Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study

This phase 1 study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00507442) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide (VDCR) and to assess the safety and efficacy of this combination in untreated multiple myeloma patients. Cohorts of three to six patients received a cyclophosphamide dosage of 100, 200, 300, 400 or 500 mg/m(2) (on days 1 and 8) plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) (on days 1, 4, 8 and 11), dexamethasone 40 mg (on days 1, 8 and 15) and lenalidomide 15 mg (on days 1-14), for eight 21-day induction cycles, followed by four 42-day maintenance cycles (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, 15 and 22). The MTD was the cyclophosphamide dose below which more than one of six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Twenty-five patients were treated. Two DLTs were seen, of grade 4 febrile neutropenia (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2)) and grade 4 herpes zoster despite anti-viral prophylaxis (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)). No cumulative hematological toxicity or thromboembolic episodes were reported. The overall response rate was 96%, including 20% stringent complete response (CR), 40% CR/near-complete response and 68% >or=very good partial response. VDCR is well tolerated and highly active in this population. No MTD was reached; the recommended phase 2 cyclophosphamide dose in VDCR is 500 mg/m(2), which was the highest dose tested.

Comparison of residence time estimation methods for radioimmunotherapy dosimetry and treatment planning--Monte Carlo simulation studies

Estimating the residence times in tumor and normal organs is an essential part of treatment planning for radioimmunotherapy (RIT). This estimation is usually done using a conjugate view whole body scan time series and planar processing. This method has logistical and cost advantages compared to 3-D imaging methods such as Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), but, because it does not provide information about the 3-D distribution of activity, it is difficult to fully compensate for effects such as attenuation and background and overlapping activity. Incomplete compensation for these effects reduces the accuracy of the residence time estimates. In this work we compare residence times estimates obtained using planar methods to those from methods based on quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) reconstructions. We have previously developed QSPECT methods that provide compensation for attenuation, scatter, collimator-detector response, and partial volume effects. In this study we compared the use of residence time estimation methods using QSPECT to planar methods. The evaluation was done using the realistic NCAT phantom with organ time activities that model (111)In ibritumomab tiuxetan. Projection data were obtained using Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) that realistically model the image formation process including penetration and scatter in the collimator-detector system. These projection data were used to evaluate the accuracy of residence time estimation using a time series of QSPECT studies, a single QSPECT study combined with planar scans and the planar scans alone. The errors in the residence time estimates were 3.8%, 15%, and 2%-107% for the QSPECT, hybrid planar/QSPECT, and planar methods, respectively. The quantitative accuracy was worst for pure planar processing and best for pure QSPECT processing. Hybrid planar/QSPECT methods, where a single QSPECT study was combined with a series of planar scans, provided a large and statistically significant improvement in quantitative accuracy for most organs compared to the planar scans alone, even without sophisticated attention to background subtraction or thickness corrections in planar processing. These results indicate that hybrid planar/QSPECT methods are generally superior to pure planar methods and may be an acceptable alternative to performing a time series of QSPECT studies.

Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim after chemotherapy for lymphoma

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to assess the duration of grade 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) after one cycle of chemotherapy with etoposide, methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in patients randomly assigned to receive one dose of pegfilgrastim or daily filgrastim after chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profiles, time to neutrophil recovery, pharmacokinetics, and safety were also assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An open-label, randomized, phase II study was designed to compare the effects of a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (sustained-duration filgrastim) 100 micro g/kg per chemotherapy cycle (n = 33) with daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 micro g/kg (n = 33) in patients receiving salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

RESULTS

The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 69% and 68%, respectively. In addition, the mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (2.8 and 2.4 days, respectively). The results for the two groups were also not significantly different for febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profile, time to neutrophil recovery, or toxicity profile. A single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 micro g/kg produced a sustained serum concentration relative to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim. Filgrastim-treated patients received a median of 11 injections per cycle.

CONCLUSION

Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated in this patient population. A single injection of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle provided neutrophil support with safety and efficacy similar to that provided by daily injections of filgrastim. Once-per-cycle administration of pegfilgrastim simplifies the management of neutropenia and may have important clinical benefits for patients and healthcare providers.

Using point-of-care CD34 enumeration to optimize PBSC collection conditions

BACKGROUND

A PBSC graft containing 4-5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg is considered optimal in terms of durable engraftment. Tracking CD34 kinetics via point-of-care testing during PBSC mobilization could determine which (and when) patients will yield an optimal product. We evaluated whether microvolume fluorimetry (MVF) would be useful in optimizing PBSC mobilization/harvest and if it will shorten our standard 6 h collection.

METHODS

Absolute CD34 values were obtained using the IMAGN 2000 and STELLer CD34 assay (50 microL sample volume). Peripheral blood (PB) CD34 values from 30 patients undergoing PBSC mobilization were used to generate a PB CD34-based algorithm that would predict collection day/duration of apheresis. The algorithm was then used prospectively to collect PBSC products on 50 hematologic malignancy (HM) patients.

RESULTS

Using the algorithm, patients were assigned to either a 6 (11-20 CD34/microL), 4 (21-49 CD34/microL) or 2 (> or = 50 CD34/microL) h collection. Patients with a CD34 value < or = 10/microL were re-tested. All patients (n = 43) predicted to mobilize reached the optimal CD34 (4-5 x 10(6)/kg) value with 1.0 apheresis procedure; seven patients had < or = 10/microL (nonmobilizers). The majority (75%) had apheresis charges decreased by 33-66%; 47% only required a 2 h procedure and 28% required 4 h. All patients demonstrated rapid trilineage engraftment.

DISCUSSION

Absolute PB CD34 measurement using MVF offers a rapid and reliable approach to obtaining optimal PBSC products with minimal technical expertise. Although not a replacement for conventional flow cytometry, it meets the requirements for a point-of-care procedure.

CD34+ stem cell augmentation of elutriated allogeneic bone marrow grafts: results of a phase II clinical trial of engraftment and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in high-risk hematologic malignancies

Although T cell depletion of allografts used in BMT has reduced GVHD, it has been associated with inferior engraftment and an increased risk of relapse. We have found that T cell depletion by counterflow centrifugal elutriation (CCE) also results in depletion of CD34+ stem cells. In order to determine if the discarded CD34+ cells would improve engraftment, we undertook a phase II trial of allogeneic BMT in which 110 patients (median age 43) with a variety of hematologic malignancies received CD34+ stem cell augmented, elutriated marrow grafts. The T cell-depleted grafts were tightly controlled and contained a mean of 4.3 x 10(7) mononuclear cells/kg, 3.3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, 1.5 x 10(5) CFU-GM/kg and 5.5 x 10(5) CD3+ T cells/kg. Median time to engraftment of granulocytes (>500/microl) was 16 days and of platelets (>50000/microl) was 25 days, comparable to that seen with unmanipulated marrow. No mixed hematopoietic chimerism was observed that was not associated with disease relapse. The four patients (3.6%) who failed to engraft were all at high risk because of prior donor transfusions or underlying marrow disorders. The incidence of GVHD was dependent on the duration of cyclosporin A (CsA) immunosuppression. In patients who received CsA for > or = 80 days, the incidence of clinically significant acute GVHD (>stage 1) and extensive, chronic GVHD was 5% and 11%, respectively. Peritransplant (< or = 100 day post-BMT) mortality for this group of patients was 15%. Event-free survival in selected subsets of patients compared favorably to previous studies in which patients received unmanipulated marrow allografts.