1
|
Asscher VER, Rodriguez Gírondo M, Fens J, Waars SN, Stuyt RJL, Baven-Pronk AMC, Srivastava N, Jacobs RJ, Haans JJL, Meijer LJ, Klijnsma-Slagboom JD, Duin MH, Peters MER, Lee-Kong FVYL, Provoost NE, Tijdeman F, van Dijk KT, Wieland MWM, Verstegen MGM, van der Meijs ME, Maan ADI, van Deudekom FJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Mooijaart SP, Maljaars PWJ. Frailty Screening is Associated with Hospitalization and Decline in Quality of Life and Functional Status in Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:516-524. [PMID: 37870484 PMCID: PMC11037105 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Our goals were to study frailty screening in association with hospitalization and decline in quality of life [QoL] and functional status in older patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. METHODS This was a prospective multicentre cohort study in IBD patients ≥65 years old using frailty screening [G8 Questionnaire]. Outcomes were all-cause, acute, and IBD-related hospitalization, any infection, any malignancy, QoL [EQ5D-3L], and functional decline (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL]) during 18 months of follow-up. Confounders were age, IBD type, biochemical disease activity [C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/L and/or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g], and comorbidity [Charlson Comorbidity Index]. RESULTS Of 405 patients, with a median age of 70 years, 196 [48%] were screened as being at risk for frailty. All-cause hospitalizations occurred 136 times in 96 patients [23.7%], and acute hospitalizations 103 times in 74 patients [18.3%]. Risk of frailty was not associated with all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.4), but was associated with acute hospitalizations [aHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8]. Infections occurred in 86 patients [21.2%] and these were not associated with frailty. A decline in QoL was experienced by 108 [30.6%] patients, and a decline in functional status by 46 patients [13.3%]. Frailty screening was associated with a decline in QoL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6) and functional status [aOR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7-8.1]. CONCLUSIONS Frailty screening is associated with worse health outcomes in older patients with IBD. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of its implementation in routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera E R Asscher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mar Rodriguez Gírondo
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse Fens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne N Waars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier J L Stuyt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - A Martine C Baven-Pronk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Nidhi Srivastava
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger J Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden and Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart J Meijer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marijn H Duin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Milou E R Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Felicia V Y L Lee-Kong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nanda E Provoost
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Tijdeman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Kenan T van Dijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monse W M Wieland
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mirre G M Verstegen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa E van der Meijs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Annemijn D I Maan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Floor J van Deudekom
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P W Jeroen Maljaars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Asscher VER, Waars SN, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Stuyt RJL, Baven-Pronk AMC, van der Marel S, Jacobs RJ, Haans JJL, Meijer LJ, Klijnsma-Slagboom JD, Duin MH, Peters MER, Lee-Kong FVYL, Provoost NE, Tijdeman F, van Dijk KT, Wieland MWM, Verstegen MGM, van der Meijs ME, Maan ADI, van Deudekom FJ, Mooijaart SP, Maljaars PWJ. Deficits in Geriatric Assessment Associate With Disease Activity and Burden in Older Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e1006-e1021. [PMID: 34153476 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We aimed to perform geriatric assessment in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to evaluate which IBD characteristics associate with deficits in geriatric assessment and the impact of deficits on disease burden (health-related quality of life). METHODS A prospective multicenter cohort study including 405 consecutive outpatient patients with IBD aged ≥65 years. Somatic domain (comorbidity, polypharmacy, malnutrition), impairments in (instrumental) activities of daily living, physical capacity (handgrip strength, gait speed), and mental (depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment) and social domain (life-partner) were assessed. Deficits in geriatric assessment were defined as ≥2 abnormal domains; 2-3 moderate deficits and 4-5 severe deficits. Clinical (Harvey Bradshaw Index >4/partial Mayo Score >2) and biochemical (C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/L and/or fecal calprotectin ≥250 μg/g) disease activity and disease burden (short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire) were assessed. RESULTS Somatic domain (51.6%) and activities of daily living (43.0%) were most frequently impaired. A total of 160 (39.5%) patients had moderate deficits in their geriatric assessment; 32 (7.9%) severe. Clinical and biochemical disease activity associated with deficits (clinical: adjusted odds ratio, 2.191; 95% confidence interval, 1.284-3.743; P = .004; biochemical: adjusted odds ratio, 3.358; 95% confidence interval, 1.936-5.825; P < .001). Deficits in geriatric assessment independently associate with lower health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION Deficits in geriatric assessment are highly prevalent in older patients with IBD. Patients with active disease are more prone to deficits, and deficits associate with lower health-related quality of life, indicating higher disease burden. Prospective data validating impact of frailty and geriatric assessment on outcomes are warranted to further improve treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera E R Asscher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Sanne N Waars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rogier J L Stuyt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - A Martine C Baven-Pronk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Marel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger J Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden and Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart J Meijer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marijn H Duin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Milou E R Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Felicia V Y L Lee-Kong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nanda E Provoost
