1
|
Jackson-Spence F, Furtado O’Mahony L, Toms C, Flanders L, Hockings H, Choy J, Szabados B, Powles T. Outcomes of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who have received previous first line therapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(22)02595-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
2
|
Hoare JI, Hockings H, Saxena J, Silva VL, Haughey MJ, Wood GE, Nicolini F, Mirza H, McNeish IA, Huang W, Maniati E, Graham TA, Lockley M. A novel cell line panel reveals non-genetic mediators of platinum resistance and phenotypic diversity in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:96-106. [PMID: 35918200 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Resistance to cancer therapy is an enduring challenge and accurate and reliable preclinical models are lacking. We interrogated this unmet need using high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) as a disease model. METHODS We created five in vitro and two in vivo platinum-resistant HGSC models and characterised the entire cell panel via whole genome sequencing, RNASeq and creation of intraperitoneal models. RESULTS Mutational signature analysis indicated that platinum-resistant cell lines evolved from a pre-existing ancestral clone but a unifying mutational cause for drug resistance was not identified. However, cisplatin-resistant and carboplatin-resistant cells evolved recurrent changes in gene expression that significantly overlapped with independent samples obtained from multiple patients with relapsed HGSC. Gene Ontology Biological Pathways (GOBP) related to the tumour microenvironment, particularly the extracellular matrix, were repeatedly enriched in cisplatin-resistant cells, carboplatin-resistant cells and also in human resistant/refractory samples. The majority of significantly over-represented GOBP however, evolved uniquely in either cisplatin- or carboplatin-resistant cell lines resulting in diverse intraperitoneal behaviours that reflect different clinical manifestations of relapsed human HGSC. CONCLUSIONS Our clinically relevant and usable models reveal a key role for non-genetic factors in the evolution of chemotherapy resistance. Biological pathways relevant to the extracellular matrix were repeatedly expressed by resistant cancer cells in multiple settings. This suggests that recurrent gene expression changes provide a fitness advantage during platinum therapy and also that cancer cell-intrinsic mechanisms influence the tumour microenvironment during the evolution of drug resistance. Candidate genes and pathways identified here could reveal therapeutic opportunities in platinum-resistant HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J I Hoare
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - H Hockings
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - J Saxena
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - V L Silva
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Haughey
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - G E Wood
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - F Nicolini
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - H Mirza
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - W Huang
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - E Maniati
- Bioinformatics Core Service, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - T A Graham
- Centre for Cancer Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M Lockley
- Centre for Cancer Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Cancer Services, University College London Hospital, London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Newton C, Murali K, Ahmad A, Hockings H, Graham R, Liberale V, Sarker SJ, Ledermann J, Berney DM, Shamash J, Banerjee S, Stoneham S, Lockley M. A multicentre retrospective cohort study of ovarian germ cell tumours: Evidence for chemotherapy de-escalation and alignment of paediatric and adult practice. Eur J Cancer 2019; 113:19-27. [PMID: 30954883 PMCID: PMC6522056 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult guidelines recommend BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) for all ovarian germ cell tumours, causing debilitating toxicities in young patients who will survive long term. Paediatricians successfully reduce toxicities by using lower bleomycin doses and substituting carboplatin for cisplatin, while testicular and paediatric immature teratomas (ITs) are safely managed with surgery alone. AIM The aim was to determine whether reduced-toxicity treatment could rationally be extended to patients older than 18 years. METHODS Multicentre cohort study was carried out in four large UK cancer centres over 12 years. RESULTS One hundred thirty-eight patients were enrolled. Overall survival was 93%, and event-free survival (EFS) was 72%. Neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (82% BEP) caused 27 potentially chronic toxicities, and one patient subsequently died from acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. There was no difference in histology, stage or grade in patients ≤/>18 years, and EFS was not different in these age groups (≤18:28% and >18:28%; log-rank P = 0.96). Histological subtype powerfully predicted EFS (log-rank P = 4.9 × 10-7). Neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy reduced future relapse/progression in dysgerminoma (n = 37, chemo:0% vs. no chemo:20%), yolk sac tumour (n = 23, 26.3% vs.75%) and mixed germ cell tumour (n = 32, 40%vs.70%) but not in IT (n = 42, 33% vs.15%). Additionally, we observed no radiological responses to chemotherapy in ITs, pathological IT grade did not predict EFS (univariate hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.57-1.19, P = 0.94) and there were no deaths in this subtype. CONCLUSION Survival was excellent but chemotherapy toxicities were severe, implying significant overtreatment. Our data support the extension of reduced-toxicity, paediatric regimens to adults. Our practice-changing findings that IT was chemotherapy resistant and pathological grade uninformative strongly endorse exclusive surgical management of ovarian ITs at all ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Newton
- Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK; University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road London, NW1 2BU, UK; University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK; University of Bristol, Senate House, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK
| | - K Murali
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - A Ahmad
- The Wolfson Institute, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; Cancer Intelligence, Cancer Research UK, Angel Building, 407 St John Street, London EC1V 4AD, UK
| | - H Hockings
- Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - R Graham
- University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - V Liberale
- University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - S-J Sarker
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; Research Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Hampstead, London NW3 2PR, UK
| | - J Ledermann
- University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - D M Berney
- Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - J Shamash
- Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - S Stoneham
- University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - M Lockley
- Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK; University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road London, NW1 2BU, UK; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|