1
|
Homans NC, van der Toom HFE, Pauw RJ, Vroegop JL. Patient and clinician experiences with the multidisciplinary single-day cochlear implant selection (MSCS) protocol. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104277. [PMID: 38636172 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the MSCS (Multidisciplinary Single-day Cochlear Implant Selection) protocol with a primary focus on sustaining or enhancing patient satisfaction throughout the cochlear implant selection process. MATERIALS AND METHODS Following the implementation of the new selection protocol, where all selection appointments take place on the same day, we surveyed 37 individuals who underwent the process. Twenty adhered to the standard procedure, while 17 followed the MSCS protocol. We also gathered feedback from seven out of eight involved healthcare providers. This method enabled us to evaluate the protocol's effectiveness in maintaining patient satisfaction and ensuring staff contentment with care delivery within a condensed timeframe. RESULTS Patient responses showed slight variations in average scores without statistical significant differences, indicating comparable satisfaction between the MSCS pathway and the standard protocol. The majority of patients preferred the MSCS protocol, with none of the MSCS participants opting for appointments spread over multiple days. Healthcare practitioners of the CI center also displayed similar or increased satisfaction levels with the MSCS protocol. CONCLUSION The adoption of the MSCS in daily clinical care has led to a decrease in patient appointment times without sacrificing patient satisfaction. Additionally, the majority of individuals actively choose the MSCS protocol. Among those who have directly experienced it, there is unanimous preference for the consolidated appointments over spreading them across multiple days. Professionals within the CI team express equal satisfaction with both the new and old protocols, indicating that the reduction in patient time does not diminish overall satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke C Homans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | - Hylke F E van der Toom
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Pauw
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Homans NC, van der Toom HFE, Pauw RJ, Vroegop JL. Pilot study of a multidisciplinary single-day cochlear implant selection protocol. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104190. [PMID: 38101132 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore and introduce the potential of a MSCS (Multidisciplinary Single-day Cochlear Implant Selection) protocol. The primary objectives of this pilot were to reduce the duration between referral and surgery, minimize hospital visits and decrease the time healthcare professionals dedicate to the cochlear implant (CI) selection process. MATERIALS AND METHODS We established a pilot program at the CI center of the Erasmus MC, a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands, with the goal of improving and shorten the selection process. We evaluated our pilot, including 15 CI candidates, and conducted a retrospective analysis for time and cost savings. RESULTS The results showed that the pilot of the MSCS protocol significantly reduced the length of the CI selection phase (84 days vs 1; standard intake vs MSCS protocol) and the number of hospital visits (6 vs 2 visits; standard vs MSCS protocol), resulting in less travel time and lower costs for the CI candidates. The total time of professionals spend on patients was also reduced with 27 %. CONCLUSION This study highlights the potential benefits of the MSCS protocol in terms of reducing the burden on patients and healthcare providers and improving the efficiency of the CI selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke C Homans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, the Netherlands.
