Real-world effectiveness of anti-interleukin-23 antibodies in chronic plaque-type psoriasis of patients from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA)

With the introduction of the latest class of biologic drugs targeting interleukin (IL)-23p19, three new, highly effective drugs can be used for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. However, poorer skin improvement as well as higher rates of serious adverse events have been reported for patients under real-world conditions (outside clinical trials). This accounts especially for patients who have already been treated with biologic drugs. We therefore aimed to determine effectiveness and safety of IL-23p19 inhibitors in real-world patients by analysing data from the Psoriasis Registry Austria (PsoRA) in this observational, retrospective, multicentre cohort study. Data for 197 patients (52.3% biologic-non-naïve), who were treated with anti-IL-23p19 antibodies (127 guselkumab, 55 risankizumab and 15 tildrakizumab) for at least 3 months, were eligible for analysis. In general, biologic-non-naïve patients displayed a less favourable response to anti-IL-23 treatment as compared to biologic-naïve patients. However, after correction for previous biologic exposure, few differences in PASI improvement were detected among biologic-naïve and -non-naïve patients treated with different IL-23p19 inhibitors. This indicates that treatment effectiveness is not related to the class of the previously administered therapy in biologic-non-naïve patients. Therefore, IL-23p19 inhibitors represent a promising treatment alternative for patients who have not responded to previous biologics. However, as with other biologic agents (including IL-17 inhibitors), we did not observe an entirely satisfactory treatment response (i.e. PASI < 3 and/or PASI 75) to anti-IL-23 treatment in one out of four to five patients. Adverse events (mainly non-severe infections) were observed in 23 (11.7%) patients with no major differences regarding the administered IL-23 inhibitor or previous biologic exposure.

Biologic drug survival rates in the era of anti-interleukin-17 antibodies: a time-period-adjusted registry analysis

Background

Drug survival rates reflect efficacy and safety and may be influenced by the availability of alternative treatment options. Little is known about time‐dependent drug survival in psoriasis and the effect of increasing numbers of biologic treatment options.

Objectives

To determine whether drug survival is influenced by the availability of treatment options and by factors such as gender, psoriatic arthritis or previous biologic treatment.

Methods

This observational, retrospective, multicentre cohort study analysed data from patients registered in the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA) who were treated with biologics between 1 January 2015 and 30 November 2019.

Results

A total of 1572 patients who received 1848 treatment cycles were included in this analysis. The highest long‐term Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement was observed after treatment with ixekizumab, followed by ustekinumab and secukinumab, adalimumab and etanercept. Overall, ustekinumab surpassed all other biologics in drug survival up to 48 months. However, when adjusted for biologic naïvety, its superiority vanished and drug survival rates were similar for ixekizumab (91·6%), secukinumab (90·2%) and ustekinumab (92·8%), all of them superior to adalimumab (76·5%) and etanercept (71·9%) at 12 months and beyond. Besides biologic non‐naïvety (2·10, P < 0·001), the introduction of a new drug such as secukinumab or ixekizumab (relative hazard ratio 1·6, P = 0·001) and female gender (1·50, P = 0·019) increased the risk of treatment discontinuation overall, whereas psoriatic arthritis did not (1·12, P = 0·21).

Conclusions

The time‐dependent availability of drugs should be considered when analysing and comparing drug survival. Previous biologic exposure significantly influences drug survival. Women are more likely to stop treatment.

What is already known about this topic?

Female gender and previous biologic exposure have been discussed as predictors for decreased drug survival in patients with psoriasis, but it remains unknown whether a time‐dependent increased availability of treatment options alters biologic drug survival.

What does this study add?

The increased availability of alternative biologic treatments over time leads to an elevated risk for treatment discontinuation overall; therefore, drug survival analysis has to be time adjusted.

Moreover, the study reveals that the impact of previous biologic treatment on drug survival is tremendous and confirms worse drug survival in female patients.

Linked Comment: Gniadecki. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:996–997.