Endometriosis and dyspareunia: Solving the enigma

Introduction

Endometriosis is a chronic oestrogen-dependent disease that affects 1 in 10 women of childbearing age. Half of these women have deep dyspareunia. The presence of this symptom has been shown to negatively affect your quality of life. There are few studies in the literature that address this issue and its pathophysiology remains poorly understood.

Materials and methods

A case-control study has been carried out in order to assess the multi-causality of dyspareunia in patients with endometriosis. All the patients were assessed in a unit specialising in endometriosis and pelvic pain and their disease was staged using high-resolution ultrasound following the criteria of the IDEA group. The patients were divided into two groups, patients with dyspareunia n = 45 (cases) and those without it n = 55 (controls).

Results

The only element that was statistically significant in explaining the dyspareunia was the presence of nodules in the retrocervical region with p = 0.000. The odds ratio of dyspareunia in the cases group was 5.3 (95 % CI 2.2-12.5).

Conclusions

Dyspareunia in patients with endometriosis is strongly dependent on the presence of nodules in the retrocervical region, although there are other factors involved that remain unknown, so more studies are still needed to understand and optimally address this symptom.

Challenges in chronic pelvic pain: Diffuse uterine capillary haemangioma simulating a clinical picture of adenomyosis

Introduction:

Adenomyosis is a heterogeneous condition of difficult diagnosis that stands out in our patients for causing abundant menstrual bleeding, dyspareunia and dysmenorrhoea. However, in chronic pelvic pain units it is important to consider other conditions of similar symptomatologies, such as vascular malformations. These include capillary haemangiomas which, although rare in the reproductive tract, can produce serious symptoms.

Case description:

We present the case of a 31-year-old woman under observation by the chronic pelvic pain unit for dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia since menarche. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance findings were compatible with adenomyosis. The patient showed no improvement with hormonal treatment. Upon failure of the medical treatment and taking into account the patient’s lack of gestational desire, a laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed. The pathological report revealed a diffuse capillary haemangioma as the cause of the symptoms. Given the completely curative nature of surgery for this type of condition, the patient was discharged from our unit.

Conclusion:

The preoperative diagnosis of adenomyosis is still a challenge and units specializing in chronic pelvic pain must consider all possible diagnostic options so as not to overlook rarer conditions such as vascular malformations.