| | - Hylke F E van der Toom
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Pauw
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, the Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Jong TJ, Hakkesteegt MM, van der Schroeff MP, Vroegop JL. Communicating Emotion: Vocal Expression of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Children With Mild to Profound Hearing Loss Compared With That of Normal Hearing Peers. Ear Hear 2024; 45:72-80. [PMID: 37316994 PMCID: PMC10718210 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Emotional prosody is known to play an important role in social communication. Research has shown that children with cochlear implants (CCIs) may face challenges in their ability to express prosody, as their expressions may have less distinct acoustic contrasts and therefore may be judged less accurately. The prosody of children with milder degrees of hearing loss, wearing hearing aids, has sparsely been investigated. More understanding of the prosodic expression by children with hearing loss, hearing aid users in particular, could create more awareness among healthcare professionals and parents on limitations in social communication, which awareness may lead to more targeted rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare the prosodic expression potential of children wearing hearing aids (CHA) with that of CCIs and children with normal hearing (CNH). DESIGN In this prospective experimental study, utterances of pediatric hearing aid users, cochlear implant users, and CNH containing emotional expressions (happy, sad, and angry) were recorded during a reading task. Of the utterances, three acoustic properties were calculated: fundamental frequency (F0), variance in fundamental frequency (SD of F0), and intensity. Acoustic properties of the utterances were compared within subjects and between groups. RESULTS A total of 75 children were included (CHA: 26, CCI: 23, and CNH: 26). Participants were between 7 and 13 years of age. The 15 CCI with congenital hearing loss had received the cochlear implant at median age of 8 months. The acoustic patterns of emotions uttered by CHA were similar to those of CCI and CNH. Only in CCI, we found no difference in F0 variation between happiness and anger, although an intensity difference was present. In addition, CCI and CHA produced poorer happy-sad contrasts than did CNH. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that on a fundamental, acoustic level, both CHA and CCI have a prosodic expression potential that is almost on par with normal hearing peers. However, there were some minor limitations observed in the prosodic expression of these children, it is important to determine whether these differences are perceptible to listeners and could affect social communication. This study sets the groundwork for more research that will help us fully understand the implications of these findings and how they may affect the communication abilities of these children. With a clearer understanding of these factors, we can develop effective ways to help improve their communication skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjeerd J. de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke M. Hakkesteegt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P. van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jantien L. Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Jong TJ, van der Schroeff MP, Stapersma L, Vroegop JL. A systematic review on the impact of auditory functioning and language proficiency on psychosocial difficulties in children and adolescents with hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2023:1-11. [PMID: 37887640 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2261074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Approximately 20% to 40% of children with hearing loss encounter psychosocial difficulties. This prevalence may be outdated, given the advancements in hearing technology and rehabilitation efforts to enhance the psychosocial well-being of these children. A systematic review of up-to-date literature can help to identify factors that may contribute to the children's psychosocial well-being. DESIGN/STUDY SAMPLE A systematic review was conducted. Original articles were identified through systematic searches in Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. The quality of the papers was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and custom Reviewers' Criteria. RESULTS A search was performed on 20 October 2022. A total of 1561 articles were identified, and 36 were included for review. Critical appraisal led to 24 good to fair quality articles, and 12 poor quality articles. CONCLUSION Children with hearing loss have a twofold risk of experiencing psychosocial difficulties compared to normal hearing peers. Estimates for functioning in social interactions, like speech perception (in noise) or language proficiency, have proven to be more adequate predictors for psychosocial difficulties than the degree of hearing loss. Our findings can be useful for identifying children at risk for difficulties and offering them earlier and more elaborate psychological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjeerd J de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk Stapersma
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Levvel, Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Jong TJ, van der Schroeff MP, Achterkamp MD, Vroegop JL. First results of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, applied as a screening tool for psychosocial difficulties in pediatric audiology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:4467-4476. [PMID: 37083817 PMCID: PMC10477219 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07979-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite major improvements in rehabilitation possibilities, children with sensorineural hearing loss are at risk for psychosocial difficulties. These difficulties can impact their educational and career achievements and may be two to three times more common in children with hearing loss compared to those with normal hearing. Early identification of psychosocial difficulties can be facilitated using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and