Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Optimal and Borderline Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricle Function

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used for treatment of end-stage heart failure. Outcomes are dependent on right ventricle (RV) function. Prediction of RV function after LVAD implantation is crucial for device selection and patient outcome. The aim of our study was to compare early LVAD course in patients with optimal and borderline echocardiographic parameters of RV function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 24 male patients with LVAD implantation. The following echocardiographic data of RV function were collected: FAC (fractional area change) with optimal value > 20%, tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion >15 mm, RV diameter < 50mm, and right-to-left ventricle ratio < 0.57 (RV/LV). Patients were divided into group 1 (12 patients) with transthoracic echocardiography parameters in optimal ranges and group 2 (12 patients) with suboptimal transthoracic echocardiography findings. Study endpoints were mortality, discharge from the intensive care unit, and RV dysfunction. Demographics, postoperative clinical outcomes, comorbidities, complications, and results in a 30-day period were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

Echocardiography parameters differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 according to FAC (31.8% vs 24.08%; P = .005), RV4 (45.08 mm vs 51.69 mm; P = .02), and RV/LV ratio (0.6 vs 0.7; P = .009). Patients did not differ according to course of disease, comorbidities before implantation, or complications. One patient from each group died. Patients in group 2 experienced more pulmonary hypertension, required increased doses of catecholamines, and stayed in the intensive care unit longer. No RV dysfunction was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline FAC, tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, and RV4 add RV/LV ratio prolonged recovery after LVAD implantation even with no RV failure. Parameters chosen for qualification are in safe ranges.

Predictive Value of Models for End-Stage Liver Disease Score in Patients With Pulsatile Flow POLVAD MEV Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

BACKGROUND

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts multisystem dysfunction and death in patients with heart failure (HF). Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used for the treatment of end-stage HF.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We evaluated the prognostic values of MELD, MELD-XI, and MELD-Na scores in patients with POLVAD MEV LVAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 25 consecutive pulsatile flow POLVAD MEV LVAD patients (22 men and 3 women) divided in 2 groups: Group S (survivors), 20 patients (18 men and 2 women), and Group NS (nonsurvivors), 5 patients (4 men and 1 woman). Patients were qualified in INTERMACS class 1 (7 patients) and class 2 (18 patients). Clinical data and laboratory parameters for MELD, MELD-XI, and MELD-Na score calculation were obtained on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Study endpoints were mortality or 30 days survival. MELD scores and complications were compared between Groups S and NS.

RESULTS

20 patients survived, and 5 (4 men and 1 woman) died during observation. Demographics did not differ. MELD scores were insignificantly higher in patients who died (Group 2). Values were as follows: 1. MELD preoperatively (21.71 vs 15.28, P = .225) in day 1 (22.03 vs 17.14, P = .126), day 2 (20.52 vs 17.03, P = .296); 2. MELD-XI preoperatively (19.28 vs 16.39, P = .48), day 1 (21.55 vs 18.14, P = .2662), day 2 (20.45 vs 17.2, P = .461); and 3. MELD-Na preoperatively (20.78 vs 18.7, P = .46), day 1 23.68 vs 18.12, P = .083), day 2 (22.00 vs 19.19, P = .295) consecutively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MELD scores do not identify patients with pulsatile LVAD at high risk for mortality in our series. Further investigation is needed.

Effects of Left Ventricular Assist Device Support on End-Organ Function in Patients With Heart Failure: Comparison of Pulsatile- and Continuous-Flow Support in a Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist about the effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) on end-organ function. We hypothesized that a pulsatile Polvad MEV (PM) would result in outcomes similar to those of similarly ill patients implanted with a continuous-flow LVAD (Heartware [HW] or Heartmate II [HMII]). We aimed to compare renal, hepatic, and hematologic functions in the 1st 30 days of support.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with 24 PM (21 M, 3 F; group P) and 15 HW and 5 HMII (20 M, 0 F); group C LVAD implantations from April 2007 to February 2014. Creatinine, bilirubin, aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) transaminases, hematocrit, platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) parameters were analyzed before implantation and during 30 days of support. Demographic parameters were similar.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the groups regarding baseline renal, hepatic, or hematologic function. Baseline INR and APTT were significantly higher in group P. Levels of creatinine were similar between groups. They increased from baseline to postoperative day (POD) 1 and then decreased. Bilirubin levels were insignificantly higher in group P. Transaminases were significantly higher in group P (AST in PODs 3-6, ALT in PODs 3-7). INR values were significantly higher at baseline and in POD 0. APTT values were insignificantly higher in group P.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LVAD improved renal and hepatic function in our series. Patients in group P had more decreased hepatic function and presented slower regeneration.

