1
|
Tao Y, Biau J, Sun XS, Sire C, Martin L, Alfonsi M, Prevost JB, Modesto A, Lafond C, Tourani JM, Miroir J, Kaminsky MC, Coutte A, Liem X, Chautard E, Vauleon E, Drouet F, Ruffier A, Ramee JF, Waksi G, Péchery A, Wanneveich M, Guigay J, Aupérin A, Bourhis J. Pembrolizumab versus cetuximab concurrent with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck unfit for cisplatin (GORTEC 2015-01 PembroRad): a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:101-110. [PMID: 36522816 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate potential synergistic effect of pembrolizumab with radiotherapy (RT) compared with a standard-of-care (SOC) cetuximab-RT in patients with locally advanced-squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (LA-SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with nonoperated stage III-IV SCC of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx and unfit for receiving high-dose cisplatin were enrolled. Patients received once-daily RT up to 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions with weekly cetuximab (cetuximab-RT arm) or 200 mg Q3W pembrolizumab during RT (pembrolizumab-RT arm). The primary endpoint was locoregional control (LRC) rate 15 months after RT. To detect a difference between arms of 60%-80% in 15-month LRC, inclusion of 66 patients per arm was required to achieve a power of at least 0.85 at two-sided significance level of 0.20. RESULTS Between May 2016 and October 2017, 133 patients were randomized to cetuximab-RT (n = 66) and pembrolizumab-RT (n = 67). Two patients (one in each arm) were not included in the analysis (a consent withdrawal and a progression before treatment start). The median age was 65 years (interquartile range 60-70 years), 92% were smokers, 60% were oropharynx (46% of oropharynx with p16+) and 75% were stage IV. Median follow-up was 25 months in both arms. The 15-month LRC rate was 59% with cetuximab-RT and 60% with pembrolizumab-RT ]odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-2.59; P = 0.91]. There was no significant difference between arms for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.55-1.32; P = 0.47) and for overall survival (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.49-1.40; P = 0.49). Toxicity was lower in the pembrolizumab-RT arm than in the cetuximab-RT arm: 74% versus 92% patients with at least one grade ≥3 adverse events (P = 0.006), mainly due to mucositis, radiodermatitis, and rash. CONCLUSION Compared with the SOC cetuximab-RT, pembrolizumab concomitant with RT did not improve the tumor control and survival but appeared less toxic in unfit patients with LA-SCCHN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Tao
- Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - J Biau
- Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - X S Sun
- Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Montbéliard and CHU Besançon, Montbéliard, France
| | - C Sire
- Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France
| | - L Martin
- Clinique des Ormeaux, Le Havre, France
| | - M Alfonsi
- Clinique Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | | | - A Modesto
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | - C Lafond
- Clinique Victor Hugo-Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - J M Tourani
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - J Miroir
- Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - M C Kaminsky
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - A Coutte
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - X Liem
- Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - E Chautard
- Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - E Vauleon
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - F Drouet
- Clinique Mutualiste de l'estuaire, Saint-Nazaire, France
| | - A Ruffier
- Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France; Clinique Victor Hugo-Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - J F Ramee
- Centre Hospitalier Départemental de Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | | | | | | | - J Guigay
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - A Aupérin
- Unit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat 1018 INSERM, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - J Bourhis
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|