Cognitive Dependence in Physically Independent Patients at Discharge From Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of cognitive dependence in adults who are physically independent at discharge from acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Analysis of historical clinical and demographic data obtained from inpatient stay.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation unit in a large, metropolitan university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult inpatients with moderate to severe TBI (N=226) who were physically independent at discharge from acute rehabilitation.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FIM Motor and Cognitive subscales, discharge destination, and care plan.

RESULTS

Approximately 69% (n=155) of the physically independent inpatients were cognitively dependent at discharge from acute rehabilitation, with the highest proportions of dependence found in the domains of problem solving and memory. Most (82.6%; n=128) of these physically independent, yet cognitively dependent, patients were discharged home. Of those discharged home, 82% (n=105) were discharged to the care of family members, and 11% (n=15) were discharged home alone. Patients from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds were significantly more likely than White patients to be discharged while cognitively dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of physically independent patients with TBI were cognitively dependent at the time of discharge from acute inpatient rehabilitation. Further research is needed to understand the effect of cognitive dependence on caregiver stress and strain and the disproportionate burden on racial and ethnic minority patients and families. Given the potential functional and safety limitations imposed by cognitive deficits, health care policy and practice should facilitate delivery of cognitive rehabilitation services in acute TBI rehabilitation.

Screening Instruments for the Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairments are common in individuals with MS and adversely affect functioning. Early detection of cognitive impairment, therefore, would enable earlier, and possibly more effective, treatment. We sought to compare self-reports with a short neuropsychological test as possible screening tools for cognitive impairment.

METHODS

One hundred patients with MS were tested with the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis; z scores were used to derive the Cognitive Index (CI). Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were performed, with criteria for impairment set at -1.5 and -2.0 SD below the mean. Scores from two self-reports (the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire-Patient Version and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version [BRIEF-A]) and a neuropsychological test (the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT]) were entered as test variables. Exploratory regression analyses were conducted with 1) CI and self-reports and 2) CI and the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI).

RESULTS

Classification accuracy was high or moderately high for SDMT when the criterion was -2.0 or -1.5 SD, respectively, but low for the self-reports. Hierarchical linear regression showed that the SDMT alone was the best predictor of cognitive impairment; adding the self-reports did not improve the model. Exploratory analyses indicated that certain self-reports (BRIEF-A, PSI) provided some explanatory power in separate models.

CONCLUSIONS

The SDMT is a more accurate screening tool for cognitive impairment; however, self-reports provide additional information and may complement objective testing. Results suggest that screening for cognitive impairment may require a multidimensional approach.