMID: 22117640 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2011] [Revised: 09/26/2011] [Accepted: 10/25/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma complicates primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) in approximately 10% of cases, but no risk factor that can identify this subgroup of patients is known. No imaging modalities or serum tumour markers that can diagnose early cholangiocarcinoma are available, but endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with brush cytology is recommended when clinically indicated. Liver transplantation with neoadjuvant therapy is carried out in specialist centres in cases of limited stage cancer. Transplantation should also be considered in patients with biliary dysplasia without evident tumour. Gallbladder polyps in PSC are often malignant, and liberal indication for cholecystectomy is recommended. Hepatocellular carcinoma develops in 2%-4% of patients with end-stage liver disease. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at risk of colorectal neoplasia. Surveillance colonoscopies are recommended, also after liver transplantation. Epigenetic markers represent one among several classes of potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of malignancies in PSC that should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Muri Boberg
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Clinic for Specialized Medicine and Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, P.O. Box 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Paulo P, Barros-Silva JD, Ribeiro FR, Ramalho-Carvalho J, Jerónimo C, Henrique R, Lind GE, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA, Teixeira MR. FLI1 is a novel ETS transcription factor involved in gene fusions in prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011; 51:240-9. [PMID: 22081504 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/10/2011] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
To characterize the pattern of ETS rearrangements and to uncover novel ETS fusion genes, we analyzed 200 prostate carcinomas (PCa) with TaqMan low-density arrays (TLDAs), followed by selective analyses with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, and sequencing. Besides confirming the recurrent presence of ERG, ETV1, ETV4, and ETV5 rearrangements, we here report FLI1 as the fifth ETS transcription factor involved in fusion genes in prostate cancer. Outlier expression of the FLI1 gene was detected by TLDAs in one PCa that showed relative overexpression of FLI1 exons 4:5 as compared with FLI1 exons 2:3. A structural rearrangement was found using FISH probes flanking the FLI1 gene and RT-PCR and sequencing analyses showed fusion of SLC45A3 exon 1 with FLI1 exon 3. Interestingly, we found four cases with two different ETS rearrangements in the index tumor, thus revealing intratumor genetic heterogeneity. Correlation analysis with clinico-pathological data showed association of ERG rearrangements with locally advanced disease (pT3, P = 0.007) and MYC overexpression (P = 0.001), and association of ETV1 rearrangements with PTEN downregulation (P = 0.015). We report that FLI1 is a novel ETS transcription factor involved in gene fusions in prostate cancer and that intratumor genetic heterogeneity of ETS rearrangements can occasionally be found in index primary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Paulo
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sirnes S, Bruun J, Kolberg M, Kjenseth A, Lind GE, Svindland A, Brech A, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA, Leithe E, Rivedal E. Connexin43 acts as a colorectal cancer tumor suppressor and predicts disease outcome. Int J Cancer 2011; 131:570-81. [PMID: 21866551 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2011] [Accepted: 07/12/2011] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
This article is the first to show that loss of connexin43 (Cx43) expression in colorectal tumors is correlated with significantly shorter relapse-free and overall survival. Cx43 was further found to negatively regulate growth of colon cancer cells, in part by enhancing apoptosis. In addition, Cx43 was found to colocalize with β-catenin and reduce Wnt signaling. The study represents the first evidence that Cx43 acts as a colorectal cancer tumor suppressor and that loss of Cx43 expression during colorectal cancer development is associated with reduced patient survival. The study has important implications for the assessment of Cx43 as a prognostic marker and target in colorectal cancer prevention and therapy. Gap junctions consist of intercellular channels that permit direct transfer of ions and small molecules between adjacent cells. The gap junction channel protein Cx43 plays important roles in cell growth control and differentiation and is frequently dysregulated in human cancers. However, the functional importance and clinical relevance of Cx43 in cancer development has remained elusive. Here, we show that Cx43 is downregulated or aberrantly localized in colon cancer cell lines and colorectal carcinomas, which is associated with loss of gap junction intercellular communication. The in situ protein expression of Cx43 was analyzed in colorectal tumors in a cohort of 674 patients and related to established clinicopathological variables and survival. A subgroup of the patients had weak or no expression of Cx43 in tumors. Loss of Cx43 expression was significantly correlated with shorter relapse-free and overall survival. Loss of Cx43 further identified a high-risk subgroup among stage I and stage II patients with reduced relapse-free and overall survival. Ectopic expression of Cx43 in the colon cancer cell line HT29 was associated with reduced growth in monolayer and soft agar cultures and in tumor xenografts. Cx43 was found to colocalize with β-catenin and negatively regulate the Wnt signaling pathway, and expression of Cx43 was associated with increased levels of apoptosis. Altogether, these data indicate that Cx43 is a colorectal cancer tumor suppressor protein that predicts clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig Sirnes
