The role of chest X-ray in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: findings and correlation with clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

It is possible to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) faster and more accurately with chest X-ray (CXR) and chest computed tomography (CT) than with reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) tests. The aim of this study was to verify the possibility of reducing the use of CT in diagnosis and follow-up of COVID-19 infection by using CXR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 326 COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in Ankara City Hospital were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

A total of 326 patients were RT-PCR positive for COVID-19 infection; 178 were male (54.6%) and 148 were female (45.4%), with a median age of 45. Considering the results, the baseline CXR sensitivity in our experience was approximately 72%. The CXRs of 113 patients with abnormal CT were divided into 2 groups, the CXR normal and abnormal groups, and were then compared. In the 1st group with abnormal CXR, the mean age, the number of patients over 65 years old, and the comorbidity rate were higher. Additionally, it was determined that the number of patients requiring respiratory support and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in this 1st group was higher than in the 2nd group (with normal CXR). Most of the patients who died (91%, 10/11) were in Group 1. In the group with normal CXR, no patients in the critically ill category needed invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilators.

CONCLUSIONS

CXR can help in detecting clinically moderate and severe cases of COVID-19. CXR can assist clinicians in patient management and treatment planning regarding the clinical course, respiratory support, ICU need, and mortality and can help them prepare for potential negative outcomes.

Outcomes in patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and treated with tigecycline alone or in combination therapy

PURPOSE

Acinetobacter baumannii is a non-fermenting aerobic gram-negative bacteria and one of the important nosocomial pathogens, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). In recent years, multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates have been an emerging problem, with limited therapeutic options. Tigecycline is a novel antimicrobial, with its in vitro activity against most gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that was conducted in a tertiary care hospital with 550 beds in Ankara, Turkey, from January 2009 to July 2010. Thirty-three patients who had carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. infections and received tigecycline alone or in combination with other antibiotics for at least 3 days were included.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 62 (18-87) years. All of the patients were diagnosed and treated in the ICU. Clinical responses were observed in 23 patients (69.7%). Ten patients (30%) had clinical failure. There was no significant difference between ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bloodstream infection (BSI) in terms of clinical or microbiological outcome (p > 0.05). The microbiological response rate was 50%. Superinfection was detected in 13 patients (43.3%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated pathogen. The 30-day overall mortality rate and attributable mortality rates were 57.6 and 24.2%, respectively. The attributable mortality rate was higher in the group in which microbiological eradication was not provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated skin and soft tissue infections, and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, emerged resistance of Acinetobacter spp. and limited therapeutic options left physicians no choice but to use tigecycline for off-label indications.