Dosimetric Study of Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation on a Ring Gantry-Based Medical Linac with a Two-Layer Multi-Leaf Collimator

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In this study, we aimed to evaluate dosimetric quality of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) plans for a ring gantry-based medical Linac with a two-layer multi-leaf collimator.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved treatment planning CT images, structure sets, and plan dose for four adult patients, two male and two female, who previously received TMLI treatments on helical tomotherapy (HT) at our institution. TMLI plans were optimized for a ring gantry-based medical Linac with a two-layer multi-leaf collimator (Halcyon, Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). A prescription dose of 12 Gy in 8 fractions was prescribed to the skeletal bones from the skull to mid-thigh, spleen, spinal canal, and lymphoid volume. Five or six isocenters were placed with equal spacing along the patient's longitudinal direction in each TMLI plan with two 6-MV flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) fields at each isocenter. Isocenter separation ranged from 15 cm to 16.5 cm. Each VMAT field has a field size of 28 cm to 28 cm with the collimator at 90° and a full gantry rotation. The nominal dose rate was 800 MU/minute, and the maximum gantry rotation speed was 24°/sec. Institutional dosimetric constraints were used for optimization including a mean lung dose limit of less than 8 Gy. All the plans were normalized so that 85% the primary planning target volume received the prescription dose.

RESULTS

The average mean doses to the target volumes ranged from 12.2 to 12.6 Gy in the Halcyon TMLI plans, while they ranged from 12.1 to 12.5 Gy in the HT TMLI plans. Relative to the prescription dose, the average mean dose for normal organs ranged from 21.3% to 56.6% in the Halcyon TMLI plans, while it ranged from 10.1% to 68.4% in the clinical HT plans. The difference in the average mean dose to normal organs was less than 0.5 Gy except two organs between the Halcyon and HT TMLI plans. The average median dose for normal organs ranged from 18.2% to 48.8% relative to the prescription dose in the Halcyon TMLI plans. The mean lung dose (MLD) in the Halcyon TMLI plans met the institutional limit with an average dose of 6.75±0.42 Gy (range: 6.44 - 7.36 Gy), while the average MLD was 6.54±0.77 Gy (range: 6.24 - 7.22 Gy) in the HT plans (p-value = 0.71 in the paired t-test). The average total monitor unit in the Halcyon TMLI plans was 4,425±906 MU (range: 3,470 - 5,575 MU) with an average beam-on time of 5.1±1.3 minutes (range: 4.1 - 7.0 minutes), which excludes isocenter setup time, while the average beam-on time was 22.2±3.2 minutes (range: 19.6 - 26.1 minutes) with the HT plans.

CONCLUSION

Halcyon TMLI plans met our institutional dosimetric constraints with adequate normal organ sparing and target dose coverage. The beam-on time with the Halcyon plans was significantly shorter than that with the HT plans, which could lead to shorter treatment time and increased patient comfort. This study showed the feasibility of TMLI treatments on the Halcyon machine. The same method could be used for total body irradiation on Halcyon.

Real-World Toxicity of Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Definitive Prostate Radiotherapy across a Large, Diverse, Academic and Community-Based Enterprise

