Pathologic response with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemo-immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A systematic review and meta-analysis

531

Background: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) is established in the management of MIBC. Pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0N0) and downstaging (<ypT2N0) are associated with long term survival in patients with MIBC. Several trials have evaluated neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAI) and chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) for MIBC. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of available trials to compare the incidence of pathological response with NAC, NAI and NACI in MIBC patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Methods: Phase II/III clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NAC, NAI, or NACI) in patients with MIBC undergoing radical cystectomy were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Outcomes of interest included pCR and pathological downstaging. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled incidence of events using the Freeman-Tukey transformation. Clopper-Pearson method was used to estimate the associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Of the 5357 records initially identified, 28 trials with a total of 2138 patients were considered eligible for inclusion. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed in 15 trials (1535 patients), NAI in 5 (288 patients), and NACI in 8 (315 patients). The pooled incidence of patients experiencing a pCR was 30.91% (95% CI: 26.54%-35.45%) with NAC, 30.92% (23.22%-39.14%) with NAI, and 42.25% (36.6%-48.0%) with NACI. The difference in pCR among these therapies was statistically significant (p <0.05). Similarly, the pooled incidence of achieving pathological downstaging was 40.91% (34.26%-47.72%) with NAC, 38.84% (26.73%-51.64%) with NAI, and 62.88% (57.22%-68.39%) with NACI. Consistently, there was statistically significant effect modification by the choice of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (p <0.01). The results were consistent across different clinically important subgroups (Table). Conclusions: NACI may achieve better pCR and pathological downstaging than NAC and NAI alone in MIBC patients which may potentially be associated with long-term survival. Definitive data from phase III trials are pending. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination as a first-line (1L) therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sarcomatoid histology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

692

Background: Sarcomatoid mRCC exhibits poor prognosis and limited response to vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibition. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of ICI combination therapy in this patient population using data from contemporary trials. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ICI combinations with sunitinib monotherapy in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC. Patient important outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR). Precomputed hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for survival outcomes and binary outcome data for response rates (expressed as relative risk [RR] were meta-analyzed using a DerSimonian-Lairds random-effects method. Mixed treatment comparisons among different ICI combinations were made using a network-meta-analysis within the Bayesian framework. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were computed to assess the relative treatment rankings. Results: Six RCTs with a total of 618 patients were considered eligible for inclusion. ICI combination therapy was significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.43-0.72) and PFS (HR: 0.50; 0.40-0.62), increased ORR (RR: 2.42; 1.92-3.06), and CR (RR: 4.23; 2.00-8.93) when compared to sunitinib in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC (Table). The results were consistent with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Mixed treatment comparisons using current data revealed no statistically significant differences among different ICI combinations. However, the combination of nivolumab-ipilimumab was consistently ranked higher (rank 2 for OS, ORR, and CR) and may potentially be more efficacious than other counterparts. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests improved survival, delayed disease progression and increased response rates with the use of ICI combination therapy in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC. [Table: see text]

Source of funding and enrollment disparity in prostate cancer (PCa) clinical trials

40

Background: Previously we have reported enrollment disparities in PCa clinical trials. Funding source can influence minority representation in clinical trials. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the impact of source of funding on enrollment disparities in PCa clinical trials. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify phase II/III PCa trials. All relevant trials reporting age by 65 years were considered eligible for inclusion. Trials recruiting from the United States (US) were considered eligible for analysis by race and ethnicity. The trial proportions of age, or racial/ethnic subgroup category and the global incidence in the corresponding age subgroup (from the global burden of disease database), or the US-population-based incidence in the corresponding racial/ethnic subgroup (from SEER 21 database) were used to compute enrollment incidence ratio (EIR) at each trial. EIRs with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were then meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and stratified by sources of funding (industry, US-government, and others [academic and non-US govt]). A univariate meta-regression was conducted to assess the temporal changes in EIR by each funding category. Results: Of 127 trials recruiting from the US, 89 (70%) reported race, and 35 (27%) reported ethnicity. Among those, 57 (64%), 14 (16%), and 18 (20%) trials reported industry, US-government, and other sources of funding, respectively. Of those reporting ethnicity, 23 (66%), 4 (11%), and 8 (23%) trials reported industry, US-government, and other sources of funding, respectively. Among the 287 eligible trials, 49 trials (17%) reported age by 65 years. Of those, 36 (73%), 6 (12%), and 7 (13%) reported industry, US-government, and other sources of funding, respectively. In terms of racial/ethnic enrollment, Black patients were significantly under-represented in industry funded trials (0.33; 0.27-0.41). No significant disparity was observed in US-government funded trials (0.75: 0.57-1.00). The P-value of interaction was <0.0001. Hispanics were significantly under-represented in industry funded clinical trials (0.56; 0.43-0.74). The number of US-government funded trials reporting Hispanics were small (<10) which precluded any meaningful statistics. No significant disparity was observed in terms of older adults (EIR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.95; 1.05) overall and by funding sources. Black patients’ representation in industry funded PCa trials has significantly decreased over the last three decades. No significant change was observed in US-government funded PCa trials over the last three decades (P:0.004). Conclusions: Black and Hispanic men with PCa are likely to be under-represented in industry sponsored clinical trials. Black patients’ representation in industry sponsored trials has declined over time, thus widening the cancer-care inequities in these patients.

