Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy with the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS®) with preattached scrotal port

INTRODUCTION

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a significant sequela of prostate cancer surgery. In this article, we present the surgical technique and safety and efficacy of the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS®) with preattached scrotal port.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

An open prospective study was conducted at a university hospital with the main objective of changing the baseline condition after adjustment in the daily pad count and their wet weight (pad test). The secondary objectives were the quality-of-life assessment (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF] and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 [IIQ-7], baseline and after the adjustment), patient-perceived results (Patient Global Index [PGI] and Global Response Assessment [GRA] at 1 year) and assessment of complications according to Clavien-Dindo. The numerical values are expressed in median ± IQR.

RESULTS

We analysed 60 consecutive patients with a follow-up of 21±22 months. The baseline pad-test was 465±450mL, and the pad-count was 5+3 pads/day. The baseline SUI was mild (11.6% of patients), moderate (25%) and severe (63.3%). The operative time was 60±25min, the hospital stay was 1±0 days, and the visual analogue scale of pain on day 1 after surgery was 0±1. The total filling was 16.5±7mL, and the number of refillings was 1±2. The pad-test and pad-count after the adjustment were 0±20mL and 0±1, respectively (both p<.0001 compared with baseline). SUI disappeared (81.7%) or remained mild (11.7%), moderate (5%) or severe (1.6%). We observed a reduction in the ICIQ-SF (p<.0001) and IIQ-7 scores (p=.0003). Both continence (p=.002) and satisfaction (p=.03) were lower in the irradiated patients. Complications occurred in 11 cases (18.6%), 8 (13.5%) of which were grade I and 3 (5.1%) of which were grade 3. The treatment satisfaction rate was 91.7%, and the patient-perceived overall improvement at 1 year was highly pronounced (PGI-I score, 1±1; GRA, 6±1).

CONCLUSIONS

SUI treatment of men using third-generation ATOMS® is safe and effective in the short-term, even in patients with severe SUI. The rate of dry patients after the adjustment exceeded 80%, and the satisfaction rates exceeded 90%. The patients assessed this treatment highly positively.

Corticosteroids, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen for IFN -1a flu symptoms in MS: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and prednisone in the treatment of interferon beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a) flu-like syndrome (FLS).

METHODS

Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis initiating treatment with IM IFNbeta-1a were randomized in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to receive acetaminophen 500 mg before and 6 and 12 hours after each injection, ibuprofen 400 mg before and 6 and 12 hours after each injection, or prednisone 60 mg daily for 1 week, plus tapering. Patients were instructed to keep a daily diary of fever severity, myalgia, chills, headache, and asthenia for 27 days. The sum of the scores of individual symptoms was used to obtain a daily FLS index. The primary outcome was the FLS index area under the curve (AUC) corrected by the number of measurement days.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were randomized at 11 hospitals: acetaminophen (n = 28), ibuprofen (n = 28), and corticosteroids (n = 28). No differences were detected between treatments in the mean AUC of the FLS index. With limitation of the analysis to the days of IM IFNbeta-1a injection, differences favoring ibuprofen were observed in the mean FLS index (p = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

No prophylactic treatment for flu-like syndrome seems to be superior to another in terms of overall well-being during the first month of IM IFNbeta-1a therapy. However, ibuprofen confers better control of symptoms immediately following IM IFNbeta-1a injection.

Ifosfamide and irinotecan in solid tumors: a phase I dose-finding trial

The combination of ifosfamide and irinotecan was tested in a dose-finding study. The preliminary results of the combination in this phase I study did not show any major toxicity that could help to define the dose-limiting toxicity. The escalation continues even after nine levels; the study is therefore ongoing. The main toxicity is gastrointestinal, with mild nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. There was some other irrelevant toxicity, which was easily manageable with the usual supportive therapy. When responses were evaluated, stable disease was found in some cases, suggesting some activity for the combination.