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Over the past 10-15 years there has been increasing adoption of moderate hypofractionation (HF) for definitive prostate radiotherapy as compared to conventional fractionation (CF). Based on several randomized trials hypofractionation results in equivalent treatment efficacy with similar rates of long-term toxicity. However, some studies suggest higher acute GI toxicity with moderate hypofractionation. We sought to compare the rates of toxicity between these two groups across our enterprise including 16 community-based practices and one academic NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively extracted radiation treatment intent from our network-wide clinical pathways for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 3/2019 and 10/2022. Patients treated after prostatectomy and those treated with brachytherapy or SBRT were excluded. For the remaining 1529 patients treated with either conventional fractionation or moderate hypofractionation, we identified and merged physician-graded toxicity data using CTCAE version 5.0 recorded in their electronic medical record at each weekly on-treatment visit and follow-up. A total of 1051 patients had toxicity data available. Rates of toxicities were then compared between the cohort of patients who received CF and those who HF using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Of the 1051 patients, 450 (43%) received CF and 601 (57%) received HF. These patients were treated by 40 different radiation oncologists (median patients per physician = 18, interquartile range = 7-35). Median age in the CF and HF cohorts was 71 (IQR: 66-76) and 71 (IQR: 66-77; p = 0.51), respectively. The CF cohort had more patients with Gleason 8+ disease (39% vs 19%; p<0.01), PSA >20 (26% vs 11%; p<0.01), or T3a+ (18% vs 8%; p<0.01). Rates of any grade 2+ toxicity were significantly higher in patients who received HF at 45.8% vs 39.6% for those treated with CF (p = 0.04). However, the respective rates of any grade 3+ toxicity were no different at 2.0% vs. 1.8% (p = 0.80). The difference in grade 2 toxicities appeared to be primarily driven by the rates of urinary frequency at 27.1% vs. 17.8% (p<0.01) and prostatic obstruction 14.8% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.03). Rates of grade 2 diarrhea were worse with MF at 5.3% vs. 2.8% for CF (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between HF and CF in the rates of grade 2 dysuria (6% vs 5.2%), urinary urgency (6.5% vs. 4.2%), proctitis (3.0% vs. 3.6%), urinary incontinence (0.5% vs. 1.3%), rectal bleeding (0.3% vs. 0%), hematuria (0% vs. 0.4%), and fatigue (14.1% vs. 15.1%).

CONCLUSION

In this large network-wide analysis, toxicity was slightly increased among patients with prostate cancer treated with HF compared to CF, consistent with published randomized data. However, the increased toxicity appeared to be primarily GU rather than GI. This study demonstrates the feasibility of analyzing impacts of treatment decisions on a large scale using real-world data through an integrated network of practices.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation with Intensity Modulated Total Body Irradiation Conditioning for Systemic Sclerosis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Based on the seminal SCOT trial, autologous stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as a conditioning regimen has become a standard treatment option for certain patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). In patients with SSc, normal organs are more radiosensitive and prone to compromised function, and therefore lungs and kidneys require dose reduction. With traditional techniques, TBI requires heavy and thick physical blocks, which can be cumbersome and have poor reproducibility. We hypothesized that intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) TBI compared to standard anteroposterior (AP)/posteroanterior (PA) TBI would facilitate improvements in dosimetry and reproducibility (due to not requiring physical blocks) without compromising outcomes. Herein, we report a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with SSc treated with an IMRT TBI.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with SSc who underwent HSCT with TBI between 2017 and 2022 were eligible. All patients underwent conditioning with equine ATG, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and IMRT TBI administered twice-daily to a total dose of 800 cGy in 200 cGy fractions. A minimum of 80% of the PTV was to receive prescription dose. Mean lung and kidney dose were to be less than 200 cGy. Patients were then replanned using an AP/PA technique for dosimetric comparison. The primary endpoint was planning target volume (PTV), lung, and kidney dosimetry. Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-free survival (DMARD-FS), treatment related mortality (TRM), and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients were eligible for our analysis. On dosimetric analysis, the mean dose to the PTV was significantly higher on the IMRT compared to the AP/PA plans (809.4 cGy versus 728.5 cGy, p<0.001). The mean dose to the lungs (239.5 cGy versus 443.9 cGy, p<0.001) and kidneys (204.9 cGy versus 281.2 cGy, p<0.001) was significantly lower. Median follow-up was 34.6 months (1.0-51.7 months). There was one case of TRM secondary to respiratory failure. The 24-month OS, EFS, and DMARD-FS estimates were 92.9%, 74.3%, and 70.0%, respectively. Three patients experienced adverse events, which included respiratory failure (n = 1), renal failure (n = 1), and death (n = 1). No patients experienced clinically significant pneumonitis or nephritis that were deemed to be a likely consequence of TBI. Five patients subsequently initiated DMARDs, but three did so due to worsening skin symptoms without other major organ dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Use of IMRT TBI as part of the conditioning regimen for HSCT for SSc yields improved dosimetry relative to a standard AP/PA technique, with efficacy and toxicity outcomes comparable with published data. This technique should be considered for patients undergoing HSCT for SSc and warrants inclusion in prospective trials for SSc that involve TBI.

