Influence of postoperative radiotherapy target volumes in unilateral head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary: A multicentric study using propensity score

OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact of two radiation modalities on loco-regional control, survival and tumour emergence, after node dissection for an unilateral head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a multicentric retrospective study of 138 patients with unilateral HNCUP treated between 2002 and 2017. The absence of primary tumour was assessed by a systematic panendoscopy and positron emission tomography. Neck dissection was initially performed for all patients. Radiation Therapy was delivered on ipsilateral lymph node areas in 62 cases (44%: UL-RT group) and on bilateral lymph node areas and the entire pharyngeal mucosa in 77 cases (56%: COMP-RT group). Impact of radiation modalities on locoregional control and overall survival was assessed using propensity score matching method in order to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups.

RESULTS

The population included 80.4% men, 80.4% smokers, 32.6% P16 positive tumours and 71.0% extracapsular extension. After a median follow-up of 5 years, the locoregional control rate was 80.3% in the UL-RT group and 75.3% in the COMP-RT group (p = 0.688). The corresponding rate of contralateral lymph node recurrence was 0% versus 2.6% (p = 0.503) and the rate of tumour emergence was 11.5% versus 9.1% (p = 0.778). No significant difference was observed between the UL-RT and the COMP-RT groups for overall survival (p = 0.9516), specific survival (p = 0.4837) or tumour emergence (p = 0.9034).

CONCLUSION

UL-RT seems to provide similar outcomes as COMP-RT in unilateral HNCUP post-operative management.

Oncological and functional outcomes of trans-oral robotic surgery for pyriform sinus carcinoma: A French GETTEC group study

BACKGROUND

Pyriform sinus carcinomas (SCC) present specific functional and oncological issues. The recent advent of trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS), as a conservative procedure, has opened up new perspectives.

OBJECTIVES

To present the oncological and functional outcomes of TORS for pyriform sinus SCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included, retrospectively, all TORS procedures for pyriform sinus SCC performed between 2009 and 2017 in eight French tertiary referral centers. We excluded lesions involving the pyriform sinus that had developed from the oropharynx, larynx, or other anatomic sub-sites of the hypopharynx.

RESULTS

We included 57 TORS procedures. Median hospital stay was 10 days. A preventive tracheotomy was performed in seven cases (12%), and all were successfully decannulated. Oral re-feeding was possible for 93%, after a median of 5 days. The main surgical complications were hemorrhages (three cases), all successfully handled, although 2 patients with heavy comorbidities died from blood loss in the days after. Adjuvant therapy was proposed in 31 cases (54%), including two cases of salvage surgery (total pharyngolaryngectomy). After a median follow-up of 23 months, overall and disease-free survival were, respectively, 84% and 74% at 24 months, and 66% and 50% at 48 months. At the end of follow-up, organ preservation rate was 96%. None of the surviving patients needed a tracheotomy and oral diet was possible for 96%.

CONCLUSION

The functional and oncological outcomes of TORS for pyriform sinus cancer are encouraging, and this procedure can be considered safe for selected early or moderately advanced cases as a conservative treatment.

Revisiting vascular contraindications for transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer

Objective

We analyzed the outcomes for patients with a retropharyngeal internal carotid artery (ICA) who underwent a transoral robotic surgery (TORS) procedure involving a cervical‐transoral robotic oropharyngectomy course with free flap reconstruction.

Methods

Patients were included in the prospective multicentric trial NCT02517125. These patients were scheduled to undergo surgery for an oropharyngeal localization. By pre‐operative CT scan and MRI it was determined that they had a retropharyngeal internal carotid artery.

Results

Three patients had a retropharyngeal ICA: a patient with a 35 mm synovial sarcoma of the tonsillar fossa, a patient with a T2N2b squamous‐cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glossotonsillar sulcus, and a patient with a T3N0 SCC of the tonsillar fossa in a previously irradiated field. These patients encountered neither preoperative nor postoperative complications.

Conclusions

In our experience, TORS for oropharyngeal cancers appears to be feasible in patients with a retropharyngeal ICA, provided that the procedure has been adapted for complex situations.

Level of evidence

4.

Treatment of laryngeal cancer: the permanent challenge

There are many options to treat larynx cancers. Throughout the 20th century, surgical research has provided many partial surgery techniques (either open surgery or endoscopic CO2 surgery). In parallel, the modification of radiotherapy schedules has notably improved the local control with definitive irradiation. The appearance of active chemotherapy regimens has also modified the concept of treatment for advanced disease, allowing a decrease in the total indications of laryngectomy, although this remains the treatment of choice in some cases. The selection of the most appropriate treatment is based on a multidisciplinary approach. Early diseases may be treated by open surgery, endoscopic laser CO2 surgery or irradiation. Some advanced diseases may be treated by partial surgery, but the majority are theoretically candidates for radical surgery when resectable. In many instances, but not in all, chemotherapy-based larynx-preserving protocols may avoid performing such mutilating surgery. When inoperable, larynx cancers are better treated by combined chemotherapy and irradiation when the performance status of the patient is compatible with such an intensive regimen.

