Evaluation of Metastatic Potential in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer with Adherence to Elective Nodal Volume Guidelines: A Retrospective Analysis of Elective Nodal Irradiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In 2015, expert guidelines on esophageal/GEJ cancer contouring for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were published in IJROBP, which delineate recommended elective nodal basins (celiac, para-aortic, gastrohepatic ligament, supraclavicular) to be irradiated depending on the primary tumor location. We hypothesize that incomplete coverage of these areas increases the risk of the development of distant failures.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients treated for non-metastatic esophageal or GEJ cancer with chemoradiotherapy pre-operatively or definitively from 2012 to 2021 were retrospectively identified from a single institution database. Radiation plans of eligible patients were then analyzed by tumor location. Plans were deemed guideline-compliant if radiation dose coverage, between 41.4 to 45 Gy, encompassed nodal basins recommended by the 2015 guidelines. The primary endpoint of this study was the overall rate of distant disease. Other endpoints included locoregional failures, defined as failures within the radiation field but outside of the primary tumor, and local failures within the gross tumor volume. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to define collected variables. Differences were measured using chi-square and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and two-sided t-tests for continuous measures. Assessment of distant, locoregional, and local failures were assessed using univariate logistic regression with statistical significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 25.0 months, 37 patients, with a median age of 66, were included in the study. Most patients were male (94.6%) with cT3 (54.1%), cN0 (43.2%), moderately differentiated (47.1%) adenocarcinoma (75.7%) located at the GEJ (56.8%). The median radiation dose used was 50.4 Gy, with the majority of patients receiving concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel (83.8%). Four patients received induction chemotherapy and 20 (55.6%) underwent esophagectomy. When examining guideline compliance, 17 (46.0%) radiation plans demonstrated adequate ENI. The most common improperly covered nodal basin was para-aortic (65.0%), followed by gastrohepatic (30.0%). No patients with sufficient ENI coverage (0/17) developed distant failure compared to 45.0% (9/20) with insufficient coverage (p = 0.001). There were inappreciable differences in locoregional or local failure rates between those with and without complete ENI. Patients with complete ENI were more likely to be of larger craniocaudal length (p = 0.007) or have N2 disease (p = 0.003). When examining other tumor characteristics (histologic subtype, location, HER2 status, esophagectomy rate) of patients with and without complete ENI, no further differences were noted.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that proper coverage of nodal basins, when indicated by expert guidelines, could improve distant metastasis. ENI analysis of previous prospective CRT studies for esophageal cancer could validate these findings.

Sins of omission: A meta-research study evaluating the omission of operability in published retrospective comparisons of surgery with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are typically inoperable, in concordance with guidelines that advocate surgical resection as preferred treatment for operable patients. This differential treatment allocation complicates retrospective comparisons of surgery with SBRT by introducing the potential for confounding by operability.

METHODS

PubMed was queried for manuscripts reporting primary data from retrospective comparisons of overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing surgery versus SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Each manuscript was categorized for two outcomes: (1) whether treatment allocation was based on a determination of patient operability, and (2) whether a direct OS comparison between operable SBRT patients and surgically treated patients was included. Associations with variables of interest were measured with statistical significance prespecified at p < 0.10.

RESULTS

From 3,072 manuscripts identified in our query, sixty-one analyses met screening criteria. Twenty-one (34 %) reported operability status influencing treatment allocation. These were more likely to be published in journals with a surgical focus (52 vs 20 %) and impact factor < 5 (81 vs 58 %), and to contain cohorts from institutional datasets (81 vs 55 %), and to have a radiation oncologist as first (43 vs 25 %) or senior (43 vs 28 %) author. Seven (11 %) manuscripts featured a direct OS comparison between SBRT and surgery.

CONCLUSION

Nearly-two-thirds of peer-reviewed retrospective studies that have compared OS between surgery and SBRT for early-stage NSCLC lack information on patient operability status, and nearly 90% lack a direct comparison between operable SBRT patients and those receiving surgery.