may improve outcomes and quality of life. We implemented the SDQ into the clinical follow-up of children with hearing loss in a tertiary referral hospital. With this, prevalence and severity of difficulties in specific psychosocial domains and several predictors were investigated. METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional investigation was performed of the following factors in association with the SDQ results: type of hearing device, type and degree of hearing loss, speech perception in quiet and in noise, and type of schooling. RESULTS Between June 2020 and January 2022, parents of 312 children (age 4-18) completed the SDQ. An additional 113 child-reports were completed. The response rate of the parents was 69%. Problems with peer relationships and prosocial behavior were the most affected areas with clinically elevated scores in 22% of the children. Psychosocial difficulties were distributed similarly across types of hearing device, nature and degrees of hearing loss, and educational settings. Better speech perception in quiet was significantly associated with fewer parent-reported conduct problems. CONCLUSION The results of the present study suggest that children with hearing loss may be at risk of experiencing challenges with social interactions and attachment in social contexts. Using the SDQ in clinical follow-up may improve the chances for early psychological assessment and intervention. In addition, the study found that children's mental health may be impacted by their communication abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjeerd J de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke D Achterkamp
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paping DE, Oosterloo BC, El Marroun H, Homans NC, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Schroeff MP, Vroegop JL. Risk Factors For Hearing Decline From Childhood To Early Adolescence. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:389-395. [PMID: 35587728 PMCID: PMC10084436 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors of hearing decline between 9 and 13 years of age. The risk factors examined included sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle-related factors. METHODS This study was embedded within a population-based prospective cohort study from fetal life onwards in the Netherlands. Pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry were performed at the age of 9 and 13 years. The hearing decline was defined as an increase in low-frequency or high-frequency pure-tone average of at least 5 dB in one of both ears. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association of possible risk factors with hearing decline. The study was conducted from April 2012 to October 2015, and from April 2016 to September 2019. RESULTS Of the 3,508 participants included, 7.8% demonstrated a hearing decline in the low frequencies, and 11.3% in the high frequencies. Participants who reported alcohol consumption were more likely to have a hearing decline in the low frequencies (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1; 2.0). Moreover, a lower educational level was associated with an increased odds of having a hearing decline in the high frequencies (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0; 1.8). Age, sex, household income, personal music player use, and body mass index were not associated with hearing decline. CONCLUSION Educational level and risky behavior were significantly associated with hearing decline from childhood to early adolescence. The findings of the present study can help in the design of public health interventions to prevent hearing loss at a young age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 (prospective cohort study) Laryngoscope, 133:389-395, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Berthe C Oosterloo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanan El Marroun
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke C Homans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Paping DE, Vroegop JL, El Marroun H, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Schroeff MP. The association of sociodemographic factors and risk behavior with unsafe use of personal listening devices in adolescents. Int J Environ Health Res 2022:1-10. [PMID: 35262403 DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2022.2047901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Many young people are potentially at risk of noise-induced hearing loss due to unsafe use of personal listening devices. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the association of sociodemographic factors and risk behavior with unsafe use of personal listening devices in adolescents to identify a target group for prevention. A smartphone application was developed to objectively measure music listening habits among 314 adolescents with a mean age of 13 years and 7 months (SD ±5 months). Listening habits were characterized as safe or unsafe based on the weekly noise dose. Data on sociodemographic factors and traditional health risk behaviors were obtained by questionnaires. Within the study group, 10.5% of the participants exceeded the 50%, and 4.8% the 100% recommended weekly noise dose. Adolescents with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to engage in unsafe listening habits as compared to adolescents with a higher socioeconomic status. Additionally, risk behavior was associated with higher odds of having unsafe listening habits as compared to no risk behavior. Age, sex and educational levels were not significantly associated with unsafe listening habits. The findings of the present study indicate that interventions to promote safe listening habits should target adolescents with a lower socioeconomic status and higher risk behavior. Future research is needed to investigate how these adolescents can be motivated to adopt safe listening habits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanan El Marroun