Nasal septum perforation: a side effect of bevacizumab chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor approved in association with paclitaxel or docetaxel as first line in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer. Rare cases of nasal septum perforations have been reported. We report our experience of nasal perforation in breast cancer pts receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy either in the adjuvant or in the metastatic settings.

METHODS

Between 1 January and 31 December 2009, 70 pts received bevacizumab together with chemotherapy. All the pts who had received bevacizumab were referred to the ENT specialist. Symptoms potentially related were looked for. Side effects were graded according to CTCAE.

RESULTS

Five nasal septum perforations were diagnosed (5 out of 70; 7.14%). Bevacizumab dose was 15 mg kg(-1) 3 weekly. Three pts were metastatic. Bevacizumab was associated with docetaxel (100 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks) in two pts and with weekly paclitaxel in one. The last two pts received bevacizumab in combination with anthracyclin and then taxanes in the adjuvant setting. In these two cases, nasal septum perforation occurred at the time of docetaxel treatment.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of nasal septum perforation has been shown in pts with breast cancer receiving bevacizumab together with chemotherapy. Several mechanisms could be involved (mucositis, delayed tissue repair, antiangiogenic action of taxanes).

Primary Mucosal Melanoma of Head and Neck: Prognostic Value of Clear Margins

BACKGROUND

Primary mucosal melanomas of the head and neck (MMHN) are rare and carry a poor outcome. The impact of different treatments on survival is not yet clearly established.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated from 1991 to 2004 at a single referral center were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Primary sites were oral mucosa in 14 cases, paranasal sinuses in three cases, and nasal cavities in three cases. The sex ratio was equal to 1, and the median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range, 17-77 y). At presentation, one patient had lymph node metastases, one patient had distant metastases, and one patient had both. Surgery was performed with curative intent in 19 cases (and achieved clear margins in 14 cases). Postoperative radiation therapy was delivered in four cases. The actuarial 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 13/19 and 7/16. The risk factors for death were male gender (RR = 9.3 [1.2-72], P = .024) and positive margins (RR = 21 [1.9-47], P = .013). In addition, we observed three metachromous cancers (one breast cancer, one kidney cancer and one lymphoma) during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that obtaining clear margins must be the goal in the treatment of MMNH.

Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas of adult: prognostic value of surgery in multimodal therapeutic approach

Adult head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (AHNSTS) are rare, and data concerning treatment results are spare. To assess clinico-pathological characteristics, management prognostic factors, and survival of AHNSTS, we reviewed our experience of 28 recent successive new cases. Data were collected from a retrospective database (1997-2002). Aggressive fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, chondrosarcoma and osteogenic sarcoma were excluded. Univariate analysis for prognostic factors was performed with chi2 test with Yates correction. The median age was 45.7 years (range: 18-86). The male/female ratio was 15/13. The most common subtypes was rhabdomyosarcoma (seven cases). Twenty-two patients presented with previous inadequate resection performed elsewhere before admission. The most common location was neck muscles (11 cases). Nineteen patients had surgery (complete resection in 13 cases). Associated treatments were neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy in respectively, 4, 3 and 10 cases. The 2-year overall survival was 56%. Rhabdomyosarcomas (p = 0.005) and inadequate resection (p = 0.04) were associated with poor outcome. Large resection of AHNSTS in a multimodality approach may afford the best chance of disease control.

[Induction chemotherapy and larynx preservation: is such practice useful?]

BACKGROUND

Surgery followed by irradiation is considered to be the standard treatment but require frequently a total laryngectomy. Chemotherapy followed by irradiation is available in larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treatment. Are results obtained in daily induction chemotherapy usefulness identical to results obtained in larynx preservation studies?

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, from 1986 to 1995, by chemotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or by surgery and radiotherapy for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer treatment. All patients were naive of previous head and neck SCC and a surgical treatment, requiring total laryngectomy, should be proposed with curative intent. Induction chemotherapy associated cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (5FU)(1,000 mg/m2) on days 1-4 or 1-5. Irradiation was performed for responders (complete or partial > 50%). If case of non-responder, patients underwent surgical treatment followed by irradiation. We compared results obtained with patients enrolled in clinical trial and with patients whom benefited from this protocol out of trial.

