Evaluation of bird-adapted self-amplifying mRNA vaccine formulations in chickens

Each year, millions of poultry succumb to highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus (AIV) and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infections. Conventional vaccines based on inactivated or live-attenuated viruses are useful tools for disease prevention and control, yet, they often fall short in terms of safety, efficacy, and development times. Therefore, versatile vaccine platforms are crucial to protect poultry from emerging viral pathogens. Self-amplifying (replicon) RNA vaccines offer a well-defined and scalable option for the protection of both animals and humans. The best-studied replicon platform, based on the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV; family Togaviridae) TC-83 vaccine strain, however, displays limited efficacy in poultry, warranting the exploration of alternative, avian-adapted, replicon platforms. In this study, we engineered two Tembusu virus (TMUV; family Flaviviridae) replicons encoding varying capsid gene lengths and compared these to the benchmark VEEV replicon in vitro. The TMUV replicon system exhibited a robust and prolonged transgene expression compared to the VEEV replicon system in both avian and mammalian cells. Moreover, the TMUV replicon induced a lesser cytopathic effect compared to the VEEV replicon RNA in vitro. DNA-launched versions of the TMUV and VEEV replicons (DREP) were also developed. The replicons successfully expressed the AIV haemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins and the IBDV capsid protein (pVP2). To assess the immune responses elicited by the TMUV replicon system in chickens, a prime-boost vaccination trial was conducted using lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-formulated replicon RNA and DREP encoding the viral (glyco)proteins of AIV or IBDV. Both TMUV and VEEV replicon RNAs were unable to induce a humoral response against AIV. However, TMUV replicon RNA induced IBDV-specific seroconversion in vaccinated chickens, in contrast to VEEV replicon RNA, which showed no significant humoral response. In both AIV and IBDV immunization studies, VEEV DREP generated the highest (neutralizing) antibody responses, which underscores the potential for self-amplifying mRNA vaccine technology to combat emerging poultry diseases.

Efficacy of a turkey herpesvirus double construct vaccine (HVT-ND-IBD) against challenge with different strains of Newcastle disease, infectious bursal disease and Marek's disease viruses

A double construct vaccine of turkey herpesvirus (HVT) was prepared that contains the fusion (F) gene from Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and the viral protein 2 (VP2) gene from infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Safety of the vaccine (HVT-ND-IBD) was confirmed and efficacy was evaluated after subcutaneous (SC) vaccination at 1 day of age or the in ovo route of vaccination. Challenges were performed with velogenic NDV strains (Texas GB and Herts Weybridge 33/56), with different strains of IBDV (classical strain STC; very virulent strain CS89 and variant E strain) and with Marek's disease virus (MDV) strain RB1B. Vaccination with HVT-ND-IBD induced a high level of protection against these challenges. Vaccination with HVT is often combined with Rispens CVI988 vaccine and live ND vaccines for higher and earlier, MD and ND protection, respectively. HVT-ND-IBD vaccination in combination with these vaccines showed MD protection as early as 4 days post vaccination and ND protection as early as 2 weeks post vaccination. The long protection as seen with HVT vaccination was confirmed by demonstrating protection against NDV up to 60 weeks. Finally, to evaluate the performance of the vaccine in commercial birds with maternally-derived antibodies, two field trials were performed, using in ovo vaccination in broilers and SC vaccination in combination with Rispens CVI988 vaccine in layer-type birds. The efficacy was confirmed for all components by challenges. These results demonstrate that HVT-ND-IBD is a safe and highly efficacious vaccine for simultaneous control of ND, IBD and MD. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS A double construct HVT vaccine with the NDV F and the IBDV VP2 genes was prepared. The vaccine protects against three important diseases: MDV, NDV and IBDV. In ovo and sub-cutaneous vaccination was evaluated in the field in commercial chickens.

Vaccination of cats against feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV): a matter of challenge

So far, most apparently successful immunodeficiency virus vaccines have only been tested against challenge with cell culture-adapted virus. However, even live priming of cats with feline herpesvirus (FHV) vectors expressing the FIV gag and env gene followed by inactivated booster vaccination with fixed FIX infected cell vaccine proved non-protective against infection with a primary FIV isolate. An effective FIV vaccine for field applications therefore is still not underway.

Evaluation of subunit vaccines against feline immunodeficiency virus infection

Subunit vaccines prepared against feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infection were evaluated in two trials. First, cats were immunized with bacterial expression products of an envelope fragment that contained the V3 neutralization domain of the FIV surface protein fused to either galactokinase (K-SU3) or glutathione-S-transferase (G-SU3). Quantitative and qualitative differences in the humoral immune response were observed with three adjuvants of which Quil A was the best in terms of total and virus neutralizing antibody. Notwithstanding the responses induced, 19 of 20 immunized cats did not resist challenge and became infected. To determine whether priming with a live viral vector would confer protection, cats were inoculated oronasally and subcutaneously with a feline herpesvirus (FHV) mutant expressing the FIV env gene; two booster immunizations followed using the K-SU3 product in either Quil A or a mineral oill Al(OH)3 adjuvant. FIV-specific antibody responses were only weak, and the vaccinates did not withstand challenge with a low dose of homologous virus.

Chronic non-specific lung disease and occupational exposures estimated by means of a job exposure matrix: the Zutphen Study

Information gathered in the Zutphen Study, the Dutch contribution to the Seven Countries Study that started in the 1960s, was used in this study. Of the 1266 men invited to take part in the 1985 survey, 939 (74%) participated. All participants were interviewed according to the BMRC chronic non-specific lung disease (CNSLD) questionnaire and medically examined for CNSLD complaints by a trained physician. The physician also filled in a questionnaire containing questions concerning previous treatments for asthma, bronchitis and emphysema. Exposures were generated by means of a job exposure matrix on the basis of the longest performed job and the gain and grouped into 12 exposure categories. A logistic regression analysis was performed using the occupational exposures as the sector of industry dependent variables in allowing for smoking habits, age and socioeconomic status. For the diagnosis by the physician and treatment for emphysema and or bronchitis, the strongest elevated odds ratios were found, indicating an adverse effect of the occupational exposures. In contrast, the variable 'ever treated for asthma' had odds ratios smaller than one with most of the exposure variables indicating a selection effect. In an analysis in which everyone who was ever treated for asthma was excluded an increase in the odds ratios compared with the first analysis was seen. The relationships between occupational exposures as generated by the job exposure matrix and CNSLD were stronger than those recently reported in the literature.