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paping DE, van der Schroef M, Helleman HW, Goedegebure A, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Vroegop JL. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Screening for Early Stages of High-frequency Hearing Loss in Adolescents. Noise Health 2022; 24:20-26. [PMID: 35645136 PMCID: PMC9239147 DOI: 10.4103/nah.nah_38_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Adolescents may be at risk of noise-induced hearing loss due to recreational sound. The aim of this study was to examine the role of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in screening for early stages of high-frequency loss such as can be observed in noise-induced hearing loss. Setting and design This cross-sectional study was embedded within Generation R, an ongoing prospective birth cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Data were collected from April 2016 to September 2019. Methods A total of 3456 adolescents with a mean age of 13 years and 8 months old (standard deviation ± 5 months) were included. Pure-tone thresholds were measured in a sound-treated booth. DPOAEs were recorded using an ILO V6 analyzer with primary levels of 65/55 dB SPL and frequency ratio f2/f1 of 1.22. Subjects had normal middle ear function at the time of assessment, based on tympanometry results. Results Measurements in 6065 ears showed that DPOAE levels tend to decrease with increasing pure-tone thresholds. However, the intersubject variability of DPOAE levels in ears with the same threshold was large. DPOAE levels could reasonably identify early stages of high-frequency hearing loss. Conclusion The findings of present study indicate that DPOAE measurements can potentially be used for adolescents hearing screening in the high frequencies. Future research is needed to optimize test performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E. Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,Address for correspondence: Danique E. Paping, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail:
| | - Marc van der Schroef
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hiske W. Helleman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J. Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien L. Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Toom HFE, van der Schroeff MP, Molenaar TL, Metselaar M, van Linge A, Vroegop JL, Pauw RJ. Revision surgery for chronically discharging mastoid cavities: mastoid obliteration with canal wall reconstruction versus non-obliteration surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:3881-3889. [PMID: 34705081 PMCID: PMC9249682 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07138-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the surgical results of revision canal wall down (CWD) surgery for chronically discharging mastoid cavities and to compare the non-obliteration approach to mastoid obliteration with canal wall reconstruction. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study. All adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent revision surgery for chronically draining mastoid cavities between January 2013 and January 2020 were included. Primary outcome measures included the dry ear rate, complications and postoperative hearing. Results 79 ears were included; 56 ears received revision CWD with mastoid obliteration and posterior canal wall reconstruction and 23 ears received CWD without mastoid obliteration. The dry ear rate at the most recent outpatient clinic visit (median 28.0 months postoperative) was significantly higher in the obliteration group with 96.4% compared to 73.9% for the non-obliteration group (p = .002). There were no differences in audiological outcome and incidence of complications between the two techniques. Conclusion We show that in our study population revision CWD surgery with mastoid obliteration and posterior canal wall reconstruction is superior to revision CWD surgery without mastoid obliteration in the management of chronically discharging mastoid cavities. In the obliteration group, a dry ear was achieved in 96.4% as this was 73.9% in the non-obliteration group. We found no differences in audiological outcome and in incidence of complications between the two techniques. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-07138-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hylke F E van der Toom
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim L Molenaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mick Metselaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne van Linge
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Pauw
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Toom HFE, van der Schroeff MP, Metselaar M, van Linge A, Vroegop JL, Pauw RJ. Treatment Outcome of the Bony Obliteration Tympanoplasty Versus Nonobliterative Techniques in Cholesteatoma Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:1366-1374. [PMID: 34238901 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In cholesteatoma surgery, obliteration of the mastoid and epitympanic space (bony obliteration tympanoplasty, BOT) is an increasingly used technique with low recurrent and residual cholesteatoma rates. While factors as the postoperative hearing level and infection rate are important for the patient as well, these outcome parameters are not frequently reported on in current literature. The objective of this study is to evaluate the recurrent and residual cholesteatoma rates of the BOT technique and nonobliterative canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy in a large patient cohort. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the infection rate and hearing outcome for all three techniques. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Single-center study. PATIENTS All 337 adult patients (≥18 yrs) who underwent primary or revision cholesteatoma surgery between January 2013 and March 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Recurrent cholesteatoma rates, residual cholesteatoma rates, postoperative infections and other complications, hearing outcome. RESULTS The estimated combined rate of recurrent and residual cholesteatoma at 5 years follow-up was 7.6% in the BOT group, 34.9% in the CWU group, and 17.9% in the CWD group. The postoperative infection rate in the different groups ranged from 4.3% to 4.9%. The median gain in AC threshold level varied from 0.0 dB in the BOT and CWD group to 3.8 dB in the CWU group. CONCLUSIONS We show that cholesteatoma recurrence rates after the BOT technique in our clinic are significantly lower compared to CWU surgery. There were no differences in infection rate and no clinically relevant differences in postoperative hearing between the BOT, CWU, and CWD technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hylke F E van der Toom
