The NewYork-Presbyterian Regional Health Collaborative: a three-year progress report

The Washington Heights-Inwood section of Manhattan is a predominantly poor Hispanic community with disproportionately high rates of chronic disease, including asthma, diabetes, and congestive heart failure. In October 2010, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, in association with the Columbia University Medical Center, launched an integrated network of patient-centered medical homes that were linked to other providers and community-based resources and formed a "medical village." Three years later, a study of 5,852 patients who had some combination of diabetes, asthma, and congestive heart failure found that emergency department visits and hospitalizations had been reduced by 29.7 percent and 28.5 percent, respectively, compared to the year before implementation of the network. Thirty-day readmissions and average length-of-stay declined by 36.7 percent and 4.9 percent, respectively. Patient satisfaction scores improved across all measures. Financially, NewYork-Presbyterian experienced a short-term return on investment of 11 percent. Some of the gain was a result of increased reimbursements from New York State. Nonetheless, these findings demonstrate that academic medical centers can improve outcomes for poor communities by building regional care models centering on medical homes that incorporate patient-centered processes and are linked through information systems and service collaborations to hospitals, specialty practices, and community-based providers and organizations.

Factors Affecting Cigarette Smoking and Intention to Smoke Among Puerto Rican-American High School Students

Using data from a survey of Puerto Rican adolescents in Boston and Hartford, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted of factors affecting recent cigarette smoking status and intentions to smoke in the next 5 years. Among Puerto Rican-American high school students between the ages of 14 and 20 years, nearly 12% of the males and 10% of the females had smoked at least one cigarette during the month prior to in-home interviews. Two factors -the proportion of close friends who smoked and exposure to smokers during recreational activities-were positively associated with the likelihood that respondents had smoked in the past month and intended to smoke in the future. The smoking status offamily members had no major independent effects on a teen's behavior. Degree of acculturation, measured by three language usage items, was associated with higher rates of smoking by male students but not by females. These results suggest that peer pressure is as important an influence on the cigarette smoking behavior of Puerto Ricans as it is for non-Latino students.

Abstract A68: What do they do? The art and science of patient navigation among underserved Latina minorities: The significance of language

Background: Patient Navigation has evolved to reduce cancer health disparities by eliminating barriers to diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship services. Attempts have been made to describe barriers to care and navigator actions. Little attention has been paid to the unique needs of underserved minorities. Here we describe barriers to care reported by Latina survivors in the context of a social-ecological framework, actions taken by navigators to resolve those barriers, and the consequences of those activities.

Methods: We evaluated 399 barriers to care reported by Latinas diagnosed with cancer as part of Redes En Acción: The National Latino Cancer Research Network from July 2008-January 2011. Navigators maintained monthly logs of encounters with patients and recorded reported barriers to care and actions taken to overcome each barrier. Spearman Correlation, Chi-squared analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the barriers and actions.

Results: The most common barrier to care was needed Spanish-English translation (55.6%). Personal (e.g. fear) and system barriers (e.g. insurance) accounted for the remainder. 85% of all Latinas reported one or more barriers; 37% reported more than one. Multiple (2+) barriers resulted in slightly longer time to treatment (aHR [adjusted Hazard Ratio]= 0.871; p < .05). However this disappeared when barriers were tallied without translation (aHR=0.964; p=.982). Many barriers not specifically reported to be language-based in nature were resolved by providing translation services in the social-ecological context of the reported problem. This was reflected in significant correlation between patient-reported barriers involving Health Education, Insurance issues, Fear, and Beliefs and navigator actions regarding translation services (all p < .05). For example, of 70 instances of “fear” reported as a barrier to care, 12 (17.1%) were resolved with a translation action.

Conclusions: Barriers reported by Latinas are predominantly linguistic in nature. Multiple barriers appear to result in a delay between diagnosis and treatment initiation; however this effect disappears when accounting for the effects of a language barrier. Health care systems must attend to the special needs of underserved minorities when planning and improving programs.

Citation Format: Amelie G. Ramirez, Eliseo J. Perez-Stable, Frank Penedo, Gregory A. Talavera, J. Emilio Carrillo, Maria Fernandez, Alan E. C. Holden, Edgar Munoz, Sandra San Miguel, Kipling Gallion. What do they do? The art and science of patient navigation among underserved Latina minorities: The significance of language. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A68.

