1
|
Casaro S, Pérez-Báez J, Bisinotto RS, Chebel RC, Prim JG, Gonzalez TD, Gomes GC, Tao S, Toledo IM, do Amaral BC, Bollati JM, Zenobi MG, Martinez N, Dahl GE, Santos JEP, Galvão KN. Association between prepartum body condition score and prepartum and postpartum dry matter intake and energy balance in multiparous Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2024:S0022-0302(24)00047-X. [PMID: 38278298 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-24047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
The objectives of this retrospective observational study were to investigate the association between body condition score (BCS) at 21 d before calving with prepartum and postpartum dry matter intake (DMI), energy balance (EB), and milk yield. Data from 427 multigravid cows from 11 different experiments conducted at the University of Florida were used. Cows were classified according to their BCS at 21 d before calving as FAT (BCS ≥4.00; n = 83), MOD (BCS 3.25 to 3.75; n = 287), and THIN (BCS ≤3.00; n = 57). Daily DMI from -21 to -1 and from +1 to +28 DIM was individually recorded. Energy balance was calculated as the difference between net energy for lactation consumed and required. Dry matter intake in FAT cows was lesser than in MOD and THIN cows both prepartum (FAT = 9.97 ± 0.21, MOD = 11.15 ± 0.14, THIN = 11.92 ± 0.22 kg/d) and postpartum (FAT = 14.35 ± 0.49, MOD = 15.47 ± 0.38, THIN = 16.09 ± 0.47 kg/d). Dry matter intake was also lesser for MOD cows compared with THIN cows prepartum, but not postpartum. Energy balance in FAT cows was lesser than in MOD and THIN cows both prepartum (FAT = -4.16 ± 0.61, MOD = -1.20 ± 0.56, THIN = 0.88 ± 0.62 Mcal/d) and postpartum (FAT = -12.77 ± 0.50, MOD = -10.13 ± 0.29, THIN = -6.14 ± 0.51 Mcal/d). Energy balance was also lesser for MOD cows compared with THIN cows both prepartum and postpartum. There was a quadratic association between BCS at 21 d before calving and milk yield. Increasing BCS from 2.5 to 3.5 was associated with an increase in daily milk yield of 6.0 kg and 28 d cumulative milk of 147 kg. Increasing BCS from 3.5 to 4.5 was associated with a decrease in daily milk yield of 4.4 kg and 28 d cumulative milk of 116 kg. In summary, a moderated BCS at 21 d before calving was associated with intermediate DMI and EB pre- and postpartum but greater milk yield compared with thinner and fatter cows. Our findings indicate that a moderated BCS is ideal for ensuring a successful lactation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Casaro
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - J Pérez-Báez
- Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas y Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 10904
| | - R S Bisinotto
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - R C Chebel
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - J G Prim
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - T D Gonzalez
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - G C Gomes
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - S Tao
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793
| | - I M Toledo
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - B C do Amaral
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - J M Bollati
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - M G Zenobi
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - N Martinez
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - G E Dahl
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - J E P Santos
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610; D. H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610
| | - K N Galvão
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610; D. H. Barron Reproductive and Perinatal Biology Research Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidson BD, Dado-Senn B, Padilla NR, Fabris TF, Casarotto LT, Ouellet V, Toledo IM, Dahl GE, Laporta J. Late-gestation heat stress abatement in dairy heifers promotes thermoregulation and improves productivity. J Dairy Sci 2020; 104:2357-2368. [PMID: 33246618 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Multiparous, nonlactating pregnant cows are negatively affected by heat stress, but the effect of heat stress on more thermotolerant pregnant heifers has received less attention. Our objective was to characterize the effect of late-gestation heat abatement on thermoregulatory responses and subsequent milk production of nulliparous Holstein heifers. Pregnant heifers, blocked by body condition score (BCS) and predicted transmitting ability (PTA) for milk, were enrolled in either heat stress (HT, shade of freestall barn; n = 16) or cooling (CL, shade of freestall barn, water soakers, and fans; n = 15) environments during the last 60 d of pregnancy (~8 weeks). Rectal temperature (RT; thermometer), respiration rate (RR; breaths/min), sweating rate (SR; VapoMeter, Delfin Technologies, Kuopio, Finland), and skin temperature (ST; infrared thermometer) were measured thrice weekly from enrollment to calving. Vaginal temperature (VT; i-button intravaginal device) was measured every 10 min for 7 consecutive days at wk -8, -6, -4, and -2 relative to calving and averaged hourly. Daily thermoregulatory patterns assessed by SR and ST, were measured every 4 h over a 36-h time interval at wk -6, -4, and -2 relative to calving. Upon calving, milk, protein, and fat yields were recorded twice daily for 15 wk. The average temperature-humidity index (Hobo Pro temperature probe, Onset Computer Corporation, Pocasset, MA) in the barn during the precalving period was 77 (minimum of 72, maximum of 82). Only heifers that gave birth to a female calf (CL = 12, HT = 14) were included in the statistical analysis. In the precalving period, CL heifers had lower RR (44.3 vs. 60.0 ± 1.6 breaths/min), RT (38.7 vs. 38.8 ± 0.04°C), unshaved ST (34.7 vs. 35.3 ± 0.17°C), and unshaved SR (19.0 vs. 35.2 ± 1.9 g/m2h), relative to HT heifers. Additionally, VT was lower in CL heifers during wk -4, and -2, specifically during early morning and early afternoon hours. When measured over a 36-h time interval, ST and SR were lower in CL heifers, when compared with HT heifers for all weeks. Notably, ST was reduced overnight and SR was reduced during the daytime. Cooled heifers had higher milk yield (35.8 vs. 31.9 ± 1.4 kg/d), when compared with HT heifers. Similar to multiparous cows, our data indicate that actively cooling heifers in late pregnancy is effective in promoting thermoregulation and results in elevated milk production postcalving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B D Davidson
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - B Dado-Senn
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - N Rosa Padilla
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - T F Fabris
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - L T Casarotto
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - V Ouellet
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - I M Toledo
- IFAS Extension, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603
| | - G E Dahl
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608
| | - J Laporta
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32608.
| |
Collapse
|