Cost minimization analysis of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants

BACKGROUND

Trials describing 4-12 week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R-transplants), may be limited in application by costs and delayed access to expensive DAAs. A short prophylactic strategy may be safer and cost-effective. Here, we report a cost minimization analysis using the health system perspective to determine the least expensive DAA regimen, using available published strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct cost-minimization analyses (CMAs) from the health system perspective of four DAA regimens to prevent and/or treat HCV transmission from D+/R-kidney transplants.

METHODS

CMAs comparing 4 strategies: 1) 7-day prophylaxis with generic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), with 12-week branded glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for those with transmission; 2) 8-day branded G/P prophylaxis, with 12-week branded SOF/VEL/voxilaprevir for those with transmission; 3) 4-week perioperative generic SOF/VEL prophylaxis, with 12-week branded G/P for those with transmission; and 4) 8-week branded G/P "transmit-and-treat." We included data from published literature to estimate the probability of viral transmission in patients who received DAA prophylaxis, and assumed a 100% transmission rate for those who received the "transmit-and-treat" approach.

RESULTS

In base-case analyses, strategies 1 (expected cost [EC]: $2326) and 2 (expected cost: $2646) were less expensive than strategies 3 (EC: $4859) and 4 (EC: $18,525). Threshold analyses for 7-day SOF/VEL versus 8-day G/P suggested that there were reasonable input levels at which the 8-day strategy may be least costly. The threshold values for the SOF/VEL prophylaxis strategies (7-day vs. 4- week) indicated that the 4-week strategy is unlikely to be less costly under any reasonable value of the input variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Short duration DAA prophylaxis using 7 days of SOF/VEL or 8 days of G/P has the potential to yield significant cost savings for D+/R- kidney transplants.

Use of belatacept in kidney transplantation: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The advent of calcineurin inhibitors have led to a significant improvement in short term outcomes after kidney transplantation. However, long term outcomes are hindered by the cardiovascular, metabolic and chronic renal toxicity associated with these agents. Belatacept is a selective T cell costimulation blocker that is approved for prevention of rejection in kidney transplantation, and has been associated with favorable cardiovascular, metabolic and renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. This review provides an overview of recent updates in the use of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Belatacept may be a safe alternative to calcineurin inhibitors for select kidney transplant populations. Patients converted to belatacept from a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression generally experience improvement in renal function, and may be less likely to develop de novo donor specific antibodies or new onset diabetes after transplantation. Although, belatacept based immunosuppression may increase the risk of early acute cellular rejection, it may however be beneficial in stabilization of long-term renal function and improvement in inflammation in patients with chronic active antibody mediated rejection. These benefits need to be counterweighed with risks of lack of response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination and other adverse infectious outcomes.

SUMMARY

Belatacept may be an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors and may contribute to improved long term metabolic and allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Careful selection of patients for belatacept-based immunosuppression is needed, to obviate the risk of acute rejection shown in clinical studies.

Outcomes of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants

Trials describing 4- to 12-week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R- transplants) may be limited in "real-world" application by costs and delayed access to DAAs. We previously reported HCV transmission of 13% among D+/R- transplants with 2- to 4-day pangenotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) perioperative prophylaxis, where one patient with HCV transmission was a nonresponder to first-line full-course DAA. Here, we report new data with a 7-day prophylaxis protocol (N = 50), as well as cumulative treatment and outcome data on all HCV D+/R- transplants (N = 102). Overall, nine patients (9/102; 9%; 95% CI: 5%-16%) developed HCV transmission, with a significant decline noted in the 7-day group (2/50; 4%; 95% CI: 0%-13%) compared with 2- to 4-day prophylaxis (7/52; 13%; 95% CI: 5%-25%). All patients with HCV transmission achieved sustained virologic response post full-course therapy (including one nonresponder from initial trial). A 1:1 matched analysis (N = 102) with contemporary HCV D-/R- transplants (controls) showed that although the pretransplant wait time was significantly shorter for D+/R- compared with D-/R- (mean: 1.8 vs. 4.4 years; p < .001), there were no differences in infections, rejection, development of de novo donor-specific antibody, or transplant outcomes up to 6 months of transplant.

Early initiation of sodium-glucose linked transporter inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and associated metabolic and electrolyte outcomes in diabetic kidney transplant recipients

There is a paucity of data on the use of SGLT2 inhibitors on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. There may be concern in initiating these agents, especially within the first year post-transplant when renal function is more labile and immunosuppression more intense, due to a presumed high risk of urinary infections and acute kidney injury. This is a retrospective study on 50 kidney transplant recipients, half of whom were started on therapy within the first year of transplant. Over a follow-up period of 6 months, overall patients had a statistically significant improvement in weight by -2.95 kg [SD 3.54, P = <.0001 (CI: 3.53, 1.50)] as well as hypomagnesemia 0.13 [SD 1.73, P = .0004 (CI: 0.06, 0.20)]. Overall insulin usage declined by -3.7 units [SD 22.8, P = .17]. 14% of patients had at least one urinary tract infection although this rate is not different (~20%) than that reported historically in this high-risk population.

