1
|
Cro S, Cornelius V, Pink A, Wilson R, Pushpa‐Rajah A, Patel P, Abdul‐Wahab A, August S, Azad J, Becher G, Chapman A, Dunnill G, Ferguson A, Fogo A, Ghaffar S, Ingram J, Kavakleiva S, Ladoyanni E, Leman J, Macbeth A, Makrygeorgou A, Parslew R, Ryan A, Sharma A, Shipman A, Sinclair C, Wachsmuth R, Woolf R, Wright A, McAteer H, Barker J, Burden A, Griffiths C, Reynolds N, Warren R, Lachmann H, Capon F, Smith C. Anakinra for palmoplantar pustulosis: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, two-staged, adaptive placebo-controlled trial (APRICOT). Br J Dermatol 2021; 186:245-256. [PMID: 34411292 PMCID: PMC9255857 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a rare, debilitating, chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects the hands and feet. Clinical, immunological and genetic findings suggest a pathogenic role for interleukin (IL)-1. OBJECTIVES To determine whether anakinra (an IL-1 receptor antagonist) delivers therapeutic benefit in PPP. METHODS This was a randomized (1 : 1), double-blind, two-staged, adaptive, UK multicentre, placebo-controlled trial [ISCRTN13127147 (registered 1 August 2016); EudraCT number: 2015-003600-23 (registered 1 April 2016)]. Participants had a diagnosis of PPP (> 6 months) requiring systemic therapy. Treatment was 8 weeks of anakinra or placebo via daily, self-administered subcutaneous injections. Primary outcome was the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) at 8 weeks. RESULTS A total of 374 patients were screened; 64 were enrolled (31 in the anakinra arm and 33 in the placebo arm) with a mean (SD) baseline PPPASI of 17·8 (10·5) and a PPP investigator's global assessment of severe (50%) or moderate (50%). The baseline adjusted mean difference in PPPASI favoured anakinra but did not demonstrate superiority in the intention-to-treat analysis [-1·65, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4·77 to 1·47; P = 0·30]. Similarly, secondary objective measures, including fresh pustule count (2·94, 95% CI -26·44 to 32·33; favouring anakinra), total pustule count (-30·08, 95% CI -83·20 to 23·05; favouring placebo) and patient-reported outcomes, did not show superiority of anakinra. When modelling the impact of adherence, the PPPASI complier average causal effect for an individual who received ≥ 90% of the total treatment (48% in the anakinra group) was -3·80 (95% CI -10·76 to 3·16; P = 0·285). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS No evidence for the superiority of anakinra was found. IL-1 blockade is not a useful intervention for the treatment of PPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Cro
- Imperial Clinical Trials UnitImperial College LondonLondonW12 7RHUK
| | - V.R. Cornelius
- Imperial Clinical Trials UnitImperial College LondonLondonW12 7RHUK
| | - A.E. Pink
- St John’s Institute of DermatologyGuy’s HospitalGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - R. Wilson
- St John’s Institute of DermatologyGuy’s HospitalGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - A. Pushpa‐Rajah
- St John’s Institute of DermatologyGuy’s HospitalGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - P. Patel
- St John’s Institute of DermatologyGuy’s HospitalGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - A. Abdul‐Wahab
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonSW17 0QTUK
| | - S. August
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust University Hospitals DorsetPooleBH15 2JBUK
| | - J. Azad
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustMiddlesbroughTS4 3BWUK
| | - G. Becher
- West Glasgow Ambulatory Care HospitalGlasgowG3 8SJUK
| | - A. Chapman
- Homerton University HospitalLondonE9 6SRUK
| | | | - A.D. Ferguson
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustDerbyDE22 3NEUK
| | - A. Fogo
- Kingston HospitalKingston upon ThamesKT2 7QBUK
| | - S.A. Ghaffar
- Ninewells Hospital and Medical SchoolDundeeDD1 9SYUK
| | - J.R. Ingram
- Division of Infection and ImmunitySchool of MedicineCardiff UniversityUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffCF14 4XNUK
| | | | | | | | - A.E. Macbeth
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNorwichNR4 7UYUK
| | | | - R. Parslew
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolL9 7ALUK
| | - A.J. Ryan
- King’s College HospitalLondonSE5 9RSUK
| | - A. Sharma
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNottinghamNG7 2UHUK
| | - A.R. Shipman
- Portsmouth Hospitals Universities NHS TrustSt Mary’s Community Health CampusPortsmouthPO3 6ADUK
| | | | - R. Wachsmuth
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustExeterEX2 5DWUK
| | - R.T. Woolf
- St John’s Institute of DermatologyGuy’s HospitalGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - A. Wright
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBradfordBD9 6RJUK
| | - H. McAteer
- The Psoriasis AssociationNorthamptonNN4 7BFUK
| | - J.N.W.N. Barker
- St John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic and Medical BiosciencesFaculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing’s College LondonLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - A.D. Burden
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and InflammationUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowG12 8TAUK
| | - C.E.M. Griffiths
- Dermatology CentreSalford Royal NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research CentreManchesterM6 8HDUK
| | - N.J. Reynolds
