Single cell landscape of functionally cured chronic hepatitis B patients reveals activation of innate and altered CD4-CTL-driven adaptive immunity

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or functional cure (FC), is considered the desirable therapeutic outcome for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, the immune-pathological biomarkers and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study we comprehensively interrogate disease-associated cell states (DACS) identified within intra-hepatic tissue and matched PBMCs from either CHB or FC patients, at the resolution of single cells, to provide novel insights into putative mechanisms underlying FC.

METHODS

We combined single cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) with multiparametric flow cytometry-based immune phenotyping, and multiplexed immunofluorescence to elucidate the immunopathological cell states associated with CHB vs FC.

RESULTS

We find that the intra-hepatic environment of CHB and FC patients displays specific cell identities and molecular signatures that are distinct from those found in matched PBMCs. FC is associated with emergence of an altered adaptive immune response marked by CD4 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD4-CTLs), and an activated innate response represented by liver-resident natural killer (LR-NK) cells, specific Kupffer cell (KC) subtypes and marginated neutrophils. Surprisingly, we find that FC patients are also characterized by the presence of MHC class II-expressing hepatocytes and low but persistent levels of cccDNA and pgRNA, which may play an important role in achieving functional cure in HBV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides conceptually novel insights into the immuno-pathological control of HBV cure, and opens exciting new avenues for clinical management, biomarker discovery and therapeutic interventions. We believe that the discoveries from this study, as it relates to the activation of an innate and altered immune response that may facilitate sustained, low-grade inflammation, may have broader implications in the resolution of chronic viral hepatitis.

Antiviral therapy substantially reduces HCC risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in the indeterminate phase

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

HCC risk in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is higher in the indeterminate phase compared with the inactive phase. However, it is unclear if antiviral therapy reduces HCC risk in this population. We aimed to evaluate the association between antiviral therapy and HCC risk in the indeterminate phase.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We analyzed 855 adult (59% male), treatment-naïve patients with CHB infection without advanced fibrosis in the indeterminate phase at 14 centers (USA, Europe, and Asia). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the treated (n = 405) and untreated (n = 450) groups. The primary outcome was HCC development. The mean age was 46±13 years, the median alanine transaminase was 38 (interquartile range, 24-52) U/L, the mean HBV DNA was 4.5±2.1 log 10 IU/mL, and 20% were HBeAg positive. The 2 groups were similar after IPTW. After IPTW (n = 819), the 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative HCC incidence was 3%, 4%, and 9% among treated patients (n = 394) versus 3%, 15%, and 19%, among untreated patients (n = 425), respectively ( p = 0.02), with consistent findings in subgroup analyses for age >35 years, males, HBeAg positive, HBV DNA>1000 IU/mL, and alanine transaminase

CONCLUSIONS

Antiviral therapy reduces HCC risk by 70% among patients with indeterminate-phase CHB. These data have important implications for the potential expansion of CHB treatment criteria.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Female
• Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology
• Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology
• Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/prevention & control
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy
• Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology
• Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology
• Liver Neoplasms/etiology
• Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control
• Alanine Transaminase
• DNA, Viral
• Hepatitis B e Antigens
• Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
• Hepatitis B/complications
• Hepatitis B virus/genetics

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Daniel Q Huang Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Andrew Tran Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
Ming-Lun Yeh Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Satoshi Yasuda Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
Pei-Chien Tsai Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Chung-Feng Huang Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Chia Yen Dai Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Eiichi Ogawa Department of General Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Masatoshi Ishigami Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
Takanori Ito Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
Ritsuzo Kozuka Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
Masaru Enomoto Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
Takanori Suzuki Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan
Yoko Yoshimaru Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
Carmen M Preda Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinic Fundeni Institute, Bucharest, Romania
Raluca I Marin Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinic Fundeni Institute, Bucharest, Romania
Irina Sandra Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinic Fundeni Institute, Bucharest, Romania
Sally Tran Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
Sabrina X Z Quek Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Htet Htet Toe Wai Khine Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Norio Itokawa Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Masanori Atsukawa Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Haruki Uojima Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
Tsunamasa Watanabe Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
Hirokazu Takahashi Liver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
Kaori Inoue Liver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
Mayumi Maeda Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
Joseph K Hoang Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
Lindsey Trinh Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
Scott Barnett Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
Ramsey Cheung Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare, Palo Alto, California, USA
Seng Gee Lim Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Huy N Trinh San Jose Gastroenterology, San Jose, California, USA
Wan-Long Chuang Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Yasuhito Tanaka Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan Department of Virology and Liver Unit, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
Hidenori Toyoda Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
Ming-Lung Yu Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Mindie H Nguyen Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

