1
|
van Doorne I, Willems DL, Baks N, de Kuijper J, Buurman BM, van Rijn M. Current practice of hospital-based palliative care teams: Advance care planning in advanced stages of disease: A retrospective observational study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0288514. [PMID: 38422038 PMCID: PMC10903912 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specialist palliative care teams are consulted during hospital admission for advice on complex palliative care. These consultations need to be timely to prevent symptom burden and maintain quality of life. Insight into specialist palliative care teams may help improve the outcomes of palliative care. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed qualitative and quantitative data of palliative care consultations in a six-month period (2017 or 2018) in four general hospitals in the northwestern part of the Netherlands. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS We extracted data from 336 consultations. The most common diagnoses were cancer (54.8%) and organ failure (26.8%). The estimated life expectancy was less than three months for 52.3% of all patients. Within two weeks after consultation, 53.2% of the patients died, and the median time until death was 11 days (range 191) after consultation. Most patients died in hospital (49.4%) but only 7.5% preferred to die in hospital. Consultations were mostly requested for advance care planning (31.6%). End-of-life preferences focused on last wishes and maintaining quality of life. CONCLUSION This study provides detailed insight into consultations of palliative care teams and shows that even though most palliative care consultations were requested for advance care planning, consultations focus on end-of-life care and are more crisis-oriented than prevention-oriented. Death often occurs too quickly after consultation for end-of-life preferences to be met and these preferences tend to focus on dying. Educating healthcare professionals on when to initiate advance care planning would promote a more prevention-oriented approach. Defining factors that indicate the need for timely palliative care team consultation and advance care planning could help timely identification and consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van Doorne
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dick L. Willems
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine Baks
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle de Kuijper
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca M. Buurman
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon van Rijn
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Doorne I, de Meij MA, Parlevliet JL, van Schie VMW, Willems DL, Buurman BM, van Rijn M. More older adults died at their preferred place after implementation of a transmural care pathway for older adults at the end of life: a before-after study. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:110. [PMID: 37533107 PMCID: PMC10394846 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01218-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve transmural palliative care for older adults acutely admitted to hospital, the PalliSupport intervention, comprising an educational programme and transmural palliative care pathway, was developed. This care pathway involves timely identification of palliative care needs, advance care planning, multidisciplinary team meetings, warm handover, and follow-up home visits. With this study, we evaluate changes in patient-related outcomes and transmural collaboration after implementation of the care pathway. METHODS We conducted a before-after study, in which we compared 1) unplanned hospital admission and death at place of preference and 2) transmural collaboration before implementation, up to six months, and six to 18 months after implementation. Data from palliative care team consultations were collected between February 2017 and February 2020 in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. RESULTS The palliative care team held 711 first-time consultations. The number of consultation, as well as the number of consultations for patients with non-malignant diseases, and consultations for advance care planning increased after implementation. The implementation of the pathway had no statistically significant effect on unplanned hospitalization but associated positively with death at place of preference more than six months after implementation (during/shortly after adjusted OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 0.84-5.35; p-value: 0.11, long term after adjusted OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.49-6.62; p-value: 0.003). Effects on transmural collaboration showed that there were more warm handovers during/shortly after implementation, but not on long term. Primary care professionals attended multidisciplinary team meetings more often during and shortly after implementation, but did not more than six months after implementation. CONCLUSIONS The pathway did not affect unplanned hospital admissions, but more patients died at their place of preference after implementation. Implementation of the pathway increased attention to- and awareness for in-hospital palliative care, but did not improve transmural collaboration on long-term. For some patients, the hospital admissions might helped in facilitating death at place of preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van Doorne
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-335, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marike A de Meij
- Palliative and Supportive Care Team, Oncology Center Amsterdam, OLVG, Oosterpark 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette L Parlevliet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-335, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vera M W van Schie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-335, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick L Willems
- General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-335, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Medicine for Older People, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-335, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Medicine for Older People, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flierman I, Gieteling E, Van Rijn M, Van Grootven B, van Doorne I, Jamaludin FS, Willems DL, Muller M, Buurman BM. Effectiveness of transmural team-based palliative care in prevention of hospitalizations in patients at the end of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med 2023; 37:75-87. [PMID: 36541477 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221135616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Team-based palliative care interventions have shown positive results for patients at the end of life in both hospital and community settings. However, evidence on the effectiveness of transmural, that is, spanning hospital and home, team-based palliative care collaborations is limited. AIM To systematically review whether transmural team-based palliative care interventions can prevent hospital admissions and increase death at home. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsychINFO (Ovid), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) were systematically searched until January 2021. Studies incorporating teams in which hospital and community professionals co-managed patients, hospital-based teams with community follow-up, and case-management interventions led by palliative care teams were included. Data was extracted by two researchers independently. RESULTS About 19 studies were included involving 6614 patients, of whom 2202 received an intervention. The overall pooled odds ratio of at least one hospital (re)admissions was 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.68) in favor of the intervention group. The highest reduction in admission was in the hospital-based teams with community follow-up: OR 0.21 (95% CI 0.07-0.66). The pooled effect on home deaths was 2.19 (95% CI 1.26-3.79), favoring the intervention, with also the highest in the hospital-based teams: OR 4.77 (95% CI 1.23-18.47). However, studies had high heterogeneity regarding intervention, study population, and follow-up time. CONCLUSION Transmural team-based palliative care interventions, especially hospital-based teams that follow-up patients at home, show an overall effect on lowering hospital admissions and increasing the number of patients dying at home. However, broad clinical and statistical heterogeneity of included studies results in uncertainty about the effect size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Flierman
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elske Gieteling
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amstelland Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon Van Rijn
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Van Grootven
- Research Foundation Flanders - FWO, Brussels, Belgium + KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Iris van Doorne
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Faridi S Jamaludin
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Research Support, Medical Library AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick L Willems
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Majon Muller
- Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Doorne I, van Rijn M, Dofferhoff SM, Willems DL, Buurman BM. Patients' preferred place of death: patients are willing to consider their preferences, but someone has to ask them. Age Ageing 2021; 50:2004-2011. [PMID: 34473834 PMCID: PMC8581384 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background end-of-life care is not always in line with end-of-life preferences, so patients do not always die at their preferred place of death (PPD). This study aims to identify factors associated with patients’ PPD and changes in PPD. Methods we prospectively collected data on PPD at four time points within 6 months from 230 acutely hospitalised older patients who were part of the control group in a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. Associations between patient characteristics and preferences were calculated using multivariable (multinomial) logistic regression analysis. Results the mean age of participants was 80.7 years. 47.8% of the patients had no PPD at hospital admission. Patients previously admitted to hospital preferred to die at home (home versus no preference: odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–4.92; home versus healthcare facility: OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.15–9.16). Patients with more chronic diseases preferred the healthcare facility as their PPD (healthcare facility versus no preference: OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09–1.61; healthcare facility versus home: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00–1.47). 32 of 65 patients changed their preference during follow-up, and most of these had no PPD at hospital admission (home versus no preference: OR 0.005, 95% CI ≤0.001–0.095) and poorer self-rated well-being (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.07–3.08). Conclusions almost half of the patients had no PPD at baseline. Previous hospital admission, having more chronic diseases and living alone are associated with having a PPD. Introducing PPD could make older people aware of PPD and facilitate optimal palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van Doorne
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon van Rijn
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Dofferhoff
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick L Willems
- Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|