RESULTS

Hundred-eight patients were evaluable for purposes of this study. Fifty-two patients were included in clinical trial (group 1) while 56 patients (group 2) were not. There was no statistical difference as regard neither to sex nor to node (palpable or not palpable) and metastasis status between the groups. We found a higher frequency of laryngeal tumour in group 2 (31 vs 17; p =.03). We observed more stage III and less stage IV in group 1. For chemotherapy-related toxic reactions, the exclusive statistical difference observed was haematological toxicity grade III and IV after the second cycle (0 pt in group 1 vs 8 pts in group 2; p =.02). After initial treatment, complete response was achieved without statistical difference between the groups (88.2% vs 78%; p =.27). A surgical procedure was performed in 46 cases without difference according to the reference group and functional larynx preservation was 55.8% (29/52) in group 1 and 53.6% (30/56) in group 2. Whatever the group, causes of death were similarly distributed. Cancer was the first cause of death in both groups. The overall survival of the population (108 patients) was 81.5% at one year, 49.6% at 3 years and 35.3% at 5 years with a median survival of 3 years. There was no statistical difference between both groups. Some parameters influenced the overall survival like T (p =.04), response to chemotherapy (p=.006), extra capsular spread (p = 0.03) and response after completion treatment.

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy is available for larynx preservation but cannot be considered as a standard treatment. Nevertheless, results should be reproduced in daily practice with experimented teams as found with non included patient's results. The long-term side effects of such protocols should be evaluated. Recent publication, on increase postoperative infection after chemotherapy, should be evaluated in clinical trial. If confirmed, cost effectiveness of such complication must be integrated in larynx preservation protocols. Larynx preservation remains an interesting point of view for patients but stay an optional procedure and not a reference.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients: a long-term retrospective review of 273 cases

BACKGROUND

The prolongation of life expectancy results in an increasing number of malignant neoplasms occurring in the elderly population. For a long time these patients were not considered good candidates to receive aggressive therapy and probably were inadequately treated in many instances.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of patients older than 74 years who had had head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our database of 4610 consecutive patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas who were evaluated and treated at the Centre Oscar Lambret, Northern France Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lille, over a 10-year period (1974-1983), we identified 273 patients who were 75 years or older. The outcome was updated for all patients included in the database.

RESULTS

A significantly higher proportion of females were noted in the older patient group (43/273, 15.8%) than in younger patient group (192/4337, 4.4%, P<.001). There were no differences for primary site except for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma that occurred less frequently in the elderly patients (8.8% vs 14.5%, borderline significance P =.02). There were no differences for TNM stage grouping, histological classification, incidences of previous cancer, and comorbidities. Surgery was performed in a smaller proportion of older patients (13.9% vs 27.4%, P<.001, for the primary site and 15.4% vs 35.6%, P<.001, for those occurring in the neck) as well as chemotherapy that was delivered in 5.5% vs 17.7% (P<.001). On the contrary, there was no difference in radiotherapeutic treatments. Tolerance to treatment was similar and there was the same proportion of persistent diseases 2 months after completion of the overall treatment (27.8% vs 25.4%, P =.94). Pooling local, regional, and distant failures and metachronous cancers, there was a borderline lower incidence in older patients (57.1% vs 64.2%, P =.02), which is explained by an obvious shorter life expectancy. If survival is not meaningful in such a comparison (5-year survival 23.8% vs 36.4%), then the causes of deaths may be compared. Among the 4067 patients who were dead at the last update, index tumor evolution-related deaths numbered 130 (48.1% of dead patients in this cohort) in older patients compared with 2045 (53.9% of dead patients in this cohort), which was not significantly different. There was no difference in treatment-related deaths (11.1% vs 9.3%). Fewer intercurrent disease-related deaths occurred in the older patients (19.7% vs 11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients did not seem to have a significantly different outcome when compared with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma occurring in younger patients. When properly monitored, conventional therapies seem feasible in older patients.

Epilarynx: pharynx or larynx?

BACKGROUND

As a general rule, epilarynx is studied as a part of supraglottis. On the contrary, in France, due to its particular natural history, it is often studied separately.

METHODS

To assess the value of this French classification, we compared from an epidemiologic point of view, in one study, 86 cases of epilarynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with 431 oropharynx, 339 hypopharynx, and 89 vestibule SCC. In another study, we compared, from a clinical point of view, 232 epilarynx SCC with 1351 oropharynx, 652 hypopharynx, and 372 vestibule SCC.