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Tijdeman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Kenan T van Dijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monse W M Wieland
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirre G M Verstegen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa E van der Meijs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Annemijn D I Maan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Floor J van Deudekom
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute for Evidence-Based Medicine in Old Age (IEMO), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P W Jeroen Maljaars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Straatmijer T, Biemans VBC, Hoentjen F, de Boer NKH, Bodelier AGL, Dijkstra G, van Dop WA, Haans JJL, Jansen JM, Maljaars PWJ, van der Marel S, Oldenburg B, Ponsioen CY, Visschedijk MC, de Vries AC, West RL, van der Woude CJ, Pierik M, Duijvestein M, van der Meulen-de Jong AE. Ustekinuma b for Crohn's Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, a Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1920-1930. [PMID: 33909062 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets p40, a shared subunit of the cytokines interleukin [IL]-12 and IL-23. It is registered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. We assessed the 2-year effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a real world, prospective cohort of patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. METHODS Patients who started ustekinumab were prospectively enrolled in the nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis [ICC] Registry. At weeks 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104, clinical remission Harvey Bradshaw Index≤ 4 points], biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin ≤ 200 μg/g and/or C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L], perianal fistula remission, extra-intestinal manifestations, ustekinumab dosage and safety outcomes were determined. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104. RESULTS In total, 252 CD patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Of all included patients, the proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission was 32.3% [81/251], 41.4% [104/251], 39% [97/249] and 34.0% [84/247] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. In patients with combined clinical and biochemical disease activity at baseline [n = 122], the corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 23.8% [29/122], 35.2% [43/122], 40.0% [48/120] and 32.8% [39/119] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. The probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment after 52 and 104 weeks in all patients was 64.3% and 54.8%, respectively. The main reason for discontinuing treatment after 52 weeks was loss of response [66.7%]. No new safety issues were observed. CONCLUSION After 104 weeks of ustekinumab treatment, one-third of CD patients were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn A van Dop
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P W Jeroen Maljaars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Marel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haaglanden Medisch Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijn C Visschedijk
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marieke Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asscher VER, Biemans VBC, Pierik MJ, Dijkstra G, Löwenberg M, van der Marel S, de Boer NKH, Bodelier AGL, Jansen JM, West RL, Haans JJL, van Dop WA, Weersma RK, Hoentjen F, Maljaars PWJ. Comorbidity, not patient age, is associated with impaired safety outcomes in vedolizumab- and ustekinumab-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease-a prospective multicentre cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:1366-1376. [PMID: 32901983 PMCID: PMC7539998 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few data are available on the effects of age and comorbidity on treatment outcomes of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIMS To evaluate the association between age and comorbidity with safety and effectiveness outcomes of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD. METHODS IBD patients initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab in regular care were enrolled prospectively. Comorbidity prevalence was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Association between age and CCI, both continuously assessed, with safety outcomes (any infection, hospitalisation, adverse events) during treatment, and effectiveness outcomes (clinical response and remission, corticosteroid-free remission, clinical remission combined with biochemical remission) after 52 weeks of treatment were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS We included 203 vedolizumab- and 207 ustekinumab-treated IBD patients, mean age 42.2 (SD 16.0) and 41.6 (SD 14.4). Median treatment duration 54.0 (IQR 19.9-104.0) and 48.4 (IQR 24.4-55.1) weeks, median follow-up time 104.0 (IQR 103.1-104.0) and 52.0 weeks (IQR 49.3-100.4). On vedolizumab, CCI associated independently with any infection (OR 1.387, 95% CI 1.022-1.883, P = 0.036) and hospitalisation (OR 1.586, 95% CI 1.127-2.231, P = 0.008). On ustekinumab, CCI associated independently with hospitalisation (OR 1.621, 95% CI 1.034-2.541, P = 0.035). CCI was not associated with effectiveness, and age was not associated with any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidity - but not age - is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisations on either treatment, and with any infection on vedolizumab. This underlines the importance of comorbidity assessment and safety