1
|
Drakaki A, Powles T, Bamias A, Martin-Liberal J, Shin SJ, Friedlander T, Tosi D, Park C, Gomez-Roca C, Joly Lobbedez F, Castellano D, Morales-Barrera R, Moreno-Candilejo I, Fléchon A, Yuen K, Rishipathak D, DuPree K, Young F, Michielin F, Shemesh CS, Steinberg EE, Williams P, Lee JL. Atezolizumab plus Magrolimab, Niraparib, or Tocilizumab versus Atezolizumab Monotherapy in Platinum-Refractory Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase Ib/II Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Umbrella Study (MORPHEUS Urothelial Carcinoma). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4373-4384. [PMID: 37651261 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The MORPHEUS platform was designed to identify early efficacy signals and evaluate the safety of novel immunotherapy combinations across cancer types. The phase Ib/II MORPHEUS-UC trial (NCT03869190) is evaluating atezolizumab plus magrolimab, niraparib, or tocilizumab in platinum-refractory locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Additional treatment combinations were evaluated and will be reported separately. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had locally advanced or mUC that progressed during or following treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety and exploratory biomarker analyses were also conducted. RESULTS Seventy-six patients were randomized to receive either atezolizumab plus magrolimab (n = 16), atezolizumab plus niraparib (n = 15), atezolizumab plus tocilizumab (n = 15), or atezolizumab monotherapy (control; n = 30). No additive benefit in ORR, PFS, or OS was seen in the treatment arms versus the control. The best confirmed ORR was 26.7% with atezolizumab plus magrolimab, 6.7% with atezolizumab plus niraparib, 20.0% with atezolizumab plus tocilizumab, and 27.6% with atezolizumab monotherapy. Overall, the treatment combinations were tolerable, and adverse events were consistent with each agent's known safety profile. Trends were observed for shrinkage of programmed death-ligand 1-positive tumors (atezolizumab, atezolizumab plus magrolimab, atezolizumab plus tocilizumab), inflamed tumors, or tumors with high mutational burden (atezolizumab), and immune excluded tumors (atezolizumab plus magrolimab). CONCLUSIONS The evaluated regimens in MORPHEUS-UC were tolerable. However, response rates for the combinations did not meet the criteria for further development in platinum-experienced locally advanced or mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Juan Martin-Liberal
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sang Joon Shin
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Terence Friedlander
- University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Diego Tosi
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | | | - Carlos Gomez-Roca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Kobe Yuen
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | | | - Kelly DuPree
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Fiona Young
- Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Jae Lyun Lee
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Francini E, Montagnani F, Nuzzo PV, Gonzalez-Velez M, Alimohamed NS, Rosellini P, Moreno-Candilejo I, Cigliola A, Rubio-Perez J, Crivelli F, Shaw GK, Zhang L, Petrioli R, Bengala C, Francini G, Garcia-Foncillas J, Sweeney CJ, Higano CS, Bryce AH, Harshman LC, Lee-Ying R, Heng DYC. Association of Concomitant Bone Resorption Inhibitors With Overall Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases Receiving Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone as First-Line Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2116536. [PMID: 34292336 PMCID: PMC8299314 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Bone resorption inhibitors (BRIs) are recommended by international guidelines to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases. Abiraterone acetate with prednisone is currently the most common first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with mCRPC; however, the clinical impact of the addition of BRIs to abiraterone acetate with prednisone in this disease setting is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of the use of concomitant BRIs with overall survival (OS) and time to first SRE among patients with mCRPC and bone metastases receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study collected data from 745 consecutive patients who began receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for mCRPC with bone metastases between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Data were collected from 8 hospitals in Canada, Europe, and the US from June 15 to September 15, 2019. EXPOSURES Patients were classified by receipt vs nonreceipt of concomitant BRIs and subclassified by volume of disease (high volume or low volume, using definitions from the Chemohormonal Therapy Vs Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer [CHAARTED] E3805 study) at the initiation of abiraterone acetate with prednisone therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was OS. The secondary end point was time to first SRE. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS Of the 745 men (median age, 77.6 years [interquartile range, 68.1-83.6 years]; 699 White individuals [93.8%]) included in the analysis, 529 men (71.0%) received abiraterone acetate with prednisone alone (abiraterone acetate cohort), and 216 men (29.0%) received abiraterone acetate with prednisone plus BRIs (BRI cohort). A total of 420 men (56.4%) had high-volume disease, and 276 men (37.0%) had low-volume disease. The median follow-up was 23.5 months (95% CI, 19.8-24.9 months). Patients in the BRI cohort experienced significantly longer OS compared with those in the abiraterone acetate cohort (31.8 vs 23.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P < .001). The OS benefit in the BRI cohort was greater for patients with high-volume vs low-volume disease (33.6 vs 19.7 months; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; P < .001). The BRI cohort also had a significantly shorter time to first SRE compared with the abiraterone acetate cohort (32.4 vs 42.7 months; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.60; P = .04), and the risk of a first SRE was more than double in the subgroup with low-volume disease (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.57-3.35; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, concomitant BRIs use was independently associated with longer OS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, the addition of BRIs to abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with mCRPC and bone metastases was associated with longer OS, particularly in patients with high-volume disease. These results suggest that the use of BRIs in combination with abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for the treatment of mCRPC with bone metastases could be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Francini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Pier Vitale Nuzzo
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Pietro Rosellini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Cigliola
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Jaime Rubio-Perez
- University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Grace K. Shaw
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Li Zhang
- DFCI at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Roberto Petrioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Carmelo Bengala
- Medical Oncology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Guido Francini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christopher J. Sweeney
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Celestia S. Higano
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Alan H. Bryce
- Genomic Oncology Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Lauren C. Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard Lee-Ying
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel Y. C. Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|