Impact of belatacept conversion on kidney transplant function, histology, and gene expression - a single-center study

Prior studies on belatacept conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have been limited by an absence of postconversion surveillance biopsies that could underestimate subclinical rejection, or a case-controlled design. A total of 53 adult patients with allograft dysfunction underwent belatacept conversion (median: 6 months) post-transplant. At a median follow-up = 2.5 years, patient survival was 94% with a death-censored graft survival of 85%. Seven (13%) patients had acute rejection (including 3 subclinical) at median 6 months postconversion. Overall, eGFR improved (P = <0.001) from baseline = 31±15 to 40.2 ± 17.6 ml/min/1.73m² by 6 months postconversion, but then stayed stable. This improvement was also observed (P < 0.001) in comparison with a propensity matched control cohort on CNI, where eGFR stayed stable (mean ~ 32ml/min/1.72m² ) over 2-year follow-up. Patients converted < 6 months post-transplant were more likely to have a long-term improvement in kidney function. Paired gene expression analysis of 30 (of 53) consecutive pre- and postconversion surveillance biopsies did not reveal changes in inflammation/acute injury; although atrophy-fibrosis score worsened (mean = 0.28 to 0.44; P = 0.005). Thus, improvement in renal function with belatacept conversion occurred early and then sustained in comparison with controls where renal function remained unchanged overtime. We were unable to show molecular signals that could be related to CNI administration and regressed after withdrawal.

COVID-19 in Kidney Transplantation: Epidemiology, Management Considerations, and the Impact on Kidney Transplant Practice

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was identified in the late 2019 as the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an acute respiratory viral illness. Patients with chronic underlying conditions may have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Kidney transplant recipients may be at a uniquely increased risk of serious complications from COVID-19 as compared to the general population because of a chronically immunosuppressed state and a high prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes, heart disease, and lung disease. Early data suggest that the mortality of patients on dialysis may be comparable to those with kidney transplants, although more research is needed. This concise review aims to describe the epidemiology of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients, manifestations, appropriate management, and clinical outcomes based on the available literature. Current evidence on many of the specific antiviral measures against COVID-19 has not shown a clear-cut benefit in smaller studies and the results of several ongoing larger clinical trials are awaited. In addition, we also highlight the impact of COVID-19 on kidney transplant center practice and volumes; potential living or deceased donors, recipients; and induction immunosuppression and surgical strategies.

Lack of Histological and Molecular Signature Response to Tocilizumab in Kidney Transplants with Chronic Active Antibody Mediated Rejection: A Case Series

Background

Traditional therapies for caAbMR have unclear efficacy with significant side effects in recipients of kidney transplants (KTs). A recent single-center case series suggested tocilizumab (TCZ) could stabilize renal function and improve microvascular inflammation. Here we report our findings of the use of TCZ in patients with caAbMR.

Methods

Ten adult recipients of KTs with biopsy-proven caAbMR were treated with TCZ at 8 mg/kg per month. Patients were monitored for adverse events, and therapy was interrupted in the setting of serious infections. Six patients (60%) underwent post-treatment biopsies.

Results

Patients (mean age of 43 years) were initiated on TCZ at a median of 36 months post-KT. A majority of patients were black (70%), underwent regrafts (40%), and were sensitized (mean cPRA=41%). Patients received a median of six doses of TCZ (range=3-10). At a median follow-up of 12 months (range=8-24 months), renal function did not show improvement (mean eGFR, 42±18 ml/min per 1.73 m² to 37±24 ml/min per 1.73 m²; P=0.27). The slope of decline in eGFR remained unchanged (-0.14±0.9 to -0.33±1.1; P=0.25). There was no improvement in mean MVI (g+ptc) (4.8±1.4 to 4.2±2.0; P=0.39) scores or Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) AbMR scores (0.79±0.17 to 0.78±0.26; P=0.86). There was a numeric worsening of chronicity (ci+ct) scores (2.5±0.8 to 3.3±1.7; P=0.38) and MMDx atrophy fibrosis scores (0.36±0.24 to 0.58±0.15; P=0.21). Patient survival was 90%, with one patient death due to complications from a hip infection. Overall death-censored graft survival was 80%, with two graft losses in patients who had recurrent infections requiring hospitalization.

Conclusions

In this early experience, we report a lack of efficacy and toxicity with the use of TCZ for caAbMR. Prospective clinical trials are needed to clarify the role of IL-6 blockade and the possibility of increased incidence of infections in patients with caAbMR who are treated with TCZ.

