Do Females Have Worse Outcomes in Penetrating Trauma: A Single-Center Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating trauma occurs less frequently in females than in males. Studies on penetrating injuries are conducted in predominantly male populations. We aim to elucidate the demographics and outcomes of penetrating trauma specifically in females to mitigate disparities of care in females.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of hospitalized adult trauma patients suffering penetrating trauma from 2015 to 2021 was performed in an urban American College of Surgeon-verified level 1 trauma center. Patients were stratified by sex (females or males) and mechanism of injury (gun-related versus nongun-related). The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included incidence of blood transfusion, incidence of surgical/interventional radiology (IR) interventions, hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications. Descriptive statistics were employed with a significance defined as P value <0.05. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the impact of sex on mortality, surgical/IR interventions, and hospital LOS.

RESULTS

Females with penetrating injury had lower Injury Severity Score (1 versus 4, P < 0.05) than males, but had similar mortality rates (4% versus 6%, P = 0.06). In multivariable logistic analysis adjusting for age and Injury Severity Score, while females experience 33% fewer OR/IR intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates, hospital LOS, and complication rates between males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite receiving fewer surgical/IR intervention, females with penetrating injuries have similar outcomes to their male counterparts. Further study is needed to study this discrepancy.

Age Does Not Predict Failure to Rescue Following Resuscitative Thoracotomy in Penetrating Trauma

BACKGROUND

The limitations of resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) after penetrating trauma have been well documented, but there is a paucity of data on the effect age has on mortality. This begs the question as to the utility of RT in an aging patient population. We investigate the significance of age as a predictor for failure to rescue after RT in penetrating trauma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify whether chronologic age has a measurable effect on rates of failure to rescue after RT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2015 including all pulseless patients undergoing RT after penetrating injury. Our primary outcome was failure to rescue defined as death in the emergency department after RT. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the relationship between age and morality controlling for injury severity.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred twelve RTs were performed during the study period with an overall failure to rescue rate of 61.8% (n = 687) within the emergency department and an in-hospital mortality rate of 96.9%, which is in line with national data. On univariate analysis, there was no significant association between age and mortality (p = 0.44). On multivariate analysis examining the interaction between age and mortality adjusting for injury severity, we found that chronologic age was not an independent predictor of death after RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Age does not appear to be an independent predictor of failure to rescue after RT in penetrating trauma and should not be a sole determinant in procedural decision making.