Pilot Study of a Novel Ring Gantry-Based PET/CT Linear Accelerator in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving [18F]-DCFPyL for PSMA PET Imaging

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The RefleXion X1® system is a hybrid PET imaging-radiotherapy system that uses real-time positron emissions from a PET tracer to deliver biologically guided radiotherapy (BgRT). This study (NCT05470699) evaluated the hypothesis that the X1 PET imaging subsystem would be able to detect [18F]-DCFPyL PSMA PET signal sufficient to generate a deliverable BgRT plan in patients with prostate cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer scheduled for a diagnostic [18F]-DCFPyL PSMA PET scan as part of standard of care were eligible. Upon completion of the diagnostic PSMA PET scan, images were transferred to the radiotherapy planning system for target identification and contouring. If at least one PET avid tumor lesion was identified, the patient was then scanned on the X1 unit. BgRT planning was performed on each X1 scanned patient. The target lesion volume, activity concentration (AC) and normalized target signal (NTS) were acquired. Successful and deliverable BgRT plans required that the target AC was ≥ 5 kBq/ml and NTS ≥ 2.7.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent [18F]-DCFPyL PET scans (13 with rising PSA after surgery or radiotherapy, 6 with known metastases and 7 with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer). Median (range) PSA was 3.40 (0.04-122). In 16 patients a PET avid tumor was identified and contoured for planning (4 lymph nodes, 5 bone, 6 prostate gland, and 1 prostate bed). In 13 patients the target lesion was visualized on the X1 PET scan, while in 3 patients the target lesion was too close to the bladder to be clearly visualized. BgRT planning was feasible and met standard of care published SBRT organ dose constraints in 8 patients (3 prostate gland, 3 bone, 2 lymph nodes). BgRT planning was not feasible in 8 patients due to insufficient AC, low NTS or proximity of the target lesion to the PET avid bladder. The accompanying table compares median (range) target volume, AC and NTS for feasible versus not feasible plans.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to investigate the feasibility of using [18F]-DCFPyL PET imaging for BgRT plan generation on the X1 system in patients with prostate cancer. Lesions that are relevant to radiotherapy of prostate cancer can be visualized including lymph node and bone metastases. A dedicated BgRT workflow with PSMA PET imaging on the X1 at 60 minutes post injection will result in higher target AC and will optimize BgRT planning. PET avid lesions < 1 cm or close to the bladder may make BgRT planning challenging. [18F]-DCFPyL-guided BgRT is technically feasible using the RefleXion X1. BgRT using targeted PET radiopharmaceuticals to biologically guide external beam radiotherapy represents a promising new dimension in radiation oncology and warrants further investigation.

Dosimetric Plan Evaluation of Biology Guided Radiotherapy Using [18F]-DCFPyL PSMA Radiotracer in Patients with Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The X1 system represents a cutting-edge solution in radiotherapy delivery, with its capability to perform Biology Guided Radiotherapy (BgRT). The system utilizes real-time positron emission tomography (PET) signal as biological fiducials to provide tracked dose delivery and is initially available for use with [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The aim of this research study is to assess the quality of BgRT treatment plans for prostate cancer using patients' PSMA PET images obtained on the X1 system.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Sixteen patients with at least one PET-avid tumor identified on their whole-body diagnostic PSMA PET scan were selected. These patients were scanned on X1 following their diagnostic scan without additional radiotracer administration. Based on the X1 PET images, a BgRT plan was created for each patient, with the prescription dose determined by the location of treatment sites. The planning objectives of organs-at-risk (OARs) were established in accordance with the 2018 Timmerman guidelines. Target coverage objective was the dose covering 95% (D95%) of the planning target volume (PTV) to be higher than 100%. The following parameters were analyzed: PTV D95%, the minimal dose (Dmin) of gross tumor volume (GTV), plan maximum dose (Dmax), conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and maximum point dose (D0.03cc) to the nearest OARs. The X1 BgRT planning system also generated dose volume histogram (DVH) bounds, which model variations in BgRT delivery. The low boundary of GTV Dmin, representing the minimum GTV dose in the worst-case scenario, was recorded.