- Institute of Translational and Clinical MedicineMedical SchoolUniversity of NewcastleDepartment of DermatologyRoyal Victoria Infirmary and NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research CentreNewcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneNE2 4HHUK
| | - R.B. Warren
- National Amyloidosis CentreUniversity College LondonLondonNW3 2PFUK
| | - H.J. Lachmann
- National Amyloidosis CentreUniversity College LondonLondonNW3 2PFUK
| | - F. Capon
- Department of Medical and Molecular GeneticsKing’s College LondonLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - C.H. Smith
- St John’s Institute of DermatologyGuy’s HospitalGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonSE1 9RTUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thomas KS, Batchelor JM, Akram P, Chalmers JR, Haines RH, Meakin GD, Duley L, Ravenscroft JC, Rogers A, Sach TH, Santer M, Tan W, White J, Whitton ME, Williams HC, Cheung ST, Hamad H, Wright A, Ingram JR, Levell NJ, Goulding JMR, Makrygeorgou A, Bewley A, Ogboli M, Stainforth J, Ferguson A, Laguda B, Wahie S, Ellis R, Azad J, Rajasekaran A, Eleftheriadou V, Montgomery AA. Randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home-based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo: results of the HI-Light Vitiligo Trial. Br J Dermatol 2020; 184:828-839. [PMID: 33006767 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the effectiveness of vitiligo treatments is limited. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of (i) handheld narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) and (ii) a combination of potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) and NB-UVB, compared with TCS alone, for localized vitiligo. METHODS A pragmatic, three-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial (9-month treatment, 12-month follow-up). Adults and children, recruited from secondary care and the community, aged ≥ 5 years and with active vitiligo affecting < 10% of skin, were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive TCS (mometasone furoate 0·1% ointment + dummy NB-UVB), NB-UVB (NB-UVB + placebo TCS) or a combination (TCS + NB-UVB). TCS was applied once daily on alternating weeks; NB-UVB was administered on alternate days in escalating doses, adjusted for erythema. The primary outcome was treatment success at 9 months at a target patch assessed using the participant-reported Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, with multiple imputation for missing data. The trial was registered with number ISRCTN17160087 on 8 January 2015. RESULTS In total 517 participants were randomized to TCS (n = 173), NB-UVB (n = 169) and combination (n = 175). Primary outcome data were available for 370 (72%) participants. The proportions with target patch treatment success were 17% (TCS), 22% (NB-UVB) and 27% (combination). Combination treatment was superior to TCS: adjusted between-group difference 10·9% (95% confidence interval 1·0%-20·9%; P = 0·032; number needed to treat = 10). NB-UVB alone was not superior to TCS: adjusted between-group difference 5·2% (95% CI - 4·4% to 14·9%; P = 0·29; number needed to treat = 19). Participants using interventions with ≥ 75% expected adherence were more likely to achieve treatment success, but the effects were lost once treatment stopped. Localized grade 3 or 4 erythema was reported in 62 (12%) participants (including three with dummy light). Skin thinning was reported in 13 (2·5%) participants (including one with placebo ointment). CONCLUSIONS Combination treatment with home-based handheld NB-UVB plus TCS is likely to be superior to TCS alone for treatment of localized vitiligo. Combination treatment was relatively safe and well tolerated but was successful in only around one-quarter of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J M Batchelor
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - P Akram
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - J R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - R H Haines
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - G D Meakin
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - L Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J C Ravenscroft
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - A Rogers
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - T H Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - M Santer
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - W Tan
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J White
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - M E Whitton
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - H C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - S T Cheung
- Cannock Chase Hospital and New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - H Hamad
- Cannock Chase Hospital and New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - A Wright
- St Luke's Hospital, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - J R Ingram
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - N J Levell
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - J M R Goulding
- Solihull Hospital, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Makrygeorgou
- West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Bewley
- Barts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - M Ogboli
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Stainforth
- York Hospital, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - A Ferguson
- Royal Derby Hospital and the London Road Community Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - B Laguda
