Hearing Outcomes in Cisplatin or Cetuximab Combined with Radiation for Patients with HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer in NRG/RTOG 1016

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

NRG/RTOG 1016 was a noninferiority phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of radiation with either cisplatin (RT+Cisp) or cetuximab (RT+Cetux) for patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Perceived hearing handicap was included as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) secondary endpoint. The primary hypothesis was that perceived hearing handicap would be greater for patients receiving RT+Cisp compared to RT+Cetux.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Perceived hearing handicap was measured at baseline, end of treatment, 3, 6, and 12-months post-treatment using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults Screening Version (HHIA-S), a 10-item self-assessment questionnaire designed to measure patients' reactions to their hearing loss. Total HHIA-S scores range from 0 to 40; higher total score indicates more severe perceived hearing handicap. Hearing handicap categories (none, mild/moderate, and severe) were also analyzed. Mixed ordinal logistic models were used to analyze the raw HHIA-S scores and handicap categories (2-sided alpha 0.05).

RESULTS

Participation in the PRO assessments was optional, with 368 patients participating in the hearing PRO. No significant differences in patient/tumor characteristics were found between PRO participants/non-participants. Pre-treatment (mean [SD]) HHIA-S scores were not different for RT+Cisp (3.23 [6.28]) and RT+Cetux (4.77 [8.14]) groups. Post-treatment HHIA-S scores increased for RT+Cisp, and remained stable at the later follow-up time points. RT+Cetux scores remained stable from baseline. Change score from pre- to post-treatment was higher for RT+Cisp (4.32, 95% CI = [2.57, 6.07]) than RT+Cetux (0.08, 95% CI = [-1.15, 1.31]; p < 0.001). For hearing handicap category, post-treatment RT+Cisp had a significantly higher percentage of mild/moderate and severe cases (32%) compared to RT+Cetux (20%). From pre- to post-treatment, worsening of hearing handicap category from normal to mild/moderate or severe was greater for RT+Cisp (24%) than for RT+Cetux (9%). The conditional odds of being in a higher self-perceived hearing handicap category in the RT+Cisp arm were 3.57 (95% CI [2.04, 6.25]) times that in the RT+Cetux arm. Averaging over patients, the marginal odds ratio was 2.46 (95% CI [1.65, 3.66]).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving concurrent RT+Cisp for HPV-associated OPC have significantly higher odds of worsening self-perceived hearing handicap after treatment than with RT+Cetux. This was consistent across time through one-year post-treatment. These findings inform hearing-related outcomes for patients with HPV-associated OPC.

Stereotactic Boost and Short-Course Radiotherapy for p16-Associated Oropharynx Cancer (SHORT-OPC): First Planned Interim Safety Analysis from a Randomized Phase II Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

There is a need for safe treatment de-intensification in p16+ oropharynx cancer (OPC). The standard of care (SOC) radiotherapy (RT) regimen is cumbersome and associated with high toxicity. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and multimodality image guidance is an opportunity to precisely target the gross tumor while safely reducing elective irradiation dose. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of a short course RT for p16+ OPC, consisting of an SBRT boost to the gross tumor volume (GTV) followed by de-escalated elective irradiation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this randomized phase II trial, patients with p16-positive, stage I-II OPSCC with primary tumor <30 cc (8th Ed AJCC) are planned with combined CT, MRI and FDG-PET, and randomized to 1) SBRT boost (14 Gy in 2 fractions) to the GTV followed with de-escalated RT (+/- Cisplatin) to a dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions, or 2) SOC RT (+/- Cisplatin) to a dose of 70 Gy in 33 fractions to the GTV and 59.4-54Gy (or equivalent) to the intermediate-to-low dose elective region. Patients are stratified by stage (I vs. II) and use of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the trial is locoregional control at 2 years, powered for a sample size of 100 patients. A Bayesian adaptive design includes 2 planned safety interim analysis using grade ≥ 3 subacute toxicities >40% as a stopping criterion, and 1 planned futility analysis. Acute adverse events (AE) are defined as those occurring ≤ 60 days from RT, subacute AE between 60-180 days after RT, and late AE >180 days from RT. This is the first planned toxicity analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned and eligible (11 in SOC and 10 in experimental arm). Median age was 69 years (range 49-84); 29% and 71% had stage T1 and T2, while 10%, 85% and 1 patient had N0, N1 and N2 disease, respectively. RT alone and chemoradiation was administered in 67% and 33% of patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1.7-17.6), there was 1 local recurrence at the primary tumor site in the SOC arm (at 10 month) and no recurrence in the experimental arm. All enrolled patients remain alive at the time of analysis. There was a 54.5% rate of grade 3 acute AE in the SOC arm and 30.0% rate of grade 3 acute AE in the experimental arm. More specifically, 1, 5 (45%), 2 (18%), and 2 (18%) versus 0, 1, 1 and 1 patient developed acute grade 3 dysphagia, mucositis, pain and dermatitis in the SOC and experimental arm, respectively. There was no acute grade 4 or 5 toxicity. There was no grade ≥ 3 subacute toxicity or late toxicity in both arms.