RESULTS

BgRT plans were created for all patients, except for one where the target signal was indistinguishable from the bladder. The prescription dose was 2700 cGy or 3000 cGy in 3 fractions for lymph node lesions, 2400 cGy to 3000 cGy in 3 fractions for bone metastasis, and 4500 cGy in 5 fractions for lesions in prostate. All plans met the dose constraints for OARs as per the Timmerman guidelines. The Dmax of all plans was 129.9% ± 6.9% (mean ± standard deviation). The PTV D95% and GTV Dmin were 101.7% ± 1.0% and 111.0% ± 7.6%, respectively. The low boundary of GTV Dmin was 95.9% ± 5.8%. The CI and GI were 1.22 ± 0.11 and 9.40 ± 2.12, respectively. The D0.03cc to nearest OARs was 84.6% ± 25.4%. The estimated treatment time was 699 ± 228 seconds.

CONCLUSION

This study is a pioneering effort to evaluate the quality of BgRT plans for prostate cancer patients using the [18F]-DCFPyL PSMA radiotracer. Our results showed that all BgRT plans met the planning objectives defined in the Timmerman protocol. BgRT with [18F]-DCFPyL represents a promising treatment modality for patients with prostate cancer. Further research is needed to validate this approach, including a comprehensive assessment of the dosimetric and tracking accuracy through physical measurements.

First-in-Human Phase I Trial Combining Biologically Guided Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) Using a 90Y-Anti-CD25 Monoclonal Antibody (Mab) with CT-guided Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation (TMLI) in Relapsed and Refractory (R/R) Acute Leukemia

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with R/R acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) have a dismal prognosis with 3-year survival rates of < 20%. To improve outcomes, innovative targeted forms of organ sparing radiotherapy, such as tumor-specific RIT and TMLI, are needed to dose escalate with acceptable toxicities, especially in patients ≥ age 60 years who cannot tolerate total body irradiation (TBI) / myeloablative regimens and who have a poor prognosis. CD25 is an ideal RIT target given its expression in acute leukemias, association with poor prognosis, and expression by leukemia stem cells. In this phase I trial (NCT05139004) we hypothesized that combining dose escalated 90Y-anti-CD25 RIT with fixed dose TMLI 12 Gy, fludarabine (flu), and melphalan (mel) in patients with R/R disease is safe and associated with acceptable toxicities.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The primary objective of this trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose of 90Y-anti-CD25 Mab (Day -15) with 12 Gy TMLI (1.5 Gy twice a day, days -8 to -5), flu (30 mg/m2/d days -5 to -2), and mel (100 mg/m2, day -2) in patients ≥ 60 years old or with a HCT-comorbidity index ≥ 2 and with R/R AML, ALL or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) scheduled to undergo alloHCT from a matched donor. TMLI mean organ dose constraints for kidney, lung and liver were 4 Gy. Planned dose levels of 90Y-anti-CD25 were 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mCi/kg. 111In-anti-CD25 (5 mCi) was co-infused followed by serial nuclear scans to assess dosimetry and biodistribution.

RESULTS

To date 5 patients (ages 31-74) with R/R AML have been treated. Marrow and circulating blasts ranged from 10-36% and 9-44%, respectively. For the 3 patients at 0.3 mCi/kg, follow-up ranged from 89-191+ days. 90Y/111In-anti-CD25 nuclear scans demonstrated persistent uptake in bone out to 144 hours, which was associated with a decline in circulating blasts. After combined RIT and TMLI, mean doses (Gy) to lungs ranged from 5.7-6.5, to kidneys from 7.5-8.2 and to liver from 7.2-11.6. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed. All 3 patients achieved CR on day +30 bone marrow biopsies and 2 remained in CR on day +90 biopsies. Two patients have recently been treated at the 0.4 mCi/kg dose level. The results of patients treated at the higher dose levels will be provided.

