Abstract P6-18-12: EMBRACA: Efficacy and safety of talazoparib or physician's choice of therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation: A regional analysis

Background: Talazoparib (TAL) prevents DNA damage repair by inhibiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes and trapping PARP on DNA, resulting in cell death in BRCA1/2-mutated cells.

Methods: EMBRACA is an open-label, randomized, 2-arm phase 3 trial in which efficacy and safety of TAL (1 mg/d) were compared with physician's choice of therapy (PCT; capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm). Outcomes were assessed by region of the world (North America [NA]; Europe [EU]; rest of world [ROW]). Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 wks were assessed; safety was also assessed.

Results: 431 pts were randomized 2:1. Pt characteristics were well balanced, although a higher percentage of pts in ROW had more severe disease (eg, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC], Disease-free interval [DFI]<12 mo, more distant metastases, more disease sites) and were on average younger than pts in NA/EU. TAL provided improvement in PFS, ORR, and CBR in all regions vs PCT. The most common toxicities with TAL included anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and nausea for all regions. Alopecia was less frequent with TAL in EU/ROW. Serious adverse events for pts receiving TAL were more frequent in EU than NA/ROW. Incidences of adverse events associated with permanent treatment discontinuation in pts receiving TAL were low in all regions and generally lower than for PCT.

Table 1CategoryNA* (N=156)EU* (N=190)ROW* (N=85)Mean age, years49.049.244.2Race, %   White76.971.152.9Black5.8-3.5Asian5.8-42.4Not reported-27.4-TNBC, %424447BRCA1**, %414748BRCA2**, %595352DFI<12 mo, %313444Distant metastases, %949397≥3 disease sites, %474049PFS, (hazard ratio [HR]; [95% CI]); P value0.46 [0.29-0.74] P=.00090.52 [0.33-0.80]; P<.0030.57 [0.31-1.07] ;P=.08ORR (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]); P value5.54 [2.4-16.1];P<.00013.75 [1.57-9.87]; P=.0016.7 [1.61-28.39]; P=.001CBR (OR [95% CI]); P value4.71 [2.20-10.57]; P<.00013.39 [1.56-7.36]; P=.00075.70 [1.70-17.13]; P=.002Hematologic AEs, %   Anemia50.558.642.6Neutropenia31.332.346.3Thrombocytopenia28.322.635.2Nonhematologic AEs, %   Fatigue59.643.650.0Nausea47.545.957.4Headache32.330.837.0Alopecia34.320.320.4Serious adverse events, %25.340.622.2Treatment discontinuation, n/N, (%)   TAL7/99 (7.1)12/133 (9.0)3/54 (5.6)PCT7/43 (16.3)3/54 (5.6)2/29 (6.9)AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; *NA (United States); EU (Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, Russia, Ukraine, Israel); ROW (Brazil, Korea, Australia, Taiwan).**Central laboratory.

Conclusions: In pts with gBRCAm ABC, TAL demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes compared with PCT regardless of the region of the world in which they lived. However, slight differences among the regions in baseline characteristics were noted, possibly due to regional variation in diagnosis and detection of gBRCAm ABC as well as different treatment paradigms for metastatic breast cancer.

Funding: Medivation LLC, acquired by Pfizer.

Citation Format: Mina L, Lee K-H, Gonçalves A, Woodward N, Hurvitz SA, Diab S, Yerushalmi R, Goodwin A, Moreira Costa Zorzetto M, Kim S-B, Czibere A, Tudor IC, Gauthier E, Litton JK, Ettl J. EMBRACA: Efficacy and safety of talazoparib or physician's choice of therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation: A regional analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-12.

Abstract OT3-03-02: A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multi-center study of talazoparib for neoadjuvant treatment of germline BRCA1/2 mutation patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background: Approximately 15% of all breast cancers are triple negative and deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations are found in ˜11% of unselected TNBC. In the phase 3 EMBRACA trial (NCT01945775), the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor talazoparib was superior to chemotherapy in prolonging progression-free survival in BRCA1/2 mutation patients with advanced breast cancer. A recent pilot study (NCT02282345) of 20 patients, explored the feasibility of neoadjuvant talazoparib in BRCA1/2 mutation patients; pathologic complete response (pCR) was reported at 53% with 6 months of single agent talazoparib.

