Implementation of a CMS Nursing Facility Initiative: Differences by Racial Minority Resident Population

Objectives: The CMS Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalizations Among Nursing Facility Residents: Payment Reform (NFI 2) provided billing opportunities to incentivize participating facilities to keep long-stay residents onsite for acute care, rather than hospitalizing them. We examined cross-facility differences in NFI 2 implementation by racial composition of facility resident populations. Methods: We analyzed Medicare claims in conjunction with in-person and telephone interviews among facility staff to assess NFI 2 engagement in relation to racial minority resident population. Results: Participating facilities with larger racial minority resident populations faced additional barriers to NFI 2 implementation. These facilities submitted fewer NFI 2 claims, reported more challenges engaging resident families, and experienced greater facility staff and leadership instability, compared to facilities with predominantly white resident populations. Discussion: Addressing structural differences within facilities with larger populations of racial minority residents may encourage future development of targeted programs to support diverse nursing facilities.

Federal Interventions Targeting Social Isolation and Loneliness: An Exploratory Review

Even prior to the COVID-19 Public Health and Medical Emergency, the experiences of chronic social isolation and loneliness (SIL) were growing among older adults. Countries began increasing national visibility for these issues and implementing programs and services focused on addressing them. In the United States (US), however, little is known about successful national interventions or their effectiveness in tackling SIL among older Americans. We conducted a rapid review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature from 2009-2019, focusing on existing federal programs, health systems, and health care models in the US that address SIL among older adults. Of the 110 articles identified, 36 met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized. Our review found few federal interventions that directly address SIL; several may be addressing SIL as an auxiliary outcome to addressing social determinants of health, such as group exercise, transportation support, or food insecurity. While these interventions may provide a promising opportunity, implementation and evaluation challenges were identified. Thus, federal and state agencies face significant obstacles to understanding the impact of existing interventions and their effectiveness in addressing SIL, hampering progress toward large scale implementation. As SIL receives increasing attention, we add another voice to existing literature that indicates significant heterogeneity among existing programs; we found that few evidence-based, scalable federal initiatives exist in the US that target SIL. Without resources from federal and state agencies, the ability of health entities, community-based organizations, and direct care providers to implement effective interventions is significantly diminished.

Trends in the Use of Residential Settings among Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

As the U.S. population ages, the prevalence of disability and functional limitations, and demand for long-term services and supports (LTSS), will increase. This study identified the distribution of older adults across different residential settings, and how their health characteristics have changed over time.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of older adults residing in traditional housing, community-based residential facilities (CBRF), and nursing facilities using three data sources: The Medicare Current Beneficiary, 2008 and 2013; the Health and Retirement Study, 2008 and 2014; and the National Health and Aging Trends Study, 2011 and 2015. We calculated age-standardized prevalence of older adults by setting, functional limitations, and comorbidities, and tested for health characteristics changes relative to the baseline year (2002).

RESULTS

The proportion of older adults in traditional housing increased over time, relative to baseline (p < 0.05), while the proportion of older adults in CBRF was unchanged. The proportion of nursing facility residents declined from 2002 to 2013 in the MCBS (p < 0.05). The prevalence of dementia and functional limitations among traditional housing residents increased, relative to the baseline year in the HRS and MCBS (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The proportion of older adults residing in traditional housing is increasing, while the nursing facility population is decreasing. This change may not be due to better health; rather, older adults may be relying on non-institutional LTSS.

Treating in Place: Acute Care for Long-Stay Residents in Nursing Facilities Under a CMS Initiative

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Nursing facility (NF) residents are commonly hospitalized, and many of these hospitalizations may be avoidable. A Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiative enables participating NFs to bill Medicare for providing on-site acute care to long-stay residents diagnosed with one of six ambulatory care sensitive conditions (pneumonia, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dehydration, skin infection, and urinary tract infection) that account for many avoidable hospitalizations. This study describes the frequency of initiative-related treatment for the six conditions, both on site and in the hospital, and the health status of residents who were treated.

DESIGN

We used the Minimum Data Set V3.0 and Medicare data to identify eligible residents, detect on-site treatment under the initiative as well as in-hospital treatment both before and during the initiative, and measure health status.

SETTING

Participating NFs during fiscal years 2017 to 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 47,202 long-stay NF residents from 260 facilities in seven states.

INTERVENTION

CMS initiative to reduce avoidable hospitalizations among NF residents-payment reform.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage per year who received on-site treatment (2017-2018), and who received in-hospital treatment (2014-2018), for the six conditions.

RESULTS

Each year, approximately 20% of residents received treatment on site during 2017 to 2018, and under 10% received treatment in the hospital during 2014 to 2018, with little change over these years. Residents treated on site had less chronic illness than those treated in the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Although the initiative sought to reduce hospitalizations, in-hospital treatment for the six conditions did not substantially change after initiative implementation, despite substantial new billing for on-site treatment for those conditions. These findings suggest that many residents treated on site would likely not have been hospitalized even absent the initiative. The residents treated on site tended to have fewer chronic conditions than those treated in the hospital.