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation by adding 90Y-anti-CD25 RIT at 0.3 mCi/kg to 12 Gy TMLI was safe, including in older patients, with no dose-limiting toxicities, mean critical organ doses lower than conventional myeloablative TBI, and encouraging response rates. The toxicity profile and dose estimates at 0.3 mCi/kg predict that the planned higher dose levels will also be feasible with acceptable toxicities. RIT and TMLI are complementary and when combined address the limitations of each modality. Combining these targeted therapies may be a superior strategy to intensify dose to leukemia compared to dose escalation of either modality alone.

Prognostic Significance of Positron Emission Tomography Delta Radiomics Following Bridging Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing CAR T-Cell Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

CAR T-cell therapy is routinely used as a treatment option for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Bridging therapy radiation therapy (bRT) is increasingly being utilized prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). It is unknown how the extent of debulking as a result of bRT impacts outcomes following CAR T-cell infusion. We hypothesized that the extent of debulking is prognostic of overall response to therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We reviewed patients with LBCL treated with bRT followed by commercially available CAR T-cell therapy between 2017 and 2022. Patients required a F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scan prior to bRT and between completion of bRT and CAR T-cell infusion. On each scan, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were determined. Delta-radiomics based on changes of these values between scans in patients overall and irradiated sites were then calculated. Optimal cut points were determined using maximally selected log-rank. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC), measured from CAR T-cell infusion by Kaplan-Meier and Fine-Gray competing risk survival analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with LBCL with 33 irradiated sites were reviewed. All metabolically active disease was treated in 10 patients. Median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was 26 Gy (14-44). Median interval from bRT to PET was 9 days (2-30). Following bRT, 2 patients achieved complete responses, 16 had partial responses, and 5 had progressive disease. Five irradiated sites progressed through bRT. No local failures were observed when EQD2>32.5 Gy was given. LC was improved with EQD2>20 Gy (24 mo LC: 94.5% vs 68.6%; p = 0.075). Following BRT, median overall decreases in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG were 22.2 cc (63.1%), 8.9 (36.8%), 3.4 (31.1%), and 297.9 cc (75.8%), respectively. Median decreases in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG in irradiated sites were 15.6 cc (91.1%), 17.0 (74.6%), 6.8 (55.3%), and 157.0 cc (94.6%), respectively. PFS was significantly improved in patients with reductions of MTV of at least 36 cc (24 mo PFS: 69.2% vs 0%; p = 0.047) or SUVmax of at least 15 (24-mo PFS: 80.0% vs 28.1%; p < 0.001). LC was significantly improved in lesions with reductions of SUVmax of at least 14 (24-mo LC: 100% vs 67.3%; p < 0.001) or SUVmean of at least 7 (24-mo LC: 100% vs 74.4%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

bRT led to significant reductions in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG. The extent of these decreases correlated with improved PFS and LC. There appears to be a dose-response relationship. Larger cohorts should validate the value of interim PET following bRT, and associated changes in disease burden as a means of prognosticating patients. Future work might evaluate whether escalation of BT in patients with suboptimal response, using either systemic therapy or higher radiation doses, has an impact on outcomes.

Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Predict Occult Pelvic Nodal Metastases in Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Determination of risk of occult pelvic lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with cN0 prostate cancer is critical for determination of optimal treatment options. Though several nomograms exist, machine learning (ML) approaches might enable physicians to better assess individual risk by incorporating multiple clinical risk factors. Herein, we developed a ML model to predict occult LNI, and explained its composition using an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with cN0 prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2018-2020 were identified in the National Cancer Database. The query was limited to patients with known clinical staging and biopsy results who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy prior to pelvic nodal examination. Occult LNI was defined as pN1 disease based on surgical evaluation, with a minimum of 10 nodes examined. Five ML models were trained to predict LNI. Variables incorporated into the model were age, core biopsy results, Gleason scores, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), and clinical T-stage. Model performance, measured using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) on a holdout testing dataset, was compared to multivariable logistic regression. The best-performing model was explained using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values. To permit more clinically-meaningful statistical interpretation, using a novel approach SHAP values were converted into odds ratios (OR), confidence intervals (CI), and p-values.