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paping DE, Vroegop JL, Koenraads SPC, le Clercq CMP, Goedegebure A, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Schroeff MP. Correction to: A smartphone application to objectively monitor music listening habits in adolescents. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 50:50. [PMID: 34384502 PMCID: PMC8361637 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-021-00532-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone P C Koenraads
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn M P le Clercq
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of surgical masks and face shields on speech intelligibility of adults with moderate to severe hearing loss. DESIGN This study measured speech tracking scores in quiet for life speech in three different conditions: without a mask, with a surgical mask and with a face shield. Acoustic effects of the masks and face shields on the speech signal were also investigated. Study sample: The study sample consists of 42 patients with moderate to severe hearing loss, 23 cochlear implant users and 19 hearing aid users. RESULTS A significant average difference in speech perception scores was found for the use of a surgical mask compared to the listening situation "without mask". The worse the speech understanding in quiet, the larger the impact of the surgical mask. For the worse performers even the face shield had a negative impact on speech perception. The sound distortion for the face shield compared to the surgical mask was greater. CONCLUSION This study shows that even for speech perception in quiet, surgical face masks, and face shields to a lesser extent, have a negative effect for patients with moderate to severe hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke C Homans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Homans NC, Vroegop JL. Impact of face masks in public spaces during COVID-19 pandemic on daily life communication of cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6:531-539. [PMID: 34195375 PMCID: PMC8223455 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS Investigate potential problems in the daily life communication of cochlear implant (CI) patients due to the widespread use of face masks in public places during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN Prospective survey study. METHODS This study used an online questionnaire about the effects of face masks on daily life communication of adult CI users. The questionnaire consists of three parts: (a) A face mask questionnaire, (b) loneliness question (c) three subdomains of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire to assess quality of life. The questionnaires were send out on October 20, 2020. Four hundred and seven adult CI users were invited to participate in the study. The survey inclusion was closed on November 5, 2020. The study setting was the Rotterdam Cochlear Implant Center, Erasmus MC, a tertiary referral center in The Netherlands. The loneliness question and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire were analyzed for possible differences between the current situation with masks and the situation before, when masks were not commonly used. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty one adult CI users (54% female, mean age 62 years) participated in the study. The face mask questionnaire showed that face masks cause considerable problems in daily life communication of 80% of the participants. Also, CI users tend to feel more lonely and all used subdomains of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire worsened due to the use of face masks. CONCLUSION The widespread use of face masks greatly complicates the daily life communication of CI users and reduces quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke C. Homans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jantien L. Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paping DE, Vroegop JL, Geleijnse G, le Clercq CMP, Koenraads SPC, van der Schroeff MP. Objective Measurement of Listening Device Use and Its Relation to Hearing Acuity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:515-522. [PMID: 34030491 PMCID: PMC8892050 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211012274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To examine whether adolescents exceed recommended noise exposure limits when using personal listening devices (PLDs) and to investigate the relationship between objectively measured PLD use and hearing thresholds Study Design Cross-sectional study. Setting This study was embedded within an ongoing prospective birth cohort study in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Data were collected from May 2017 to September 2019. Methods A smartphone application was developed to measure daily noise exposure from PLDs. Listening habits were monitored among 314 adolescents with a mean age of 13 years 7 months (SD, 5 months), of whom 51.6% were male. Hearing acuity was measured by pure tone audiometry, and tympanometry was performed in both ears. Results Within the study group, 2.2% adolescents exceeded the recommended daily noise dose (85 dBA as an 8-hour time-weighted average) among all days when the application was active and 9.9% when among only the listening days. No significant correlation was found between the daily noise dose from PLDs and pure tone thresholds. Conclusions The majority of adolescents exhibited listening habits that could be considered safe. As noise-induced hearing loss develops slowly over time, it could be that the effects of PLD use on hearing are not evident yet in this young population with a relatively short duration of PLD use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Geleijnse
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carlijn M P le Clercq