Comparison of Mechanical Circulatory Support by the Use of Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Devices Polvad MEV and Continuous Flow Heart Ware and Heart Mate II in a Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Mechanical circulatory support is increasingly used in patients with heart failure as a bridge to transplant or recovery. Results of use the Polish POLVAD MEV pulsatile circulatory support system and its comparison with novel devices never was done. We compared the course of patients with left ventricular circulatory support (left ventricular assist device [LVAD]) supported by POLVAD MEV or continuous flow devices Heart Mate II (HM II) and Heart Ware (HW) in single-center cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients who underwent Polvad Mev (group P; n = 24 [21M/3F]) or HW or HM II (group C; n = 20 [20M/0F]) implantation between April 2007 and February 2014. Patients were in INTERMACS 1 (6 in group P and 1 in group C) or 2. Preimplant demographics, and perioperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were reviewed between groups. We analyzed baseline signs of heart failure, comorbidities, complications, and the 30- and 90-day results.

RESULTS

Among the groups, age, gender, weight, and cause of heart failure were comparable. Patients in group C suffered more frequently from hypercholesterolemia preoperatively. Patients in group P had more pulmonary complications (7 vs 0) after LVAD implantation and stay longer on intensive care unit than patients in group C (17.61 ± 16.96 vs 9.56 ± 9.42; P = .047). After exclusion, INTERMACS 1 patients it was not significant (14.8 ± 10.8 vs 9.8 ± 9.6 days; P = .065), the 30- and 90-day mortality was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of pulsatile POLVAD MEV and continuous flow devices as LVAD support provides comparable results. A greater number of complications in group P can cause increased mortality over a longer observation period.

Exhaled nitric oxide concentration in patients after heart transplantation

Nitric oxide (NO) is present in exhaled air in humans and its level may decrease in heart diseases. In the present study we prospectively investigated how heart transplantation treated with oral immunosuppresive drugs based on ciclosporine A influences the exhaled NO concentration (exNO). The study was performed in 17 patients after heart transplantation in various time after procedure and 15 nonsmoking healthy volunteers as a control group. Patients after heart transplantation were free of clinical signs of rejection. End-tidal concentration of exNO was measured by the use of a chemiluminescence method. We found no statistically significant differences in the exNO level between patients after heart transplantation and healthy controls (6.81+/-2.70 part per billion (ppb) in the transplant group vs. 6.01+/-3.43 ppb in the control group). We conclude that heart transplantation and immunosuppresive therapy do not influence the exhaled NO concentration.

Perioperative management of calves undergoing implantation of a left ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVE

To describe perioperative management of calves that underwent left lateral thoracotomy, aortic cross-clamping, partial left heart bypass and implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

SAMPLE POPULATION

A total of 43 healthy castrated male calves, weighing 121 +/- 24 kg.

RESULTS

Diazepam (mean +/- SD, 0.26 +/- 0.07 mg/kg), ketamine (5.9 +/- 2.17 mg/kg) and isoflurane were used in the anesthetic management of calves undergoing implantation of a left ventricular assist device in the descending thoracic aorta. Other adjunctive agents administered were fentanyl (11 +/- 5.4 microg/kg), lidocaine (4.9 +/- 3.19 mg/kg), bupivacaine (0.75%) and butorphanol (0.49 +/- 0.13 mg/kg). None of the calves regurgitated at induction or during intubation. A tube was used to drain the rumen and prevent bloat during the procedure. Partial left heart bypass was used to perfuse the caudal half of the body during the period of aortic cross clamp and device implantation. Initial mean systemic blood pressure was 96 +/- 25 mm Hg, and pressures measured in the auricular artery increased during aortic cross-clamping and bypass. Vasoconstrictor therapy was required to treat caudal arterial hypotension during the procedure in 9 calves. Mean systemic arterial pressures returned to baseline values by the end of the anesthetic period. Initial mean pulmonary arterial pressures (PAP) were 22 +/- 3 mm Hg. A significant but transient increase in pulmonary arterial pressure occurred after both heparin and protamine administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The described anesthetic protocol was effective for thoracotomy and implantation of an intra-aortic left ventricular assist device in normal calves. Partial left ventricular bypass was a useful adjunct during the period of aortic cross clamp. The doses of heparin and protamine administered were effective. Responsibility to monitor oxygenation of the cranial half of the animal continues during the bypass period as hypoxemia due to pulmonary dysfunction will not be detected by the perfusionist.