Reducing time-to-treatment in underserved Latinas with breast cancer: the Six Cities Study

BACKGROUND

The interaction of clinical and patient-level challenges following a breast cancer diagnosis can be a significant source of health care disparities. Failure to address specific cultural features that create or exacerbate barriers can lead to less-than optimal navigation results, specifically in Hispanic/Latino women.

METHODS

To address these disparities, the study leaders in San Antonio, Texas, and 5 other regional partners of the federally-funded Redes En Acción: The National Latino Cancer Research Network developed a culturally-tailored patient navigation intervention model for Latinas with breast cancer.

RESULTS

Compared with control patients, a higher percentage of navigated subjects initiated treatment within 30 days (69.0% versus 46.3%, P = .029) and 60 days (97.6% versus 73.1%, P = .001) following their cancer diagnosis. Time from cancer diagnosis to first treatment was lower in the navigated group (mean, 22.22 days; median, 23.00 days) than controls (mean, 48.30 days; median, 33.00 days). These results were independent of cancer stage at diagnosis and numerous characteristics of cancer clinics and individual participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful application of patient navigation increased the percentage of Latinas initiating breast cancer treatment within 30 and 60 days of diagnosis. This was achieved through navigator provision of services such as accompaniment to appointments, transportation arrangements, patient telephone support, patient-family telephone support, Spanish-English language translation, and assistance with insurance paperwork.

Reducing time-to-treatment in underserved Latinas with breast cancer: the Six Cities Study

BACKGROUND

The interaction of clinical and patient-level challenges following a breast cancer diagnosis can be a significant source of health care disparities. Failure to address specific cultural features that create or exacerbate barriers can lead to less-than optimal navigation results, specifically in Hispanic/Latino women.

METHODS

To address these disparities, the study leaders in San Antonio, Texas, and 5 other regional partners of the federally-funded Redes En Acción: The National Latino Cancer Research Network developed a culturally-tailored patient navigation intervention model for Latinas with breast cancer.

RESULTS

Compared with control patients, a higher percentage of navigated subjects initiated treatment within 30 days (69.0% versus 46.3%, P = .029) and 60 days (97.6% versus 73.1%, P = .001) following their cancer diagnosis. Time from cancer diagnosis to first treatment was lower in the navigated group (mean, 22.22 days; median, 23.00 days) than controls (mean, 48.30 days; median, 33.00 days). These results were independent of cancer stage at diagnosis and numerous characteristics of cancer clinics and individual participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful application of patient navigation increased the percentage of Latinas initiating breast cancer treatment within 30 and 60 days of diagnosis. This was achieved through navigator provision of services such as accompaniment to appointments, transportation arrangements, patient telephone support, patient-family telephone support, Spanish-English language translation, and assistance with insurance paperwork.

Time to definitive diagnosis of breast cancer in Latina and non-Hispanic white women: the six cities study

Time delay after an abnormal screening mammogram may have a critical impact on tumor size, stage at diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and survival of subsequent breast cancer. This study was undertaken to evaluate disparities between Latina and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women in time to definitive diagnosis of breast cancer after an abnormal screening mammogram, as well as factors contributing to such disparities. As part of the activities of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded Redes En Acción research network, clinical records of 186 Latinas and 74 NHWs who received abnormal screening mammogram results were reviewed to determine the time to obtain a definitive diagnosis. Data was obtained from participating clinics in six U.S. cities and included demographics, clinical history, and mammogram characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test differences in median time to definitive diagnosis by ethnicity after adjusting for clinic site, demographics, and clinical characteristics. Time-to-event analysis showed that Latinas took 2.2 times longer to reach 50% definitively diagnosed with breast cancer relative to NHWs, and three times longer to reach 80% diagnosed (p=0.001). Latinas' median time to definitive diagnosis was 60 days compared to 27 for NHWs, a 59% gap in diagnosis rates (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.09, 2.31; p=0.015). BI-RADS-4/5 women's diagnosis rate was more than twice that of BI-RADS-3 (aHR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.18, 3.78; p=0.011). Disparities in time between receipt of abnormal screening result and definitive diagnosis adversely affect Latinas compared to NHWs, and remain significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. With cancer now the leading cause of mortality among Latinos, a greater need exists for ethnically and culturally appropriate interventions like patient navigation to facilitate Latinas' successful entry into, and progression through, the cancer care system.

