When is a person dead? The Canadian public's understanding of death and death determination: a nationwide survey

PURPOSE

We aimed to describe the Canadian public's understanding and perception of how death is determined in Canada, their level of interest in learning about death and death determination, and their preferred strategies for informing the public.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of the Canadian public. The survey presented two scenarios of a man who met current criteria for neurologic death determination (scenario 1) and a man who met current criteria for circulatory death determination (scenario 2). Survey questions evaluated understanding of how death is determined, acceptance of death determination by neurologic and circulatory criteria, and interest and preferred strategies in learning more about the topic.

RESULTS

Among 2,000 respondents (50.8% women; n = 1,015), nearly 67.2% believed that the man in scenario 1 was dead (n = 1,344) and 81.2% (n = 1,623) believed that the man in scenario 2 was dead. Respondents who believed that the man was not dead or were unsure endorsed several factors that may increase their agreement with the determination of death, including requiring more information about how death was determined, seeing the results of brain imaging/tests, and a third doctor's opinion. Predictors of disbelief that the man in scenario 1 is dead were younger age, being uncomfortable with the topic of death, and subscribing to a religion. Predictors of disbelief that the man in scenario 2 is dead were younger age, residing in Quebec (compared with Ontario), having a high school education, and subscribing to a religion. Most respondents (63.3%) indicated interest in learning more about death and death determination. Most respondents preferred to receive information about death and death determination from their health care professional (50.9%) and written information provided by their health care professional (42.7%).

CONCLUSION

Among the Canadian public, the understanding of neurologic and circulatory death determination is variable. More uncertainty exists with death determination by neurologic criteria than with circulatory criteria. Nevertheless, there is a high level of general interest in learning more about how death is determined in Canada. These findings provide important opportunities for further public engagement.

A brain-based definition of death and criteria for its determination after arrest of circulation or neurologic function in Canada: a 2023 clinical practice guideline

This 2023 Clinical Practice Guideline provides the biomedical definition of death based on permanent cessation of brain function that applies to all persons, as well as recommendations for death determination by circulatory criteria for potential organ donors and death determination by neurologic criteria for all mechanically ventilated patients regardless of organ donation potential. This Guideline is endorsed by the Canadian Critical Care Society, the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (representing the Canadian Neurological Society, Canadian Neurosurgical Society, Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists, Canadian Association of Child Neurology, Canadian Society of Neuroradiology, and Canadian Stroke Consortium), Canadian Blood Services, the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the Nurse Practitioners Association of Canada, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society.

Satisfaction and Race Influence on Positive Health Choices among Patients at an Urban Community Health Center

Background. Promoting positive health choices is one way to lessen health care disparities in indigent populations. This pilot study investigated satisfaction with the health information received at an urban heath care center for the indigent and its effect on health behaviors. Such information will inform providers on their role in advancing the health center’s quality improvement goals (i.e., goals used to measure the clinic’s performance in providing preventive service information to patients). Methods. A survey was used to determine respondent satisfaction with health care information and whether respondents would make positive health choices based on this information. Results. Respondents (n = 185) were satisfied with the health information received; this was the most consistent predictor of making a lifestyle change. Minority respondents were more likely to get a vaccination, to not start smoking, and to start exercising than non-minority respondents. Conclusion. The results suggested that, for the positive health choices examined, satisfaction with education is very important. For certain positive health choices, race also may play a role. Additional studies should be undertaken linking chronic health problems to patient responses.

Clinical efficacy of specific immunotherapy to cat dander: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of specific immunotherapy with standardized cat dander extract, using objective endpoints and simulated 'natural' exposure to cats.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study carried out at a UK Allergy research clinic.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-eight patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with asthma due to cat allergy. Subjects were stratified for cat sensitivity, cat ownership and asthma, and the groups were well matched for all relevant parameters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptom scores and peak flow rate during and after exposure to cats in a cat-room. Skin tests and conjunctival provocation thresholds.

RESULTS

The actively treated group showed a marked reduction in symptoms during the cat exposure (mean score 61.6-17.1; P < 0.001) with no change in the placebo group (64.7 vs 62.1). The active group also showed a reduced peak flow response to cat exposure (mean fall of 85 L/min pretreatment, 29 L/min after treatment, P < 0.005) as well as reductions in conjunctival provocation sensitivity, skin sensitivity to cat extract and skin sensitivity to house dust mite (D.pteronyssinus). Skin reactivity to histamine and codeine were unaltered. No significant adverse reactions were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific immunotherapy seems to be an effective treatment for cat allergy. Allergy to cats is common and often poorly controlled on conventional pharmacotherapy. Although cat allergy has not traditionally been considered as a valid indication for immunotherapy in the UK, it should now be considered as a legitimate treatment, especially for those who are unable to avoid exposure.

Safety aspects of local endobronchial allergen challenge in asthmatic patients

Local endobronchial allergen challenge is being increasingly used to investigate the role of allergic inflammation in asthma. However, little information is available about the safety of this procedure and the changes induced in airway physiology. BAL and biopsy were performed at 10 min and at 4 to 6 h, or 24 h after segmental allergen challenge in 49 patients with atopic asthma. Two hours after challenge, FEV1 was reduced from 97.6 +/- 13.9 (mean +/- SD) to 83.4 +/- 21.7% predicted. FEV1 remained reduced at 4 to 6 h (87.7 +/- 20.4%), but it had nearly returned to baseline by 24 h (93.2 +/- 14.0%). When endobronchial challenge was combined with BAL and biopsy, the initial fall in FEV1 was slightly greater (from 101.8 +/- 14.2 to 78.5 +/- 13.6%). Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was measured in 10 subjects, and it showed a twofold increase 24 h after local challenge and lavage. Significant changes in FEV1 and methacholine PC20 were still detectable 72 h after challenge. Widespread wheezing occurred in 29% of the subjects, but none of the them had to be admitted to hospital. We conclude that local endobronchial allergen challenge, although producing measurable changes in airway physiology, is in general well tolerated and is an acceptable method to investigate airway pathophysiologic processes in patients with mild to moderate asthma.