The evaluation of rhytidectomy flap healing after CO2 laser resurfacing in a pig model

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine when it becomes safe to perform laser resurfacing after rhytidectomy flap elevation.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-four sites on 12 domestic Yorkshire pigs were selected; 4 x 10-cm skin flaps were elevated in 72 of the 84 sites and shortened 10%. The 12 remaining sites (controls) were treated with laser resurfacing alone. Laser resurfacing was also performed at days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after closing the skin flaps. The healing time for the laser-resurfaced sites without flap elevation were compared to that of the skin flaps treated with the laser at days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Twelve "skin flap" controls were elevated, shortened 10%, and closed without laser treatment. Resurfacing was performed using 2 passes with the Sharplan Silk Touch CO(2) laser.

RESULTS

The average healing time for the skin flaps treated with the laser at day 0 was 23.9 days. All of these flaps showed skin slough with delayed healing followed by scar formation. The areas treated with the laser alone (controls), and the subsequent skin flaps treated with the laser postoperatively at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 days completely re-epithelialized in an average of 7.8, 8.1, 7.3, 7.4, and 7.3 days, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in healing time between the controls and flaps treated with the laser on or after 7 days (P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in healing time between the laser-treated skin flaps at day 0 and the controls, between the laser-treated flaps on day 0 and day 7, and between the laser-treated flaps on day 0 and day 14 (P < 0.001). Because there was little difference in healing time after 14 days, only the healing times for laser-treated skin flaps up to 14 days were compared using paired t tests.

CONCLUSIONS

From our observations using a pig model, we conclude that skin flaps may be safely laser resurfaced about 1 week postoperatively. On the other hand, simultaneous flap elevation and laser resurfacing results in delayed healing with subsequent scar formation.

The fate of fresh, layered, nonsutured and sutured, autogenous cartilage in the rabbit model

OBJECTIVE

To compare the thickness, area, and volume of sutured and nonsutured multilayered cartilage grafts in a rabbit population.

DESIGN

Autogenous rabbit cartilage grafts were harvested, layered, and placed in the contralateral auricle. Half the grafts were sutured; the other half were nonsutured. Graft thickness, area, and volume were measured before implantation, after 90 days in vivo, and after explantation.

RESULTS

The area and volume of the cartilage grafts increased during the 90-day period. Histologically, this was caused by increased fibrous tissue around the cartilage grafts. Minimal cartilage resorption was observed. No differences were noted between sutured and nonsutured grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Autogenous, fresh, uncrushed, layered nonsutured or sutured cartilage grafts are well tolerated. Statistically significant increases in the area and volume of autogenous, fresh, uncrushed, layered cartilage grafts occurred primarily because of fibrous tissue formation at the margins of the layered grafts. Suturing had no effect on the postoperative volume retention of these layered grafts. This information will be helpful to the facial plastic surgeon when using fresh-layered autogenous cartilage grafts during cosmetic or reconstructive procedures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:256-259

The endoscopic browlift for forehead rejuvenation

Since its initial description by Vasconez et al in 1992, the endoscopic browlift has evolved into a popular method for addressing brow ptosis and forehead rejuvenation. The advantages of fewer incisions, less postoperative swelling, alopecia and prolonged scalp anesthesia, and more rapid rehabilitation have provided greater patient acceptance than the traditional coronal approach. Unlike the coronal browlift where the amount of elevation is determined by the amount of skin excised, the elevation in the endoscopic browlift is determined by periosteal release at the arcus marginalis and forehead flap fixation. Though equipment costs are greater and a learning curve exists, the endoscopic browlift offers the oculoplastic surgeon additional beneficial options in the management of brow ptosis.