1
|
Crusciol CAC, Campos MD, Martello JM, Alves CJ, Nascimento CAC, Pereira JCDR, Cantarella H. Organomineral Fertilizer as Source of P and K for Sugarcane. Sci Rep 2020; 10:5398. [PMID: 32214188 PMCID: PMC7096467 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62315-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp) crop has high social, economic and environmental importance for several regions throughout the world. However, the increasing demand for efficiency and optimization of agricultural resources generates uncertainties regarding high mineral fertilizer consumption. Thereby, organomineral fertilizers are to reduce the conventional sources consumption. Thus, this study was carried out to evaluate the agronomic and economic sugarcane performancies and the residual effect of P and K under mineral and organomineral fertilization. Growth and technological parameters, leaf and soil nutrients concentration in surface and subsurface layers were analyzed from sugarcane planting (plant cane) until the first ratoon. Agronomic and economic sugarcane efficiency were evaluated. At the first ratoon, resin-extractable P provided by mineral and organomineral fertilizers were, respectively, 15 and 11 mg kg−1 in the 0.0–0.2 m, and 28 and 31 mg kg−1 in 0.2–0.4 m layer. However, exchangeable K in the 0.0–0.2 m layer was 1.88 and 1.58 mmolc kg−1 for mineral and organomineral fertilizers, respectively. The yield gains over the control reached with mineral and organomineral fertilizers were, respectively, 10.99 and 17 Mg ha−1 at the lowest fertilizer rate; and 29.25 and 61.3 Mg ha−1 at the highest fertilizer rate. Agronomic and economic organomineral fertilizer efficiencies are more pronounced in plant cane. Summing two harvests, the organomineral is 7% more profitable than mineral fertilizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), College of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Crop Science, Lageado Experimental Farm, P.O. Box: 237, Zip Code: 18610-034, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Murilo de Campos
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), College of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Crop Science, Lageado Experimental Farm, P.O. Box: 237, Zip Code: 18610-034, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Cleiton José Alves
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), College of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Crop Science, Lageado Experimental Farm, P.O. Box: 237, Zip Code: 18610-034, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos Antonio Costa Nascimento
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), College of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Crop Science, Lageado Experimental Farm, P.O. Box: 237, Zip Code: 18610-034, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Júlio Cesar Dos Reis Pereira
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), College of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Crop Science, Lageado Experimental Farm, P.O. Box: 237, Zip Code: 18610-034, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Heitor Cantarella
- Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC), Soils and Environmental Resources Center, Av. Barão de Itapura 1481, Zip Code: 13020-902, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|