CONCLUSION

This primary safety analysis showed that SBRT boost followed by a short course of de-escalated elective irradiation in p16+ OPC has limited early toxicity and meets criteria for study continuation.

Clinical Acceptability of Automatically Generated Elective Lymph Node Volumes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Manual contouring of head and neck lymph node levels is a time-intensive process prone to provider-specific variation. The purpose of this work is to generate a clinical segmentation tool while minimizing the amount of manual effort required by physicians to develop training datasets and review contours. Here we investigate an approach to curate, develop, and clinically validate an auto-contouring model for standard cervical lymph node volumes in the head and neck using a publicly available deep learning architecture. This model updates our previously validated tool to reflect modern practices in lymph node segmentation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

With the assistance of a resident physician, five radiation oncologists manually contoured individual lymph node levels on CT scans for three separate patients treated definitively with radiation or chemoradiation for oropharynx cancer, resulting in 15 unique ground truth cases. These cases were then used to train an nnUnet deep-learning model to generate automated contours for 32 additional cases. These 32 cases were reviewed, manually edited, and used to create the final model. Finally, the model was used to generate contours on the original 15 CT scans (testing cohort), and providers compared these automated contours with the ground-truth (manual) contours. Two blinded studies were performed. In a double-blinded fashion, providers were first asked to select which set of contours they would prefer to use in clinical practice as a starting point for actual cases. Second, they scored each contour on a Likert scale (1-5) to indicate clinical acceptability, ranging from completely unusable to usable without modification.

RESULTS

Across all lymph node levels (IA, IB, II, III, IV, V, RP), average Dice Similarity Coefficient ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for AI vs manual contours in the testing cohort. These AI and manual lymph node contours were reviewed by 5 physicians each, resulting in 525 preference scores. Across all lymph nodes, the AI contour was superior to or equally preferred to the manual contours at rates ranging from 75% to 91% in the first blinded study. In the second blinded study, physician preference for the manual vs AI contour was statistically different for only the RP contours (p < 0.01). Thus, there was not a significant difference in clinical acceptability for nodal levels I-V for manual versus AI contours. Across all physician-generated contours, 82% were rated as usable with stylistic to no edits, and across all AI-generated contours, 92% were rated as usable with stylistic to no edits.

CONCLUSION

An approach to generate clinically acceptable automated contours for cervical lymph node levels in the head and neck was demonstrated. Furthermore, for nodal levels I-V, there was no significant difference in clinical acceptability in manual vs AI contours. Because we were able to generate and validate a model for each lymph node level individually, the output is applicable to a complete range of disease in which cervical lymph nodes are treated.