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Wahie
- University Hospital of North Durham, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - R Ellis
- The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - J Azad
- The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - A Rajasekaran
- Birmingham City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - A A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sach TH, Thomas KS, Batchelor JM, Perways A, Chalmers JR, Haines RH, Meakin GD, Duley L, Ravenscroft JC, Rogers A, Santer M, Tan W, White J, Whitton ME, Williams HC, Cheung ST, Hamad H, Wright A, Ingram JR, Levell N, Goulding JMR, Makrygeorgou A, Bewley A, Ogboli M, Stainforth J, Ferguson A, Laguda B, Wahie S, Ellis R, Azad J, Rajasekaran A, Eleftheriadou V, Montgomery AA. An economic evaluation of the randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home-based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo (the HI-Light Vitiligo Trial). Br J Dermatol 2020; 184:840-848. [PMID: 32920824 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Economic evidence for vitiligo treatments is absent. OBJECTIVES To determine the cost-effectiveness of (i) handheld narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and (ii) a combination of topical corticosteroid (TCS) and NB-UVB compared with TCS alone for localized vitiligo. METHODS Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic, three-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial with 9 months' treatment. In total 517 adults and children (aged ≥ 5 years) with active vitiligo affecting < 10% of skin were recruited from secondary care and the community and were randomized 1: 1: 1 to receive TCS, NB-UVB or both. Cost per successful treatment (measured on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale) was estimated. Secondary cost-utility analyses measured quality-adjusted life-years using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels for those aged ≥ 11 years and the Child Health Utility 9D for those aged 5 to < 18 years. The trial was registered with number ISRCTN17160087 on 8 January 2015. RESULTS The mean ± SD cost per participant was £775 ± 83·7 for NB-UVB, £813 ± 111.4 for combination treatment and £600 ± 96·2 for TCS. In analyses adjusted for age and target patch location, the incremental difference in cost for combination treatment compared with TCS was £211 (95% confidence interval 188-235), corresponding to a risk difference of 10·9% (number needed to treat = 9). The incremental cost was £1932 per successful treatment. The incremental difference in cost for NB-UVB compared with TCS was £173 (95% confidence interval 151-196), with a risk difference of 5·2% (number needed to treat = 19). The incremental cost was £3336 per successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS Combination treatment, compared with TCS alone, has a lower incremental cost per additional successful treatment than NB-UVB only. Combination treatment would be considered cost-effective if decision makers are willing to pay £1932 per additional treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - K S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J M Batchelor
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - A Perways
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - J R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - R H Haines
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - G D Meakin
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - L Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J C Ravenscroft
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - A Rogers
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - M Santer
- Primary Care, Population Sciences & Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - W Tan
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J White
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - M E Whitton
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - H C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - S T Cheung
- Cannock Chase Hospital and New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - H Hamad
- Cannock Chase Hospital and New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - A Wright
- St Luke's Hospital, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - J R Ingram
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - N Levell
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - J M R Goulding
- Solihull Hospital, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Makrygeorgou
- West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Bewley
- Whipps Cross Hospital and The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Ogboli
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Stainforth
- York Hospital, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - A Ferguson
- Royal Derby Hospital and the London Road Community Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - B Laguda
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Wahie
- University Hospital of North Durham, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
| | - R Ellis
- The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - J Azad
- The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - A Rajasekaran