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simone P C Koenraads
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Paping DE, Vroegop JL, le Clercq CMP, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Schroeff MP. A 4-year follow-up study of hearing acuity in a large population-based cohort of children and adolescents. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6:302-309. [PMID: 33869762 PMCID: PMC8035936 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence of hearing loss among 13 year old adolescents, and to examine the change in prevalence between ages 9 and 13 years. METHODS This study was embedded within Generation R, a population-based prospective cohort study from fetal life onwards in the Netherlands. Pure-tone thresholds were obtained at 0.5 to 8 kHz, and tympanometry was performed. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was defined as a low-frequency and/or high-frequency pure-tone average of more than 15 dB HL in one of both ears. Audiometric signs suggestive of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) included the presence of a notch and/or high-frequency hearing loss. The study was conducted from April 2012 to October 2015, and April 2016 to September 2019. RESULTS A total of 4572 adolescents with a mean age of 13 years and 7 months (SD, 5 months) were included, of whom 2334 (51.0%) were girls. Within the cohort, 6.4% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.2%) were estimated to have SNHL, and 12.4% (95% CI, 11.5%-13.4%) met the criteria of NIHL. In total, 3675 participants were included in the longitudinal analysis. The prevalence of SNHL decreased from 8.0% to 5.3% between ages 9 and 13 years (P < .001). The prevalence of NIHL increased from 9.8% to 11.7% (P = .004), due to an increase in number of participants with a notch. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of SNHL significantly decreased by 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.9%) between ages 9 and 13 years, probably due to a change in alertness during assessment at the age of 13 years. Other possible explanations include the presence of selection bias or a decline in prevalence of conductive hearing loss. The number of participants with audiometric signs suggestive of NIHL increased by 1.9% (95% CI, 0.5%-3.3%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E. Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamNetherlands
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Jantien L. Vroegop
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Carlijn M. P. le Clercq
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamNetherlands
- The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamNetherlands
| | | | - Marc P. van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Paping DE, Vroegop JL, Koenraads SPC, le Clercq CMP, Goedegebure A, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, van der Schroeff MP. A smartphone application to objectively monitor music listening habits in adolescents : Personal listening device usage and the accuracy of self-reported listening habits. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 50:11. [PMID: 33588927 PMCID: PMC7885602 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-020-00488-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Listening to music through personal listening devices (PLDs) has become more prevalent during last decades. The aim of this study was to evaluate music listening habits through PLDs in adolescents with a smartphone application, and to assess the accuracy of self-reported listening habits. Methods This study was embedded in the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective birth cohort in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. A smartphone application for Android operating systems was developed to objectively monitor music listening habits for a period of 35 days. A postal questionnaire was used to subjectively assess listening habits. The level of agreement between the objectively measured and self-reported listening habits were evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients. Data were collected from May 2017 to March 2019. Results A total of 311 adolescents aged 12 to 15 years were included, of whom 237 (76.2%) completed the postal questionnaire. The results of the smartphone application showed that the median listening frequency was 2.1 days a week (IQR 1.0–3.4), the median listening time 21.1 min a day (IQR 9.1–53.7), and the mean listening level 54.5% (SD 18.1%). There was a slight to fair agreement between the objectively measured, and self-reported listening habits according to the weighted kappa coefficients (k = 0.179 to 0.364). Conclusions The results of the current study suggest that self-reported measures of listening habits are not always accurate. We consider a smartphone application to monitor listening habits of added value in future research investigating the possible damaging effects of PLDs on hearing acuity. Graphical abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-020-00488-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique E Paping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. .,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simone P C Koenraads
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carlijn M P le Clercq
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vroegop JL, Dingemanse JG, van der Schroeff MP, Goedegebure A. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Am J Audiol 2019; 28:1-10. [PMID: 30383163 DOI: 10.1044/2018_aja-18-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of 3 hearing aid fitting procedures on provided gain of the hearing aid in bimodal cochlear implant users and their effect on bimodal benefit. Method This prospective study measured hearing aid gain and auditory performance in a cross-over design in which 3 hearing aid fitting methods were compared. Hearing aid fitting methods differed in initial gain prescription rule (NAL-NL2 and Audiogram+) and loudness balancing method (broadband vs. narrowband loudness balancing). Auditory functioning was evaluated by a speech-in-quiet test, a speech-in-noise test, and a sound localization test. Fourteen postlingually deafened adult bimodal cochlear implant users participated in the study. Results No differences in provided gain and in bimodal performance were found for the different hearing aid fittings. For all hearing aid fittings, a bimodal benefit was found for speech in noise and sound localization. Conclusion Our results confirm that cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the contralateral ear substantially benefit from bimodal stimulation. However, on average, no differences were found between different types of fitting methods, varying in prescription rule and loudness balancing method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jantien L. Vroegop