Proton Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Skull Base Patients: Dosimetric Comparison to 4 Modern Radiation Treatment Modalities

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Re-irradiation with ablative doses to a smaller target volume and strict critical structure constraint is a challenge for modern radiation planning and delivery systems. Several advanced radiation treatment techniques can be used for fractionated stereotactic ablative radiosurgery (FSRS) in select patients with unresectable recurrent head and neck tumors. In this study, in order to better understand the dosimetry advantage of each technique, we compare the stereotactic treatment plans of our new small spot size Hitachi proton treatment unit to those of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (CK), Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GK), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and MR Linac radiotherapy (MRL).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Ten FSRS skull base patients treated at our institution using VMAT (n = 5) or GK (n = 5) techniques. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were created in Raystation using Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. VMAT, CK, GK and MRL plans were generated in RayStation, Accuray Precision, Leksell Gamma Plan, and Monaco treatment planning systems, separately. Planning goals were to achieve the best target coverage of prescribed dose without compromising the critical organs at risk dose volume constraints of the clinical treatment plans. Plans were compared based on percent CTV coverage, Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI, V50/V100), dose homogeneity index (HI, (D2-D98)/D50), low dose bath volume (LDBV, ratio of total volume irradiated between 20% and 50% prescription dose and the target volume), beam-on-time (BOT), and mean/maximum doses to brainstems.

RESULTS

The median target volume was 15.5 cm3 (range 1.0 - 36.23 cm3). The prescription was 45 Gy in 5 fractions for VMAT patients, and 21 - 27 Gy in 3 fractions for GK patients. The comparison of the treatment plans of these 5 delivery modalities was shown in table. All techniques achieved comparable CTV coverage. GI was superior for GK plans and outstanding in CK and IMPT plans. IMPT plans were also outstanding in regard to BOT and PCI. Significantly improved HI, LDBV and brainstem mean doses were achieved in IMPT plans. For adjacent brainstem and other OARs, maximum doses were comparable among all techniques.

CONCLUSION

In these five advanced radiation therapy modalities, proton therapy SBRT showed dosimetric advantage over other modalities to spare nearby OARs without sacrifice of target coverage. Further studies are needed to utilize this clinical benefit and investigate plan robustness.

Definitive Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Thyroid Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Local consolidative radiotherapy (LCT) for oligometastatic disease is a promising paradigm improving outcomes for various malignancies but has been underexplored for metastatic thyroid cancer. We hypothesize that LCT to distant sites with definitive RT doses can yield favorable outcomes and defer systemic therapy escalation for these patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We reviewed 96 thyroid cancer patients who received 175 LCT courses from 2010-2022 to 228 metastatic sites, including: thorax (45%), bone (40%), brain (6%), head/neck (5%), and abdomen (3%). Common prescriptions were 50-55Gy/4-5fxs or 56-70Gy/8-10fxs for lung; 52.5-60Gy/15fxs for mediastinum; and 18-24Gy/1fx or 27-30Gy/3fxs for bone. RECIST v1.1 and CTCAE v5.0 were used to define progression and toxicities, respectively. Outcomes were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier and associations examined via Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Median age was 63 years (range: 26-92), with 62 oligometastatic cases (total 1-5 sites) and 34 oligoprogressive (with 1-5 growing sites). Primary disease was controlled in all patients, with 39% receiving post-op RT and 66% prior RAI. Histologies included papillary (40%), anaplastic (25%), follicular (12%), medullary (9%), Hurthle (7%), and poorly-differentiated (7%). Median time from initial diagnosis to LCT was 3 yrs (IQR 1-8), and median follow-up from 1st LCT was 21 mos (IQR 9-51). Patients received an average 2 LCT courses (range 1-8) treating 1-4 sites. Median survival (OS) from 1st LCT was 9 yrs (95% CI = 5-14). On multivariable analysis (MVA), worse OS was associated with anaplastic histology (HR 4.6, p<.01), but longer OS was associated with prior RAI (HR 0.33, p = .02) and oligometastatic disease (HR 0.3, p = .01). For anaplastic histology, median OS was 1.2 years vs. 9.3 years for non-anaplastic; 3-yr OS was 36% vs. 88% (log-rank, p<.01). Five-year OS for oligometastatic cases was 75% vs 53% for oligoprogressive (log-rank, p = .04). Median progression free survival (PFS) from 1st LCT was 15.5 mos (95% C I = 11-20). On MVA for all LCT courses, time to any progression (TTP) was negatively associated with anaplastic histology (HR 1.7, p = .02) and 2nd or higher LCT course (HR 1.45, p = .05), but favorably associated with thoracic site (HR 0.49, p<.01). Following later LCT courses, median TTP was 11 mos vs 17 mos for initial LCT course (log-rank, p = .03). After LCT to lung/chest, TTP was 18.6 mos vs 9.5 mos for non-thoracic sites (log-rank, p<.01). Only 6% of failures occurred at previously treated lesions. Most LCT courses (67%) were without ongoing chemotherapy, while 25% entailed continuing the same regimen and 9% had planned treatment post-RT. There were 2 Grade 3 toxicities (pneumonitis and esophagitis) and no Grade 4-5 events.