Ultra-short duration direct acting antiviral prophylaxis to prevent virus transmission from hepatitis C viremic donors to hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients

We conducted an adaptive design single-center pilot trial between October 2017 and November 2018 to determine the safety and efficacy of ultra-short-term perioperative pangenotypic direct acting antiviral (DAA) prophylaxis for deceased hepatitis C virus (HCV)-nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors to HCV negative kidney recipients (D+/R-). In Group 1, 10 patients received one dose of SOF/VEL (sofusbuvir/velpatasvir) pretransplant and one dose on posttransplant Day 1. In Group 2A (N = 15) and the posttrial validation (Group 2B; N = 25) phase, patients received two additional SOF/VEL doses (total 4) on Days 2 and 3 posttransplant. Development of posttransplant HCV transmission triggered 12-week DAA therapy. For available donor samples (N = 27), median donor viral load was 1.37E + 06 IU/mL (genotype [GT]1a: 70%; GT2: 7%; GT3: 23%). Overall viral transmission rate was 12% (6/50; Group 1:30% [3/10]; Group 2A:13% [2/15]; Group 2B:4% [1/25]). For the 6 viremic patients, 5 (83%) achieved sustained virologic response (3 with first-line DAA therapy; and two after retreatment with second-line DAA). At a median follow-up of 8 months posttransplant, overall patient and allograft survivals were 98%, respectively. The 4-day strategy reduced viral transmission to 7.5% (3/40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8%-20.5%) and could result in avoidance of prolonged posttransplant DAA therapy for most D+/R - transplants.

Comparison of Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of induction immunosuppression for elderly kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. Although alemtuzumab has been associated with escalating risk of death and graft loss in this population, this risk has not been adequately explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab with basiliximab induction in this population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched cohort study of kidney transplant recipients aged ≥65 years. Patients who received alemtuzumab induction were matched (1:2) to a basiliximab control. The primary outcome was allograft survival. The incidence of acute rejection, infection, and all-cause mortality was measured.

RESULTS

Fifty-one and 102 patients were included in the alemtuzumab and basiliximab groups, respectively. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except for more living donor transplant recipients in the alemtuzumab group (26/51 [51%] vs 31/102 [30.4%], P = .02). Acute cellular rejection occurred more frequently within the first year in the basiliximab group (P = .02). There was no difference in rates of infection within the first year. Graft and patient survival rates were similar over the follow-up period. Patients receiving basiliximab had a higher glomerular filtration rate at 2 years posttransplant (59 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 49 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with similar outcomes to basiliximab in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

1138. Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Amphotericin B Nephrotoxicity in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background

Treatment of invasive fungal infections with amphotericin B is a concern in kidney transplant patients due to fear of allograft loss. Reluctance to use amphotericin B may lead to suboptimal therapy and poor treatment outcomes. The risk of amphotericin B-related nephrotoxicity and allograft dysfunction has not been studied in kidney transplant patients. Our aim was to study the association between amphotericin B and acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification, allograft loss and patient mortality in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

We used SPSS to conduct a descriptive analysis of a retrospective cohort of 30 adult kidney transplant recipients who were admitted to Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center and received treatment with amphotericin B from 2005 to 2015.

Results

The median age in our cohort was 57. 40% were female, 60% were male. 60% had received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor; 13.3% from a living related donor; 13.3% from a living unrelated donor; and 13.3% had received a combined kidney–pancreas transplant. 63.3% of patients had received liposomal amphotericin B; 33.3% had received lipid-complex amphotericin B; 3.3% had received conventional amphotericin B. We found an association between cumulative amphotericin B doses above 5,000 mg and AKI, whereby 64.7% of patients exposed to less than 5,000 mg of amphotericin B developed AKI and 100% of patients exposed to more than 5,000 mg of amphotericin B developed AKI (P = 0.017). We did not find an association between cumulative amphotericin B doses above 5,000 mg and return to dialysis at 3 months and 12 months post-exposure (P = 0.436 and 0.288, respectively). We also did not find an association between such doses of amphotericin B and mortality at 30 and 90 days (P = 0.869 and 0.193, respectively).

Conclusion

In the first descriptive analysis of a retrospective cohort of kidney transplant patients exposed to amphotericin B, our results suggest that the risk of nephrotoxicity may be significantly increased when a cumulative dose of 5,000 milligrams is exceeded. Our results also suggest that amphotericin B doses associated with nephrotoxicity in kidney transplant patients may not have an effect on allograft survival and patient mortality.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Implementation of a Cardiac Transitions of Care Pilot Program: A Prospective Study of Inpatient and Outpatient Clinical Pharmacy Services for Patients With Heart Failure Exacerbation or Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND:

Pharmacists may assist with reducing 30-day readmission rates for patients with heart failure (HF) exacerbation or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by promoting medication adherence.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the change in 30-day readmission rates for patients with HF exacerbation or AMI after implementation of a "high-touch" standard of care.

METHODS:

Patients admitted with HF exacerbation, non-ST-segment elevation AMI, or ST-segment elevation AMI from August 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015, were included in this prospective study. Patients were educated while in the inpatient setting and followed up in the outpatient setting through telephone contact and scheduling a medication therapy management (MTM) appointment with a pharmacist. Data were collected by pharmacy personnel involved in the implementation of the intervention.

RESULTS:

Within the HF and AMI arms, 100 and 93 patients, respectively, were included in the study. The 30-day readmission rates were 24% and 17.2% for HF and AMI, respectively, which were not statistically significant when compared to historical institutional readmission rates prior to study initiation (18.2% for HF, P = .238; 11.4% for AMI, P = .252).

CONCLUSION:

A "high-touch" pharmacist-driven transitions of care program may affect 30-day readmission rates for patients with HF exacerbation or AMI; potential processes for initiating transitions of care programs are provided.