Glass wool column filtration for stallion sperm selection: A comparative analysis with the single-layer colloid centrifugation

Glass wool column filtration (GWCF) selects human, bull, boar, dog and buffalo spermatozoa, but reports in the horse are scarce. Single-layer colloid centrifugation with Androcoll-E™ is currently the standard procedure to select good-quality equine sperm. This study was designed to assess GWCF (50 and 75 mg columns; GWCF-50 and GWCF-75, respectively) efficacy to select good-quality sperm from fresh and frozen-thawed equine semen, and to compare its performance with Androcoll-E™ colloid centrifugation. Percentage total motile (TM), progressively motile (PM), morphologically normal (MN), osmotically competent (HOS+) and acrosome-intact/osmotically competent (AI/HOS+) sperm were determined. In studies done with fresh semen samples (n = 17), suspensions subjected to GWCF-50 showed an improvement (p < .05) in PM and HOS+ sperm after selection. With GWCF-75, an increase (p < .05) in PM, MN and HOS+ sperm was observed. Results with GWCF were comparable or better than with Androcoll-E™ selection. Sperm recovery was similar between procedures for all semen parameters. Total sperm count recovery was lower after GWCF-75 (GWCF-50 = 60.0; GWCF-75 = 51.0; Androcoll-E™ = 76.0 million sperm; median; p = .013), but results on total progressive sperm count were similar (GWCF-50 = 23.0; GWCF-75 = 27.0; Androcoll-E™ = 24.0 million sperm; median; p = .3850). Using frozen-thawed semen samples (n = 16), an improvement (p < .05) in TM, PM, NM, HOS+ and AI/HOS+ sperm was observed in GWCF-75 filtrates. Results were comparable to Androcoll-E™ centrifugation, except HOS+ that increased (p < .05) only after GWCF-75. Recovery was comparable for all parameters in frozen samples. GWCF is a simple and low-cost procedure that selects equine sperm with a quality comparable to colloid centrifugation with Androcoll-E™.

Association between meteorological variables and semen quality: a retrospective study

Spermatogenesis is a temperature-dependent process, and high summer temperatures have been linked to lower sperm concentration and count. However, reports describing the association between other meteorological variables and semen quality are scarce. This study evaluated the association between semen quality and temperature, humidity, pressure, apparent temperature (AT), temperature-humidity index (THI), simplified wet-bulb global temperature (sWBGT), and sunshine duration. Semen samples were obtained at the Laboratorio de Andrología y Reproducción (LAR, Argentina), from men undergoing routine andrology examination (n=11657) and computer-assisted sperm analysis (n=4705) following WHO 2010 criteria. Meteorological variables readings were obtained from the Sistema Meteorológico Nacional. Sperm quality parameters were negatively affected in summer when compared to winter. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in sperm kinematics between winter and spring. Branch and bound variable selection followed by multiple regression analysis revealed a significant association between semen quality and meteorological variables. Specifically, changes in sunshine duration and humidity reinforced the prognosis of semen quality. Highest/lowest sunshine duration and humidity quantiles resulted in decreased sperm concentration, count, motility, vitality and membrane competence, nuclear maturity, and sperm kinematics associated to highest sunshine duration and lowest humidity. Findings from this report highlight the relevance of environmental studies for predicting alterations in male reproductive health associated to variations in meteorological variables, especially considering the current climate changes around the planet due to global warming and its consequences for human health.

Impact of age, clinical conditions, and lifestyle on routine semen parameters and sperm kinematics

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of aging on routine semen and computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) motility parameters according to the current World Health Organization guidelines; and to evaluate the effect of obesity and lifestyle (alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking) in older men's semen.

DESIGN

Blind cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Research laboratory and andrology and reproduction laboratory.

PATIENT(S)

A population of 11,706 men.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Semen analysis: routine (semen volume, sperm concentration and count, motility, vitality, morphology, hypo-osmotic swelling test, round and peroxidase-positive cell concentration) and CASA (straight-line velocity, curvilinear velocity, average path velocity, linearity, straightness, beat cross frequency, wobble, amplitude of lateral head displacement, and mean angular displacement) parameters; and body mass index.

RESULT(S)

A negative correlation was found between age and routine semen parameters: volume, sperm count, motility, vitality, total motile spermatozoa and normal-motile spermatozoa, round cell concentration, and hypo-osmotic swelling test values. Several CASA variables (straight-line velocity, curvilinear velocity, average path velocity, beat cross frequency, amplitude of lateral head displacement, and mean angular displacement) were also negatively affected. Using 40 years as a cut-off value, significant differences in most parameters correlated to age. In a selected subpopulation of men unexposed to known fertility-compromising factors, the same evaluations were performed, finding some parameters still decreased. Although obesity exerted a significant deleterious effect on older patients' semen quality, alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking mildly affected it.

CONCLUSION(S)

Male aging, with the contribution of unhealthy conditions, are paramount effectors of sperm quality deterioration.

Incidence of Sperm Surface Autoantibodies and Relationship with Routine Semen Parameters and Sperm Kinematics

PROBLEM

Antisperm antibodies (ASA) are associated with male subfertility. However, results on sperm surface autoantibodies are controversial, the relationship between ASA and semen parameters (WHO, 2010) is unknown, and data on ASA and sperm kinematics are scarce.

METHOD OF STUDY

A retrospective study carried out in men undergoing routine semen analysis (WHO 2010), ASA evaluation (direct SpermMAR(™) (IgG) test), and computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).

RESULTS

A 2.6% and a 5.9% incidence of ASA-positive cases were found (cut-off 50% and 10%, respectively; n = 7492). ASA-positive samples had lower (P < 0.0001) sperm concentration, count, motility, and hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) test score. HOS results did not correlate with sperm vitality in normozoospermic samples with high ASA levels. In unselected samples, ASA-positive samples (cut-off 50%) showed decreased sperm kinematics (VSL, VAP, LIN, ALH, STR, BCF, WOB), but in normozoospermic samples, ASA-positive and ASA-negative subgroups had similar CASA results.

CONCLUSIONS

ASA evaluation is highly relevant in full semen assessment.