RESULTS

A total of 23,131 patients met inclusion criteria; 2,676 (11.6%) had occult LNI. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model outperformed all other models with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86) compared to 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84) for logistic regression. Increasing PSA (OR: 1.031; p<0.001), number of positive biopsy cores (OR: 1.055; p<0.001), and percent positive biopsy cores (OR: 1.01; p<0.001) were all associated with increased risk of LNI. Based on observation of SHAP dependence plots, risk of LNI plateaued at PSA>20 ng/dL and >11 positive cores, while no plateau was observed for percent positive biopsy cores. Relative to T1c disease, patients with T3b were at highest risk of LNI (OR: 1.461; p = 0.003). Gleason score of 9 was associated with significant risk of LNI (Ref: Gleason 6; OR: 1.891; p<0.001). This was primarily driven by the primary Gleason score; primary Gleason 5 disease was associated with significant risk of LNI (Ref: Gleason 3; OR: 1.915; p<0.001) while a secondary Gleason score of 5 was the only grade with significant increased risk of LNI (Ref: Gleason 3; OR: 1.185; p = 0.004). Age and number of cores examined were not significant predictors of LNI.

CONCLUSION

Our ML achieved improved performance relative to logistic regression at predicting occult LNI. XAI provided insight into the inner-working of the ML model. ML can be used to identify patients at risk for occult LNI and therefore inform clinical decision-making.

Phase I Study of Bortezomib, Fludarabine, and Melphalan, with or without Total Marrow Irradiation as Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Though outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved, cure remains elusive. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-sCT) is associated with a lower relapse rate, but its role is hindered due to toxicities. We hypothesized that targeted total body irradiation in the form of total marrow irradiation (TMI) could safely facilitate allo-SCT via an improved toxicity profile. Therefore, we conducted a phase I study to investigate the safety and feasibility of a bortezomib (BTZ), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL), with or without TMI, prior to allo-SCT for patients with high-risk (HR) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018 this study enrolled patients with HR or R/R MM on one of two strata, each comprising BTZ dose-escalation cohorts. Patients aged 18-60 with no prior radiation (RT) received TMI at 900 cGy (in 6 fractions delivered twice-daily), FLU, and MEL conditioning, with BTZ added in the second cohort (stratum I). Patients aged 18-70 with prior RT received FLU, MEL, and BTZ, without TMI (stratum II). The primary endpoint was feasibility of escalating doses of BTZ, with or without TMI, defined using a 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any Grade 3+ Bearman toxicity or prolonged CTCAE v4.0 Grade 4+ neutropenia. Secondary endpoints included treatment response, time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, incidence of acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), progression-free-survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eight patients were enrolled on stratum I. One of three patients in the first cohort of stratum I experienced DLT, which led to expansion to three more patients with no DLT. Cohort 2 enrolled only 2 patients due to low accrual, with BTZ added at 0.5 mg/m2; neither experienced DLT. Nine patients were enrolled on stratum II. Three patients were enrolled on cohort 1 (BTZ 0.5 mg/m2) and none experienced DLT. Three were enrolled on cohort 2 (bortezomib 0.7 mg/m2), and one experienced DLT. Therefore, the cohort expanded to three more patients. One more patient experienced DLT and 0.5 mg/m2 was considered the maximum tolerated dose. There were no primary or secondary graft failures. Complete response was achieved in 7 and 4 patients in strata I and II, respectively. Median follow-up for all patients was 30.7 months (mos) and was 99.8 mos for surviving patients. Median overall survival (OS) on strata I and II were 44.5 mos and 21.6 mos, respectively. Median PFS on strata I and II were 18.1 mos and 8.9 mos, respectively. In strata I, 5 patients developed Grade 2+ aGVHD and 8 developed extensive cGVHD. In strata II, 4 patients developed Grade 2+ aGVHD and 6 developed extensive cGVHD.

CONCLUSION

The TMI 900 cGy, FLU, and MEL conditioning regimen is considered safe as conditioning for allo-SCT and may warrant further investigation due to favorable response rates and survival; the conditioning regimen of FLU, MEL, and BTZ (0.7 mg/m2) is associated with unacceptable toxicities.