CONCLUSION

With high local control rates and minimal toxicity, LCT can be a feasible strategy to defer systemic therapy escalation for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive thyroid cancer.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Dural Recurrence of Olfactory Neuroblastoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Treatment protocols for dural recurrence among esthesioneuroblastoma patients have not been standardized. We assess the outcomes of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) for patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) dura-based recurrences.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified ONB patients with dura-based recurrences treated with FSR after prior radiotherapy who were enrolled between 2013 and 2022 in our prospective head and neck reirradiation and skull base registries. In-field tumor control (within 2 cm of prescribed radiotherapy volume) and out-of-field tumor control (non-contiguous or contralateral dura, nodal, or distant metastases) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with 28 dural lesions were included in this analysis. All patients were initially treated with surgery to their primary paranasal sinus disease; 69% with a craniofacial approach followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to a median dose of 63 Gy (range 60-72.4 Gy) prescribed to the resected tumor bed. Patients re-presented with dural recurrence at median 58.3 months (range 35.0 - 163.0 months) from completion of their initial treatment. Two patients underwent dural resections. On presentation of recurrence, 4 patients had 1 lesion treated, with a median of 2 lesions treated (range 1-4 lesions). All dural based tumors were treated with FSR to a median dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions delivered QOD. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was utilized for FSR treatment planning in 31% of cases. The median follow up from FSR was 23.3 months (range: 13.1 - 51.6 months). The 1-year overall survival and progression free survival was 75% and 38%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year in-field control rate was 85% and 75%, respectively. Among treated lesions, 25 of 28 (89%) responded or remained stable following FSR. Two patients (3 lesions) had evidence of in-field radiographic progression at 17 and 9 months, respectively. Five patients (38%) experienced progression in the contralateral or non-contiguous dura, and 5 patients (38%) developed distant metastases. The overall out-of-field progression rate was 58% at 1 year. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity observed. Three patients (23%) developed asymptomatic changes on MRI consistent with brain necrosis, all of which occurred in a previously irradiated region.

CONCLUSION

In the largest single institution study of FSR reirradiation for ONB dural recurrence to date, high local control rates with minimal toxicity are attainable. However, subsequent out-of-field dural recurrences and/or distant metastases remain problematic.

The KRAS-Variant and Cetuximab in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer in NRG/RTOG 1016

