Grimmer M, Sarria GR, Hamed M, Banat M, Koch D, Lorenzana H, Holz JA, Schmeel C, Kowark A, Schmeel LC, Garbe S. Image-Guided IORT after Surgical Resection of Brain Malignancies: A Feasibility Study.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023;
117:e715. [PMID:
37786089 DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2217]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) can be used to locally apply radiation doses to surgical cavities of resected brain metastases and glioblastoma. The miniaturized linear accelerator INTRABEAM 600® offers a low-energy system of 50kV X-rays. To date, placing the spherical applicator in the surgical bed has been done manually and without final positioning verification. Ultimately, without positional control, it must be assumed that the applicator is optimally positioned against the tissue in the tumor cavity, without any air interference or fluid underlying. Misplacements could lead to incomplete dose delivery, potentially yielding an increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, we deemed relevant to assess intraoperative imaging as a novel option for easing the applicator positioning.
MATERIALS/METHODS
A surgical environment was mimicked in two test runs with an interdisciplinary team, accounting for operating and anesthesia times. The IORT planning software Radiance (GMV Innovating Solutions, Madrid, Spain) was previously calibrated with a "cheese" phantom, using twelve different density levels from 0.3 to 1.842 g/cm3, yielding a value-to-density table with -600 to +600 HU range. Furthermore, two inserts were placed in the phantom to evaluate the quality and spatial resolution of the cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging. The O-Arm System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was employed for acquiring tomographic intraoperative imaging, once the applicator was placed in a skull-shaped phantom. Two expert radiation oncologists contoured the acquired dataset and performed the treatment calculations, based on a 30 Gy prescription dose.
RESULTS
We achieved the best possible CBCT imaging quality with the 120kV and 20mA setting parameters. This corresponds to the "HD3D (large)" O-Arm setting mode. With this, the image quality with artifact reduction, minimization of image noise and consideration of a low radiation exposure of only 0.5mSv for the patients is feasible. Approximately 15 additional minutes were accounted for contouring and planning times.
CONCLUSION
Good-quality intraoperative imaging can be obtained when performing IORT, easing the applicator positioning and resulting in a more precise target irradiation. Operating times would be minimally extended with this procedure. A clinical study will initiate based on these findings.
Collapse