RESULTS

Epilarynx patients appeared to be much heavier drinkers than larynx patients and similar to pharynx patients but tobacco consumption did not differ. The patterns of nodal involvement were similar for pharynx and epilarynx SCC. For stages I and II, patterns of failures were similar, but for stages III and IV, there were fewer locoregional failures in vestibule patients; distant metastases were equally frequent for these tumors. From the standpoint of multiple primaries, epilarynx SCC appeared to be more akin to pharynx than to larynx SCC with a much lower incidence of lung cancers. Finally, the outcome after treatment was different for vestibule, epilarynx, and pharynx SCC, with a 5-year survival of 43%, 27%, and 13%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the identification of epilarynx as a real entity that should be taken into account for stratification in clinical trials.

Management of early oral cavity cancer. Experience of Centre Oscar Lambret

From 1974 to 1983, 579 patients presenting with early oral cancer (excluding lip tumours) were treated at Centre Oscar Lambret. Of these, 429 were treated locally by brachytherapy with local control achieved in 82% of the cases (90% after salvage surgery). Treatment-related complications occurred in 19% of the cases, requiring surgical management in 13 patients. In contrast, only 51% of the 35 patients treated by external radiotherapy and brachytherapy were controlled, resulting in a poor 5-year survival (14%). Results for the 24 patients treated surgically were similar to those of brachytherapy alone. Finally, for T1 T2 N0 patients, the advantages of an elective neck dissection are not clear and could be clarified by a randomised trial. Indeed, this retrospective study failed to find a significant difference in the incidence of death due to an uncontrolled neck evolution whatever the neck management.

Composite resection with mandibulectomy in the treatment of posterolateral oral cavity and lateral oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma

From 1972 to 1987, 403 patients underwent a composite resection consisting of segmental mandibulectomy and neck dissection for the treatment of bucco-pharynx squamous cell carcinoma (303 patients had postoperative radiotherapy [XRT], 29 patients had preoperative XRT, and 100 patients had tissue salvage performed after XRT). Of the 303 patients who received preoperative XRT, 32 were clinically staged T2, 149 were staged T3, and 122 were staged T4; 194 of the 303 patients were staged N0. In the 100 patients who experienced relapse and who required "salvage surgery," the restaging found 20 patients staged T2, 39 staged T3, and 41 staged T4; 73 of the 100 patients were staged N0. The patients' mean postoperative stay was 15 days for those who had prior surgery and 21 days for those who had salvage surgery. With a minimum follow-up of 5 years, locoregional recurrences and postoperative death occurred in 86 of 274 patients (31%) in whom surgery and postoperative XRT were performed; in 17 of 29 patients (59%) who had preoperative XRT performed; and in 61 of 100 patients (61%) who had salvage surgery performed. In addition, in terms of functional results, only 61% of patients (206) were able to maintain normal speech function, and only 23% (91) were able to maintain normal oral feeding. Of the 403 patients, the 5-year survival rates were 33% for the overall population, 42% for patients with postoperative XRT, 16% for patients in whom operation was performed after preoperative XRT, and 17% for patients who underwent salvage surgery.

Cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary tumor in 190 patients

Over 10 years, 475 patients with isolated lateral neck masses were evaluated: 190 with lymph nodes from an unknown primary tumor (LNUP), 188 with neck lymphomas, 78 with benign tumors, 10 with sarcomas, and 9 with chemodectomas. This study focused on the patients with LNUP. Only 86 patients were treated with surgery (plus radiotherapy). Other patients were treated with radiotherapy (84) or chemotherapy (13) or had no treatment (7). For the overall population, failures in the neck occurred in 51% of the patients and distant metastases in 27%, while primary tumors appeared in 16%. Survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 27%, 19%, and 7%, respectively, for the overall population and 45%, 35%, and 19%, respectively, for the surgical group. The diagnosis and therapeutic approach had a direct effect on neck control; failure in the neck occurred in 7 of 47 patients (15%) when fine needle aspiration and radical neck dissection with radiotherapy were performed, in 5 of 12 patients (42%) when fine needle aspiration and modified neck dissection with radiotherapy were used, in 5 of 12 patients (42%) when adenectomy diagnosis and radiotherapy treatment were performed, and in 6 of 11 patients (54%) when diagnosis by incisional biopsy was performed prior to admission, despite subsequent radical neck dissection and radiotherapy treatment. In our opinion, panendoscopy and fine needle aspiration should be the first-line diagnostic approach. When cytologic diagnosis proves impossible, the second-line approach must consist of cervical exploration with frozen section examination and excisional biopsy, followed by immediate appropriate treatment. In cases of LNUP, radical neck dissection seems to be preferable.