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
We have previously shown that the gap junction protein γ 1 (GJC1) gene, encoding the connexin-45 protein, is inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. This was confirmed in a recent Endocrine-Related Cancer publication analyzing a limited number of samples. The aim of this study was to analyze GJC1 in a larger clinical cohort (n=485) and to assess whether or not the promoter hypermethylation was associated with clinical or pathological features. The methylation of GJC1 was confirmed to be tumor specific and was observed in 33% of colorectal cancers and 12% of adenomas. The methylation was strongly associated with BRAF mutations (P=5.64×10(-13)) as well as with proximal tumor location (P=1.42×10(-3)), features compatible with a CpG island methylator phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeqa Ahmed
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Costa VL, Henrique R, Danielsen SA, Eknaes M, Patrício P, Morais A, Oliveira J, Lothe RA, Teixeira MR, Lind GE, Jerónimo C. TCF21 and PCDH17 methylation: An innovative panel of biomarkers for a simultaneous detection of urological cancers. Epigenetics 2011; 6:1120-30. [PMID: 21847011 DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.9.16376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The three main types of urological cancers are mostly curable by surgical resection, if early detected. We aimed to identify novel DNA methylation biomarkers common to these three urological cancers, potentially suitable for non-invasive testing. From a candidate list of markers created after gene expression assessment of pharmacologically treated cell lines and tissue samples, two genes were selected for further validation. Methylation levels of these genes were quantified in a total of 12 cancer cell lines and 318 clinical samples. PCDH17 and TCF21 methylation levels provided a sensitivity rate of 92% for bladder cancer, 67% for renal cell tumors and 96% for prostate cancer. Methylation levels were significantly different from those of cancer free individuals (n = 37) for all tumor types (p < 0.001), providing 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for cancer detection. Although in urine samples the sensitivity was 60%, 32% and 26% for bladder, renal, and prostate tumors, respectively (39% overall), absolute specificity was retained. We identified novel and highly specific methylation markers common to the three main urological cancers. However, additional efforts are required to increase the assay's sensitivity, enabling the simultaneous non-invasive screening of urological tumors in a single voided urine analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera L Costa
- Cancer Epigenetics Group, Research Center of the Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Danielsen SA, Cekaite L, Ågesen TH, Sveen A, Nesbakken A, Thiis-Evensen E, Skotheim RI, Lind GE, Lothe RA. Phospholipase C isozymes are deregulated in colorectal cancer--insights gained from gene set enrichment analysis of the transcriptome. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24419. [PMID: 21909432 PMCID: PMC3164721 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2011] [Accepted: 08/10/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer types in developed countries. To identify molecular networks and biological processes that are deregulated in CRC compared to normal colonic mucosa, we applied Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to two independent transcriptome datasets, including a total of 137 CRC and ten normal colonic mucosa samples. Eighty-two gene sets as described by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database had significantly altered gene expression in both datasets. These included networks associated with cell division, DNA maintenance, and metabolism. Among signaling pathways with known changes in key genes, the “Phosphatidylinositol signaling network”, comprising part of the PI3K pathway, was found deregulated. The downregulated genes in this pathway included several members of the Phospholipase C protein family, and the reduced expression of two of these, PLCD1 and PLCE1, were successfully validated in CRC biopsies (n = 70) and cell lines (n = 19) by quantitative analyses. The repression of both genes was found associated with KRAS mutations (P = 0.005 and 0.006, respectively), and we observed that microsatellite stable carcinomas with reduced PLCD1 expression more frequently had TP53 mutations (P = 0.002). Promoter methylation analyses of PLCD1 and PLCE1 performed in cell lines and tumor biopsies revealed that methylation of PLCD1 can contribute to reduced expression in 40% of the microsatellite instable carcinomas. In conclusion, we have identified significantly deregulated pathways in CRC, and validated repression of PLCD1 and PLCE1 expression. This illustrates that the GSEA approach may guide discovery of novel biomarkers in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine A. Danielsen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lina Cekaite
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trude H. Ågesen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen Thiis-Evensen
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Gastroenterology, and Nephrology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf I. Skotheim
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ribeiro FR, Paulo P, Costa VL, Barros-Silva JD, Ramalho-Carvalho J, Jerónimo C, Henrique R, Lind GE, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA, Teixeira MR. Cysteine-rich secretory protein-3 (CRISP3) is strongly up-regulated in prostate carcinomas with the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene. PLoS One 2011; 6:e22317. [PMID: 21814574 PMCID: PMC3141037 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2011] [Accepted: 06/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