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

NRG/RTOG 1016 was a non-inferiority phase III trial comparing radiation with cisplatin versus cetuximab monotherapy for patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The trial did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival (OS) and had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional failure (LRF) in patients treated with cetuximab. Based on prior evidence that HNSCC patients with a germ-line mutation in KRAS (the KRAS-variant) had a positive response to radiation with cisplatin plus cetuximab without increased toxicity, samples from RTOG 1016 were used to test the protocol-specified hypothesis that KRAS-variant patients will have better outcomes when receiving IMRT + cetuximab monotherapy compared to IMRT + cisplatin.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The KRAS-variant was tested in 562 samples at MiraDx, a CLIA-certified laboratory. OS, PFS, LRF, and distant metastases (DM) were as defined per the RTOG 1016 protocol, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by (cause-specific) Cox models. Negative binomial regression was used to model the number of treatment-related acute and late (≤ and > 180 days from end of treatment, respectively) grade 3-5 adverse events. To assess the predictive role of the KRAS-variant, all models included KRAS, assigned treatment, and their interaction, with the interaction tested at two-sided 0.05. HRs and toxicity ratios are expressed as IMRT + cetuximab / IMRT + cisplatin.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the KRAS-variant was 16% with similar patient and tumor characteristics and well-balanced treatment arms for variant and non-variant patients. Median follow-up was 8.6 years. There was no significant interaction between KRAS and treatment for OS (p = 0.99), PFS (p = 0.56), LRF (p = 0.09), or DM (p = 0.19) (Table 1). In KRAS-variant patients the mean acute and late toxicity ratios were 0.53 (95% CI 0.36, 0.80) and 1.62 (95% CI 0.57, 4.62). In non-variant patients, the mean acute and late toxicity ratios were 0.80 (95% CI 0.67, 0.95) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.35, 0.87), respectively. The interaction of KRAS and treatment was not significant for acute (p = 0.07) or late toxicity (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

While this study does not directly refute prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients benefit from radiation + cisplatin and cetuximab, this study does not support the hypothesis that the KRAS-variant is a predictive biomarker of improved outcome in HPV+ oropharyngeal SCC patients treated with IMRT + cetuximab alone, and suggests that for KRAS-variant patients, potential benefits in LRF and acute toxicity with cetuximab may be offset by worse DM and worse late toxicity.

Evaluation of prognostic risk models for postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and international external validation cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stratifying risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery allows clinicians to modify risk through targeted interventions and enhanced monitoring. In this study, we aimed to identify and validate prognostic models against a new consensus definition of postoperative pulmonary complications.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and international external validation cohort study. The systematic review was done in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched MEDLINE and Embase on March 1, 2020, for articles published in English that reported on risk prediction models for postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. External validation of existing models was done within a prospective international cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing major abdominal surgery. Data were collected between Jan 1, 2019, and April 30, 2019, in the UK, Ireland, and Australia. Discriminative ability and prognostic accuracy summary statistics were compared between models for the 30-day postoperative pulmonary complication rate as defined by the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC). Model performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC).

FINDINGS

In total, we identified 2903 records from our literature search; of which, 2514 (86·6%) unique records were screened, 121 (4·8%) of 2514 full texts were assessed for eligibility, and 29 unique prognostic models were identified. Nine (31·0%) of 29 models had score development reported only, 19 (65·5%) had undergone internal validation, and only four (13·8%) had been externally validated. Data to validate six eligible models were collected in the international external validation cohort study. Data from 11 591 patients were available, with an overall postoperative pulmonary complication rate of 7·8% (n=903). None of the six models showed good discrimination (defined as AUROCC ≥0·70) for identifying postoperative pulmonary complications, with the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia score showing the best discrimination (AUROCC 0·700 [95% CI 0·683-0·717]).

INTERPRETATION

In the pre-COVID-19 pandemic data, variability in the risk of pulmonary complications (StEP-COMPAC definition) following major abdominal surgery was poorly described by existing prognostication tools. To improve surgical safety during the COVID-19 pandemic recovery and beyond, novel risk stratification tools are required.

FUNDING

British Journal of Surgery Society.

La confrontation au deuil d’un pair chez une AJA atteinte de cancer. Une analyse phénoménologique interprétative

Objectif : Les adolescents et jeunes adultes (AJA) atteints de cancer faisant face à la perte d’un autre AJA malade peuvent être confrontés à une « triple tâche » : le processus d’adolescence, l’ajustement psychologique au cancer et la mort d’un pair malade. L’objectif de l’étude a été d’explorer les processus sous-jacents à la perte d’un pair malade chez les AJA atteints de cancer.

Matériel et méthodes : Un entretien unique a été soumis à une Analyse phénoménologique interprétative (IPA), conçu pour comprendre le système de significations attaché à un phénomène subjectif et intime tel que le deuil.