- Birmingham City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - A A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Nail involvement is estimated to affect 80-90% of patients with psoriasis at some point in their lives and is often associated with severe disease. Patients with nail involvement experience pain, functional impairment and social stigma, with significant restriction of daily activities and quality of life. Nail psoriasis is also considered a risk factor for the development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Management of nail psoriasis is deemed challenging and as a result, it is often left untreated by physicians. Assessing the severity of nail disease can also be difficult in clinical practice. While the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index is used widely in trials, it is time-consuming and rarely used in the clinic, highlighting the need to develop a simplified disease severity score for nail psoriasis. All patients should be advised to keep their nails short, wear gloves for wet and dirty work, and regularly apply emollient to the nail folds and nail surface. Patients with mild nail psoriasis, without signs of severe cutaneous psoriasis or PsA, may benefit from topical treatment, while systemic treatment is indicated in patients with severe nail involvement. Evidence suggests that all anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-interleukin (IL)-17, and anti-IL-12/23 antibodies available for plaque psoriasis and PsA are highly effective treatments for nail psoriasis. This article aims to provide an up-to-date review of the therapeutic options currently available for the management of nail psoriasis in patients with or without skin psoriasis. Therapeutic options for the management of nail psoriasis in children will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Thomas
- Department of Dermatology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - J Azad
- Department of Dermatology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - A Takwale
- Department of Dermatology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Azad J, Brennan P, Carmichael AJ. New mutation identified in two sisters with adult-onset erythropoietic protoporphyria. Clin Exp Dermatol 2013; 38:601-5. [DOI: 10.1111/ced.12076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. Azad
- Department of Dermatology; The James Cook University Hospital; Middlesbrough; UK
| | - P. Brennan
- Northern Genetics Service; Institute for Human Genetics; Newcastle upon Tyne; UK
| | - A. J. Carmichael
- Department of Dermatology; The James Cook University Hospital; Middlesbrough; UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu J, Fei J, Azad J, Gong M, Lan Y, Chen G. Myocardial protection by Salvia miltiorrhiza Injection in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats through attenuation of expression of thrombospondin-1 and transforming growth factor-β1. J Int Med Res 2013; 40:1016-24. [PMID: 22906274 DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the myocardially protective effects of Salvia miltiorrhiza injection in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats and the possible mechanisms involved. METHODS Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups (n = 10 per group): diabetes, no treatment (Sm-); diabetes, S. miltiorrhiza injection (Sm+); control (no diabetes; saline treatment). After model induction and 4 weeks' treatment, heart function of five rats from each group was tested by Langendorff isolated in vivo heart perfusion. In the remaining rats, pathological changes of the myocardium were observed by haematoxylin and eosin staining, and protein levels of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) were assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Left ventricular systolic end pressure and left ventricular developed pressure were significantly improved in the Sm+ group compared with the Sm- group. Pathological changes were ameliorated through significantly reduced TSP-1 and TGF-β1 protein levels. CONCLUSIONS S. miltiorrhiza injection may improve the heart function of diabetic rats and protect against cardiomyopathy by downregulating TSP-1 and TGF-β1 in myocardial tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Yu
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Solitary morphoea profunda (SMP) is an unusual form of scleroderma and is rarely mentioned in the literature. The back of the trunk is described as the commonest site of involvement by SMP. This disease has been recognized as a nonprogressive condition. We report three cases of SMP seen at our department within a 1-year period. Interestingly, all three patients were females and the lesions were situated on the right upper buttock. In one patient the lesion extended despite using topical tacrolimus but subsequently the lesion was kept under control with topical clobetasol propionate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Azad
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 0SF, Scotland, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Azad J, Kirkbright GF, Snook RD. Determination of arsenic in soil digests by non-dispersive atomic-fluorescence spectrometry using an argon-hydrogen flame and the hydride generation technique. Analyst 1980. [DOI: 10.1039/an9800500079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
9
|
Azad J, Kirkbright GF, Snook RD. Determination of selenium in soil digests by non-dispersive atomic-fluorescence spectrometry using an argon-hydrogen flame and the hydride generation technique. Analyst 1979. [DOI: 10.1039/an9790400232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|