Social vulnerability and gastrointestinal cancer mortality among United States counties

499

Background: The impact of socioeconomic status on gastrointestinal (GI) cancer mortality in the United States (US) is not well-established. We hypothesized that socially vulnerable populations have disproportionately higher mortality rates. Hence, we assessed the association of the social vulnerability index (SVI) with GI cancer mortality across US counties. Methods: Social vulnerability indices were obtained from the agency for toxic substances and disease registry (ATSDR) from 2014-2018 to compute percentile ranking scores (PRS: ranging from 0-1) for each US county. PRS were further categorized into quartiles (Q: 1st: 0-0.25 [least vulnerable]; 4th:0.75-1.00 [most vulnerable]). The wide-ranging online data for epidemiological research (WONDER) database was queried to abstract county-level age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 person-years (PY) for populations diagnosed with GI cancers. AAMRs were then linked with quartile rankings. Rate ratios (RR) of AAMRs between 4th and 1st Q were subsequently estimated with 95% confidence intervals using population-weighted, Poisson regression. Results: A total of 3142 counties were included in this analysis. The AAMR for overall deaths (OD) and premature deaths (PD; defined as death at age <65) in the GI cancer population was 53.8 and 17.7 per 100,000 PY. A gradient increase in GI cancer-related mortality was observed from 1st Q to 4th Q (OD: 49.2 vs 59.3; PD: 14.1 vs 21.3). This stepwise increase in AAMR over the quartiles was consistent across gender, different racial/ethnic subgroups, and rural/urban categories of counties. The AAMRs for OD were significantly higher in the 4th Q as compared to the 1st Q for gastric (RR: 1.67 [95% CI, 1.51-1.86]), hepatocellular including intrahepatic biliary (1.52 [1.45-1.61]), colorectal (1.21 [1.16-1.26]) and biliary (1.17 [1.06-1.28]) cancer. Similarly, significantly higher AAMRs for PD were observed in 4th Q vs1st Q for gastric (1.81 [1.60-2.05]), hepatocellular including intrahepatic biliary (1.78 [1.58-2.00]), biliary (1.64 [1.35-1.99]), colorectal (1.29 [1.21-1.39]) and pancreatic (1.16 [1.07-1.25]) cancer. However, no significant differences were observed for esophageal and small intestinal cancers. Men with gastric (1.58 [1.41-1.78]) and hepatocellular cancer (1.54 [1.43-1.66]), non-Hispanic Black population (1.54 [1.31-1.80]) with hepatocellular cancer, and Hispanic population with colorectal cancer (1.50 [1.31-1.72]) were observed to have higher overall mortality in the 4th Q compared to the 1st Q. The findings were similar for premature mortality. Conclusions: Population-level data suggests that the US counties with higher socio-economic adversities may be at an increased risk of GI cancer-related mortality. Investigations using patient-level data are required to probe the impact of socioeconomic vulnerabilities on cancer-related mortality.

Source of funding and enrollment disparities in the inclusion of minorities in colorectal clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

