Safety and Efficacy of Tucatinib, Letrozole, and Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated HR+/HER2+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome resistance to antihormonal and HER2-targeted agents mediated by cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex, we proposed an oral combination of the HER2 inhibitor tucatinib, aromatase inhibitor letrozole, and CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (TLP combination) for treatment of HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Phase Ib/II TLP trial (NCT03054363) enrolled patients with HR+/HER2+ MBC treated with ≥2 HER2-targeted agents. The phase Ib primary endpoint was safety of the regimen evaluated by NCI CTCAE version 4.3. The phase II primary endpoint was efficacy by median progression-free survival (mPFS).

RESULTS

Forty-two women ages 22 to 81 years were enrolled. Patients received a median of two lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, 71.4% had visceral disease, 35.7% had CNS disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) of grade ≥3 were neutropenia (64.3%), leukopenia (23.8%), diarrhea (19.0%), and fatigue (14.3%). Tucatinib increased AUC10-19 hours of palbociclib 1.7-fold, requiring palbociclib dose reduction from 125 to 75 mg daily. In 40 response-evaluable patients, mPFS was 8.4 months, with similar mPFS in non-CNS and CNS cohorts (10.0 months vs. 8.2 months; P = 0.9). Overall response rate was 44.5%, median duration of response was 13.9 months, and clinical benefit rate was 70.4%; 60% of patients were on treatment for ≥6 months, 25% for ≥1 year, and 10% for ≥2 years. In the CNS cohort, 26.6% of patients remained on study for ≥1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

TLP combination was safe and tolerable. AEs were expected and manageable with supportive therapy and dose reductions. TLP showed excellent efficacy for an all-oral chemotherapy-free regimen warranting further testing. See related commentary by Huppert and Rugo, p. 4993.

Twenty-one-gene recurrence score (RS) in germline (g)CHEK2 mutation-associated versus sporadic breast cancers (BC): A multi-site case-control study

10531

Background: Genomic assays, such as RS, are used to determine chemotherapy benefit in early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER2 negative BC patients (pts). Currently, guidelines to use pts’ germline genetic testing results to guide adjuvant therapy are lacking. Several reports have indicated worse outcomes for BC pts with g CHEK2 pathogenic variants (PV). We investigated whether PV in CHEK2 were associated with increased RS. Methods: Patient-level clinical data and RS were derived from electronic medical records of seven medical centers between years 2013-17. Confirmation of RS using the Genomic Health provider portal was performed. 38 pts with germline PV in CHEK2 (15 pts/39.5% with c.1100delC mutation) and RS score (cases) were matched with BC pts whose genetic testing did not identify PV (controls) using a 1:2 matching schema. Pts were matched based on age at diagnosis and lymph node (LN) status. LN negative pts were further matched based on T-stage. A multivariate random intercept linear mixed model of CHEK2 mutation status on RS was performed, adjusting for PR. A secondary ordinal univariate analysis was conducted that categorized RS into low, intermediate and high risk ( < 18, 18-30, and > 30, respectively). P-values were reported based on a null hypothesis of no effect against a two-sided alternative. Results: The median RS for cases was 19.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 15 to 25) and the median RS for controls was 18 (IQR: 12 to 22). A greater proportion of cases were categorized as high risk (10.5%) compared to controls (5.6%), and a smaller proportion of cases were categorized as low risk (36.8%) compared to controls (49.3%). Cases had higher grade and increased proportion of PR-negative BC as compared with controls (grade 1: 12.1% of cases versus 32.4% of controls; PR-negative: 7.9% of cases versus 5.6% of controls). The variables used to match cases and controls (age, lymph node status, and T-stage) had similar summary statistics. The RS was 1.97-point higher in pts with g CHEK2 PV compared to controls, after adjusting for PR (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-point lower to 4.96-point higher; p = 0.194). The secondary analysis of CHEK2 mutation status on an ordinal RS risk group yielded comparable results; on average, the odds of being high risk compared to the combined intermediate/low risk groups was 1.72 times higher in cases compared to controls (95% CI: 0.77 to 3.80; p = 0.181), but these differences were not significant. Conclusions: Our case-control study did not show a statistically higher RS for BC that develops in pts with g CHEK2 PV. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the association between type of CHEK2 PV (frameshift versus missense) and other modifying genetic variables and RS.

Vascular intracerebral lesion

Images