A large percentage of prostate cancers harbor TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions, leading to aberrant overexpression of the transcription factor ERG. The target genes deregulated by this rearrangement, however, remain mostly unknown. To address this subject we performed genome-wide mRNA expression analysis on 6 non-malignant prostate samples and 24 prostate carcinomas with (n = 16) and without (n = 8) TMPRSS2-ERG fusion as determined by FISH. The top-most differentially expressed genes and their associations with ERG over-expression were technically validated by quantitative real-time PCR and biologically validated in an independent series of 200 prostate carcinomas. Several genes encoding metabolic enzymes or extracellular/transmembrane proteins involved in cell adhesion, matrix remodeling and signal transduction pathways were found to be co-expressed with ERG. Within those significantly over-expressed in fusion-positive carcinomas, CRISP3 showed more than a 50-fold increase when compared to fusion-negative carcinomas, whose expression levels were in turn similar to that of non-malignant samples. In the independent validation series, ERG and CRISP3 mRNA levels were strongly correlated (rs = 0.65, p<0.001) and both were associated with pT3 disease staging. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry results showed CRISP3 protein overexpression in 63% of the carcinomas and chromatin immunoprecipitation with an anti-ERG antibody showed that CRISP3 is a direct target of the transcription factor ERG. We conclude that ERG rearrangement is associated with significant expression alterations in genes involved in critical cellular pathways that define a subset of locally advanced PCa. In particular, we show that CRISP3 is a direct target of ERG that is strongly overexpressed in PCa with the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franclim R. Ribeiro
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Paulo
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vera L. Costa
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Epigenetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - João D. Barros-Silva
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Ramalho-Carvalho
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Epigenetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carmen Jerónimo
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Epigenetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Henrique
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Epigenetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Guro E. Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf I. Skotheim
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Manuel R. Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of the Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lind GE, Danielsen SA, Ahlquist T, Merok MA, Andresen K, Skotheim RI, Hektoen M, Rognum TO, Meling GI, Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA. Identification of an epigenetic biomarker panel with high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer and adenomas. Mol Cancer 2011; 10:85. [PMID: 21777459 PMCID: PMC3166273 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2011] [Accepted: 07/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of cancer-specific DNA methylation patterns in epithelial colorectal cells in human feces provides the prospect of a simple, non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer and its precursor, the adenoma. This study investigates a panel of epigenetic markers for the detection of colorectal cancer and adenomas. Methods Candidate biomarkers were subjected to quantitative methylation analysis in test sets of tissue samples from colorectal cancers, adenomas, and normal colonic mucosa. All findings were verified in independent clinical validation series. A total of 523 human samples were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the biomarker panel. Results Promoter hypermethylation of the genes CNRIP1, FBN1, INA, MAL, SNCA, and SPG20 was frequent in both colorectal cancers (65-94%) and adenomas (35-91%), whereas normal mucosa samples were rarely (0-5%) methylated. The combined sensitivity of at least two positives among the six markers was 94% for colorectal cancers and 93% for adenoma samples, with a specificity of 98%. The resulting areas under the ROC curve were 0.984 for cancers and 0.968 for adenomas versus normal mucosa. Conclusions The novel epigenetic marker panel shows very high sensitivity and specificity for both colorectal cancers and adenomas. Our findings suggest this biomarker panel to be highly suitable for early tumor detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guro E Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sirnes S, Honne H, Ahmed D, Danielsen SA, Rognum TO, Meling GI, Leithe E, Rivedal E, Lothe RA, Lind GE. DNA methylation analyses of the connexin gene family reveal silencing of GJC1 (Connexin45) by promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Epigenetics 2011; 6:602-9. [PMID: 21406965 DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.5.15237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Gap junctions are specialized plasma membrane domains consisting of channels formed by members of the connexin protein family. Gap junctional intercellular communication is often lost in cancers due to aberrant localization or downregulation of connexins, and connexins are therefore suggested to act as tumor suppressor genes in various tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression pattern and DNA promoter methylation status of connexins in colorectal cancer. Expression of six (GJA1, GJA9, GJB1, GJB2, GJC1 and GJD3) connexin genes was detected in normal colonic tissue samples. GJC1 expression