monitoring of IBD patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Biemans VBC, van der Woude CJ, Dijkstra G, van der Meulen‐de Jong AE, Löwenberg M, de Boer NK, Oldenburg B, Srivastava N, Jansen JM, Bodelier AGL, West RL, de Vries AC, Haans JJL, de Jong D, Hoentjen F, Pierik MJ. Ustekinumab is associated with superior effectiveness outcomes compared to vedolizumab in Crohn's disease patients with prior failure to anti-TNF treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:123-134. [PMID: 32441396 PMCID: PMC7318204 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be considered for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) when anti-TNF treatment fails. However, head-to-head trials are currently not available or planned. AIM To compare vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn´s disease patients in a prospective registry specifically developed for comparative studies with correction for confounders. METHODS Crohn´s disease patients, who failed anti-TNF treatment and started vedolizumab or ustekinumab in standard care as second-line biological, were identified in the observational prospective Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤4), biochemical remission (C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L and fecal calprotectin ≤250 µg/g), combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission, and safety outcomes were compared after 52 weeks of treatment. To adjust for confounding and selection bias, we used multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching. RESULTS In total, 128 vedolizumab- and 85 ustekinumab-treated patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for confounders, ustekinumab-treated patients were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-free clinical remission (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.36-4.90, P = 0.004), biochemical remission (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.10-4.96, P = 0.027), and combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (OR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.23-6.09, P = 0.014), while safety outcomes (infections: OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.63-2.54, P = 0.517; adverse events: OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.62-2.81, P = 0.464; hospitalisations: OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.32-1.39, P = 0.282) were comparable between the two groups. The propensity score matched cohort with sensitivity analyses showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS Ustekinumab was associated with superior effectiveness outcomes when compared to vedolizumab, while safety outcomes were comparable after 52 weeks of treatment in CD patients who have failed anti-TNF treatment.
Collapse
|
6
|
Biemans VBC, van der Meulen - de Jong AE, van der Woude CJ, Löwenberg M, Dijkstra G, Oldenburg B, de Boer NKH, van der Marel S, Bodelier AGL, Jansen JM, Haans JJL, Theeuwen R, de Jong D, Pierik MJ, Hoentjen F. Ustekinumab for Crohn's Disease: Results of the ICC Registry, a Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:33-45. [PMID: 31219157 PMCID: PMC7142409 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Ustekinumab is approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease [CD]. Systematically registered prospective real-world data are scarce. We therefore aimed to study the effectiveness, safety and usage of ustekinumab for CD in everyday practice. METHODS We prospectively enrolled CD patients initiating ustekinumab in regular care between December 2016 and January 2019. Clinical (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI]), biochemical (C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [FCP]), extra-intestinal manifestations and, peri-anal fistula activity, ustekinumab dosage, concomitant medication use, and adverse events were documented at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission. RESULTS In total, 221 CD patients were included (98.6% anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] and 46.6% vedolizumab exposed) with a median follow-up of 52.0 weeks [interquartile range 49.3-58.4]. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates at weeks 24 and 52 were 38.2% and 37.1%, respectively. An initial dosing schedule of 8 weeks, compared to 12 weeks, correlated with a lower discontinuation rate [20.0% vs 42.6%, p = 0.01], but comparable corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 52 (46.3% [q8w] vs 34.6% [q12w], p = 0.20). There was no clinical benefit of combination therapy after 52 weeks when compared to ustekinumab monotherapy [combi 40.6% vs mono 36.0%, p = 0.64]. At baseline, 28 patients had active peri-anal fistula, of whom 35.7% showed complete clinical resolution after 24 weeks. During follow-up we encountered six severe infections [3.5 per 100 patient-years], with all patients being on concomitant immunosuppressant therapies. Ustekinumab treatment discontinuation was observed in 75 [33.9%] patients mainly due to lack of response. CONCLUSION Ustekinumab is a relatively safe and effective treatment option for CD patients with prior failure of anti-TNF and anti-integrin therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince B C Biemans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Marel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosaline Theeuwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marie J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Corresponding author: Frank Hoentjen, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, code 455, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 243619190;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biemans VBC, van der Woude CJ, Dijkstra G, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Oldenburg B, de Boer NK, Löwenberg M, Srivastava N, Bodelier AGL, West RL, Jansen JM, de Vries AC, Haans JJL, de Jong DJ, Pierik MJ, Hoentjen F. Vedolizumab for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study: ICC Registry - Vedolizumab. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 107:1189-1199. [PMID: 31677154 PMCID: PMC7232860 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Prospective data of vedolizumab treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) beyond 1 year of treatment is scarce but needed for clinical decision making. We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with IBD (191 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 119 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)) with a follow‐up period of 104 weeks (interquartile range: 103–104) in a nationwide registry. The corticosteroid‐free clinical remission rate (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4, Short Clinical Colitis Activity index ≤ 2) at weeks 52 and 104 were 28% and 19% for CD and 27% and 28% for UC, respectively. Fifty‐nine percent maintained corticosteroid‐free clinical remission between weeks 52 and 104. Vedolizumab with concomitant immunosuppression showed comparable effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab monotherapy (week 104: 21% vs. 23%; P = 0.77), whereas 8 of 13 severe infections occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. To conclude, the clinical effect was 19% for CD and 28% for UC after 2 years of follow‐up regardless of concomitant immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince B C Biemans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nidhi Srivastava