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. Gertjan Dingemanse
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P. van der Schroeff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vroegop JL, Homans NC, Goedegebure A, van der Schroeff MP. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2018; 57:858-863. [PMID: 30261771 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1508896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate whether speech recognition in noise differs according to whether a wireless remote microphone is connected to just the cochlear implant (CI) or to both the CI and to the hearing aid (HA) in bimodal CI users. The second aim was to evaluate the additional benefit of the directional microphone mode compared with the omnidirectional microphone mode of the wireless microphone. This prospective study measured Speech Recognition Thresholds (SRT) in babble noise in a 'within-subjects repeated measures design' for different listening conditions. Eighteen postlingually deafened adult bimodal CI users. No difference in speech recognition in noise in the bimodal listening condition was found between the wireless microphone connected to the CI only and to both the CI and the HA. An improvement of 4.1 dB was found for switching from the omnidirectional microphone mode to the directional mode in the CI only condition. The use of a wireless microphone improved speech recognition in noise for bimodal CI users. The use of the directional microphone mode led to a substantial additional improvement of speech perception in noise for situations with one target signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jantien L Vroegop
- a ENT-Department , Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Nienke C Homans
- a ENT-Department , Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- a ENT-Department , Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vroegop JL, Homans NC, Goedegebure A, Dingemanse JG, van Immerzeel T, van der Schroeff MP. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients. Audiol Neurootol 2018; 23:32-38. [PMID: 29936510 DOI: 10.1159/000487749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the benefit of bimodal listening in cochlear implant users has been agreed on, speech comprehension remains a challenge in acoustically complex real-life environments due to reverberation and disturbing background noises. One way to additionally improve bimodal auditory performance is the use of directional microphones. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a binaural beamformer for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. This prospective study measured speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise in a repeated-measures design that varied in listening modality for static and dynamic listening conditions. A significant improvement in SRT of 4.7 dB was found with the binaural beamformer switched on in the bimodal static listening condition. No significant improvement was found in the dynamic listening condition. We conclude that there is a clear additional advantage of the binaural beamformer in bimodal CI users for predictable/static listening conditions with frontal target speech and spatially separated noise sources.
Collapse
|
20
|
Dingemanse JG, Vroegop JL, Goedegebure A. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech intelligibility in noise, noise tolerance and perceived annoyance in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2018; 57:360-369. [PMID: 29334269 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1425004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the validity and efficacy of a transient noise reduction algorithm (TNR) in cochlear implant processing and the interaction of TNR with a continuous noise reduction algorithm (CNR). DESIGN We studied the effects of TNR and CNR on the perception of realistic sound samples with transients, using subjective ratings of annoyance, a speech-in-noise test and a noise tolerance test. STUDY SAMPLE Participants were 16 experienced cochlear implant recipients wearing an Advanced Bionics Naida Q70 processor. RESULTS CI users rated sounds with transients as moderately annoying. Annoyance was slightly, but significantly reduced by TNR. Transients caused a large decrease in speech intelligibility in noise and a moderate decrease in noise tolerance, measured on the Acceptable Noise Level test. The TNR had no significant effect on noise tolerance or on speech intelligibility in noise. The combined application of TNR and CNR did not result in interactions. CONCLUSIONS The TNR algorithm was effective in reducing annoyance from transient sounds, but was not able to prevent a decreasing effect of transients on speech understanding in noise and noise tolerance. TNR did not reduce the beneficial effect of CNR on speech intelligibility in noise, but no cumulated improvement was found either.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jantien L Vroegop
- a Department of ENT , Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- a Department of ENT , Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Vroegop JL, Dingemanse JG, Homans NC, Goedegebure A. Evaluation of a wireless remote microphone in bimodal cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2017; 56:643-649. [DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1308565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nienke C. Homans
- Department of ENT, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - André Goedegebure
- Department of ENT, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|