was reduced in colorectal carcinomas compared to normal tissue samples. All analyzed connexins were hypermethylated in colon cancer cell lines, although at various frequencies. GJA4, GJB6 and GJD2 were hypermethylated in 60% (29/48), 25% (12/48) and 96% (46/48) of primary colorectal carcinomas, respectively. However, the methylation status was not associated with gene expression. GJC1 has two alternative promoters, which were methylated in 42% (32/76) and 38% (25/65) of colorectal tumors, and in none of the normal mucosa samples. Expression of GJC1 was significantly lower in methylated compared with unmethylated samples (p < 0.01) and was restored in cell lines treated with the demethylating drug 5-aza-2'deoxycytidine. Taken together, DNA hypermethylation of the promoter region of GJC1, encoding connexin45, is an important mechanism in silencing gene expression in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig Sirnes
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Radiumhospitalet - Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lind GE, Raiborg C, Danielsen SA, Rognum TO, Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G, Nesbakken A, Stenmark H, Lothe RA. SPG20, a novel biomarker for early detection of colorectal cancer, encodes a regulator of cytokinesis. Oncogene 2011; 30:3967-78. [PMID: 21499309 PMCID: PMC3174365 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a common disease with high mortality. Suitable biomarkers for detection of tumors at an early curable stage would significantly improve patient survival. Here, we show that the SPG20 (spastic paraplegia-20) promoter, encoding the multifunctional Spartin protein, is hypermethylated in 89% of colorectal carcinomas, 78% of adenomas and only 1% of normal mucosa samples. SPG20 methylation was also present in a pilot series of stool samples and corresponding tumors from colorectal cancer patients. SPG20 promoter hypermethylation resulted in loss of mRNA expression in various cancer types and subsequent depletion of Spartin. We further showed that Spartin downregulation in cancer cells resulted in cytokinesis arrest, which was reversed when SPG20 methylation was inhibited. The present study identifies SPG20 promoter hypermethylation as a biomarker suitable for non-invasive detection of colorectal cancer, and a possible mechanism for cytokinesis arrest in colorectal tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G E Lind
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Løvf M, Thomassen GOS, Bakken AC, Celestino R, Fioretos T, Lind GE, Lothe RA, Skotheim RI. Fusion gene microarray reveals cancer type-specificity among fusion genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011; 50:348-57. [PMID: 21305644 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2010] [Accepted: 01/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Detection of fusion genes for diagnostic purposes and as a guide to treatment is well-established in hematological malignancies, and the prevalence of fusion genes in epithelial cancers is also increasingly appreciated. To study whether established fusion genes are present within additional cancer types, we have used an updated version of our fusion gene microarray in a systematic survey of reported fusion genes in multiple cancer types. We assembled a comprehensive database of published fusion genes, including those reported only in individual studies and samples, and fusion genes resulting from deep sequencing of cancer genomes and transcriptomes. From the total set of 548 fusion genes, we designed 599,839 oligonucleotides, targeting both chimeric transcript junctions as well as sequences internal to each of the fusion gene partners. We investigated the presence of fusion genes in a series of 67 cell lines representing 15 different cancer types. Data from ten leukemia cell lines with known fusion gene status were used to develop an automated scoring algorithm, and in five cell lines the correct fusion gene was the top scoring hit, and one came second. Two additional fusion genes, BCAS4-BCAS3 in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and CCDC6-RET in the TPC-1 thyroid cancer cell line were validated as true positive fusion transcripts. However, these fusion genes were not new to these cancer types, and none of 548 fusion genes were identified from a novel cancer type. We therefore find it unlikely that the assayed fusion genes are commonly present across multiple cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marthe Løvf
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zwierzina H, Bardelli A, Ciardiello F, Gariboldi M, Håkansson L, Lambrechts D, Lind GE, Loeffler-Ragg J, Schmoll H, Siena S, Tabernero J, Van Cutsem E. Molecularly targeted therapies for colorectal cancer: Strategies for implementing translational research in clinical trials. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2010; 12:703-711. [PMID: 21154162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Few breakthroughs in preclinical research have translated into meaningful benefits, either in clinical terms or quality of life, for patients with advanced colorectal cancer, despite important preclinical discoveries regarding aberrant biological pathways associated with disease development and progression. The many reasons for the slow progress are diverse, ranging from the failure to codevelop biomarkers and targeted therapies, the regulatory burdens imposed on academic investigators, and the failure to collect serial tumor biopsies during clinical trials. This review discusses promising translational research that could help reduce the disparity between preclinical discovery and patient benefit, and advocate the concentration of efforts and resources on the most promising therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer, such as EGFR, VEGF and Fcγ receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Zwierzina
- Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|