|
1
|
Benomar A, Farzin B, Gevry G, Boisseau W, Roy D, Weill A, Iancu D, Guilbert F, Létourneau-Guillon L, Jacquin G, Chaalala C, Bojanowski MW, Labidi M, Fahed R, Volders D, Nguyen TN, Gentric JC, Magro E, Boulouis G, Forestier G, Hak JF, Ghostine JS, Kaderali Z, Shankar JJ, Kotowski M, Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Noninvasive Angiographic Results of Clipped or Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: An Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:1615-1620. [PMID: 34326106 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Noninvasive angiography is commonly used to assess the outcome of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in clinical series or randomized trials. We sought to assess whether a standardized 3-grade classification system could be reliably used to compare the CTA and MRA results of both treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic portfolio composed of CTAs of 30 clipped and MRAs of 30 coiled aneurysms was independently evaluated by 24 raters of diverse experience and training backgrounds. Twenty raters performed a second evaluation 1 month later. Raters were asked which angiographic grade and management decision (retreatment; close or long-term follow-up) would be most appropriate for each case. Agreement was analyzed using the Krippendorff α (αK) statistic, and the relationship between angiographic grade and clinical management choice, using the Fisher exact and Cramer V tests. RESULTS Interrater agreement was substantial (αK = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.70); results were slightly better for MRA results of coiling (αK = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.76) than for CTA results of clipping (αK = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69). Intrarater agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Interrater agreement regarding clinical management was moderate for both clipped (αK = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61) and coiled subgroups (αK = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.54). The choice of clinical management was strongly associated with the size of the residuum (mean Cramer V = 0.77 [SD, 0.14]), but complete occlusions (grade 1) were followed more closely after coiling than after clipping (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS A standardized 3-grade scale was found to be a reliable and clinically meaningful tool to compare the results of clipping and coiling of aneurysms using CTA or MRA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Benomar
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - B Farzin
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - G Gevry
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - W Boisseau
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - D Roy
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - A Weill
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - D Iancu
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - F Guilbert
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - L Létourneau-Guillon
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| | - G Jacquin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology (G.J.)
| | - C Chaalala
- Division of Neurosurgery (C.C., M.W.B., M.L.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M W Bojanowski
- Division of Neurosurgery (C.C., M.W.B., M.L.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Labidi
- Division of Neurosurgery (C.C., M.W.B., M.L.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - R Fahed
- Division ofNeurology (R.F.), The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Volders
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology (D.V.), Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - T N Nguyen
- Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Radiology (T.N.N.), Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J-C Gentric
- Departments of Interventional Neuroradiology (J.-C.G.)
| | - E Magro
- Neurosurgery (E.M.), Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - G Boulouis
- Department of Neuroradiology (G.B.), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - G Forestier
- Department of Neuroradiology (G.F.), University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - J-F Hak
- Department of Medical Imaging (J.-F.H.), University Hospital Timone Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - J S Ghostine
- Department of Radiology (J.S.G.), Jean-Talon Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - J J Shankar
- Department of Radiology (J.J.S.), Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - M Kotowski
- Department of Neurosurgery (M.K.), Hôpital de la Providence, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - T E Darsaut
- Department of Surgery (T.E.D.), Division of Neurosurgery,Walter C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Raymond
- From the Department of Radiology (A.B., B.F., G.G., W.B., D.R., A.W., D.I., F.G., L.L.-G., J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|