Trial Design: This phase 2, single-arm, open-label, multi-center study has a Simon 2-stage design. Eligible pts have stage I-III invasive TNBC (ER and PR <10%), with germline BRCA1/2 mutations who are suitable for neoadjuvant therapy. Pts will receive talazoparib 1 mg daily for 24 weeks, followed by breast surgery, which should occur within 4 to 6 weeks of the last dose. Ultrasound will be performed serially to assess tumor response. The primary objective is to evaluate pCR after 24 weeks of neoadjuvant talazoparib. pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) will be assessed by independent central review. Safety will also be assessed. Pts will be followed for at least 5 years to assess long term outcomes (event-free and overall survival). After surgery, any further adjuvant therapy will be given at the discretion of the treating physician. Pt reported outcomes will be assessed electronically including the global health status/quality of life, functions, and symptoms using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and BR23. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) samples for determination of talazoparib concentrations will be collected at defined timepoints to describe the steady-state PK of talazoparib. Exploratory biomarker research will also take place. Approximately 122 men and women will be enrolled in the study, of which 112 evaluable pts are planned. With 112 evaluable pts and one interim futility look, the null hypothesis that the true pCR rate is 35% will be tested against a 1-sided alternative. This design yields a 1-sided type 1 error rate of 2.5% and power of 90% when the true pCR rate is 50%. An interim analysis will be performed to evaluate the efficacy of talazoparib after 28 evaluable pts undergo talazoparib treatment for 24 weeks, followed by surgery, and are assessed for pCR by central review. This trial is currently recruiting and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03499353).

Funding: This study is sponsored by Pfizer, Inc.

Citation Format: Litton J, Symmans F, Gogineni K, Saltzman M, Telli ML, Usha L, Chakrabarti J, Tudor IC, Quek RG, Czibere A. A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multi-center study of talazoparib for neoadjuvant treatment of germline BRCA1/2 mutation patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-03-02.

Abstract P2-08-01: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial evaluating exemestane ± enzalutamide in patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P2-07-04: A novel diagnostic androgen receptor gene signature links clinical outcomes and preclinical response to enzalutamide, paclitaxel or the combination in triple-negative breast cancer

Background: The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in ≈70% of all breast cancers (BCs) and may be necessary for proliferation and survival advantage in AR+ tumors. A novel gene signature associated with AR-signaling biology (PREDICT AR) was developed by sequencing triple-negative BC (TNBC) tumors collected in a phase 2 study evaluating enzalutamide (ENZA) monotherapy1; clinical outcomes were superior in patients (pts) with PREDICT AR+ vs PREDICT AR- tumors.1,2 ENZA blocks nuclear localization and suppresses its activity.3 Paclitaxel (PTX) stabilizes microtubules and may also block AR nuclear localization. Thus we hypothesize that response to PTX-based therapy may be additive in PREDICT AR+ vs PREDICT AR- disease. This study sought to identify independent clinical datasets with PREDICT AR+ gene signature to assess outcomes following PTX-based therapy. Preclinically, we investigated the antitumor activity of ENZA, PTX, or ENZA+PTX in AR-driven TNBC models.

Methods: We probed publicly available TNBC clinical databases from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets to assess PREDICT AR status and clinical outcomes. Similarly, we assessed 21 TNBC lines for PREDICT AR status. BT549, MDA-MB-436, and MDA-MB-453 were treated with ENZA, PTX, or ENZA+PTX to determine activity. Cell signaling and pathway activation were assessed by western blot. ENZA and PTX activity was assessed in PREDICT AR+ xenograft models. Tumor RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry were used to identify gene signatures, potentially predictive biomarkers, and potential synergistic effects of ENZA+PTX.

Results: The prevalence of PREDICT AR+ tumors in one cohort of 182 pts with primary TNBC4 was 51%. Distant relapse-free survival following PTX-based adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy was not statistically different between pts with PREDICT AR+ vs PREDICT AR- TNBC (p=0.605). Pathologic complete response rates were 12.5% for PREDICT AR+ vs 21.0% for PREDICT AR- TNBC. Additional sets of pts with primary TNBC are being evaluated. Preclinically, we observed a dose-dependent inhibition of cell viability with either ENZA or PTX in AR+ TNBC cell lines and additive effects from ENZA+PTX. In PREDICT AR+ xenograft models, ENZA or PTX treatment resulted in a dose-dependent antitumor response. Combination studies are underway. Tumor RNA sequencing are being evaluated for gene signature of synergistic antitumor response to ENZA+PTX.

Conclusion: Analyzing publicly available clinical datasets, we found that PREDICT AR+ status was not associated with differential outcomes following PTX-based therapy in primary TNBC, suggesting there is potential to provide additive benefits in PTX-based therapy with ENZA. In preclinical studies, we observed additive effects when combining ENZA+PTX in PREDICT AR+ TNBC lines compared with single agent treatments. Taken together, these data suggest ENZA combined with PTX might provide additive benefits in a clinical setting for pts with PREDICT AR+ TNBC.

