Safety and efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for anticoagulation reversal in patients undergoing urgent neurosurgical procedures: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Anticoagulant therapy poses a significant risk for patients undergoing emergency neurosurgery procedures, necessitating reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Data on PCC efficacy lack consistency in this setting. This systematic review and metaanalysis aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of PCC for anticoagulation reversal in the context of urgent neurosurgery. Articles from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened according to the PRISMA checklist. Adult patients receiving anticoagulation reversal with PCC for emergency neurosurgical procedures were included. When available, patients who received FFP were included as a comparison group. Pooled estimates of observational studies were calculated for efficacy and safety outcomes via random-effects modeling. Initial search returned 4505 articles, of which 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Anticoagulants used included warfarin (83%), rivaroxaban (6.8%), phenprocoumon (6.1%), apixaban (2.2%), and dabigatran (1.5%). The mean International Normalized Ratio (INR) prePCC administration ranged from 2.3 to 11.7, while postPCC administration from 1.1 to 1.4. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 27% (95%CI 21, 34%; I² = 44.6%; p-heterogeneity = 0.03) and incidence of thromboembolic events was 6.00% among patients treated with PCC (95%CI 4.00, 10.0%; I² = 0%; p-heterogeneity = 0.83). Results comparing PCC and FFP demonstrated no statistically significant differences in INR reversal, mortality, or incidence of thromboembolic events. This metaanalysis demonstrated adequate safety and efficacy for PCC in the reversal of anticoagulation for urgent neurosurgical procedures. There was no significant difference between PCC and FFP, though further trials would be useful in demonstrating the safety and efficacy of PCC in this setting.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Management of Fecal Incontinence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence is a debilitating and highly prevalent problem among multiple sclerosis patients. Conservative therapies often fail to provide benefit. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive neuromodulatory therapy with proven efficacy for fecal incontinence in non-neurological settings.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in treating multiple sclerosis-related fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Consecutive multiple sclerosis patients with fecal incontinence that had failed conservative therapy received posterior tibial nerve stimulation between 2012 and 2015. All patients had previously undergone anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasound. Patients whose Wexner incontinence score reduced below 10 post-therapy or halved from baseline were deemed responders.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (25 female, median age 43 years) were included. Twenty-three (70%) had urge, 4 (12%) passive, and 9 (27%) mixed fecal incontinence. Twenty-six (79%) were classified as responders. The majority of subjects had relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (67%); those had a significantly higher response rate (95% vs. 67% and 50% in primary and secondary progressive respectively, P < 0.05). Responders tended to be more symptomatic at baseline and had greater improvements in bowel symptom scores and quality of life scores with therapy.

CONCLUSION

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation demonstrates potential as an effective therapy for fecal incontinence in multiple sclerosis. These findings provide the basis for future more definitive controlled studies.