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marie J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroparesis is a disorder characterized by a delay in gastric emptying of a meal in the absence of a mechanical gastric outlet obstruction. AIM To provide an evidence based overview on diagnosis and management of gastroparesis. METHODS A PubMed search was performed using search terms including gastroparesis, gastric retention, gastric emptying, accommodation, manometry, prokinetics, antiemetics, metoclopramide, domperidone, erythromycin, botulinum toxin, gastric pacing. Relevant studies were identified and original articles and reviews were collected. References in these articles were examined for relevance and included where appropriate. RESULTS Diagnosis of gastroparesis is based on the presence of symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and postprandial abdominal fullness and on an objectively determined delay in gastric emptying. The true prevalence of gastroparesis is unknown. Gastric emptying can be assessed by scintigraphy and stable isotope breath tests. Management of gastroparesis consists of dietary and lifestyle measures and/or pharmacological interventions (prokinetics, antiemetics, intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection) or other interventions that focus on adequate nutrient intake either through a nasoduodenal tube, percutaneous gastrostomy or jejunostomy. CONCLUSIONS Accurate diagnosis of gastroparesis requires an adequate protocol to measure gastric emptying. Treatment options in gastroparesis remain limited despite the disabling nature of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J L Haans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Zwart IM, Haans JJL, Verbeek P, Eilers PHC, de Roos A, Masclee AAM. Gastric accommodation and motility are influenced by the barostat device: Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292:G208-14. [PMID: 16891299 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00151.2006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The barostat is considered the gold standard for evaluation of proximal gastric motility especially for the accommodation response to a meal. The procedure is invasive because it involves the introduction of an intragastric catheter and bag and is not always well tolerated. Moreover, the barostat bag itself may influence motility. Nowadays magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to measure several aspects of gastric motility noninvasively. To evaluate whether the accommodation response of the stomach, observed with the barostat, is present during MRI and whether the barostat interferes with gastric physiology, gastric accommodation, motility, and emptying were studied twice in 14 healthy subjects with MRI using three-dimensional volume scans and two-dimensional dynamic scans once in the presence of a barostat bag and once when the barostat bag was not present. Fasting and postprandial intragastric volumes were significantly higher in the experiment with barostat vs. without barostat (fasting: 350 +/- 132 ml vs. 37 +/- 21 ml, P < 0.0001; postprandial: 852 +/- 126 ml vs. 361 +/- 62 ml, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in gastric emptying (88 +/- 41 vs. 97 +/- 40 ml/h, not significant) and contraction frequency between both experiments. The accommodation response observed in the presence of the barostat bag was not observed in the absence of the barostat bag. In conclusion, the presence of an intragastric barostat bag does not interfere with gastric emptying or motility, but the accommodation response measured with the barostat in situ is not observed without the barostat bag in situ. Gastric accommodation is a nonphysiological barostat-induced phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid M de Zwart
- Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Leiden Univ. Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Abstract
In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover design we studied the effect of gastric acidification on motilin-induced interdigestive antropyloroduodenal motility. Ten healthy volunteers participated in the study consisting of four experiments. Each experiment started after a spontaneous occurring phase III and consisted of intragastric infusion of either saline or acid (0.08 mol L(-1) HCl) for 90 min and intravenous infusion of either saline or motilin (4 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) for 30 min. Antropyloroduodenal motility and pH were recorded continuously for 240 min. Reoccurrence of phase III was significantly (P < 0.05) earlier during intragastric saline-intravenous motilin infusion compared with control (intragastric saline-intravenous saline), 52 min (range 25-79) and 113 min (84-141) respectively. This effect was completely abolished during intragastric acid-intravenous motilin infusion, 112 min (82-142). The percentage of phase III of antral origin was significantly (P < 0.05) higher during intragastric saline-intravenous motilin infusion (90%) compared with control (30%). The mean area under the contraction (AUC) for phase II was significantly (P < 0.05) lower during intragastric saline-intravenous motilin infusion and intragastric acid-intravenous saline infusion compared with control. It is concluded that in humans intragastric acidification inhibits the effect of motilin on antroduodenal motility, decreases the AUC of antral phase II contractions and delays the occurrence of phase III of the migrating motor complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|