Aichner S, Fähnle I, Frey J, Krebs J, Christmann-Schmid C. Impact of sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse on voiding dysfunction and uroflowmetry parameters: a prospective cohort study.
Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;
306:1373-1380. [PMID:
34988660 DOI:
10.1007/s00404-021-06369-0]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Voiding difficulties in the context of pelvic organ prolapse are often neglected or underestimated. To date, there are heterogeneous data available on the outcome of a surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse and the impact on concomitant voiding dysfunction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy would resolve preoperative voiding dysfunction and the impact on objective uroflowmetry parameters.
METHODS
Data from 103 women undergoing sacrocolpopexy for prolapse stage ≥ II with concurrent objective and/or subjective voiding dysfunction were prospectively evaluated. All women underwent full urogynecological examination, and completed a validated questionnaire pre- and postoperatively. Objective uroflowmetry parameters and subjective outcome data regarding voiding functions were compared pre- and postoperatively.
RESULTS
All points of the POP-Q system improved significantly pre- to postoperatively (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, 42 of 103 women showed a postvoid residual ≥ 100 ml, whereas only six women had a relevant postvoid residual postoperatively. In total, the postoperative postvoid residual in all women decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Voiding time decreased significantly postoperatively (p < 0.001) with no significant change in the voided volume (p = 0.352). The maximum flow rate increased postoperatively, reaching no statistically significant change (p = 0.132). Subjective outcome measurements (weak or prolonged stream, incomplete bladder emptying, and straining to void) improved significantly (p < 0.001 for all the questions).
CONCLUSION
Our prospective study demonstrates that sacrocolpopexy to correct pelvic organ prolapse can successfully resolve voiding dysfunction, as both objective and subjective parameters improved significantly after surgery.
Collapse