23

Background: Identification of factors associated with enrollment disparities in clinical trials can narrow cancer care inequities. Funding source can influence minority representation in clinical trials. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of funding sources on enrollment disparities in colorectal (CRC) clinical trials. Methods: CRC phase II/III randomized controlled trial (RCTs) identified through MEDLINE and EMBASE from each database’s inception through 2022 were considered eligible. Trial level enrollment incidence ratios (EIR) were computed; defined as the ratio of trial proportions of a gender, age, or racial/ethnic subgroup category and the global incidence in the corresponding gender/age subgroup (from the global burden of disease database), or the US-population-based incidence in the corresponding racial/ethnic subgroup (from SEER 21 database). EIRs were then meta-analyzed using a random-effects model for each funding source category (US- government, industry, others). Temporal trends were analyzed using a univariate meta-regression. Results: Using data from 287 RCTs, women were significantly under-represented in the industry sponsored trials (EIR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.83 - 0.88]) but not in US-government sponsored trials (0.92 [0.84-1.00]). A total of 87 RCTs reported age proportions; older adults (above 65 years) were significantly under-represented in the industry sponsored (0.84 [0.74-0.96]) and as well as in US-government sponsored CRC trials (0.52 [0.44-0.61]). Only 56 and 15 trials reported race and ethnicity, respectively. Limited data on racial/ethnic enrollment revealed significant under-representation of Black (0.45 [0.36 -0.57]) and Hispanic (0.45 [0.31-0.66]) patients across industry sponsored CRC trials. In contrast, no significant disparity was observed in the inclusion of Asian race in the industry sponsored trials. The number of US-government sponsored trials reporting racial/ethnic subgroups were small ( < 10) which precluded any meaningful statistics. Trends show that the representation of women has improved ( P: 0.02) while the representation of Black ( P: 0.007) and Hispanic patients ( P: 0.04) has worsened over the last three decades in industry sponsored CRC trials. Conclusions: The reporting of race/ethnicity is suboptimal in CRC trials especially in those sponsored by US government. Older adults may be under-represented regardless of funding source. Women, Blacks and Hispanics may be under-represented in industry sponsored CRC clinical trials. While representation of women appears to be improving, representation of Black and Hispanic patients has worsened in industry sponsored CRC clinical trials over the last three decades.

Outcomes of additional substrate modification in de novo atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Data regarding additional substrate modification has been conflicting, both in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

Purpose

To assess the effect of additional linear substrate modification during de novo AF ablation on AF recurrence.

Methods

We reviewed 1575 AF ablations in 1254 patients from January 2013 to June 2021 at a single academic medical center. There were 1096 de novo ablations. We defined substrate modification as linear ablations including cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), superior vena cava isolation, intercaval line, mitral isthmus, and left atrial roof and floor lines. We evaluated clinical and procedural characteristics to identify risk factors for AF recurrence and complications. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months.

Results

The 1096 de novo ablations included 65.5% males with mean age 61.1 years, mean BMI 31.3, 81.8% paroxysmal AF and 18.2% persistent AF. There were four AF ablation subgroups: PVI alone (41.6%), PVI and CTI ablation (37.1%), PVI with CTI and additional substrate modification (15.6%), and PVI with substrate modification without CTI ablation (5.7%). Overall, AF recurred in 36.9% cases. AF recurrence with PVI only ablation was 41% compared to 32.7% in patients with PVI and CTI ablation (p=0.02). When looking at patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, results were similar, with decreased AF recurrence with the addition of CTI ablation in both paroxysmal (37.3% v. 29.2%, p=0.03) and persistent AF (58.1% v. 40.0%, p=0.02). Additional substrate modification did not result in significant difference in outcome in either paroxysmal or persistent AF (Figure 1).

Conclusions

In de novo AF ablations, addition of CTI ablation to de novo PVI ablation is associated with lower AF recurrence in both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Additional linear substrate modification did not impact outcomes.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Safety of same day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an outpatient procedure with traditionally an overnight hospital observation (OHO). Recently, there has been a trend towards same day discharge (SDD).

Purpose

Compare AF ablation procedure safety outcomes with SDD vs. OHO.

Methods

We reviewed consecutive AF procedures performed from January 2013 to June 2021 at a single academic center. Patients underwent OHO until June 2020, after which patients had SDD whenever feasible. Adverse events were assessed at three months, which included pericardial effusion, pericarditis, post-procedure hypotension, embolic events, and vascular complications. We also assessed emergency department (ED) visits and procedure-related hospital admissions.

Results

There were 1254 patients who underwent 1575 AF ablations. 1440 patients underwent OHO and 135 had SDD. Mean age was 62.2 years, BMI 33 kg/m2, 65% were male, and 27.6% had persistent AF, without significant differences in baseline characteristics between OHO and SDD. We found that SDD was not associated with increased complications (OHO 0.20% v. SDD 0.49%; p&gt;0.05), ED visits, or hospital admissions (2% v. 5%; p&gt;0.05) (Figure 1, 2). There were no gender or age-related disparities in all outcomes (p&gt;0.05).

