[Evaluation of outpatient medical pain management in Germany : Results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey among pain specialists in outpatient departments]

Hintergrund

Nach den Kriterien der Qualitätssicherungsvereinbarung Schmerztherapie (QSV) nahmen zum Stichtag 31.12.2016 1206 Ärztinnen und Ärzte an der ambulanten Versorgung chronischer Schmerzpatienten teil. Bei in weiten Teilen bestehender Unterversorgung chronischer Schmerzpatienten fehlen Daten zur Einschätzung der ambulanten Schmerztherapie durch die Schmerztherapeuten selbst.

Methoden

In einem Hybrid-Delphi-Verfahren wurde ein Fragebogen zur inhaltlichen, strukturellen und persönlichen Bewertung der ambulanten Schmerztherapie in Deutschland entwickelt.

Mit diesem Instrument wurde eine internetbasierte Querschnittsbefragung von 281 QSV-Schmerzmedizinern aus vier Bundesländern (Berlin, Niedersachsen, Sachsen, Baden-Württemberg) und aller universitären Schmerzambulanzleiter (n = 36) in Deutschland durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Die Befragung erzielte eine bereinigte Rücklaufquote von insgesamt 35,9 %. Bei den Schmerzambulanzleitern antworteten 66,7 %. Bei 91 % der Befragten lag der Anteil an chronisch Schmerzkranken in der Praxis bei über 70 %. 67,3 % geben an, mit ihrer Praxissituation zufrieden zu sein, auf der anderen Seite äußern 63,4 % ihre Unzufriedenheit mit der aktuellen Organisation der Schmerzmedizin in Deutschland insgesamt. Diese Unzufriedenheit zeigt sich vor allem in Bezug auf die Budgetregelungen (69,3 %), die Kooperation mit Psychotherapeuten (69,3 %) und die interdisziplinäre Vernetzung (50,5 %). Als gute Vorbereitung für den späteren Beruf werden die einjährige Weiterbildung bei einem Weiterbildungsbefugten (87,1 %) und die Teilnahme an dem Kurs „Psychosomatische Grundversorgung“ (90,1 %) bewertet. Vielfältige Freitextkommentare weisen darauf hin, dass die Ausbildung zu kurz und nicht ausreichend sei. Die Mehrheit der Befragten hält es sowohl aus Arztsicht (61,4 %) wie auch aus Patientensicht (54,5 %) für sinnvoll, einen Facharzt für Schmerzmedizin als Versorgungsmodell zu etablieren. 70,8 % der Schmerzambulanzleiter sprechen sich für eigenständige Strukturen mit eigenem Budget aus, 75,0 % geben an, dass ihre Ambulanz unter den aktuellen Bedingungen nicht kostendeckend arbeitet. In Bezug auf die aktuelle Ausbildungssituation berichten nur 39,7 % der QSV-Schmerztherapeuten in der Niederlassung, dass sie auch Ärzte ausbilden, 57,6 % von ihnen planen zudem, ihre Tätigkeit innerhalb der nächsten 10 Jahre aufzugeben.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die mangelnde Eigenständigkeit der Schmerzmedizin und die unzureichend ausgebauten ambulanten Versorgungsnetzwerke tragen dazu bei, dass Schmerztherapeuten mit vielen Aspekten ihrer Tätigkeit unzufrieden sind. Die Etablierung eines Facharztes für Schmerztherapie wird als eine gute Lösung für eine bessere schmerzmedizinische Versorgung und für die Nachwuchsproblematik gesehen.

The best from East and West? Acupuncture and medical training therapy as monotherapies or in combination for adult patients with episodic and chronic tension-type headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a complex health intervention, based on the combination of conventional Western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), in an outpatient department of a university hospital for patients with frequent episodic or chronic tension-type headaches.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a prospective randomized controlled pilot study with four balanced treatment arms (usual care, acupuncture, training, and training plus acupuncture). Each arm will have 24 patients. After the initial screening examination and randomization, a 6-week treatment period follows, with treatment frequencies decreasing at 2-week intervals. After completion of the intervention, two follow-up evaluations will be performed 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. At predefined times, the various outcomes (pain intensity, health-related quality of life, pain duration, autonomic regulation, and heart rate variability) as well as the participants' acceptance of the complex treatment will be evaluated with valid assessment instruments (Migraine Disability Assessment, PHQ-D, GAD-7, and SF-12) and a headache diary. The acupuncture treatment will be based on the rules of TCM, comprising a standardized combination of acupuncture points and additional points selected according to individual pain localization. The training therapy comprises a combination of strength training, endurance training, and training to improve flexibility and coordination. Besides descriptive analyses of the samples, their comparability will be assessed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) or chi-squared tests. Analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Potential interaction effects will be calculated using a repeated-measures ANOVA to test the primary and secondary hypotheses. In supplementary analyses, the proportion of treatment responders (those with a 50% reduction in the frequency of pain episodes) will be determined for each treatment arm.

DISCUSSION

This trial may provide evidence for the additive effects of acupuncture and medical training therapy as a combination treatment and may scientifically support the implementation of this complex health intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on 11 Feburary 2019. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00016723.

[Intensified Work-Related Rehabilitation Aftercare: Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial]

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensified work-related rehabilitation aftercare (IWORAC) in comparison to the conventional intensified rehabilitation aftercare (IRAC).

METHODS

Patients with severe limitations of work-related functioning were recruited in 11 outpatient rehabilitation centres at the beginning of their orthopaedic rehabilitation aftercare and randomly assigned to the interventions. The control group (n=150) received the IRAC while the intervention group (n=157) received the IWORAC which amended the IRAC by work-related functional capacity training, work-related psychosocial groups, social counselling and relaxation training. The primary outcome was work ability. Treatment effects were analyzed by generalized linear regression models.

RESULTS

There was no statistically relevant between-group difference in follow-up primary or secondary (e. g., duration of sick leave, quality of life) outcomes. Both groups improved their quality of life and work ability considerably.

CONCLUSION

RESULTS were not in favour of the IWORAC. The improvement of existing aftercare treatments might require a stronger involvement of the employer.

[Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive Health Management System (Fit for Work and Life) for Employees of a University Hospital - A Practice Report]

Background: Due to the increase of sick leave, prolonging working life and the prediction of shortage of skilled workers in the future, health management systems are continuously gaining importance. Employees in a University Hospital are exposed to particular stress factors, which are also reflected in a higher than average amount of sick leave. Against this background, the project "Fit for Work and Life" (FWL) was developed and implemented by the Hannover Medical School (MHH). Aims: FWL aims to maintain, improve or recover the work ability of employees by offering both preventive and rehabilitative treatments. A second goal is to significantly reduce the days of sick leave. Methods: The project was jointly developed and implemented by five MHH departments and the DRV Braunschweig-Hannover (DRV BS-H) according to previously defined principles. It was scientifically evaluated by the following outcomes: average days of sick leave, work ability (WAI), quality of life (SF-36, WHOQOL), coping strategies (FERUS) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI). Results and Conclusions: So far, this project is unique in its concept. It has been successfully implemented in the organisational structures of the MHH. 376 employees have registered during the first project year. Up to now, 182 participants have completed their individual programmes. The results show that 60.4% of employees have moderate to poor WAI values. The average of the mental summary scale of the SF-36 was 44.9, indicating a high workload.