Practices that reduce the Latina survival disparity after breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

Latina breast cancer patients are 20 percent more likely to die within 5 years after diagnosis compared with white women, even though they have a lower incidence of breast cancer, lower general mortality rates, and some better health behaviors. Existing data only examine disparities in the utilization of breast cancer care; this research expands the study question to which utilization factors drive the shorter survival in Latina women compared with white women.

METHODS

This longitudinal linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare cohort study examined early stage breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2000 and followed for 5-11 years after diagnosis (N=44,999). Modifiable utilization factors included consistent visits to primary care providers and to specialists after diagnosis, consistent post-diagnosis mammograms, and receipt of initial care consistent with current standards of care.

RESULTS

Of the four utilization factors potentially driving this disparity, a lack of consistent post-diagnosis mammograms was the strongest driver of the Latina breast cancer survival disparity. Consistent mammograms attenuated the hazard of death from 23% [hazard ratio, HR, (95% confidence interval, 95%CI)=1.23 (1.1,1.4)] to a nonsignificant 12% [HR (95%CI)=1.12 (0.7,1.3)] and reduced the excess hazard of death in Latina women by 55%. Effect modification identified that visits to primary care providers have a greater protective impact on the survival of Latina compared to white women [HR (95%CI)=0.9 (0.9,0.9)].

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that undetected new or recurrent breast cancers due to less consistent post-diagnosis mammograms contribute substantially to the long-observed Latina survival disadvantage. Interventions involving primary care providers may be especially beneficial to this population.

Abstract LB-190: Time to treatment of Latinas with breast cancer utilizing patient navigation: the Six Cities Study

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in Latinas. Time from cancer diagnosis to treatment initiation is critical in optimizing cancer care. Patient navigation is a potentially effective means of promoting timely treatment of breast cancer, yet efficacy is insufficiently documented. Redes en Accion here evaluates a culturally sensitive patient navigation program to reduce time from cancer to diagnosis to treatment and increase proportions of women treated within 30 days of diagnosis.

METHODS: We analyzed 109 Latinas diagnosed with breast cancer from July 2008-January 2011 (42 navigated, 67 controls). Women were navigated by locally trained navigators or non-navigated (data abstracted from charts). Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards, and logistic regression were used to determine group differences.

RESULTS: Time from cancer diagnosis to 1st treatment was lower in the navigated group (MED 21 days, control 32 days, HR 1.6, p=0.02). 64.3% began treatment within 30 days of cancer diagnosis, compared to 47.8% of non-navigated Latinas (p=0.015) controlling for stage of cancer at diagnosis and numerous characteristics of clinics and participants. Effects were due to navigator activities compared to those who did not need or utilize them, including appointment reminders, transportation arrangements, accompaniment to appointments, and translation services.

CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered navigation to assist Latina women with breast cancer diagnoses significantly reduces time from diagnosis to treatment, and increases the proportion of women who begin treatment within 30 days of diagnosis. Improvement appears to be associated with specific navigator activities.

Acknowledgement: Redes En Acción: The National Latino Cancer Research Network (NCI U01 CA114657-05) and the Cancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science at Center San Antonio (Grant # P30CA054174).

Citation Format: Amelie G. Ramirez, Eliseo Perez-Stable, Gregory A. Talavera, Frank J. Penedo, J. Emilio Carrillo, Maria E. Fernandez, Alan E. C. Holden, Edgar Munoz, Dorothy Long-Parma, Sandra San Miguel de Mejors, Kipling Gallion. Time to treatment of Latinas with breast cancer utilizing patient navigation: the Six Cities Study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-190. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-190

Navigating Latinas with breast screen abnormalities to diagnosis: the Six Cities Study

