Successful discontinuation of eltrombopag after complete remission in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia

Eltrombopag is effective and safe in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Some patients may sustain their platelet response when treatment is withdrawn but the frequency of this phenomenon is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated 260 adult primary ITP patients (165 women and 95 men; median age, 62 years) treated with eltrombopag after a median time from diagnosis of 24 months. Among the 201 patients who achieved a complete remission (platelet count >100 × 10(9) /l), eltrombopag was discontinued in 80 patients. Reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were: persistent response despite a reduction in dose over time (n = 33), platelet count >400 × 10(9) /l (n = 29), patient's request (n = 5), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 3), thrombosis (n = 3), and other reasons (n = 4). Of the 49 evaluable patients, 26 patients showed sustained response after discontinuing eltrombopag without additional ITP therapy, with a median follow-up of 9 (range, 6-25) months. These patients were characterized by a median time since ITP diagnosis of 46.5 months, with 4/26 having ITP < 1 year. Eleven patients were male and their median age was 59 years. They received a median of 4 previous treatment lines and 42% were splenectomized. No predictive factors of sustained response after eltrombopag withdrawal were identified. Platelet response following eltrombopag cessation may be sustained in an important percentage of adult primary ITP patients who achieved CR with eltrombopag. However, reliable markers for predicting which patients will have this response are needed.

Use of eltrombopag after romiplostim in primary immune thrombocytopenia

The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (THPO-RAs), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are effective and safe in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, the value of their sequential use when no response is achieved or when adverse events occur with one THPO-RA has not been clearly established. Here we retrospectively evaluated 51 primary ITP adult patients treated with romiplostim followed by eltrombopag. The median age of our cohort was 49 (range, 18-83) years. There were 32 women and 19 men. The median duration of romiplostim use before switching to eltrombopag was 12 (interquartile range 5-21) months. The reasons for switching were: lack of efficacy (n = 25), patient preference (n = 16), platelet-count fluctuation (n = 6) and side-effects (n = 4). The response rate to eltrombopag was 80% (41/51), including 67% (n = 35) complete responses. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 31 patients maintained their response. Efficacy was maintained after switching in all patients in the patient preference, platelet-count fluctuation and side-effect groups. 33% of patients experienced one or more adverse events during treatment with eltrombopag. We consider the use of eltrombopag after romiplostim for treating ITP to be effective and safe. Response to eltrombopag was related to the cause of romiplostim discontinuation.