Collapse

Switching to or Add-on Peginterferon in Patients on Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B: The SWAP RCT

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal therapeutic strategy in nucleoside analogue (NA) experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) using peginterferon is still unclear; hence we explored a switch to or add-on peginterferon strategy versus continued NA.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of CHB patients on NA >12 months with HBV DNA(-) randomized to switch or add-on peginterferon-alpha2b (1.5 μg/kg/weekly) for 48 weeks versus continuing NA (controls) (allocation 2:2:1; Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01928511) in tertiary Singapore hospitals. The primary composite endpoint at week 72 was hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss or quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) >1 log IU/mL reduction, and secondary endpoints were HBsAg loss, HBsAg seroconversion, qHBsAg <200 IU/mL, qHBsAg <100 IU/mL, HBV DNA(-), viral relapse, and safety. Analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT).

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients (controls 51, switch 103, add-on 99) were randomized. The primary ITT endpoint was achieved in 3.9% of controls, 33.3% of switch, and 26.7% of add-on (P < .0001, switch/add-on versus controls). HBsAg loss occurred in 0% of controls, 7.8% of switch, and 10.1% of add-on (ITT, P < .001, switch/add-on versus controls). HBeAg(+) patients on peginterferon had higher HBeAg loss than controls but poor HBsAg responses, whereas HBeAg(-) patients on peginterferon achieved better HBsAg responses than controls. Reduction in qHBsAg in HBeAg(+) was 0.14 log IU/mL versus 0.51 log IU/mL in HBeAg(-) (P < .0001) in peginterferon-treated patients. Clinical relapse was higher in switch (13.6% overall, 27% in HBeAg(+)) versus 1% add-on and 0% controls. Adverse events were typically interferon-related symptoms, with one death (myocardial infarction unrelated to therapy).

CONCLUSIONS

ITT analysis showed that either peginterferon strategies were superior to NA for the primary endpoint and HBsAg loss, but add-on peginterferon is preferred to switch due to improved safety and similar efficacy. ClincialTrials.gov number: NCT01928511.

Longitudinal renal changes in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir versus TDF: a REAL-B study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to compare the longitudinal changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated with entecavir (ETV) vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 6189 adult treatment-naïve CHB patients initiated therapy with TDF (n = 2482) or ETV (n = 3707) at 25 international centers using multivariable generalized linear modeling (GLM) to determine mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) and Kaplan-Meier method to estimate incidence of renal impairment (≥ 1 chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage worsening). We also examined above renal changes in matched ETV and TDF patients (via propensity score matching [PSM] on age, sex, diabetes mellitus [DM], hypertension [HTN], cirrhosis, baseline eGFR, and follow-up duration).

RESULTS

In the overall cohort (mean age 49.7 years, 66.2% male), the baseline eGFR was higher for TDF vs. ETV group (75.9 vs. 74.0, p = 0.009). PSM yielded 1871 pairs of ETV or TDF patients with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 and 520 pairs for the eGFR < 60 group. GLM analysis of the overall (unmatched) cohort and PSM cohorts revealed lower adjusted mean eGFRs in TDF (vs. ETV) patients (all p < 0.01) during 10 years of follow-up. Among PSM eGFR ≥ 60 patients, the 5-year cumulative incidences of renal impairment were 42.64% for ETV and 48.03% for TDF (p = 0.0023). In multivariable Cox regression, TDF vs. ETV (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.43) was associated with higher risk of worsening renal function.

CONCLUSION

Over the 10-year study follow-up, compared to ETV, TDF was associated with a lower mean eGFR and higher incidence of renal impairment.