BACKGROUND.: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Latinas, chiefly because of later diagnosis. The time from screening to diagnosis is critical to optimizing cancer care, yet the efficacy of navigation in reducing it is insufficiently documented. Here, the authors evaluate a culturally sensitive patient navigation program to reduce the time to diagnosis and increase the proportions of women diagnosed within 30 days and 60 days. METHODS.: The authors analyzed 425 Latinas who had Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) radiologic abnormalities categorized as BI-RADS-3, BI-RADS-4, or BI-RADS-5 from July 2008 to January 2011. There were 217 women in the navigated group and 208 women in the control group. Women were navigated by locally trained navigators or were not navigated (data for this group were abstracted from charts). The Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression, and logistic regression were used to determine differences between groups. RESULTS.: The time to diagnosis was shorter in the navigated group (mean, 32.5 days vs 44.6 days in the control group; hazard ratio, 1.32; P = .007). Stratified analysis revealed that navigation significantly shortened the time to diagnosis among women who had BI-RADS-3 radiologic abnormalities (mean, 21.3 days vs 63.0 days; hazard ratio, 2.42; P < .001) but not among those who had BI-RADS-4 or BI-RADS-5 radiologic abnormalities (mean, 37.6 days vs 36.9 days; hazard ratio, 0.98; P = .989). Timely diagnosis occurred more frequently among navigated Latinas (within 30 days: 67.3% vs 57.7%; P = .045; within 60 days: 86.2% vs 78.4%; P = .023). This was driven by the BI-RADS-3 strata (within 30 days: 83.6% vs 50%; P < .001; within 60 days: 94.5% vs 67.2%; P < .001). A lack of missed appointments was associated with timely diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS.: Patient-centered navigation to assist Latina women with abnormal screening mammograms appeared to reduced the time to diagnosis and increase rates of timely diagnosis overall. However, in stratified analyses, only navigated Latinas with an initial BI-RADS-3 screen benefited, probably because of a reduction in missed diagnostic appointments.

Abstract PD08-05: Spanning the Continuum to assess, serve and navigate Latinas with breast cancer: A Tale of Six Projects

Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Latinas: 14,200 diagnosed in 2009. Groundbreaking work has shown that patient navigation may assist minority patients to negotiate the Cancer Care Continuum. Here we report the efforts of Redes En Acción: The National Latino Cancer Research Network at the Institute for Health Promotion Research in San Antonio, Texas in applying these findings to Latinas.

Methods We conducted six studies to assess and address the needs and self-reported barriers to care of Latina breast cancer patients, leading to the development and controlled trial of a theory-driven, culturally appropriate patient navigation model and program. We currently are evaluating health-related quality of life and barriers to genetic testing in Latina breast cancer survivors.

Results Latinas with breast cancer face significant obstacles across the cancer care continuum, originating from multiple domains, including traditional values, timely access to care and cultural orientation. These have a direct influence on interaction with the system or indirectly via influences on existing barriers including socioeconomic marginalization and affective response to the stress of any of these.

A regional health collaborative formed By NewYork-Presbyterian aims to improve the health of a largely Hispanic community

Communities of poor, low-income immigrants with limited English proficiency and disproportionate health burdens pose unique challenges to health providers and policy makers. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital developed the Regional Health Collaborative, a population-based health care model to improve the health of the residents of Washington Heights-Inwood. This area is a predominantly Hispanic community in New York City with high rates of asthma, diabetes, heart disease, and depression. NewYork-Presbyterian created an integrated network of patient-centered medical homes to form a "medical village" linked to other providers and community-based resources. The initiative set out to document the priority health needs of the community, target high-prevalence conditions, improve cultural competence among providers, and introduce integrated information systems across care sites. The first six months of the program demonstrated a significant 9.2 percent decline in emergency department visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions and a 5.8 percent decrease in hospitalizations that was not statistically significant. This initiative offers a model for other urban academic medical centers to better serve populations facing social and cultural barriers to care.

Defining and targeting health care access barriers

The impact of social and economic determinants of health status and the existence of racial and ethnic health care access disparities have been well-documented. This paper describes a model, the Health Care Access Barriers Model (HCAB), which provides a taxonomy and practical framework for the classification, analysis and reporting of those modifiable health care access barriers that are associated with health care disparities. The model describes three categories of modifiable health care access barriers: financial, structural, and cognitive. The three types of barriers are reciprocally reinforcing and affect health care access individually or in concert. These barriers are associated with screening, late presentation to care, and lack of treatment, which in turn result in poor health outcomes and health disparities. By targeting those barriers that are measurable and modifiable the model facilitates root-cause analysis and intervention design.

