Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular interventions in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) might offer clinical benefits compared to angiography-guided PTA in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). A cost-effectiveness model was developed to examine the benefits and costs of IVUS-guided PTA versus angiography-guided PTA in PAD patients with femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease. Methods: A two-step model (a one-year decision tree followed by a lifetime semi-Markov model) was developed from a German healthcare payer perspective to estimate the costs and outcomes over a one-year and lifetime horizon. Clinical events included target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation, and death. Transition probabilities and utility values were derived from published literature. Healthcare costs were based on German Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) codes. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results: In the one-year horizon, IVUS-guided PTA resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs of 0.02 and €919 per patient respectively, with a corresponding ICER of €45,195/QALY gained versus angiography-guided PTA. In the lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PTA outperforms angiography-guided PTA; it was associated with a cost saving of €46 per patient and incremental QALY of 0.22. Utility value for post-TLR, as well as probabilities of death and TLR had the greatest impact on the one-year ICER, while cost of TLR and probabilities of TLR and amputation influenced the lifetime ICER most. The probability of IVUS-guided PTA being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY was 50.4% in the one-year horizon and increased to 85.9% in the lifetime horizon. Conclusions: In this analysis IVUS-guided PTA among patients with symptomatic FP atherosclerosis was cost-saving in a lifetime horizon from the German healthcare payer perspective.

Cost-utility of direct transfer to angiography suite (DTAS) bypassing conventional imaging for patients with acute ischemic stroke in Spain: results from the ANGIOCAT trial

BACKGROUND

The ANGIOCAT trial showed a clinical benefit of direct to angiography suite (DTAS) for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke admitted within 6 hours after symptom onset in decreased hospital workflow time and improved clinical outcome. However, the impact of DTAS implementation on hospital costs is unknown. This economic evaluation aims to assess the cost-utility of DTAS from the provider (hospital) perspective.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis was applied to compare DTAS with the standard direct to CT (DTCT) suite approach using direct cost and health outcomes data. The time horizon was 90 days. One-way sensitivity analysis as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed, varying the model parameters by ±25%. Measures included costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Health outcomes, classified according to the modified Rankin Scale, were obtained from the ANGIOCAT trial. Respective utilities were obtained from the literature.

RESULTS

DTAS is the dominant strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is -€89 110 (-$97 600) with cost saving per patient of -€2848 (-$3120). The improved clinical outcome is directly related with a decrease in costs for the hospital, mainly due to the decrease in costs of hospital stay, improved clinical outcome and fewer complications.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with LVO admitted within 6 hours after symptom onset, the DTAS not only improves clinical outcome but also decreases the costs (dominant option) compared with the standard DTCT. Multicentric international randomized clinical trials are ongoing to determine the replicability of our findings.

Cost-effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A UK perspective

BACKGROUND

Use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes over angiography alone. Despite this, the adoption of IVUS in clinical practice remains low.

AIMS

To examine the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI compared to angiography alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

METHODS

A one-year decision tree and lifetime Markov model were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI to angiography alone for two hypothetical adult populations consisting of 1,000 individuals: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and unstable angina/ non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The UK healthcare system perspective was applied using 2019/20 costs. All-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat PCI, lifetime costs, life expectancy and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PCI was cost-effective compared to angiography alone in both populations, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3,649 and £5,706 per-patient in STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively. In the one-year time horizon, the model suggested that IVUS was associated with reductions in mortality, MI and repeat PCI by 51%, 33% and 52% in STEMI and by 50%, 29% and 57% in UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the model with IVUS being 100% cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £20,000 per QALY-gained.

CONCLUSIONS

From a UK healthcare perspective, an IVUS-guided PCI strategy was highly cost-effective over angiography alone amongst ACS patients undergoing DES implantation due to the medium- and long-term reduction in repeat PCI, death, and MI.