Conclusion

SDD protocol after AF ablation is feasible and not associated with higher incidence of complications, ED visits, and procedure-related hospitalizations.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Race disparities in atrial fibrillation detection using implantable loop recorder for cryptogenic stroke

Background

Cryptogenic stroke represents about 25–30% of all ischemic strokes. Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring using implantable loop recorder (ILR) can detect asymptomatic and undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).

Purpose

To assess patient-specific factors in ILR implantation and AF detection in patients with cryptogenic strokes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 379 patients with cryptogenic stroke indicated for ILR implantation, from January 2017 to June 2021 at our university hospital. We evaluated patient demographic and clinical characteristics to assess the risk factors associated with higher incidence of AF detection, using logistic regression models.

Results

Of the 379 ILRs implanted, 60.4% were males with 71.2% Caucasian, mean age 67.6 years, and mean BMI 28.5. The mean CHADSVASC score of 3.9 at the time of ischemic stroke. These patients had prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (27.4%), hypertension (65.7%), chronic kidney disease (19.5%), coronary artery disease (20%) and congestive heart failure (2%). Of the entire cohort, AF was diagnosed in 16% of patients with 14 months mean follow up. There were more females diagnosed with AF on ILR (20% v. 18.7%, p&gt;0.05). Caucasians were more likely to have AF detected compared to non-Caucasians (OR 2.3, 95% CI, p&lt;0.02). There were 52 patients with mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) before having ILR implantation. AF was not detected on MCOT, but 15% were diagnosed with AF with ILR monitoring. In univariate analysis, increasing age is strongly associated with the detection of AF (p=0.03).

Conclusions

There continues to exist race disparities in ILR implantation and eventual AF detection, leading to further socioeconomic health disparities. ILR should be considered especially in elderly with cryptogenic stroke given the higher incidence of AF detection.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Does body mass index affect atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes

Background

There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding whether body-mass index (BMI) influences the success and procedural complication rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

Purpose

To determine if differences in BMI affect AF ablation outcomes

Methods

At a single academic center, AF ablation procedures were reviewed from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes were AF recurrence (after a 90 day blanking period), procedure-related complications, emergency department visits or hospital admission (ED/HOSP). Patients had a minimum of 6 months follow-up

Results

We analyzed 1569 AF ablation consecutive procedures (1093 de novo, 476 repeat ablation) using either radiofrequency or cryoablation. The study population was 65% male with a mean age 62 years, with 28% persistent AF. BMI was separated into three cohorts: &lt;25 kg/m2 (N=218), 25–30 kg/m2 (N=547), and &gt;30 kg/m2 (N=804). There were no significant differences in the type of AF, left atrial diameter, or left ventricular ejection fraction in the BMI subgroups. There was a direct relationship between the prevalence of co-morbid conditions and increasing BMI: hypertension (49.1%, 59.9%, 60.2%; p 0.04), diabetes (6.4%, 13.5%, 21.3%; p 0.01), and obstructive sleep apnea (5.5%, 10.8%, 26.7%; p&lt;0.01). There were no significant differences in AF recurrence, procedural complications or ED/HOSP among the BMI cohorts (p&gt;0.05) (Figure 1). No gender related disparities were noted in outcomes (p&gt;0.05).

Conclusion

Higher BMI was not associated with AF recurrence, complications, or ED/HOSP after AF ablation despite a higher prevalence of comorbid medical conditions

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced breast carcinoma

e13017

Background: Novel drugs that target HER2 receptors have shown promise in the treatment of Advanced breast carcinoma (BC). We study here the safety and efficacy of select monoclonal drugs (Mab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of advanced BC. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched the literature on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase & clinicaltrials.gov. A total of 1054 articles were screened, and 6 studies were included. Results: In a phase III trial comparing Margetuximab (MAR) vs Trastuzumab (TRA), the overall survival (OS) and Progression free survival (PFS) was superior for MAR (21.6m Vs 19.8m & 5.7m Vs 4.4m respectively). However, the side effect profile is comparable for both drugs.Neutropenia (50 %) was a key problem in an ongoing trial including Zenocutuzumab (ZENO), resulting in dosage reduction. Similarly, phase III trials incorporating TKIs such as Neratinib (NER) and Tucatinib (TUC), there was improved OS (21m Vs 18.7, 24.7m Vs 19.2m respectively) as compared to Standard of care and chemotherapy. Regarding safety profile, these therapies are generally well tolerated with manageable side effects as listed in the table. Conclusions: Both monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors show clinically significant benefits in advanced HER2 positive breast carcinoma. However, more evidence and randomized clinical trials are needed to further establish their role in this rapidly evolving field.[Table: see text]