Cultural Competence And Health Care Disparities: Key Perspectives And Trends

Cultural competence has gained attention as a potential strategy to improve quality and eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in health care. In 2002 we conducted interviews with experts in cultural competence from managed care, government, and academe to identify their perspectives on the field. We present our findings here and then identify recent trends in cultural competence focusing on health care policy, practice, and education. Our analysis reveals that many health care stakeholders are developing initiatives in cultural competence. Yet the motivations for advancing cultural competence and approaches taken vary depending on mission, goals, and sphere of influence.

Barriers to health promotion and disease prevention in the Latino population

The Latino population of the United States is expected to increase substantially in the next 25 years. Although recent health promotion and disease prevention interventions have improved the health of the majority of Americans, the Latino community has derived less benefit from these advances. This is due to a number of interrelated factors, including a disproportionate representation of Latino Americans in the low socioeconomic strata and in the uninsured population. Even when insured, Latino Americans face significant barriers to health promotion and disease prevention. This policy analysis identifies barriers at the organizational and structural level of health care delivery, as well as at the level of the medical encounter. It provides a practical framework for intervention that is founded on the recruitment of Latino Americans into the health care workforce and leadership, the restructuring of health systems to be more responsive to the needs of diverse populations, and health care provider education on how to improve cross-cultural understanding and communication. By investing in a multifaceted approach that addresses barriers to health promotion and disease prevention in the Latino population, we can improve the quality of care delivered to this population and help eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care.

Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care

OBJECTIVES

Racial/ethnic disparities in health in the U.S. have been well described. The field of "cultural competence" has emerged as one strategy to address these disparities. Based on a review of the relevant literature, the authors develop a definition of cultural competence, identify key components for intervention, and describe a practical framework for implementation of measures to address racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.

METHODS

The authors conducted a literature review of academic, foundation, and government publications focusing on sociocultural barriers to care, the level of the health care system at which a given barrier occurs, and cultural competence efforts that address these barriers.

RESULTS

Sociocultural barriers to care were identified at the organizational (leadership/workforce), structural (processes of care), and clinical (provider-patient encounter) levels. A framework of cultural competence interventions--including minority recruitment into the health professions, development of interpreter services and language-appropriate health educational materials, and provider education on cross-cultural issues--emerged to categorize strategies to address racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic changes anticipated over the next decade magnify the importance of addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. A framework of organizational, structural, and clinical cultural competence interventions can facilitate the elimination of these disparities and improve care for all Americans.

The challenges of cross-cultural healthcare--diversity, ethics, and the medical encounter

Difficulties in the provider-patient relationship arise from many sources, and pose various challenges to the integrity of the medical encounter. When these issues are especially sensitive or important to the patient's health and well-being, a complete breakdown in the therapeutic relationship may result. The goal of the emerging field of cross-cultural healthcare is to improve providers' ability to understand, communicate with, and care for patients from diverse backgrounds. We should weave the concepts of cross-cultural care into the ethics of caring if we truly hope to have a positive impact on the health status of diverse patient populations.

Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care

OBJECTIVES

Racial/ethnic disparities in health in the U.S. have been well described. The field of "cultural competence" has emerged as one strategy to address these disparities. Based on a review of the relevant literature, the authors develop a definition of cultural competence, identify key components for intervention, and describe a practical framework for implementation of measures to address racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.

METHODS

The authors conducted a literature review of academic, foundation, and government publications focusing on sociocultural barriers to care, the level of the health care system at which a given barrier occurs, and cultural competence efforts that address these barriers.

RESULTS

Sociocultural barriers to care were identified at the organizational (leadership/workforce), structural (processes of care), and clinical (provider-patient encounter) levels. A framework of cultural competence interventions--including minority recruitment into the health professions, development of interpreter services and language-appropriate health educational materials, and provider education on cross-cultural issues--emerged to categorize strategies to address racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic changes anticipated over the next decade magnify the importance of addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. A framework of organizational, structural, and clinical cultural competence interventions can facilitate the elimination of these disparities and improve care for all Americans.