Résultats : L’IPA a fait émerger six thèmes majeurs : le parcours de vie ; le parcours de soins ; les représentations du cancer, de soi et du monde ; l’ajustement psychologique au cancer ; les relations interpersonnelles ainsi que la perte d’un pair AJA malade. Le récit interprétatif montre la place centrale du processus d’identification aux pairs malades, notamment au défunt, dans la mise en sens du cancer et du deuil. Cette expérience du deuil d’un pair comporte des aspects négatifs (e.g., perspective de sa propre mort, perte de repère, peur de la rechute) et positifs (e.g., sentiment de continuité avec le défunt, changement de perception de soi et du monde).

Conclusion : L’étude montre l’importance de considérer ces processus dans l’accompagnement des AJA atteints de cancer confrontés à la mort d’un pair malade et de proposer des interventions adaptées à cette tranche d’âge.

Abstract IA20: Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papilloma-virus positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG 1016): A randomized multicenter noninferiority trial*

Background: Patients with HPV-related oropharynx cancer have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab can preserve high survival and reduce toxicity is unknown. We performed a randomized trial comparing survival and toxicity in 987 patients enrolled at 182 health care centers in the US and Canada between July 2011 and July 2014.

Methods: Eligibility included histologically confirmed HPV positive carcinoma, clinical stage TI-T2, N2-N3 or T3-T4, N0-N3. Zubrod status 0 or 1. All patients received intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered in 35 fractions to 70 gray over 6 weeks using 6 fractions per week. High-dose cisplatin at 100 mg/m² was given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles in arm A (standard of care) versus arm B loading dose cetuximab plus weekly cetuximab. Patients were stratified by T category, N category, Zubord performance status, and smoking history.

Primary analysis was based on modified intention to treat for all patients meeting eligibility criteria. 849 patients were randomly assigned to radiation plus cetuximab (425) or radiotherapy plus cisplatin (424). Median follow-up is 4.5 years.

Results: Radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 78% in the cetuximab group versus 85% in the cisplatin group (p=0.016). Progression-free survival was 67% versus 78% (p=0.0002). Local-regional failure was higher in the cetuximab group, 17% versus 10% (p=0.005). High-grade acute toxicity was similar at 77% for both groups. Late toxicity was also similar.

Conclusions: For HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy plus cetuximab showed inferior overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional control compared with radiation plus cisplatin. This study defines radiation using IMRT plus cisplatin as the standard of care for this population.

*Lancet. Vol 393, p 40-50, January 5, 2019

Citation Format: J.A. Ridge, J. Ringash, M. Yao, D.M. Blakaj, M.A. Razaq, A.D. Colevas, J.J. Beitler, C.U. Jones, N.E. Dunlap, S.A. Seaward, S. Spencer, T.J. Galloway, J.J. Dignam, Q.T. Le, M.L. Gillison, E.M. Sturgis, J. Phan, A.M. Trotti, J. Harris, A. Eisbruch, P.M. Harari, D.J. Adelstein, S.A. Koyfman, B. Burtness. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papilloma-virus positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG 1016): A randomized multicenter noninferiority trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Optimizing Survival and Quality of Life through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2019 Apr 29-30; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(12_Suppl_2):Abstract nr IA20.

In situ 3D-patterning of electrospun fibers using two-layer composite materials

Polymeric electrospun nanofibers have extensive applications in filtration, sensing, drug delivery, and tissue engineering that often require the fibers to be patterned or integrated with a larger device. Here, we describe a highly versatile in situ strategy for three-dimensional electrospun fiber patterning using collectors with an insulative surface layer and conductive recessed patterns. We show that two-layer collectors with pattern dimensions down to 100-micrometers are easily fabricated using available laboratory equipment. We use finite element method simulation and experimental validation to demonstrate that the fiber patterning strategy is effective for a variety of pattern dimensions and fiber materials. Finally, the potential for this strategy to enable new applications of electrospun fibers is demonstrated by incorporating electrospun fibers into dissolving microneedles for the first time. These studies provide a framework for the adaptation of this fiber patterning strategy to many different applications of electrospun fibers.