Effect of one and two sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on clinical and microbial outcomes of non-surgical management of chronic periodontitis: A clinical study

Background

This study aimed to compare the effect of one and two sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical and microbial parameters in patients with chronic periodontitis.

Methods

This study was conducted on 20 patients. The dental quadrants of patients were randomly assigned to SRP at baseline (group 1), SRP at baseline and one month (group 2), SRP plus aPDT at baseline (group 3) and SRP plus aPDT at baseline and one month (group 4). Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and bleeding on probing (BoP) were measured at baseline, and one and three months later. F. nucleatum counts were determined by PCR. ANOVA was used for the comparison of these variables between the groups.

Results

In all the groups, PD reduction and CAL gain increased significantly at 1- and 3-month intervals compared to baseline (P=0.001). At three months, the difference in PD between groups 1 and 3 was statistically significant (P=0.014). CAL gain between groups 2 and 4 at one month (P=0.016) and three months (P=0.001) wasstatistically significant. Reduction in F. nucleatum counts was not significant between the four study groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

A combination of two sessions of aPDT and SRP could improve CAL gain; however, further long-term studies are necessary in this regard.

Comparison of the effects of different implant apical designs on the magnitude and distribution of stress and strain in bone: a finite element analysis study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of implant design on the apex area and on stress and stress patterns within surrounding bone.

METHODS

Three commercially available implants with the same diameter (3.5 mm), same length (10-11 mm), and same complement abutment were selected for modeling as follows: (1) flat apical design with light tapering degree, (2) dome-shaped apical design with light tapering, and (3) flat apical design with intense tapering in one-third of the apical area. According to human conebeam computed tomography (CBCT), the bone was modeled using a cortical thickness of 2 mm and cancellous bone. Forces of 100 N and 300 N in the vertical and 15° angle directions were applied to the entire abutment surface, and the equivalent stress and strain were calculated using finite element analysis (FEA) methods.

RESULTS

In all models, stress was concentrated on the cortical bone around the implant neck; in non-axial loads, stress was concentrated on the buccal side. The maximum strain recorded was a microstrain of 7200 μm μm-1 around the apex of sample C, which also showed the highest level of stress detected in cancellous bone (4.4 MPa). We observed the pathologic overload in the apical area of sample B (with a dome-shaped apex); however, the strain value was less than that of sample C.

CONCLUSION

FEA revealed that great sudden changes in diameter along the fixture increases stress and strain in peri-implant bone. Therefore, uniform tapering should be considered as a standard feature for most clinical situations, and a flat apical design, which creates a better stress and strain distribution in surrounding bone than dome-shaped bone, should also be used.