Integrating social factors into cross-cultural medical education

The field of cross-cultural medical education has blossomed in an environment of increasing diversity and increasing awareness of the effect of race and ethnicity on health outcomes. However, there is still no standardized approach to teaching doctors in training how best to care for diverse patient populations. As standards are developed, it is crucial to realize that medical educators cannot teach about culture in a vacuum. Caring for patients of diverse cultural backgrounds is inextricably linked to caring for patients of diverse social backgrounds. In this article, the authors discuss the importance of social issues in caring for patients of all cultures, and propose a practical, patient-based approach to social analysis covering four major domains--(1) social stress and support networks, (2) change in environment, (3) life control, and (4) literacy. By emphasizing and expanding the role of the social history in cross-cultural medical education, faculty can better train medical students, residents, and other health care providers to care for socioculturally diverse patient populations.

Hypertension in multicultural and minority populations: linking communication to compliance

Cardiovascular disease disproportionately affects minority populations, in part because of multiple sociocultural factors that directly affect compliance with antihypertensive medication regimens. Compliance is a complex health behavior determined by a variety of socioeconomic, individual, familial, and cultural factors. In general, provider-patient communication has been shown to be linked to patient satisfaction, compliance, and health outcomes. In multicultural and minority populations, the issue of communication may play an even larger role because of linguistic and contextual barriers that preclude effective provider-patient communication. These factors may further limit compliance. The ESFT Model for Communication and Compliance is an individual, patient-based communication tool that allows for screening for barriers to compliance and illustrates strategies for interventions that might improve outcomes for all hypertensive patients.

Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach

In today's multicultural society, assuring quality health care for all persons requires that physicians understand how each patient's sociocultural background affects his or her health beliefs and behaviors. Cross-cultural curricula have been developed to address these issues but are not widely used in medical education. Many curricula take a categorical and potentially stereotypic approach to "cultural competence" that weds patients of certain cultures to a set of specific, unifying characteristics. In addition, curricula frequently overlook the importance of social factors on the cross-cultural encounter. This paper discusses a patient-based cross-cultural curriculum for residents and medical students that teaches a framework for analysis of the individual patient's social context and cultural health beliefs and behaviors. The curriculum consists of five thematic units taught in four 2-hour sessions. The goal is to help physicians avoid cultural generalizations while improving their ability to understand, communicate with, and care for patients from diverse backgrounds.

The Cambridge Hospital Latino Health Clinic: a model for interagency integration of health services for Latinos at the provider level

Latinos who present for health services often suffer from a complex interaction of medical and mental health needs, requiring a multifaceted intervention. An essential element of this multilevel approach is cultural and linguistic sensitivity on the part of health providers. New, innovative models of health service organization are needed to address the unique needs of the Latino population. Some of the key characteristics these models need to focus on include interagency collaboration rather than competition for resources, interdisciplinary teams of primary-care providers that also involve other nonmedical professional members, centralized case coordination and decentralized service delivery, flexibility and adaptability to changing priorities, continuity of care for all patients, and mutual support among providers to minimize the effects of stress and burnout.

Sociocultural factors associated with smoking behavior by Puerto Rican adolescents in Boston

This study examined cigarette smoking among Puerto Rican adolescents in the Boston area in its sociocultural context by describing who uses cigarettes, and by identifying factors that encourage or discourage cigarette use. The study, conducted from 1986-87, used two approaches. The first was to survey 605 Puerto Rican households with adolescents 11-20 years old. Households were identified from a random sample of census blocks in five neighborhoods. In each household, interviews were completed with one adolescent and his or her female caretaker. The second approach was to conduct ethnographic interviews with 40 adolescents selected through a purposive sample of survey respondents from three of the study neighborhoods. Bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to examine the relationships between smoking behavior and characteristics of the adolescents. The results of these analyses were examined in light of the ethnographic data. Overall, 13.7% reported smoking in the month preceding the interview. Smoking was most prevalent among males 17-20. Patterns of smoking were associated with teens' social networks. The Puerto Rican adolescents in this study were more likely to smoke when their friends and household members smoked, if they participated in recreational activities such as sports or unsupervised games, and if they were not in school. These effects varied according to the gender of the respondent.