References

1. Traina TA et al. J Clin Oncol 2015:33(suppl):abstr 1003.

2. Parker J et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(suppl):abstr 1083.

3. Tran C et al. Science 2009;324:787-90.

4. Hatzis C et al. JAMA 2011;305:1873-81.

Citation Format: Phan VT, Protter AA, Peterson AC, Parker JS, Yoon K, Tudor IC, Paton V, Noonberg S, Uppal H. A novel diagnostic androgen receptor gene signature links clinical outcomes and preclinical response to enzalutamide, paclitaxel or the combination in triple-negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-04.

Measuring symptoms in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments

It is critical for prostate cancer researchers and clinicians to have access to comprehensive, sensitive and simple-to-use symptom measures that allow them to understand and quantify the subjective patient experience. The purpose of the current review is to provide a comprehensive review, detailed tool descriptions and objectively defined quality criteria to facilitate tool choices for patients with localized prostate cancer. Using a systematic web-based literature search, we found n=29 prostate symptom measures described in n=35 validation studies. To be recommended, tools needed to meet four criteria: broad domain coverage, ability to differentiate objective and subjective experience, good internal consistency and validation in at least two populations and/or having achieved two types of validations. Of the 29 tools reviewed, n=7 meet our criteria for recommendation, and three in particular (the EPIC-26 (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite)-26, PC-QOL (Prostate Cancer-Quality of Life) and the UCLA-PCI (UCLA Prostate Cancer Index)) showed the strongest psychometrics. There is a reasonable number of measures to choose from that meet criteria for good psychometrics.

Conversion from standard opioid therapy to once-daily oral extended-release hydromorphone in patients with chronic cancer pain

This open-label, multicenter study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of conversion to once-daily OROS hydromorphone from previous opioid agonist therapy in patients with chronic cancer pain. Patients were stabilized on their previous therapy before conversion at a 5:1 ratio of morphine sulfate to hydromorphone hydrochloride. The OROS hydromorphone dose was titrated over 3 - 21 days to achieve effective analgesia and was maintained for up to 14 days. Efficacy was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Adverse events and vital signs were monitored. Dose stabilization was achieved in 119 of the 127 (94%) patients who received the study medication; in 77%, stabilization was achieved with no titration steps. Mean BPI pain intensity ratings and BPI pain interference scores decreased significantly after OROS hydromorphone treatment compared with pretreatment values. Mean pain-relief level remained stable after conversion and throughout treatment with OROS hydromorphone. Adverse events were as expected for cancer patients receiving opioid agonists. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs.

Influence of bilayer period on the characteristics of nanometre-scale ZrN/TiAIN multilayers

In the last decade, considerable research effort was directed to the deposition of multilayer films with layer thicknesses in the nanometer range (superlattice coatings), in order to increase the performance of various cutting tools and machine parts. The goal of the present work was to investigate the main microstructural, mechanical and wear resistance characteristics of a superlattice coating, consisting of alternate multilayer ZrN/TiAIN films, with various bilayer periods (5 / 20 nm). The coatings were deposited by the cathodic arc method on Si, plain carbon steel and high speed steel substrates to be used as wear resistance surfaces. The multilayer structures were prepared by using shutters placed in front of each cathode (Zr and Ti+Al). The characteristics of multilayer structures (elemental and phase composition, texture, Vickers microhardness, thickness, adhesion, and wear resistance) were determined by using various techniques (AES, XPS, XRD, microhardness measurements, scratch, and tribological tests). A comparison with the properties of ZrN and TiAIN single-layer coatings was carried out.

Once-daily OROS hydromorphone for the management of chronic nonmalignant pain: a dose-conversion and titration study

BACKGROUND

The use of opioid analgesics for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain is becoming more widely accepted, and long-acting formulations are an important treatment option.

AIM

To assess conversion to extended-release OROS hydromorphone from previous stable opioid agonist therapy in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain of moderate-to-severe intensity.

METHODS

In this open-label multicentre trial, patients were stabilised on their previous opioid therapy before being switched to OROS hydromorphone at a ratio of 5 : 1 (morphine sulphate equivalent to hydromorphone hydrochloride). The OROS hydromorphone dose was titrated over 3-16 days to achieve effective analgesia, and maintenance treatment continued for 14 days.

RESULTS

Study medication was received by 336 patients; 66% completed all study phases. Stabilisation of OROS hydromorphone was achieved by 94.6% of patients, the majority in two or fewer titration steps (mean time, 4.2 days). Mean pain intensity scores, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory, decreased during OROS hydromorphone treatment (p <or= 0.001). The percentage of patients rating their pain relief as 'good' or 'complete' increased, and the use of rescue analgesics for breakthrough pain decreased. The interference of pain with everyday activities (e.g. walking or work), and the effects on mood and enjoyment of life, also improved during the study (all p < 0.001). OROS hydromorphone was well tolerated, and adverse events were those expected for opioid agonist therapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic nonmalignant pain who had been receiving opioid therapy easily underwent conversion to OROS hydromorphone, with no loss of efficacy or increase in adverse events.